CIA Has Interfered With Over 81 Foreign Elections in the Past Century


This number doesn’t include military coups and regime change efforts following the election of candidates the U.S. didn’t like, notably those in Iran, Guatemala and Chile.

The CIA has accused Russia of interfering in the 2016 presidential election (with absolutely zero evidence) by hacking into Democratic and Republican computer networks and selectively releasing emails.

But critics might point out the U.S. has done similar things.

The U.S. has a long history of attempting to influence presidential elections in other countries – it’s done so as many as 81 times between 1946 and 2000, according to a database amassed by political scientist Dov Levin of Carnegie Mellon University.

That number doesn’t include military coups and regime change efforts following the election of candidates the U.S. didn’t like, notably those in Iran, Guatemala and Chile. Nor does it include general assistance with the electoral process, such as election monitoring.

Levin defines intervention as “a costly act which is designed to determine the election results [in favor of] one of the two sides.”

These acts, carried out in secret two-thirds of the time, include funding the election campaigns of specific parties, disseminating misinformation or propaganda, training locals of only one side in various campaigning or get-out-the-vote techniques, helping one side design their campaign materials, making public pronouncements or threats in favor of or against a candidate, and providing or withdrawing foreign aid.

In 59% of these cases, the side that received assistance came to power, although Levin estimates the average effect of “partisan electoral interventions” to be only about a 3% increase in vote share.

The U.S. hasn’t been the only one trying to interfere in other countries’ elections, according to Levin’s data.

Russia attempted to sway 36 foreign elections from the end of World War II to the turn of the century – meaning that, in total, at least one of the two great powers of the 20th century intervened in about 1 of every 9 competitive, national-level executive elections in that time period.

Italy’s 1948 general election is an early example of a race where U.S. actions probably influenced the outcome.

“We threw everything, including the kitchen sink” at helping the Christian Democrats beat the Communists in Italy, said Levin, including covertly delivering “bags of money” to cover campaign expenses, sending experts to help run the campaign, subsidizing “pork” projects like land reclamation, and threatening publicly to end U.S. aid to Italy if the Communists were elected.

Levin said that U.S. intervention probably played an important role in preventing a Communist Party victory, not just in 1948, but in seven subsequent Italian elections.

Throughout the Cold War, U.S. involvement in foreign elections was mainly motivated by the goal of containing communism, said Thomas Carothers, a foreign policy expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

“The U.S. didn’t want to see left-wing governments elected, and so it did engage fairly often in trying to influence elections in other countries,” Carothers said.

This approach carried over into the immediate post-Soviet period.

In the 1990 Nicaragua elections, the CIA leaked damaging information on alleged corruption by the Marxist Sandinistas to German newspapers, according to Levin.

The opposition used those reports against the Sandinista candidate, Daniel Ortega. He lost to opposition candidate Violeta Chamorro.

In Czechoslovakia that same year, the U.S. provided training and campaign funding to Vaclav Havel’s party and its Slovak affiliate as they planned for the country’s first democratic election after its transition away from communism.

“The thinking was that we wanted to make sure communism was dead and buried,” said Levin.

Even after that, the U.S. continued trying to influence elections in its favor.

In Haiti after the 1986 overthrow of dictator and U.S. ally Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier, the CIA sought to support particular candidates and undermine Jean-Bertrande Aristide, a Roman Catholic priest and proponent of liberation theology.

The New York Times reported in the 1990s that the CIA had on its payroll members of the military junta that would ultimately unseat Aristide after he was democratically elected in a landslide over Marc Bazin, a former World Bank official and finance minister favored by the U.S.

The U.S. also attempted to sway Russian elections. In 1996, with the presidency of Boris Yeltsin and the Russian economy flailing, President Clinton endorsed a $10.2-billion loan from the International Monetary Fund linked to privatization, trade liberalization and other measures that would move Russia toward a capitalist economy.

Yeltsin used the loan to bolster his popular support, telling voters that only he had the reformist credentials to secure such loans, according to media reports at the time.

He used the money, in part, for social spending before the election, including payment of back wages and pensions.

In the Middle East, the U.S. has aimed to bolster candidates who could further the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.

In 1996, seeking to fulfill the legacy of assassinated Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and the peace accords the U.S. brokered, Clinton openly supported Shimon Peres, convening a peace summit in the Egyptian resort of Sharm el Sheik to boost his popular support and inviting him to a meeting at the White House a month before the election.

“We were persuaded that if [Likud candidate Benjamin] Netanyahu were elected, the peace process would be closed for the season,” said Aaron David Miller, who worked at the State Department at the time.

In 1999, in a more subtle effort to sway the election, top Clinton strategists, including James Carville, were sent to advise Labor candidate Ehud Barak in the election against Netanyahu.

In Yugoslavia, the U.S. and NATO had long sought to cut off Serbian nationalist and Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosevic from the international system through economic sanctions and military action.

In 2000, the U.S. spent millions of dollars in aid for political parties, campaign costs and independent media. Funding and broadcast equipment provided to the media arms of the opposition were a decisive factor in electing opposition candidate Vojislav Kostunica as Yugoslav president, according to Levin.

“If it wouldn’t have been for overt intervention… Milosevic would have been very likely to have won another term,” he said.


Aftershocks Of Iran’s 1953 Coup Still Felt Around The World, 65 Years Later



Sixty five years ago, Iranian military officers backed by U.S. and British intelligence agencies initiated a coup d’etat whose aftershocks can still be felt around the globe.

The coup toppled Iran’s first democratically elected government and its popular prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, and is widely credited with fueling the hostility against the West that culminated decades later with the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

But the events that played out over a five-day period from August 15-19 reverberated far beyond Iran’s borders. The coup altered the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East, became a blueprint for a succession of covert U.S. efforts to foster coups and destabilize governments in the ’50s, and provided the Soviet Union with ideological ammunition during the Cold War.

The theory, disputed by some, was that the CIA and Britain’s MI6 masterminded the coup to maintain control over Iranian oil and to prevent Tehran from falling under Soviet influence after World War II.

Mossadegh played a prominent role in Iran’s 1951 move to nationalize its oil industry, which had long been controlled by Britain. The decision led to a worldwide boycott of Iranian oil intended to rein in Mossadegh’s government, but when that failed a secret plan was devised to oust him.

The replacement of Mossadegh with a handpicked prime minister, General Fazlollah Zahedi, opened the way for Iran’s relatively weak shah to gain nearly absolute power within Iran’s constitutional monarchy.

With strong military and economic backing from Washington, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi would take on the role of autocrat until the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

As for Mossadegh himself, he was arrested and convicted of treason, along with scores of government officials, after the coup. He served three years in jail before living under house arrest until his death in 1967.

Lingering Coup

Stephen Kinzer, the author of “All The Shah’s Men: An American Coup And The Roots of Middle East Terror,” sees the coup as a short-term victory for Washington. But in the long-term, he says, Washington’s intervention in Iran would prove detrimental to its standing in Iran.

Mossadegh was named "Time" magazine's Person of the Year in 1953.

Mossadegh was named “Time” magazine’s Person of the Year in 1953.

“From the perspective of history, the coup was not successful for the United States,” Kinzer says. “The 1979 revolution was a long-term effect of the increasing repression from the shah, who came to power as a result of the coup. That Islamic Revolution brought to power a fanatically anti-American regime that has spent more than 30 years working to undermine American interests all over the world.”

Sixty years on, the coup continues to loom large in Iran’s national psyche and remains a thorn in the country’s relations with the West.

Mark Gasiorowski, author of “Mohammad Mosaddeq And The 1953 Coup In Iran,” says the removal of Mossadegh paved the way for two political trends — radical Islamists led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and radical leftists in the form of the militant Mujahedin-e Khalq — to gain ground in the decades after the coup.

