Por qué Puerto Rico no recibe un huracán mayor desde 1998

8ae72-arecibo-radio-telescope-puerto-rico

Recuerdo cada año creciendo en la isla la temporada de huracanes, un momento de estrés visto que Puerto Rico está en el camino de la mayoría de los huracanes que vienen de Cabo Verde África.

La isla ha visto un montón de huracanes devastadores, por ejemplo:

4311626_sanfelipe

San Felipe

II 13 de septiembre de 1928 (Categoría 5) Cruzó la isla de sureste a noroeste con vientos de 160 millas por hora. Se causaron 312 muertes y $ 50 millones en daños estimados.

4311626_capture_13

San Ciprian

26 de septiembre de 1932 (Categoría 3). Nos envolvió de este a oeste con vientos estimados a unos 120 kilómetros por hora. Causó 225 muertes y $ 1,500,000 en daños estimados.

4311626_santaclara

Santa Clara

11 de agosto de 1956 (Categoría 1). También es conocido como Betsy. Entró por Patillas y partió hacia Arecibo. Causó 16 muertes y 40 millones de dólares en daños estimados.

4311626_e5a0f30a-98af-4108-a6b7-5a03f806484c

 Hugo

18 de septiembre de 1989 (Categoría 4). Afecta grandemente Vieques y Culebra y la mitad del este de Puerto Rico. Causó dos muertes y un trillón en daños estimados

4311626_6bb3c18b-91ad-46ff-a657-b8cf7c03d084

Georges

21 de septiembre de 1998 (Categoría 3). Cruzó la isla de este a oeste, afectando a todo Puerto Rico con vientos de 115 millas por hora. No se reportaron muertes por el fenómeno. Los daños estimados superaron los mil millones.

4311626_f1b06e35-a8e1-4ac7-a57b-1ce9f9dba543

Irene

21-22 de agosto de 2011. Las estimaciones del radar, la explosión principal fue en la zona montañosa y sus vientos alcanzaron 111 millas por hora. Causó daños estimados en 500 millones de dólares. aunque no tocó el suelo.

La estación de HAARP comenzó a funcionar en 1993. El IRI actual ha estado funcionando desde 2007 y su principal contratista fue BAE Advanced Technologies.

“Es básicamente lo mismo que HAARP para la ciencia, excepto que HAARP estaba en la región auroral, donde la física de la ionosfera es muy diferente con todas las partículas energéticas y campos magnéticos”, dijo el profesor de ingeniería eléctrica Jim Stateall, WA3FET, dijo a ARRL. “HAARP también tenía 3 gigavatios de potencia radiada efectiva, donde Arecibo sólo será de unos 200 megavatios”.

El Club de Radioaficionados del Observatorio de Arecibo, KP4AO, tiene su sede en el centro de investigación, que celebró su 50 aniversario el otoño pasado.

La Fundación Nacional de Ciencias y la Universidad de Cornell, que anteriormente operaba el Observatorio de Arecibo, contrataron al Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica de Penn State para construir el instrumento “nuevo y mejorado” de ionofosfía de HF. Se utilizará para estudiar la interacción entre la radioenergia HF y el plasma ionosférico.

La nueva instalación reemplazará a un calentador ionosférico anterior en Islote, Puerto Rico, que fue destruido por el huracán Georges en 1998. En lugar de reconstruir esa instalación, el nuevo instrumento utilizará el plato del observatorio de 1000 pies para su antena. Esto mantendrá todas las actividades de investigación relacionadas con la modificación ionosférica en el observatorio propiamente dicho.

Los planes requieren un diseño basado en un concepto de pantalla Cassegrain de disposición en fase en la parte inferior del plato de alimentación de una malla sub-reflector que cuelga por encima del plato de tres torres de apoyo. Breakall y su equipo de estudiantes graduados en Penn State han hecho todo el diseño eléctrico y modelado de este nuevo sistema de antena.

“Hay tres dipolos cruzados para 5.1 MHz y otros tres para 8.175 MHz, formando una matriz que transmitirá energía hasta un reflector de malla neta que colgará de las tres grandes torres”, explicó Breakall. “Esta pantalla de Cassegrain entonces reflejará la energía de nuevo abajo a la placa de 1000 pies y emitirá una energía irradiada eficaz de centenares de megavatios hasta la ionosfera para modificarla.” Cada dipolo se alimenta de un transmisor de 100 kilovatios, produciendo una energía transmitida total de 600 kW.

Un sistema de antena de calentamiento HF aún más temprano también se suspendió de la plataforma por encima del plato y fue accionado por un solo transmisor de 100 kW en una gama de frecuencias de 3 a 10 MHz. Ese diseño sufrió problemas de formación de arcos y fue retirado del servicio en los años setenta.

images (4)

HAARP es el tema de numerosas teorías conspirativas. Varios individuos han especulado sobre motivos ocultos y capacidades del proyecto. Por ejemplo, Rosalie Bertell advirtió en 1996 sobre el despliegue de HAARP como arma militar. [31] Michel Chossudovsky declaró en un libro publicado por el Comité de Reforma Monetaria y Económica que “la evidencia científica reciente sugiere que el HAARP está en pleno funcionamiento y tiene la capacidad de desencadenar inundaciones, huracanes, sequías y terremotos” [32]. en Irán, Pakistán, Haití, Turquía, Grecia y Filipinas, e incluso grandes cortes de energía, la caída del Vuelo 800 de la TWA, el síndrome de la Guerra del Golfo y el síndrome de fatiga crónica [6]. [33] [34]

Potencial como arma

El programa HAARP fue controvertido a mediados de la década de 1990, debido a la suposición de que las antenas de la Estación podrían ser utilizadas como armas. En agosto de 2002, la tecnología de HAARP fue mencionada como un asunto crítico en la Duma rusa (el parlamento). La Duma emitió un comunicado de prensa sobre el programa HAARP, escrito por los comités de defensa y asuntos internacionales, firmado por 90 representantes y presentado al entonces presidente Vladimir Putin. El comunicado de prensa indica lo siguiente: “Estados Unidos está creando nuevas armas geofísicas que pueden influir en la troposfera con ondas de radio de baja frecuencia … La importancia de este salto cualitativo es comparable a la transición de armas blancas a armas de fuego, o armas convencionales a armas nucleares. Este nuevo tipo de arma difiere de cualquier otro tipo conocido en el que la troposfera y sus componentes se conviertan en objetos sobre los que influir.

El Parlamento Europeo, por su parte, en una Resolución de 28 de enero de 1999 sobre medio ambiente, seguridad y política exterior (A4-0005 / 1999), señaló que la estación HAARP manipulaba el medio ambiente con fines militares y solicitó que, (párrafo 24), fue objeto de una evaluación por STOA sobre su impacto en el medio ambiente local y mundial y en la salud pública en general. En esa misma resolución del Parlamento Europeo, pidió una convención internacional para la prohibición global de cualquier tipo de desarrollo y despliegue de armas que pudiera permitir cualquier forma de manipulación de los seres humanos.

Las alegaciones incluyen lo siguiente:

Nick Begich Jr., hijo del difunto representante estadounidense Nick Begich y hermano del ex senador estadounidense Mark Begich, es el autor de Angels Do not Play This HAARP. Ha afirmado que HAARP podría desencadenar terremotos y convertir la atmósfera superior en una lente gigante para que “el cielo literalmente parezca quemar”. Él mantiene un sitio web que afirma que HAARP es un dispositivo de control mental [35] [36]

Un diario militar ruso escribió que las pruebas ionosféricas “desencadenaría una cascada de electrones que podrían voltear los polos magnéticos de la Tierra”.

[35] La legislatura estatal de Alaska y el Parlamento Europeo celebraron audiencias sobre HAARP, la segunda citando las preocupaciones ambientales. [37]

El ex gobernador de Minnesota, ex luchador profesional y teórico de la conspiración Jesse Ventura, cuestionó si el gobierno está usando el sitio para manipular el tiempo o para bombardear a la gente con ondas de radio que controlan la mente. Una portavoz de la Fuerza Aérea dijo que Ventura hizo una solicitud oficial para visitar la estación de investigación, pero fue rechazada. “Él y su equipo se presentaron en HAARP de todos modos y se les negó el acceso.”

 El físico Bernard Eastlund afirmó que HAARP incluye tecnología basada en sus propias patentes que tiene la capacidad de modificar el clima y neutralizar los satélites. [5]

Se ha propuesto como una causa de baja frecuencia de fondo hums que se dice que se escucha en varios lugares. [39]

download (3)

Dos hombres de Georgia arrestados por cargos de narcotráfico en noviembre de 2016 planeaban conspirar terrorismo nacional basado en teorías conspirativas sobre HAARP. La Oficina del Sheriff del Condado de Coffee dice que los hombres poseían un “arsenal masivo” que incluía rifles AR-15, pistolas Glock, un rifle Remington y miles de cartuchos de munición. Según la policía, los hombres querían destruir HAARP porque creían que la instalación manipulaba el clima, controlaba las mentes e incluso atrapaba las almas de la gente. La policía dice que los hombres confesaron que “Dios les dijo que irán y volarán esta máquina que guardaba almas, para que las almas pudieran ser liberadas”. 

El profesor de la Universidad de Stanford, Umran Inan, dijo a Popular Science que las teorías de la conspiración del control del tiempo estaban “completamente desinformadas”, explicando que “no hay absolutamente nada que podamos hacer para alterar los sistemas meteorológicos de la Tierra. Aunque el poder que HAARP irradia es muy grande, es minúsculo comparado con el poder de un relámpago-y hay 50 a 100 destellos de relámpago cada segundo. El científico informático David Naiditch caracteriza a HAARP como “un imán para los teóricos de la conspiración”, diciendo que HAARP atrae su atención porque “su propósito parece profundamente misterioso para los científicos informados”. [6]

El periodista Sharon Weinberger llamó a HAARP “el Moby Dick de las teorías de la conspiración”, y dijo que la popularidad de las teorías de la conspiración a menudo eclipsa los beneficios HAARP puede proporcionar a la comunidad científica. [42] [43] Austin Baird escribiendo en el Despacho de Alaska dijo: “Lo que hace HAARP susceptible a la crítica de la conspiración es simple. La instalación no abre sus puertas de la misma manera que otras instalaciones de investigación financiadas con fondos federales en todo el país, y no hace grandes esfuerzos para explicar la importancia de su investigación para el público “. [33] En agosto de 2016 , en respuesta a estas reclamaciones, la instalación anunció que tendría una jornada de puertas abiertas, permitiendo a los visitantes recorrer el complejo

images (3)

 Es importante señalar que el huracán George fue el último en impactar directamente a Puerto Rico directamente y esto fue en 1998.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program

 

 

 

Advertisements

Why Puerto Rico Don’t Get A Major Hurricane since 1998

8ae72-arecibo-radio-telescope-puerto-rico

I remember every year growing up in the Island the hurricane season, a time for stress seen that Puerto Rico it’s in the path of most hurricanes coming in from Cabo Verde Africa.

The Island has seen a lot of devastating hurricanes  for example:

4311626_sanfelipe

San Felipe II

September 13, 1928 (Category 5) It crossed the island from southeast to northwest with winds of 160 miles per hour. It caused 312 deaths and $ 50 million in estimated damages.

4311626_capture_13

 San Ciprián 

September 26, 1932 (Category 3). It wrapped us from east to west with estimated winds at about 120 miles per hour. It caused 225 deaths and $ 1,500,000 in estimated damages.