“What the coup did was to take out the moderate, secular, element of Iranian politics and enabled radical Islamists and radical leftists to emerge as key opposition factions in place of it [in the 1960s and ’70s],” Gasiorowski says. “The coup had this big impact of essentially eliminating this pro-democracy faction and that had a very important impact on Iranian politics in the intervening years.”

Regional Repurcussions

Gasiorowksi, a professor of political science at Tulane University in New Orleans, says that to many in Iran the coup proved Washington’s duplicity. The United States, which portrayed itself as the guardian of freedom, was seen as resorting to nefarious means to get rid of a democratically elected government to suit its own strategic interests.

Gasiorowski says the ’53 coup had major regional repercussions as well. He says Iran became a key part of the U.S. strategy of containing the Soviet Union in the region, thereby further underpinning the Middle East as a key battleground of the Cold War.

Had the Iran operation not succeeded, the idea of covert operations that became such an integral part of American foreign policy during the 1950s and beyond might not have seemed so appealing.
Author Stephen Kinzer

“The coup really reinforced the Cold War polarization of the region,” he says. “Of course, that’s the reason the United States did it. They did because they were afraid of communist influence in Iran, and they wanted to make Iran, along with Turkey and Pakistan, into a battleship to oppose the Soviet Union.”

In response, the Soviet Union escalated its own activities in the region, providing aid and arms to governments in Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Libya, and a host of other states in the Middle East and North Africa.

Kinzer, an award-winning journalist who teaches at Boston University, says the Iranian coup was a milestone for the upstart CIA, which was established in 1947. He says the 1953 coup, which was the agency’s first major successful overthrow of a foreign government, became a template for the future.

“Had the Iran operation not succeeded, the idea of covert operations that became such an integral part of American foreign policy during the 1950s and beyond might not have seemed so appealing,” he says.

Following the 1953 coup in Iran, the CIA orchestrated the successful Guatemalan coup one year later, failed to oust Syria’s president in 1957; and suffered a black eye backing the unsuccessful military invasion of Cuba in 1961.

For decades, the United States denied playing any part in the Iranian coup. But that position ended in 2009 when President Barack Obama acknowledged Washington’s role.

In Britain, meanwhile, the government-funded BBC provided details in 2011 of how it broadcast anti-Mossadegh programs to undermine his government.

Secret files and memoirs of CIA operatives show that the CIA played a pivotal role in initiating and planning Operation Ajax, as the covert operation to oust Mossadegh was called.

The Complete History of the Freemasonry and the Creation of the New World Order



The creation of the New World Order (NWO) agenda was put in motion by the infamous character, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the one who decided to control the entire planet by any means necessary.

Of course, this meant: deception, control, financial enslavement, blackmail and murder… but also far graver things, like: wars, famine and depopulation… a genocide unlike any other before it.

If you want to better understand just how powerful and black-hearted the Rothschild family is, then you must read their complete history HERE.

They are the richest clan in the world, and their empire was built on mountains of bones and sufferance.

1773 – Mayer Amschel Rothschild assembles twelve of his most influential friends, and convinces them that if they all pool their resources together, they can rule the world. This meeting takes place in Frankfurt, Germany.

Rothschild also informs his friends that he has found the perfect candidate, an individual of incredible intellect and ingenuity, to lead the organization he has planned – Adam Weishaupt.

May 1, 1776 – Adam Weishaupt (code named Spartacus) establishes a secret society called the Order of the Illuminati. Weishaupt is the Professor of Canon Law at the University of Ingolstadt in Bavaria, part of Germany. The Illuminati seek to establish a New World Order.

Their objectives are as follows:

1) Abolition of all ordered governments 
2) Abolition of private property 
3) Abolition of inheritance 
4) Abolition of patriotism 
5) Abolition of the family 
6) Abolition of religion 
7) Creation of a world government 

July, 1782 – The Order of the Illuminati joins forces with Freemasonry at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad. The Comte de Virieu, an attendee at the conference, comes away visibly shaken. When questioned about the “tragic secrets” he brought back with him, he replies:

“I will not confide them to you. I can only tell you that all this is very much more serious than you think.”

From this time on, according to his biographer, “the Comte de Virieu could only speak of Freemasonry with horror.”

The insignia of the Order of the Illuminati first appeared on the reverse side of U.S. one-dollar bills in 1933. One can read, at the base of the 13-story pyramid, the year 1776 (MDCCLXVI in Roman numerals). The eye radiating in all directions is the “all-spying eye” that symbolizes the terroristic, Gestapo-like, agency set up by Weishaupt.

The Latin words “ANNUIT COEPTIS” mean “our enterprise (conspiracy) has been crowned with success.” Below, “NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM” explains the nature of the enterprise: a “New Social Order” or a “New World Order”.

1785 – An Illuminati courier named Lanze is struck by lightning, and killed while traveling by horseback through the town of Ratisbon. When Bavarian officials examine the contents of his saddle bags, they discover the existence of the Order of the Illuminati, and find plans detailing the coming French Revolution.

The Bavarian Government attempts to alert the government of France of impending disaster, but the French Government fails to heed this warning. Bavarian officials arrest all members of the Illuminati they can find, but Weishaupt and others have gone underground, and cannot be found.

1796 – Freemasonry becomes a major issue in the presidential election in the United States. John Adams wins the election by opposing Masonry, and his son, John Quincy Adams, warns of the dire threat to the nation posed by the Masonic Lodges:

“I do conscientiously and sincerely believe that the Order of Freemasonry, if not the greatest, is one of the greatest moral and political evils under which the Union is now laboring.”

1797 – John Robison, Professor of Natural History at Edinburgh University in Scotland, publishes a book entitled “Proofs of a Conspiracy” in which he reveals that Adam Weishaupt had attempted to recruit him. He exposes the diabolical aims of the Illuminati to the world.

1821 – George W. F. Hegel formulates what is called the Hegelian dialectic – the process by which Illuminati objectives are achieved. According to the Hegelian dialectic, thesis plus antithesis equals synthesis. In other words, first you foment a crisis.

Then there is an enormous public outcry that something must be done about the problem. So you offer a solution that brings about the changes you really wanted all along, but which people would have been unwilling to accept initially.

1828 – Mayer Amschel Rothschild, who finances the Illuminati, expresses his utter contempt for national governments which attempt to regulate International Bankers such as him:

“Allow me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who writes the laws.”

1848 — Moses Mordecai Marx Levy, alias Karl Marx, writes “The Communist Manifesto.” Marx is a member of an Illuminati front organization called the League of the Just.

He not only advocates economic and political changes; he advocates moral and spiritual changes as well. He believes the family should be abolished, and that all children should be raised by a central authority. He expresses his attitude toward God by saying:

“We must war against all prevailing ideas of religion, of the state, of country, of patriotism. The idea of God is the keynote of a perverted civilization. It must be destroyed.”

Jan. 22, 1870 – In a letter to Italian revolutionary leader Giuseppe Mazzini, Albert Pike – Sovereign Grand Commander of the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry – announces the establishment of a secret society within a secret society:

“We must create a super rite, which will remain unknown, to which we will call those Masons of high degree of whom we shall select. With regard to our brothers in Masonry, these men must be pledges to the strictest secrecy. Through this supreme rite, we will govern all Freemasonry which will become the one international center, the more powerful because its direction will be unknown.”

This ultra-secret organization is called The New and Reformed Paladian Rite. (This is why about 95% of the men involved in Masonry don’t have a clue as to what the objectives of the organization actually are. They are under the delusion that it’s just a fine community organization doing good works.)

1875 – Russian occultist Helena Petrovna Blavatsky founds the Theosophical Society. Madame Blavatsky claims that Tibetan holy men in the Himilayas, whom she refers to as the Masters of Wisdom, communicated with her in London by telepathy. She insists that the Christians have it all backwards – that Satan is good, and God is evil. She writes:

“The Christians and scientists must be made to respect their Indian betters. The Wisdom of India, her philosophy and achievement, must be made known in Europe and America.”