4311626_santaclara

Santa Clara

August 11, 1956 (Category 1). He is also known as Betsy. He entered through Patillas and left for Arecibo. It caused 16 deaths and $ 40 million in estimated damages.

4311626_e5a0f30a-98af-4108-a6b7-5a03f806484c

Hugo

18 September 1989 (Category 4). It greatly affects Vieques and Culebra and the eastern half of Puerto Rico. It caused two deaths and one trillion in estimated damages

4311626_6bb3c18b-91ad-46ff-a657-b8cf7c03d084

Georges

21 September 1998 (Category 3). It crossed the island from east to west, affecting all Puerto Rico with winds of 115 miles per hour. No deaths were reported from the phenomenon. The estimated damages exceeded 1 billion.

4311626_f1b06e35-a8e1-4ac7-a57b-1ce9f9dba543

Irene

August 21-22, 2011. The radar estimates, the major blast was in the mountainous zone and its winds reached 111 miles per hour. It caused damages estimated at $ 500 million. although she didn’t touch ground.

The HAARP Station started operating in 1993. The current IRI has been operating since 2007 and its main contractor was BAE Advanced Technologies

“It is basically the same as HAARP for the science, except that HAARP was in the Auroral Region, where the physics of the ionosphere is quite different with all the energetic particles and magnetic fields,” Penn State Electrical Engineering Professor Jim Breakall, WA3FET, told ARRL. “HAARP also had 3 gigawatts of effective radiated power, where Arecibo will only be about 200 megawatts.”

The Arecibo Observatory Amateur Radio Club, KP4AO, is headquartered at the research facility, which celebrated its 50th anniversary last fall.

The National Science Foundation and Cornell University, which previously operated Arecibo Observatory, contracted with Penn State’s Electrical Engineering Department to construct the “new and enhanced” HF ionospheric instrument. It will be used to study the interaction between HF radio energy and ionospheric plasma.

The new facility will replace an earlier ionospheric heater in Islote, Puerto Rico, that was destroyed by Hurricane Georges in 1998. Rather than rebuild that installation, the new instrument will use the observatory’s 1000 foot dish for its antenna. This will keep all research activities involving ionospheric modification at the observatory proper.

Plans call for a design based on a Cassegrain screen concept of phased array at the bottom of the dish feeding a sub-reflector mesh that hangs above the dish from three support towers. Breakall and his team of graduate students at Penn State have done all of the electrical design and modeling of this new antenna system.

“There are three crossed-dipoles for 5.1 MHz and another three for 8.175 MHz, forming an array that will beam energy up to a net mesh reflector that will hang from the three big towers,” Breakall explained. “This Cassegrain screen will then reflect energy back down to the 1000 foot dish and beam an effective radiated power of hundreds of megawatts up to the ionosphere to modify it.” Each dipole is fed from a 100 kW transmitter, yielding a total transmitted power of 600 kW.

An even earlier HF heating antenna system also was suspended from the platform above the dish and driven by a single 100 kW transmitter over a frequency range of 3 to 10 MHz. That design suffered from arcing problems and was taken out of service in the 1970s.

images (4)

HAARP is the subject of numerous conspiracy theories. Various individuals have speculated about hidden motives and capabilities of the project. For example, Rosalie Bertell warned in 1996 about the deployment of HAARP as a military weapon.[31] Michel Chossudovsky stated in a book published by the Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform that “recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the capability of triggering floodshurricanesdroughts and earthquakes.”[32] Over time, HAARP has been blamed for generating such catastrophes, as well as thunderstorms, in IranPakistanHaitiTurkeyGreece and the Philippines, and even major power outages, the downing of TWA Flight 800Gulf War syndrome, and chronic fatigue syndrome.[6][33][34]

Potential as a weapon

The HAARP program was controversial in the mid-1990s, due to the assumption that Station antennas could be used as weapons. In August 2002, HAARP technology was mentioned as a critical issue in the Russian Duma (parliament). The Duma produced a press release on the HAARP program, written by the defense and international affairs committees, signed by 90 representatives and presented to then-President Vladimir Putin. The press release indicated the following: “The United States is creating new comprehensive geophysical weapons that can influence the troposphere with low-frequency radio waves … The importance of this qualitative leap is comparable to the transition from white weapons to firearms, or conventional weapons to nuclear weapons. This new type of weapon differs from any other known type in which the troposphere and its components become objects on which to influence. ”

The European Parliament, for its part, in a resolution of 28 January 1999 on the environment, security and foreign policy (A4-0005 / 1999), pointed out that the HAARP station manipulated the environment for military purposes and requested that, which raised a worldwide problem (paragraph 24), was the subject of an evaluation by STOA concerning its impact on the local and global environment and on public health in general. In that same resolution of the European Parliament, it called for an international convention for the global prohibition of any type of development and deployment of weapons that could allow any form of manipulation of human beings.

Allegations include the following:

  • Nick Begich Jr., the son of the late U.S. Representative Nick Begich and brother of former U.S. Senator Mark Begich, is the author of Angels Don’t Play This HAARP. He has claimed that HAARP could trigger earthquakes and turn the upper atmosphere into a giant lens so that “the sky would literally appear to burn.” He maintains a website that claims HAARP is a mind control device.[35][36]
  • A Russian military journal wrote that ionospheric testing would “trigger a cascade of electrons that could flip Earth’s magnetic poles”.[35]
  • The Alaska state legislature and the European Parliament held hearings about HAARP, the latter citing environmental concerns.[37]
  • Former Governor of Minnesota, ex-professional wrestler, and conspiracy theorist Jesse Ventura questioned whether the government is using the site to manipulate the weather or to bombard people with mind-controlling radio waves. An Air Force spokeswoman said Ventura made an official request to visit the research station but was rejected. “He and his crew showed up at HAARP anyway and were denied access.”[38]
  • Physicist Bernard Eastlund claimed that HAARP includes technology based on his own patents that has the capability to modify weather and neutralize satellites.[5]
  • It has been proposed as a cause of low frequency background hums said to be heard in various locales.[39] 
  • download (3)

Two Georgia men arrested on drug charges in November 2016 were reportedly plotting domestic terrorism based on conspiracy theories about HAARP. The Coffee County Sheriff’s Office say the men possessed a “massive arsenal” that included AR-15 rifles, Glock handguns, a Remington rifle and thousands of rounds of ammunition. According to police, the men wanted to destroy HAARP because they believed the facility manipulates the weather, controls minds and even traps the souls of people. Police say the men confessed that “God told them to go and blow this machine up that kept souls, so souls could be released.”[40][41]

Stanford University professor Umran Inan told Popular Science that weather-control conspiracy theories were “completely uninformed,” explaining that “there’s absolutely nothing we can do to disturb the Earth’s [weather] systems. Even though the power HAARP radiates is very large, it’s minuscule compared with the power of a lightning flash—and there are 50 to 100 lightning flashes every second. HAARP’s intensity is very small.”[5] Computer scientist David Naiditch characterizes HAARP as “a magnet for conspiracy theorists”, saying that HAARP attracts their attention because, “its purpose seems deeply mysterious to the scientifically uninformed.”[6] Journalist Sharon Weinberger called HAARP “the Moby Dick of conspiracy theories,” and said the popularity of conspiracy theories often overshadows the benefits HAARP may provide to the scientific community.[42][43] Austin Baird writing in the Alaska Dispatch said, “What makes HAARP susceptible to conspiracy criticism is simple. The facility doesn’t open its doors in the same way as other federally-funded research facilities around the country, and it doesn’t go to great efforts to explain the importance of its research to the public.”[33] In August 2016, in response to these claims, the facility announced it would have an open day, allowing visitors to tour the complex.[44]

images (3)

Important to note is that Hurricane George was the last one to actually impact Puerto Rico directly and this was back in 1998.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program

 

Heliocentric theory is wrong

hqdefault
There are four pieces of solid evidence that heliocentric theory is wrong (that I know of). The first one requires a bit of visualization but is very difficult to explain otherwise. Three others are 99.99% certain bordering on the ridiculous. You would literally have to make stuff up to try and counter them (and they have!). So without further ado, let’s begin.
+++
Exhibit A – Where is the constant wind?
Exhibit B – Hovering, flying and falling
Exhibit C – Hardly any stellar parallax
Exhibit D – Scientific experiments
Conclusion
+++

Exhibit A – Where is the constant wind?

The density of the Earth has been calculated at 5,515 kg/m3 (whether accurate or not is unknown). The density of air is 1.204 kg/m3 at room temperature, 4580 times less dense than the Earth.

A denser solid object does not carry a less dense gas along with it when it moves. This is self-evident as it is the basis of aerodynamics as shown in the video below.

dog out window
A moving solid object (100km/h car) leaves a gas (air) behind, creating a 100km/h wind in the perceived opposite direction of the moving car.

When the solid planes are more perpendicular, it will push gas (such as air) away from the solid object, such as a fan. The Earth, although a spinning squashed globe, would push a little air out into space due to its slight undulations but by and large it would be very aerodynamic, as this man spinning a basketball shows.

spinning ball
A very aerodynamic globe.

Heliocentric theory states that the Earth rotates at 1675km/h at the equator, 1049km/h in London, and 231km/h in Alert, northern Canada. This rotation would cause winds of almost equal speeds on the Earth’s surface… constantly.

The fastest wind speed known to man is a F5 Incredible tornado with wind speeds of 420-511 km/h. The tornado in Oklamohma in 1999 which killed 38 people and destroyed 8000 homes traveled at 486km/h; the devastation of which we can see below.

Tornado- Oklahoma
If 486km/h winds did this, what would 1675km/h do?

There is nowhere on Earth that has a constant wind speed of between 1675km/h and 231km/h. If there were, nobody living below Greenland could venture outside. We would be all living underground in caves.

Sometimes there are days of no wind, sometimes a mild breeze. The wind travels in all kinds of directions, sometimes changing by the second. Clouds move with the wind and can travel in any direction, but mostly go from West to East. This contradicts heliocentric theory as the Earth is supposed to rotate West to East, which would create winds going in the opposite direction East to West. Oops!

Another piece of self-evident incredulity. There’s more.
+++

Exhibit B – Hovering, flying and falling

Even more obvious is the fact that the Earth does not rotate under hovering objects. A helicopter which hovers above the ground at ANY height from 1 meter all the way to its upper limit of around 8000 meters NEVER experiences the ground traveling 231km/h to 1675km/h West to East, or in any direction in fact.

hovering1
Nope, the Earth is not moving.
hovering2
Still not moving. Who’d a thunk it.

The same applies to those machines which traverse the sky, such as airplanes. The only differential between a one-way and return flight is changes in wind speed and direction.

+++

the rotation of the Earth has no effect on the travel time of an aircraft… it is the headwinds and tailwinds that cause the change in travel times… a mere 65 mph wind is more than enough to cause a difference in travel time of five hours when you are traveling long distances!

+++

Let’s check a flight along the equator just to be sure. Maldives to Singapore and back fits the bill. Singapore Airlines has two flights come up. Maldives to Singapore (West to East) takes 4 hours 45 minutes for both flights and Singapore to Maldives (East to West) takes 4 hours 30 minutes and 4 hours 25 minutes respectively.

The Earth is supposed to rotate at 1675km/h West to East at these locations which are 3388km apart. A Boeing 777 travels at 885km/h at 10,675m. Do I really need to do the math?