1884 – The Fabian Society is founded in Great Britain to promote Socialism. The Fabian Society takes its name from the Roman General Fabius Maximus, who fought Hannibal’s army in small debilitating skirmishes, rather than attempting one decisive battle.

July 14, 1889 – Albert Pike issues instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the world. He reveals who is the true object of Masonic worship:

“To you, Sovereign Grand Instructors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th degrees: The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine.”

1890-1896 – Cecil Rhodes, an enthusiastic student of John Ruskin, is Prime Minister of South Africa, a British colony at the time. He is able to exploit and control the gold and diamond wealth of South Africa.

He works to bring all the habitable portions of the world under the domination of a ruling elite. To that end, he uses a portion of his vast wealth to establish the famous Rhodes Scholarships.

1893 – The Theosophical Society sponsors a Parliament of World Religions held in Chicago. The purpose of the convention is to introduce Hindu and Buddhist concepts, such as belief in reincarnation, to the West.

1911 – The Socialist Party of Great Britain publishes a pamphlet entitled “Socialism and Religion” in which they clearly state their position on Christianity:

“It is therefore a profound truth that Socialism is the natural enemy of religion. A Christian Socialist is in fact an anti-Socialist. Christianity is the antithesis of Socialism.”

1912 – Colonel Edward Mandell House, a close advisor of President Woodrow Wilson, publishes “Phillip Dru: Administrator”, in which he promotes “socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx.”

Feb. 3, 1913 – The 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, making it possible for the Federal Government to impose a progressive income tax, is ratified. Plank #2 of “The Communist Manifesto” had called for a progressive income tax. (In Canada, the income tax is introduced in 1917, as a “temporary measure” to finance the war effort.)

1913 – President Woodrow Wilson publishes “The New Freedom” in which he reveals:

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

Dec. 23, 1913 – The Federal Reserve (neither federal nor a reserve – it’s a privately owned institution) is created. It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyl Island, Georgia, by a group of bankers and politicians, including Col. House.

This transfers the power to create money from the American Government to a private group of bankers. The Federal Reserve Act is hastily passed just before the Christmas break. Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. (father of the famed aviator) warns:

“This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs this act the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust Investigation, will be legalized.”

1916 – Three years after signing the Federal Reserve Act into law, President Woodrow Wilson observes:

“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”

1917 – With aid from Financiers in New York City and London, V. I. Lenin is able to overthrow the government of Russia. Lenin later comments on the apparent contradiction of the links between prominent capitalists and Communism:

“There also exists another alliance – at first glance a strange one, a surprising one – but if you think about it, in fact, one which is well grounded and easy to understand. This is the alliance between our Communist leaders and your capitalists.”

(Remember the Hegelian dialectic?)

May 30, 1919 – Prominent British and American personalities establish the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs in the U.S. at a meeting arranged by Col. House; attended by various Fabian socialists, including noted economist John Maynard Keynes.

1920 – Britain’s Winston Churchill recognizes the connection between the Illuminati and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. He observes:

“From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.

It played a definitely recognizable role in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century, and now at last this band of extra- ordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads, and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”

1920-1931 – Louis T. McFadden is Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Curency. Concerning the Federal Reserve, Congressman McFadden notes:

“When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by International Bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure.

Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers, but the truth is – the Fed has usurped the Government. It controls everything here, and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.” Concerning the Great Depression and the country’s acceptance of FDR’s New Deal, he asserts: “It was no accident. It was a carefully contrived occurrence. The International Bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so they might emerge as the rulers of us all.”

1921 – Col. House reorganizes the American branch of the Institute of International Affairs into theCouncil on Foreign Relations (CFR). (For the past 60 years, 80% of the top positions in every administration – whether Democrat or Republican – have been occupied by members of this organization.)

December 15, 1922 – The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine “Foreign Affairs.” Author Philip Kerr states:

“Obviously there is going to be no peace nor prosperity for mankind as long as the earth remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states, until some kind of international system is created. The real problem today is that of world government.”

1928 – “The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution” by H. G. Wells is published. A former Fabian socialist, Wells writes:

“The political world of the Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate, and supersede existing governments. The Open Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist enthusiasms; it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of New York. The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed. It will be a world religion.”

1933 – “The Shape of Things to Come” by H. G. Wells is published. Wells predicts a second world war around 1940, originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945, there would be an increasing lack of public safety in “criminally infected” areas.

The plan for the “Modern World State” would succeed on its third attempt, and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq. The book also states:

“Although world government had been plainly coming for some years, although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no opposition anywhere.”

Nov. 21, 1933 – In a letter to Col. Edward M. House, President Franklin Roosevelt writes:

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government since the days of Andrew Jackson.”

March 1942 – An article in “TIME” magazine chronicles the Federal Council of Churches (which later becomes the National Council of Churches, a part of the World Council of Churches) lending its weight to efforts to establish a global authority.

A meeting of the top officials of the council comes out in favor of:

1) a world government of delegated powers;
2) strong immediate limitations on national sovereignty;
3) international control of all armies and navies.

Representatives (375 of them) of 30-some denominations assert that “a new order of economic life is both imminent and imperative” – a new order that is sure to come either “through voluntary cooperation within the framework of democracy or through explosive revolution.”

June 28, 1945 – U.S. President Harry Truman endorses world government in a speech:

“It will be just as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the world as it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States.”

October 24, 1945 – The United Nations Charter becomes effective. Also on October 24, Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho) introduces Senate Resolution 183, calling upon the U.S. Senate to go on record as favoring creation of a world republic, including an international police force.

Feb. 7, 1950 – International financier and CFR member James Warburg tells a Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee:

“We shall have world government whether or not you like it – by conquest or consent.”

Feb. 9, 1950 – The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate Concurrent Resolution #66 which begins:

“Whereas, in order to achieve universal peace and justice, the present Charter of the United Nations should be changed to provide a true world government constitution.”

1952 – The World Association of Parliamentarians for World Government draws up a map designed to illustrate how foreign troops would occupy and police the six regions into which the United States and Canada will be divided as part of their world-government plan.

1954 – Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands establishes the Bilderbergers: international politicians and bankers who meet secretly on an annual basis.

1961 – The U.S. State Department issues Document 7277, entitled “Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.”

It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which “no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force.”

1966 – Professor Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton’s mentor at Georgetown University, authors a massive volume entitled “Tragedy and Hope” in which he states:

“There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so.

I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims, and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies, but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”

April 1972 – In his keynote address to the Association for Childhood Education International, Chester M. Pierce, Professor of Education and Psychiatry in the Faculty of Medicine at Harvard University, proclaims:

“Every child in America entering school at the age of five is insane because he comes to school with certain allegiances toward our founding fathers, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being. It’s up to you, teachers, to make all of these sick children well by creating the international child of the future.”

July 1973 – International banker and staunch member of the subversive Council on Foreign Relations, David Rockefeller, founds a new organization called the Trilateral Commission, of which the official aim is “to harmonize the political, economic, social, and cultural relations between the three major economic regions in the world” (hence the name “Trilateral”).

He invites future President Jimmy Carter to become one of the founding members. Zbigniew Brzezinski is the organization’s first director.

There are three major economic areas in the world: Europe, North America, and the Far East (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, etc.).

If, under the pretext of having to join forces to be able to face economic competition with the two other economic regions, the member countries of each of these three regions decide to merge into one single country, forming three super-States, then the one-world government will be almost achieved.

Like Fabian socialists, they achieve their ultimate goal (a world government) step by step.