Flying from Singapore to the Maldives would take about an hour (including take off and landing) if the Earth were rotating under the plane. Going the other way, it is worse as the plane can only fly half as fast as a rotating 1675km/h Earth and so you would have to continue flying all the way around the globe East to West just to get back to Singapore. This is an obvious fallacy.

asia_ref_2000
Singapore to Maldives is a one-way trip with a rotating Earth.

So, we have gone from 8000m to 10,675m altitude and still the Earth does not move under our feet. If we go any higher there won’t be many air molecules left to be magically Velcroed to the solid Earth’s surface by a mystical and yet unknown force which there must be for heliocentric theory to exist. But let’s go higher anyway.

As mentioned in my first post on the mysterious disappearing stars at high altitude, amateurs can now send weather balloons up into the stratosphere as high as 36,000m. At these heights only about 1% of the air is left, but these few air molecules must also magically stick to the solid surface of the Earth. All these different densities and all somehow staying with the Earth.

Look at the time these balloons are in the air and the difference in distance between landing and take-off. Here’s the first one: Launched at 13:07:38, hit the ground at 16:04:40, highest altitude 29.78Km, distance from launch 108.4 Km! Launched in Maine, USA would give a rotating Earth speed of 1181km/h (45° latitude). That means the Earth should have moved 3500km under the balloon making it land in the middle of USA, but it did not. (The second example on that website page is even worse!)

Let’s go higher. Felix Baumgartner on his world record free-fall jump reached 38,969m altitude and spent 2 and a half hours ascending, 4:19 minutes falling to the ground, and 7 minutes parachuting the rest of the way down. His distance from launch:

Felix-Baumgartner-Landing
70.5km!

So, the 1% of surface air density and all the other air densities on the way to the ground and Felix himself being obviously heavier than air all moved with the rotating Earth in tandem, by some magical mystical force unknown to man. At what height would Felix have experienced the Earth rotating below him? 50km? 70km? 100km? The heliocentric advocates will have to make up a magic number. Why not, it is all fantasy after all.

Let’s continue.
+++

Exhibit C – Hardly any stellar parallax

The stars revolve 360° in 24 hours in an anti-clockwise fashion around the north polar star in the northern hemisphere, and clockwise around the southern star in the southern hemisphere. Photographers take photos with very long shutter speeds to show this effect.

startrails
Rotating stars in the sky at night.

This, you may think, is a good case for a rotating Earth; but on it’s own it is also a good case for a geocentric one, as it demonstrates that either the Earth is moving or the heavens.

However, after 6 months, those EXACT same stars are at the EXACT same location, as can be seen with the naked eye, at which they had been 6 months previously. The annual change in the position of stars in the sky is called stellar parallax. You can demonstrate this lack of parallax by following this experiment devised by Samuel Rowbotham of Zetetic Astronomy.

+++

Take two carefully-bored metallic tubes, not less than six feet in length, and place them one yard asunder, on the opposite sides of a wooden frame, or a solid block of wood or stone: so adjust them that their centres or axes of vision shall be perfectly parallel to each other. Now, direct them to the plane of some notable fixed star, a few seconds previous to its meridian time. Let an observer be stationed at each tube and the moment the star appears in the first tube let a loud knock or other signal be given, to be repeated by the observer at the second tube when he first sees the same star. A distinct period of time will elapse between the signals given. The signals will follow each other in very rapid succession, but still, the time between is sufficient to show that the same star is not visible at the same moment by two parallel lines of sight when only one yard asunder. A slight inclination of the second tube towards the first tube would be required for the star to be seen through both tubes at the same instant. Let the tubes remain in their position for six months; at the end of which time the same observation or experiment will produce the same results–the star will be visible at the same meridian time, without the slightest alteration being required in the direction of the tubes: from which it is concluded that if the Earth had moved one single yard in an orbit through space, there would at least be observed the slight inclination of the tube which the difference in position of one yard had previously required. But as no such difference in the direction of the tube is required, the conclusion is unavoidable, that in six months a given meridian upon the Earth’s surface does not move a single yard, and therefore, that the Earth has not the slightest degree of orbital motion.

+++

Traditionally, stellar parallax has been notoriously difficult to measure with even the best of modern equipment.
+++

The angles involved in these calculations are very small and thus difficult to measure. The nearest star to the Sun (and thus the star with the largest parallax), Proxima Centauri, has a parallax of 0.7687 ± 0.0003 arcsec.

+++

There are 3,600 arcseconds in 1 degree, 180 of which cover the sky at night. No wonder we can’t see any movement with the naked eye. Even so, movement for only a tiny fraction of the stars can be measured at all even by modern equipment!
+++

In 1989, the satellite Hipparcos was launched primarily for obtaining parallaxes and proper motions of nearby stars, increasing the reach of the method tenfold. Even so, Hipparcos is only able to measure parallax angles for stars up to about 1,600 light-years away, a little more than one percent of the diameter of the Milky Way Galaxy. The European Space Agency’s Gaia mission, due to launch in 2013, will be able to measure parallax angles to an accuracy of 10 microarcseconds, thus mapping nearby stars (and potentially planets) up to a distance of tens of thousands of light-years from Earth.

+++
There are an estimated 100 to 200 billion galaxies in the universe (which is bunk, as there are no galaxies) each with up to 100 trillion stars! So being able to detect movement in 1% of the stars of our own galaxy is a miniscule amount. We also know about our space agencies’ weird and wonderful orbiting machines, so even this 1% is unlikely to be true.

This is a big problem for heliocentric theory which states that every 24 hours the Earth rotates on its axis at 1675km/h, revolving around the Sun at 107,000km/h, which in turn moves around the center of the galaxy at 900,000km/h, which moves in the universe at 2,160,000km/h!