This aim is almost achieved in Europe with the Single European Act (Maastricht Treaty) that was implemented in 1993, requiring all the member countries of the European Community to abolish their trade barriers, and to hand over their monetary and fiscal policies to the technocrats of the European Commission in Brussels, Belgium.

In January, 2002, all these European countries abandoned their national currencies to share only one common currency, the “Euro”. Moreover, the Nice Treaty removed more powers from countries to give them over to the European Commission.

What begun innocently in 1952 as the EEC (European Economic Community, a common authority to regulate the coal and steel industry among European nations), finally turned into a European super-state.

Jean Monnet, a French socialist economist and founder of the EEC, had this in mind when he said: “Political union inevitably follows economic union.” He also said in 1948:

“The creation of a United Europe must be regarded as an essential step towards the creation of a United World.”

As regards the North American area, the merger of its member countries is well under way with the passage of free trade between Canada and the U.S.A., and then Mexico.

In the next few years, this free-trade agreement is supposed to include also all of South and Central America, with a single currency for them all.

Mexico’s President Vucente Fox said on May 6, 2002, in Madrid:

“Eventually, our long-range objective is to establish with the United States, but also with Canada, our other regional partner, an ensemble of connections and institutions similar to those created by the European Union.”

1973 – The Club of Rome, a U.N. operative, issues a report entitled “Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System.” This report divides the entire world into ten kingdoms.

1979 – FEMA, which stands for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is given huge powers. It has the power, in case of “national emergency”, to suspend laws, move entire populations, arrest and detain citizens without a warrant, and hold them without trial.

It can seize property, food supplies, transportation systems, and can suspend the Constitution.

Not only is it the most powerful entity in the United States, but it was not even created under Constitutional law by the Congress. It was a product of a Presidential Executive Order.

An Executive Order becomes law simply by a signature of the U.S. President; it does not even have to be approved by the Representatives or Senators in the Congress.

A state of “national emergency” could be a terrorist attack, a natural disaster, or a stock market crash, for example. Here are just a few Executive Orders associated with FEMA that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years, and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen:

# 10995: Right to seize all communications media in the United States.

# 10997: Right to seize all electric power, fuels and minerals, both public and private.

# 10999: Right to seize all means of transportation, including personal vehicles of any kind, and total control of highways, seaports, and waterways.

# 11000: Right to seize any and all American people and divide up families in order to create work forces to be transferred to any place the Government sees fit.

# 11001: Right to seize all health, education and welfare facilities, both public and private.

# 11002: Right to force registration of all men, women, and children in the United States.

# 11003: Right to seize all air space, airports, and aircraft.

# 11004: Right to seize all housing and finance authorities in order to establish “Relocation Designated Areas”, and to force abandonment of areas classified as “unsafe”.

#  11005: Right to seize all railroads, inland waterways, and storage facilities, both public and private.

# 11921: Authorizes plans to establish Government control of wages and salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institutions.

1991 – President George Bush Sr. praises the New World Order in a State of the Union Message:

“What is at stake is more than one small country; it is a big idea – a new world order… to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind… based on shared principles and the rule of law… The illumination of a thousand points of light… The winds of change are with us now.”

(Theosophist Alice Bailey used that very same expression – “points of light” – in describing the process of occult enlightenment.)

June, 1991 – World leaders are gathered for another closed door meeting of the Bilderberg Society in Baden Baden, Germany. While at that meeting, David Rockefeller said in a speech:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

Oct. 29, 1991 – David Funderburk, former U.S. Ambassador to Romania, tells a North Carolina audience:

“George Bush has been surrounding himself with people who believe in one-world government. They believe that the Soviet system and the American system are converging.”

May 21, 1992 – In an address to the Bilderberger organization meeting in Evian, France, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger declares:

“Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence.

It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.”

July 20, 1992 – “TIME” magazine publishes “The Birth of the Global Nation,” by Strobe Talbott, Rhodes Scholar, roommate of Bill Clinton at Oxford University, CFR Director and Trilateralist (and appointed Deputy Secretary of State by President Clinton), in which he writes:

“Nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority… All countries are basically social arrangements… No matter how permanent or even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary… Perhaps national sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all… But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world government.”

1993 – A second Parliament of World Religions is held in Chicago on the 100th anniversary of the first. Like the first convention, this one seeks to join all the religions of the world into “one harmonious whole,” but it wants to make them “merge back into their original element.”

Traditional beliefs of monotheistic religions such as Christianity are considered incompatible with individual “en- lightenment”, and must be drastically altered.

July 18, 1993 – CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the “Los Angeles Times” concerning NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement):

“What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system…a first step toward a new world order.”

1994 – In the Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program, there was a section called “Global Governance for the 21st Century.”

The administrator for this program was appointed by Bill Clinton. His name is James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the report said:

“Mankind’s problems can no longer be solved by national government. What is needed is a world government. This can best be achieved by strengthening the United Nations system.”

May 3, 1994 – President Bill Clinton signs Presidential Decision Directive 25, and then declares it classified so the American people can’t see what it says.

(The summary of PDD-25 issued to members of Congress tells us that it authorizes the President to turn over control of U.S. military units to U.N. command.)

Sept. 23, 1994 – The globalists realize that as more and more people begin to wake up to what’s going on, they have only a limited amount of time in which to implement their policies. Speaking at the United Nations Ambassadors’ dinner, David Rockefeller remarks:

“This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long… We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis, and the nations will accept the New World Order.”

March 1995 – U.N. delegates meet in Copenhagen, Denmark, to discuss various methods for imposing global taxes on the people of the world.

Sept. 1995 – “Popular Science” magazine describes a top secret U.S. Navy installation called HAARP (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) in the state of Alaska.

This project beams powerful radio energy into the earth’s upper atmosphere. One of the goals of the program is to develop the capability of “manipulating local weather” using the techniques developed by Bernard Eastlund.

(The program has been underway since 1990.)

September 27, 1995 – The State of the World Forum took place in the fall of this year, sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation located at the Presidio in San Francisco.

Foundation President Jim Garrison chairs the meeting of who’s-who from around the world, including Margaret Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev, and others.

Conversation centers around the oneness of mankind and the coming global government. However, the term “global gov- ernance” is now used in place of “new world order” since the latter has become a political liability, being a lightning rod for opponents of global government.

1996 – The United Nations’ 420-page report “Our Global Neighborhood” is published. It outlines a plan for “global governance,” calling for an international “Conference on Global Governance” in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements for ratification by the year 2000.

2003 – The world is on the verge of another global war, the “state of emergency” looked for by the one-worlders to impose martial law and the universal microchip under the skin… But with the global shift in awareness, they will not have the last word!


La Primera Guerra Mundial y la Revolución Rusa, cómo realmente sucedió

download (3)

Para iniciar su esperada y anticipada guerra mundial, el Nuevo Orden Mundial utiliza “nacionalistas serbios”. Una sociedad secreta conocida como Young Bosnia, que posiblemente trabaja con The Young Turks, representa el asesinato de un Real austriaco. Serbia es una nación cristiana ortodoxa bajo la protección de Rusia. Debido a los planes pasados ​​de Disraeli, muchos serbios también viven bajo regla austro-húngara (en Bosnia) en vez de bajo soberanía serbia. Esta situación ha causado siempre fricción, tanto en Austria-Hungría, como también entre Rusia y Austria-Hungría. El Archiduque Franz Ferdinand es heredero del trono de la familia Habsburgo de Austria-Hungría. Mientras viaja a través de la ciudad bosnia de Sarajevo con su esposa, Sophie, una bomba es lanzada al coche abierto del archiduque. Desvía la bomba con su brazo y explota detrás de él. La pareja real insiste en ver a todos los heridos en el hospital. Después de viajar allí, deciden ir al palacio, pero su conductor da un giro equivocado en una calle lateral, donde otro asesino llamado Gavrilo.Princip los localiza. Le tira a Sophie en el estómago ya Franz en el cuello. Franz sigue vivo cuando llegan testigos para dar ayuda. Sus palabras moribundas a Sophie son: “No te mueras cariño. Vive para nuestros hijos.

images (1)

El mundo está conmocionado. Las fatídicas profecías de Tolstói y Bismarck están a punto de suceder.


29 de junio

Los disturbios antisubios estallan en la ciudad austro-húngara de Sarajevo.

07 DE JULIO Austria-Hungría convoca a un Consejo de Ministros para discutir la situación.


La prensa sionista austro-húngara de Viena alienta las llamas del sentimiento anti-serbio. Se difunden informes falsos de una conspiración serbia.

JULIO El Kaiser Wilhelm II de Alemania, a petición del zar ruso Nicholas (su primo), intenta contener a su aliado austro-húngaro animando a Austria-Hungría a hablar con Serbia. (2)

28 de julio

Austria-Hungría cede a la histeria de la guerra y declara la guerra a Serbia.

29 de julio

Para defender a su aliado serbio, Rusia moviliza sus ejércitos contra su antiguo aliado ‘Liga de los Tres Emperadores’ Austria-Hungría.


Más allá del control del zar y del Kaiser, se dispara la bomba de tiempo Triple Alliance / Triple Entente. Alemania declara la guerra a Rusia por su movilización contra su aliado Austria-Hungría.


Ignorando las súplicas alemanas para no entrar en el conflicto, Francia comienza a avanzar hacia Austria-Hungría en apoyo de su aliado Entente, Rusia.


Frente a la peligrosa guerra de dos frentes que Francia y Inglaterra habían diseñado, (y que Bismarck temía) Alemania rápidamente avanza hacia Francia, a través de Bélgica, mientras que al mismo tiempo enfrenta a Rusia en el este.


Gran Bretaña entra en la guerra al lado de sus aliados, Francia y Rusia.


Acuerdo de Londres: los aliados de la Triple Entente Francia, Rusia y Reino Unido acuerdan que ningún miembro hará una paz separada con Alemania o Austria-Hungría.

28 de octubre

El rival sur de Rusia, el Imperio turco otomano, entra en la guerra por el lado de Austria-Hungría y Alemania. En tan sólo unas semanas, Europa está ahora en llamas en la guerra, mientras la prensa sionista globalista en Francia, Inglaterra, Austria y Alemania agita un fervor nacionalista mutuamente destructivo entre las naciones europeas.

1 y 2: Rodeado por las grandes potencias de la Triple Entente, la pacífica Alemania se vio obligada a avanzar rápidamente en dos direcciones. Los telegramas “Willy-Nicky” revelan claramente cómo los emperadores rusos y alemanes intentaron evitar la guerra, pero fueron impotentes para detener las fuerzas oscuras que controlaban los acontecimientos.


Después de la marcha hacia el oeste de Alemania hacia los puestos de París, el Frente Occidental se hunda en un estancamiento sangriento con líneas de trinchera que cambian poco hasta 1918. En el este, el ejército ruso lucha con éxito contra las fuerzas austrohúngaras, . Frentes adicionales se abren después de que el Imperio Otomano (Turquía) se une a la guerra (en el lado de Alemania) en 1914. Italia cambia de lado y se une a las potencias de la Entente en 1915. En el mar, la Marina Británica bloquea Alemania. Los submarinos alemanes contrarrestarán el bloqueo y hundirán a muchos buques mercantes británicos que llevan armas y suministros.

Ni una pulgada del territorio alemán se perdió jamás durante la Gran Guerra.

1914 EL MANIFIESTO DE LOS PRINCIPALES INTELECTUALES Y ARTISTAS DE LA ALEMANIA CONDENA LA PROPAGANDA ANTI-ALEMANA DEL OESTE Para contrarrestar las mentiras de los propagandistas aliados, 93 de los principales científicos, eruditos y artistas de Alemania firman su nombre en “El Manifiesto del 93”. El documento denuncia las mentiras dirigidas a Alemania, y declara un apoyo inequívoco de las acciones militares alemanas. Tal vez el más notable de los signatarios logrados es Wilhelm Roentgen, el físico ganador del Premio Nobel que descubrió “rayos X”. El Manifiesto dice:

“Como representantes de la ciencia y el arte alemanes, protestamos ante el mundo civilizado contra las mentiras y calumnias con que nuestros enemigos tratan de manchar el honor de Alemania en su lucha por la existencia, en una lucha que se le ha impuesto. La boca de hierro de los acontecimientos ha demostrado la falsedad de las ficticias derrotas alemanas; En consecuencia, la tergiversación y la calumnia están más activamente en el trabajo. Como heraldos de la verdad levantamos nuestras voces contra éstos. No es cierto que Alemania sea culpable de haber causado esta guerra.

Ni el pueblo, ni el Gobierno, ni el Kaiser querían la guerra. No es cierto que nos invadimos en Bélgica neutral. Se ha comprobado que Francia e Inglaterra se han resuelto sobre tal transgresión, y también se ha demostrado que Bélgica había accedido a hacerlo. Habría sido un suicidio de nuestra parte no haberlo hecho. No es cierto que la vida y las propiedades de un solo ciudadano belga hayan sido heridas por nuestros soldados sin que la defensa más amarga lo hubiera hecho necesario. No es cierto que nuestras tropas trataron a Louvain brutalmente. Los furiosos habitantes que habían caído traicioneramente sobre ellos en sus cuarteles, nuestras tropas con corazones doloridos fueron obligados a disparar una parte de la ciudad, como castigo.

La mayor parte de Lovaina ha sido conservada. No es cierto que nuestra guerra no respeta las leyes internacionales. No conoce crueldad indisciplinada. Pero en el este, la tierra está saturada con la sangre de las mujeres Y los niños despiadadamente asesinados por las tropas rusas salvajes, y en el oeste, las balas dumdum mutilan los pechos de nuestros soldados. No es cierto que el combate contra nuestro llamado militarismo no sea un combate contra nuestra civilización, como pretenden hipócritamente nuestros enemigos. Si no fuera por el militarismo alemán, la civilización alemana habría sido extirpada desde hacía tiempo. No podemos arrancar el arma venenosa -la mentira- de las manos de nuestros enemigos.

Todo lo que podemos hacer es proclamar al mundo entero, que nuestros enemigos están dando un falso testimonio contra nosotros. ¡Ten fe en nosotros! Cree que continuaremos esta guerra hasta el fin como una nación civilizada, a quien el legado de un Goethe, un Beethoven y un Kant, es tan sagrado como sus propios hogares y hogares.

Como el descubridor de los “rayos X”, Wilhelm Roentgen fue capaz de “ver a través” de la propaganda anti-alemana de los aliados.


¿Otra vez con los 6 millones?