Apart from the atmosphere disappearing at these speeds, how is there no stellar parallax, especially considering that all the other stars and galaxies are revolving around each other and the Earth as well. The sky must be a right mess! Each new day must bring a brand new unique constellation in the sky at night with some new stars getting nearer so they can be seen with the naked eye and some traveling further away and disappearing never to return for thousands or millions of years.

Before we move on, this lack of stellar parallax is the reason why advocates of heliocentric theory give the unbelievably enormous distances the heavenly bodies must be from Earth. They can’t measure it! The stars must be thousands and millions of light years away (with the Milky Way 100,000 light years across, 1 light year being 9.46 trillion kilometers!) because there is no (or little) detectable stellar parallax; otherwise heliocentric theory would be definitely wrong.

+++

It is clear from Euclid’s geometry that the effect would be undetectable if the stars were far enough away, but for various reasons such gigantic distances involved seemed entirely implausible: it was one of Tycho Brahe’s principal objections to Copernican heliocentrism that in order for it to be compatible with the lack of observable stellar parallax, there would have to be an enormous and unlikely void between the orbit of Saturn and the eighth sphere (the fixed stars).

+++

Not only is there no evidence for such astronomical distances, but we have now proven that the stars are approximately 4000 miles away!

Does making stuff up to support a theory lacking any observational or experimental evidence sound like science to you?

Speaking of which…
+++

Exhibit D – Scientific experiments

How do we know it is not the heavens or “space” which moves above us, instead of the Earth, which causes both the rotation of the stars and any of their hard-to-detect parallax. We now know it is the former, thanks to an experiment in 1871 by Astronomer Royal, George Airy; which is this:

If stellar parallax is too small to see with the naked eye, then why not artificially increase it. If the Earth rotates at the same speed constantly, then by slowing the light down (by filling the telescope with water), the angle of star movement would increase. If stellar parallax increased then the telescope would have to be tilted more to see the same star and prove a rotating Earth once and for all.

And guess what? As confirmed by others, the most careful measurements gave the same angle for a telescope with water as for one filled with air. This is called “Airy’s failure”. It proved the rotation of the heavens, not Earth, which moves stars.

airy1
The angle stayed the same, proving that the Earth does not rotate.

The heliocentric advocates were now desperate. What was needed was another observable experiment to still offer the possibility of a rotating Earth. Enter Foucault’s pendulum in 1885. This pendulum swings back and forth, each swing moving slightly to the right in the northern hemisphere and to the left in the southern hemisphere until, at the poles, one full circle is achieved in 24 hours. It doesn’t move left or right at all at the equator.

California_Academy_of_Sciences_Foucault_Pendulum_Clock
Foucault Pendulum in California
Foucault
Not to scale, but illustrating the movement.

As you have noticed, this is the same phenomenon as the stars rotating every 24 hours around the polar star, which was proved not to be caused by a rotating Earth thanks to George Airy. Unfortunately for the heliocentric supporters, Foucault’s pendulum also had a problem. In 1954 and 1959, Maurice Allais noticed that during a solar eclipse, which lasted 2 and a half hours, the angle of the pendulum changed dramatically by 13.5°. This has been repeatedly observed with positive results on most of the subsequent eclipses, which obviously means that the pendulum isn’t registering the Earth’s rotation, but the motion of something else instead.

With Airy’s failure proving that the Earth does not rotate, the heliocentric theorists needed to quickly show with no further doubt that the Earth rotated. Enter two staunch supporters of heliocentricity, Albert Michelson and Edward Morley, who in 1887 set up a device which split up light: one beam in the direction of the Earth’s rotation, and one at right angles. The two light beams then recombined and hit a photographic plate. The difference is speed of the two beams would create an interference pattern. They expected to measure a speed of 30 km/s as that was the speed of the Earth’s supposed rotation, but instead registered a variable difference of between 1 and 10 km/s each time the experiment was repeated. They called this a “null” result. This proves that the Earth is not rotating and at the same time proved the existence of the ether.

M-M experiment
Gosh, the traveling light wasn’t rotating with the Earth. Who’d a thunk it?

It didn’t stop there, Georges Sagnac, and Henry Gale conducted similar experiments, but on a rotating platform, which again demonstrated the existence of the ether, already proved by default in 1871 and 1885 by combining the results from George Airy and Foucault’s pendulum, and also in 1887 by the Michelson-Morley experiment.

How do you think the advocates of heliocentric theory responded? Why, they made something up of course! What else could they do but invent another wild theory to play down these experimental results and lead us further into the cesspit of fallacy. Enter showbiz academic of the 20th century, Einstein and the special theory of relativity.

albert-einstein-colorized
Enter the clowns.

Special relativity was invented to make sure all these experiments still gave heliocentric theory a chance of being correct. It needed objects to shrink to a specific size in direct proportion to its speed. These objects weren’t measured! The concept had never been observed at all. It was metaphysical only. But it had to be correct, otherwise the unthinkable would be true.
+++

The rescue operation was performed by means of a purely metaphysical concept lifted directly from Professors Fitzgerald and Lorentz, who had also been trying to explain the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment, and renamed by him the Special Theory of Relativity. What was suggested was that if the dimensions of an object in motion were assumed to shrink exactly in proportion to the speed at which it was traveling by exactly the necessary amount, mathematical calculations could be made to show that the Earth was in motion after all. No one has ever seen an object shrink as a result of being in motion, and indeed one of the world’s leading authorities on relativity, Dr. Herbert Dingle, was later to dismiss the theory of relativity as metaphysical nonsense with no basis on what could be observed.

+++

Making up a new branch of mathematics to explain the results of experiments that disagrees with your worldview does not a proof make! As a J.J. Thomson once said:

+++

We have Einstein’s space, de Sitter’s space, expanding universes, contracting universes, vibrating universes, mysterious universes. In fact the pure mathematician may create universes just by writing down an equation, and indeed if he is an individualist he can have a universe of his own.