El Reino Unido quiere atraer a Estados Unidos a la guerra. El señor del Almirantazgo Winston Churchill y el asesor marxista de Wilson, Edward Mandell House, creen que si Alemania puede ser atrapada en hundir un buque británico con los estadounidenses a bordo, los Estados Unidos serán forzados a entrar en la guerra. (4) Sin saberlo de sus pasajeros, el lujoso Lusitania lleva armas y explosivos destinados a Gran Bretaña. (5) Navegando desde Nueva York, Lusitania está cargada con 600 toneladas de explosivos, 6 millones de municiones, 1200 cajas de metralla y algunos pasajeros americanos. La embajada alemana en Washington es consciente de esto y trata de advertir a los viajeros estadounidenses mediante la colocación de anuncios en los periódicos estadounidenses, que se rechazan en la mayoría de los casos. (6) A medida que Lusitania se acerca a la costa irlandesa, se ordena reducir la velocidad, y su buque de escolta militar, Juno, es retirado. (7) Churchill sabe que los U-Boats alemanes están en el área. Él intencionalmente ralentiza la Lusitania y llama a Juno, dejando a la Lusitania como un pato sentado. Un golpe de torpedo alemán enciende las municiones, causando una explosión secundaria que hunde el revestimiento masivo en sólo 18 minutos! Casi 1200 de sus 1959 pasajeros mueren, incluidos128 estadounidenses. . La prensa estadounidense vilipende a Alemania, pero no menciona las municiones de contrabando (o quizás una bomba pre-plantada?) Que realmente hundió a la Lusitania. Durante los años 50, la marina británica intenta destruir la evidencia histórica de la explosión de Lusitania dejando caer cargas de profundidad sobre el revestimiento hundido


1- British Mad Dog Churchill 3-Globalista NY Times, reclamó dos torpedos de éxito. 1915-16 A PESAR DE LA LUSITANIA QUE FUMA, WILSON RETRASA LA ENTRADA DE LOS EEUU EN LA GUERRA

El incidente de Lusitania juega un papel importante en convertir el sentimiento estadounidense contra Alemania, pero aún no ha llegado el momento de que Estados Unidos haga su entrada. Los sionistas están esperando para lograr el máximo apalancamiento antes de ordenar a Wilson que finalmente tire del gatillo. Por el momento, Wilson sólo condenará verbalmente el ataque de Lusitania, manteniendo a Estados Unidos fuera de la guerra y cruzando hacia la reelección en noviembre de 1916. Los británicos están decepcionados. Los políticos del Reino Unido, los periodistas y el loco Teddy Roosevelt, todos ellos ridiculizan a Wilson por ser tímidos. En un intento de mantener a Estados Unidos inflamado, los británicos inventan una historia sobre los niños alemanes que reciben unas vacaciones para celebrar el hundimiento de la Lusitania. ¡Otras historias falsas hablan de soldados alemanes clavando bebés en puertas de iglesias en Bélgica! Los británicos saben que eventualmente necesitarán ayuda de Estados Unidos si quieren ganar la ventaja sobre la Triple Alianza / Poderes Centrales. Los sionistas saben esto también, pero están esperando su tiempo, estableciendo el Reino Unido y los Estados Unidos por el momento adecuado, y el trato correcto.


Wilson pretende arrastrar a Estados Unidos a la guerra, pero sus promesas de campaña de reelección de 1916 dicen lo contrario.

DICIEMBRE, 1916 EL ALEMÁN KAISER INTENTA PARAR LA GUERRA La batalla de Verdun se agrava durante 10 meses, resultando en 306.000 muertos en el campo de batalla (163.000 franceses y 143.000 alemanes) y 500.000 heridos. ¡Eso es un promedio de 30,000 muertes por cada uno de los 10 meses de la batalla! En el noreste de Francia, Verdun es la batalla más larga y devastadora de la Gran Guerra. Al final de Verdún, la guerra se ha desmoronado en un punto muerto, pero Alemania sigue teniendo una ventaja. En diciembre de 1916, el Kaiser Wilhelm se ofrece a negociar la paz con los Poderes de la Entente. Pero Gran Bretaña y Francia deliberadamente hacen exigencias imposibles a Alemania como condición para negociar. A pesar de los esfuerzos sinceros de Alemania para detener la locura, alguien quiere que este absurdo baño de sangre continúe. ¿Pero quién? ….. ¿Y por qué?


La batalla de Verdun / Kaiser Wilhelm quería paz todo el tiempo. DICIEMBRE, 1916 EL TRATO DE SUELDO SUCIO MANTIENE LA GUERRA QUE VA / SIONISTAS A GRAN BRETAÑA: “¡PODEMOS LLEVAR LOS EEUU EN LA GUERRA!” Para diciembre de 1916, las Potencias Centrales tienen una clara ventaja. Francia ha sufrido pérdidas horribles. Rusia se enfrenta al caos interno revolucionario rojo. Gran Bretaña está bajo bloqueo de U-Boat, y no se ha ocupado una pulgada cuadrada de Alemania. Alemania ofrece generosos términos de paz. Básicamente, Kaiser Wilhelm está dispuesto a acabar con la guerra y volver a cómo eran las cosas. ¡Ahí es cuando los sionistas hacen su movimiento para cumplir el plan de Herzl! Chaim.Weizman y Nathan Sokolow se acercan a los británicos con un trato sucio. Los sionistas se ofrecen a utilizar su influencia internacional para llevar a los Estados Unidos a la guerra en el lado de Gran Bretaña, mientras que socavar Alemania desde el interior. El precio que Gran Bretaña debe pagar por la entrada de Estados Unidos es robar Palestina de Turquía otomana (aliado de Alemania) y permitir que los judíos se asienten allí. Aunque la declaración oficial del apoyo británico a una patria judía no debe hacerse pública hasta 1917 (Declaración de Balfour), el acuerdo fue alcanzado de hecho en diciembre de 1916. Poco después, los sionistas agitaron la propaganda anti-alemana Se desató en los EE.UU. mientras los sionistas y marxistas de Alemania comienzan a socavar el esfuerzo de Alemania de la guerra desde dentro


Chaim Weizman hizo a los británicos una oferta que no podían rechazar. A cambio, los sionistas quieren ver el imperio turco destruido y Palestina entregada a los judíos. FEBRERO, 1917 LA “REVOLUCIÓN FEBRERA” SUBE LA FAMILIA ROYAL ROMANOV DE RUSIA A medida que la economía rusa se deteriora y la guerra se vuelve impopular, comienza la ‘Revolución de Febrero’. Los comunistas, los socialistas progresistas y los soldados descontentos se combinan para desestabilizar el ya debilitado reinado del zar Nicolás. El zar se ve obligado a abdicar de su trono y poner bajo arresto domiciliario en espera de exilio. Los judíos de todo el mundo celebran la abdicación del zar ruso. Se establece un gobierno de coalición de “centro-izquierda” compuesto principalmente por socialistas y comunistas. Sigue una lucha de poder entre los socialistas demócratas y la parte comunista (soviético-bolchevique).

La dinastía Romanov ha terminado.


Durante las semanas que siguieron al trato sucio sionista-británico para robar Palestina, los sionistas cumplen con su objetivo final. Una campaña de propaganda intensa se desencadena repentinamente en América. El incidente de 1915 Lusitania es resucitado, junto con el bombo sobre la guerra alemana del U-barco. Un plan de contingencia alemán para aliarse con México si Estados Unidos entra en guerra (Nota de Zimmerman) es falsamente retratado como una trama para atacar a América. Citando varios falsos pretextos, el 2 de abril de 1917, Wilson, que según Benjamin Freedman estaba bajo chantaje sobre un asunto que tenía cuando era profesor de Princeton, le pide al Congreso una Declaración de Guerra. El Congreso cumple. Las fuerzas regulares de los pequeños militares estadounidenses comienzan a llegar a Europa, pero pasarán meses antes de que la fuerza total de los hombres reclutados pueda ser desplegada.

El cartel icónico de Fred Rothman de los EEUU retrata alemanes como monstruoso “Huns”


Los líderes terroristas del Red que el Zar Nicolás sólo exilió en 1905 ahora comienzan a regresar a Rusia. Vladimir Lenin llega de Suiza, a través de Alemania, con un Escondite de oro banquero sionista. León Trotsky llega de Nueva York con más dinero y una banda de matones marxistas y judíos. (9) Los comunistas financiados por sionistas socavan inmediatamente el nuevo gobierno provisional. Un golpe violento se intenta en julio, pero los rojos bolcheviques se detienen. El socialista demócrata Alexander Kerensky se convierte en primer ministro cuando los líderes bolcheviques pasan a la clandestinidad.