+++

However, when you make stuff up not based on anything in the real world, it is bound to run into trouble.

+++

Ironically, when Special Relativity failed due to its internal contradictions, Einstein had to invent General Relativity to shore up the façade, and in the process he had to take back the very two foundations he had discarded in Special Relativity, namely, (a) that nothing can exceed the speed of light and (b) the existence of ether. In the end, Einstein’s theories were a mass of contradictions which are covered over by obtuse mathematical equations.

+++

Despite this nonsense, the heliocentric “authorities” pushed it through with all their media power and academic might so that once this new mathematics was firmly established, they had carte blanche to sneak in other bad “science” when experimental observations went against them, like black holes, dark matter, wormholes and other such unobservable and unverifiable nonsense. The worst offence though was trying to tie in the Coriolis effect of a rotating Earth with observable atmospheric phenomena. The Coriolis effect is an optical illusion whereby an object traveling in a straight line is seen to be moving in a curved one instead because the observer is on a rotating platform.

wikipedia_coriolis_effect
The Coriolis optical illusion. You are the red dot. Below is what you observe. Above is what actually happens.
the-coriolis-effect
This is the complete pattern and scale of ANY Coriolis effect on the Earth. If something in the real world doesn’t match this, it can NOT be the Coriolis effect!

They say it is this effect which causes moving objects to be deflected in a clockwise direction in the northern hemisphere and anti-clockwise in the southern hemisphere; an example of which are large cyclones. This is obviously false. The Coriolis effect is NOT a force, it is an optical illusion. It cannot cause objects to be deflected; their trajectories remain the same, which is straight. Cyclones do not “travel in straight lines, but just appear to be curved because we are on the surface of a rotating sphere”. Their size ranges from under 222km to over 888km making their curves far too tight and localized. Plus there are very high altitude images looking down on cyclones from above. Is the camera rotating with the Earth to get this curved perspective?

cyclone from above
Is the camera rotating with the Earth? How can a cyclone twisting on itself be a straight line? Is this image even real?
cyclone - Australia
A tropical cyclone in Australia twisting down to Earth is not a straight line.

And what about smaller vortex phenomena like Tornadoes which average only 150m across. Where is the Coriolis effect now?

tornado1
A 150m wide tornado is really a straight line!

If you wish to study further the fallacy of linking the Coriolis effect with atmospheric phenomena then Miles Mathis‘ work is a must. Otherwise, those inclined to understand cyclones and tornadoes would do well to study the relationship between gravity and electromagnetism, and vortex dynamics instead, as even physicists admit that the Coriolis “effect” and electromagnetism is eerily similar. (What a surprise!)
+++

Conclusion

So far we have proved that:

  • The Earth does not tilt.
  • The Earth does not rotate.
  • The Sun moves, not the Earth.
  • The heavens move, not the Earth, which means that:
  • “Space” or the ether moves and not the Earth.
  • “Space” moves in a circular motion (and is probably a vortex).

 

http://www.wildheretic.com/heliocentric-theory-is-wrong-pt1/

Pugnacious Parasites and the Provocation

by Zen Gardner

Everyone knows the unscrupulously manipulative always accuse others of what they themselves are guilty of. It’s an age old trick to obfuscate the obvious and buy time to accomplish their purposes.

Lying is their pathological language.

Such behavior, especially in high profile public figures, is unthinkable, yet for some inexplicable reason it is not just tolerated, but ironically readily expected.

People still buy into it. And the reaction always remains the same. Complacency on the most part, and a rising sense of anger in others. No doubt a byproduct of cognitive dissonance and range of other deliberately triggered mechanisms, but surreal just the same.

net fist

A Bald Faced Lie is a Punch in the Face

This is essentially what transpires when someone knowingly lies to your face. It jars your mind and pushes you back on the defensive and you’re left to try and understand why your heart and head are not matching up with what you just heard.

Everyone, except these willingly possessed psychopaths, has a conscience. And it’s faithful to speak to us. This is why humanity has been conditioned to not respond to it, and also why fear is so essential to their game. When our signals are scrambled, our gut reaction belittled and intuition denied we’re left in a daze.

This is exactly what they want to happen. It gives them time to keep executing their programs, especially when a complicit media candies and bandies it about as if it’s true and nothing to question.

This is the whirled we’re in and up against. Again, another reason to stay fully conscious and circumspect and thoroughly educated as to their techniques and true nature. Not pretty stuff to look at, but understand it we must.

Abject bullies like Israel are relatively easy to spot – if we grasp their obvious odious nature and where they’re coming from. The bully in the playground works by pure intimidation and force and will resort to any form of expression they can – loud mouthed intimidation, brandishing weapons, and all bathed in swaggering bravado right up to and including physical force to get their point across.

Send a signal is their MO. And those who don’t cower, teach them a lesson. Again, just look at the abject genocidal insanity of the Israeli occupiers. Now that they’ve gained control of most of the world’s media, especially in the west, what they say goes. And if the media or governments don’t toe their line well enough they’ll hear from these vociferous, self serving elitist beasts.

warburg

The Provocation

Another aspect of bullying is provoking your supposed enemy. The US is at this big time, deliberately firing up the conservative right and constitutionalists. It’s full on deliberate. The opulent extravagance of the Obamas, the clearly deliberate crashing of the economy, the flagrant trashing of patriotism and removal of individual rights are all carefully planned. Threatening to disarm fiercely independent Americans is an essential part of this agenda.

The mass migration agenda is the same. While the US gets inundated with needy Central Americans with clear governmental manipulation, Europe is similarly being swept with an influx that threatens their economies and cultural identities.

What’s most amazing about this is anyone can read this agenda for themselves from UN statements and documents and the Agenda 21 or 2030 programs. That so many can’t be bothered to look into much of this is outright frightening.

Israel again is a master example of aggressive agendas designed to push back common sense and reason as well as true empathy for the plight of others. A clearly apartheid state while claiming they were the victims of such treatment is completely nonsensical. It flies in the face of simple reason and logic. Yet they get away with it. How? They’ve taken over the media and political structures through the same tactics of intimidation and potential consequence by their massive Mossad/CIA/MI6 black hand of control.

TENSION2

Strategy of Tension and Not Just Provoking, but Demonizing Your Subjects

What’s amazing is the thoroughness of psychopathic social engineers. This is where we need to wake up and get smart.

They operate according to something called the Strategy of Tension, keeping peoples and nations nervous and afraid and more inclined to rely on government and enforcement to protect them. It also homogenizes cultures in a form of group think and a state of malleability due to this state of fear.

The extension of their influence is far and wide. Mass shootings, weird mass “accidents” at certain interims, and most of all false flags, never mind assassinations and the like. This has been the weapon of choice for every totalitarian regime for eons and a real favorite of this latest push for world dominion by these psychopaths.

The end result, ironically, is not entirely to direct everyone’s attention to a foreign enemy. That’s just a ruse and excuse for genocide and expansion. The enemy to them is within – us. We must be contained like animals and malleable to their every whim.

OKbomb.J

So-called domestic terrorism has been a meme on the rise. The deliberate migration of “potential muslim extremists” is a key part of this, as any and every incident they stage can more and more be justified and conveniently blamed on outside influences. The end result is the same: clampdown on the populace.

Just look at this propaganda piece brought to you by the Rothschild/Rockefeller owned and CIA/Mossad/MI6 et all run Reuters news agency:

U.S. eyes ways to toughen fight against domestic extremists

The U.S. Justice Department is considering legal changes to combat what it sees as a rising threat from domestic anti-government extremists, senior officials told Reuters, even as it steps up efforts to stop Islamic State-inspired attacks at home.

Extremist groups motivated by a range of U.S.-born philosophies present a “clear and present danger,” John Carlin, the Justice Department’s chief of national security, told Reuters in an interview. “Based on recent reports and the cases we are seeing, it seems like we’re in a heightened environment.” (source)

The agenda is obvious. If we’re looking. The language as well is a giveaway, the smooth talking and use of buzz phrases like “clear and present danger”, “national security” and the like are rife.

BRAIN_GEARS

The Subtler Techniques of Deceit

This may seem a bit tangential to the main point I’m making here but is nonetheless essential information if we’re to more fully understand how these tactics are carried out on subtler levels.

You’ll see the following logical fallacy tactics in use continually, but unfortunately most people fall for them for lack of discernment as well as awareness of just what deceitful people are capable of doing.

This is a big subject well worth researching on your own but here are a few to get you started:

1. The Strawman Argument – Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack.

Example: After Will said that we should put more money into health and education, Warren responded by saying that he was surprised that Will hates our country so much that he wants to leave it defenseless by cutting military spending.

You’ll see this in use continually especially in the political and government arenas. It’s very clever really, side-stepping the real issue and misdirecting the argument to a false issue having nothing to do with the original question or discussion.

2. The False Choice Dilemma Giving an extremely narrow range of choice to an issue or situation that is much wider than is being portrayed with virtually unlimited possibilites.

Baby Bush’s carefully framed post 9/11 statement is the classic geopolitical example: “You’re either with us, or you’re with the terrorists.”

You have to admit that’s pretty damn galvanizing. But in what way? Now you can’t question what the “good guys” are doing or you might be with “axis of evil”? That’s what it’s since come down to. Again, cleverly staged propaganda by these very intelligent psychopaths. Keeping the public drugged and dumbed down would sure work in their favor, wouldn’t it?

3. Correlation versus Causation. You can apply this across the board. It’s so easy to assume what we’re told is true in this context. Beware.

The easiest example is when two events occur at the same time, or in close apparent relation with each other. One is then seen as the cause of the other. An increase in robberies occurs at the same time that jobs cuts are announced, for example. There is no evidence to support the claim that the expected job losses caused the increase in robberies.

This is best seen in false flag events when the enemy or culprit is named before any investigation whatsoever. If someone “claims” responsibility it’s case closed, as they go after their pre-selected patsy to confirm this or already executed this planted persona on the spot. Done deal.

4. Overgeneralization or Oversimplification.

This is another framework for logical fallacies. Generalizing from too small of a population, or reducing complex social issues to only one choice or the other, and leaving out the complex issues that do not support the claim are examples of fallacies that stem from overgeneralization and oversimplification. (source of last two citations)

These are just a few examples. It’s a field well worth exploring and getting a handle on. When you dissect and analyze these mechanisms it is extremely empowering.

angry-awareness

All That To Say…

Be on the look out. Stay alert and awake and aware. What we see around us is not what we get, unless we fall for it and thereby make it our reality. Personal empowerment in such an environment as we’re living in is essential.

But you have to do the work.

Psychopaths are running the external world. It’s more evident by the day to more and more people. Those not fully on board even at higher and middle levels are being bullied into it within the power structure. They can see who the apparent heirs are to the coming positions of power so they’re buckling under the pressure in an effort to save their hides.

Others at many levels of society are waking up and looking for ways to expose this nefarious agenda and help humanity push back in whatever way it can. We need to keep our voices loud and clear and distinctly truthful and helpful.

There may be many vectors by which they’re coming at us, be they geonengineering, manipulated food, societal crackdowns, media programming and the like, but we’re clearly up to the challenge.

After all, we’re here! We’re thriving just fine in spite of all they do, and we’re growing stronger by the day.

Never forget that, let down your guard, nor grow weary in well doing.

This is our day – not theirs. Let’s fulfill our mission, and use the massive spiritual weapons at our disposal – love, truth, our connection to Source and essential eternal nature which can never be taken away.

Stay true.

Love always, Zen

ZenGardner.com