De regreso de Brooklyn, el asesino Leon Trotsky (izquierda) se unirá a Lenin (centro) en la búsqueda de expulsar Kerensky (derecha)


Wilson establece el Comité de Información Pública (CPI) con el fin de manipular la opinión pública en apoyo de la guerra. Edward Bernays, “el padre de la propaganda americana” es un miembro del CPI. Un sobrino del psicoanalista Sigmund Freud, el sionista Bernays se jacta de su capacidad para controlar la mente pública. Él llama a sus métodos científicos para controlar la opinión pública, “la ingeniería del consentimiento”. En su libro de 1928, Propaganda, Berns explica: “La manipulación consciente e inteligente de los hábitos y opiniones de las masas es un elemento importante en la sociedad democrática . Los que manipulan este mecanismo invisible de la sociedad constituyen un gobierno invisible que es el verdadero poder gobernante de nuestro país. – Estamos gobernados, nuestras mentes están moldeadas, nuestros gustos formados, nuestras ideas sugeridas, en gran parte por hombres de los que nunca hemos oído hablar. Son ellos quienes tiran de los cables que controlan la mente pública. ” Bernays y sus co-conspiradores del CPI describen el esfuerzo bélico estadounidense como una santa cruzada “para hacer el mundo seguro para la democracia”, mientras que al mismo tiempo difunde una vil propaganda llena de odio dirigida hacia Alemania y su emperador Wilhelm II. “Bebés y bayonetas.”

En Europa y América, Alemania era ahora el blanco de la propaganda de guerra odiosa y ridícula.

Bernays escribió el libro sobre propaganda y manipulación; literalmente.


El ejército de Estados Unidos es muy pequeño, pero su capacidad de campo y equipar un ejército es grande. El proyecto impopular se instituyó en 1917. Al final de la guerra, bajo el pretexto idiota de “hacer el mundo seguro para la democracia” (lema de Bernays), más de 2 millones de hombres norteamericanos inocentes habrán sido enviados a luchar por el globalismo y el sionismo.

Los carteles de propaganda estadounidenses alentaron a los hombres a alistarse acusando a los “brutos locos” alemanes de crucificar a mujeres y niños.


Los sionistas han entregado en su extremo del trato sucio hecho con los británicos en 1916. La entrada americana en la guerra fue entregada según lo prometido. Por formalmente y públicamente, emitiendo “La Declaración de Balfour”, Lord Balfour está asegurando a los sionistas que Gran Bretaña cumplirá su fin del acuerdo después de la guerra, ¡el robo de Palestina! La Declaración es entregada al ‘Barón’ Walter Rothschild. Dice en parte: “El gobierno de Su Majestad ve con beneplácito el establecimiento en Palestina de un hogar nacional para el pueblo judío, y hará todo lo posible para facilitar el logro de este objetivo”. La extracción de esta promesa de los británicos es una de las razones principales por las que la guerra sin sentido se mantuvo en marcha, y por qué Estados Unidos finalmente se arrastró pulg En Israel hoy día Balfour (2 de noviembre) es ampliamente celebrado. Los árabes palestinos lo observan como un día de duelo.

“Querido Lord Rothschild” – El barón Walter Rothschild (izquierda) recibió la declaración Balfour de Lord Balfour.


7 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 1917 El primer ministro socialista Kerensky lucha por mantener a flote una mala economía, un gobierno de coalición inestable y una cansada nación rusa en la guerra. El tiempo está maduro para que los Rojos lleven a cabo otro violento intento de poder. Esta vez, Trotsky, Lenin y su pandilla malvada tendrá éxito. Con el respaldo de algunas tropas rojas – muchas de las cuales habían sido lavadas el cerebro en 1905 campamentos de prisioneros japoneses por materiales de lectura comunistas pagados por Jacob Schiff (12) – la ciudad capital de Petrogrado (San Petersburgo) es incautada durante la Revolución de Octubre “Octubre Rojo”). Kerensky huye de su vida y el nuevo régimen soviético se mueve inmediatamente para sacar a Rusia de la guerra (antes de que Alemania pueda vencerlos). Fuera de Petrogrado, el gobierno predominantemente judío Red no es reconocido como legítimo. Una sangrienta guerra civil entre los rojos dirigidos por los judíos y los “blancos” cristianos está ahora en proceso.

Vladimir Lenin, un guerrillero rojo, incita a las turbas hambrientas. HISTORIA PROHIBIDA: CITA PARA RECORDAR:


“Los líderes bolcheviques aquí (Rusia), la mayoría de los cuales son judíos y el 90 por ciento de los cuales son devueltos exiliados, se preocupan poco por Rusia o cualquier otro país, pero son internacionalistas y están tratando de iniciar una revolución social mundial”.

David R. Francis, Embajador de los Estados Unidos en Rusia, enero de 1918 1918-1921 ‘REDS’ vs ‘WHITES’ / GUERRA CIVIL EN RUSIA

Después de la caída de San Petersburgo a los Rojos, una guerra civil contrarrevolucionaria desgarra a Rusia por otros tres años. Los diversos opositores de los “rojos” son colectivamente referidos como “los blancos”, dirigidos principalmente por el almirante Kolchak. Cuando resulta evidente que un ejército revolucionario Rojo, compuesto únicamente de obreros y algunas tropas ex-zaristas, es demasiado pequeño para acabar con la contrarrevolución, Trotsky inscribe el reclutamiento obligatorio del campesinado en el Ejército Rojo. La oposición al reclutamiento del Ejército Rojo es superada por tácticas terroristas. Los rehenes y sus familias son torturados y asesinados cuando es necesario para forzar el cumplimiento.

Los Blancos del Almirante Kolchak vs Rojos de Trotsky


De no haber sido por la entrada de Estados Unidos en 1917 en la guerra, los partidos estancados habrían dejado de luchar por su cuenta y millones de vidas se habrían salvado. Pero no sería hasta 1918 que un número suficiente de reclutas estadounidenses entrenados estarían listos para desplegarse en operaciones de combate. Antes de que se derramaran nuevos ríos de sangre americana (117.000 estadounidenses morirían de causas relacionadas con el combate o la enfermedad entre abril y noviembre de 1918), tanto Alemania como Austria-Hungría volvieron a comunicar su deseo de una resolución pacífica; Tal como habían estado proponiendo previamente para hacer una paz mutuamente aceptable con Gran Bretaña y Francia todo el tiempo. En una alocución ante el Congreso de los Estados Unidos, el marioneta belicoso Wilson se ve obligado a admitir que, en respuesta a su reciente Declaración de “14 puntos”, Alemania y Austria-Hungría han expresado su acuerdo general con las propuestas de Wilson. Pero en el aliento siguiente, Wilson casualmente rechaza estas prometedoras tentativas de paz (refiriéndose a ellas como “declaraciones de paz”) ​​como inaceptables. Los manipuladores neoyorquinos de Wilsons (Baruch, Schiff, Warburg, Morgenthau, Brandeis, etc.) quieren su esperada guerra por el Globalismo (la pre-planeada “Liga de las Naciones”) y el sionismo (el robo británico de Palestina); Y ciertamente no están a punto de permitir que las propuestas de paz germánicas descarrilaran el NWO Express. Lo más asombroso de las mentiras de Wilson es su brillante descripción de cómo será la eventual paz de posguerra. El hecho de que tantos ingenuos y cansados ​​alemanes compraran más tarde las promesas vacías de Wilson, contribuirán a la bizarra entrega incondicional y al desarme de Alemania en noviembre de ese mismo año, 1918.

1- “Dice a Alemania que puede ser igual” 2- La falsa charla de paz de Wilson llevaba la píldora venenosa de la “Liga de Naciones” de los Globalistas.


Los rojos de Rusia no pueden luchar una guerra civil en el país y una guerra externa al mismo tiempo. Lenin y Trotsky no tienen más remedio que sacar a Rusia de la guerra. Antes de que las tropas estadounidenses puedan desplegarse en gran número, Alemania desvía sus tropas del frente pacificado del este y organiza una gran ofensiva occidental. La operación comienza en marzo con un ataque contra las fuerzas británicas en Francia. ¡Los alemanes avanzan 40 millas y París está a sólo 75 millas de distancia! La ofensiva de primavera es tan exitosa que Wilhelm declara el 24 de marzo una fiesta nacional. En este punto crítico, los marxistas y sionistas en Alemania apuñalan a sus compatriotas en la espalda. Los líderes sindicales marxistas ordenan huelgas de fábrica que privan a las tropas alemanas de suministros críticos. (15) La prensa judía, que había abierto la guerra Pasiones en 1914, repentinamente se convierte en agrio en la guerra y comienza a rasgar en el ejército alemán. La moral alemana comienza a caer rápidamente, al igual que la producción industrial. Recientes reclutas llegan a la primera línea con una actitud derrotista como protestas contra la guerra y el descontento general se extendió por toda Alemania. La Gran Ofensiva se detiene justo cuando los estadounidenses comienzan a llegar. Los sionistas alemanes traicionan a Alemania para que Palestina pueda ser tomada del aliado turco de Alemania y entregada a los judíos (Declaración de Balfour). Los marxistas judíos alemanes y los “socialistas demócratas” también ven una derrota alemana como un medio para desestabilizar la nación y organizar una revolución. Después de la guerra, la traición traidora de 1918 se conoce como “El Stab-in-the-Back”. Los “historiadores” modernos liberan esta alegación como una “leyenda”, pero no hay nada mítico al respecto. Al borde de la victoria final, Alemania fue traicionada desde dentro – simple y llanamente.

Las caricaturas de la posguerra representan sionistas-marxistas apuñalando a soldados alemanes en la espalda.


Había tardado un año entero en América para que sus militares fueran reclutados, entrenados y desplegados bajo el mando norteamericano. En el verano de 1918, 10,000 tropas frescas llegan diariamente al frente. Alrededor de 120,000 de ellos morirán en la Gran Guerra, 90,000 en combate, 30,000 de enfermedad. Además de la sangre fresca muy necesaria, las máquinas de guerra francesas y británicas están siendo re-suministradas por la producción industrial de la poderosa América. Con la ruptura de la ofensiva de primavera, la marea se vuelve contra Alemania y sus aliados. El contraataque aliado, (100 Days Offensive) comienza en agosto. En la batalla de Amiens, los aliados avanzan 7 millas en el territorio de dominio alemán en sólo 7 horas. De vuelta en Alemania, la prensa judía ignora los efectos devastadores de las huelgas dirigidas por los judíos y el derrotismo de inspiración judía. En cambio, los periódicos culpan al general Erich Ludendorff por los recientes reveses alemanes!

Nuevos muchachos americanos llegaron a matar a muchachos alemanes cuando la prensa judía de Alemania cambió descaradamente la culpa al general Ludendorff.

1- ¡Vamos, hombre! ¡Únete a mí para morir por las mentiras de Wilson! 2- Americano muerto enredado en alambre de púas. Si sólo su madre, su padre, su esposa, sus hijos, sus amigos pudieran haberlo visto morir. ¿Qué dirían al profesor Wilson?


El zar Nicolás II había esperado ser exiliado al Reino Unido mientras Kerensky estaba en el poder, pero su “aliado” británico se había negado a aceptarlo. Los bolcheviques (comunistas) ahora tienen a Nicholas, su esposa Alexandra, sus cuatro hijas y su hijo menor arresto domiciliario. Sus captores rojos los obligan a vivir con raciones. Niño, Nicolás había sido testigo del asesinato por bombardeo de su abuelo, Alejandro II, en 1881. El trágico error de Nicholas fue no ejecutar la escoria roja, como Lenin y Trotsky, después de su fallida revolución de 1905. Ahora, su miserable misericordia vuelve a perseguirlo, ya su familia. En la noche del 16/17 de julio de 1918, la familia real Romanov se despierta a las 2AM, se le dice que se vista, y luego se reúne en el sótano de la casa en la que están detenidos. Momentos después, los rojos judíos entran y matan a toda la familia, a su médico ya tres sirvientes a sangre fría. Algunas de las hijas Romanov son apuñaladas y golpeadas hasta morir cuando los disparos iniciales no las matan. Noticias del brutal asesinato de los Romanov enviarán ondas de choque por toda Rusia, y toda la Europa cristiana.

¡Una familia hermosa – tirada y apuñalada a la muerte como animales! Cuando comenzó el tiroteo, el zar trató de proteger a su joven hijo.


La anterior campaña de Gran Bretaña contra los turcos había terminado en fracaso (Gallipoli). Ahora, con los americanos frescos y fuertes que llegan para luchar contra los alemanes en Europa Occidental, las tropas británicas se liberan para concentrarse en el Imperio Otomano. Gran Bretaña codicia los campos petroleros de Oriente Medio, pero el Reino Unido también tiene una deuda que pagar a los jefes sionistas que arrastraron a los Estados Unidos a la guerra. Ayudar a los británicos en el esfuerzo de robar Palestina son 10.000 judíos estadounidenses que se alistan para luchar no junto con sus compatriotas en Europa, sino con los británicos, que tienen la intención de apoderarse de su futuro hogar, Palestina. Ver: La Legión Judía Durante este tiempo, aviones británicos lanzan folletos sobre Alemania. Impreso en yiddish, los folletos de Balfour buscan ganar el apoyo judío en Alemania prometiendo a los judíos una “patria” en Palestina después de haber ganado la guerra.

1- Vladimir Jabotinsky (izquierda) lideró las unidades judías en la lucha contra Turquía. 2- Dejando a los norteamericanos para hacer el levantamiento pesado contra Alemania, los británicos se dirigen hacia el sur para desmantelar el Imperio Otomano.



¡”Todo el Poder a los Trabajadores” significa realmente todo el poder al Nuevo Orden Mundial! Con la guerra civil rusa furiosa, la Internacional Comunista, conocida como “La Comintern”, se establece en Moscú, Rusia. El Comintern declara abiertamente que su intención es combatir “por todos los medios disponibles, incluida la fuerza armada, para el derrocamiento de la” burguesía “internacional (la clase empresarial) y para la creación de una república soviética internacional (gobierno mundial)”. 18)

De 1918 a 1922, los partidos afiliados a la Comintern se forman en Francia, Italia, China, Alemania, España, Bélgica, Estados Unidos y otras naciones. Todos los comunistas operan bajo la dirección de los Rojos de Moscú, que son financiados por los mismos banqueros globales internacionalistas sionistas que crearon la Reserva Federal y provocaron la Gran Guerra. 2 DE SEPTIEMBRE DE 1918 EL ‘TERROR ROJO’ ES ANUNCIADO EN RUSIA


Los comunistas rusos planean usar estratégicamente el terror para intimidar a sus adversarios blancos en sumisión. Por orden de Lenin y Trotsky, el “terror rojo” es anunciado por el Yakov rojo judío. Sverdlov. El Terror Rojo está marcado por detenciones masivas a mitad de la noche, ejecuciones y tácticas horriblemente creativas de tortura. Hasta 100.000 rusos son asesinados en el Terror Rojo, llevado a cabo por la Cheka (policía secreta), dirigida por los judíos. Entre las atrocidades cometidas, a menudo en vista de los miembros de la familia de la víctima, se encuentran:  40.000 prisioneros blancos ahorcados públicamente en Ucrania  Carbones ardientes insertados en las vaginas de las mujeres  Crucifixiones  Violaciones de mujeres de todas las edades  Víctimas sumergidas en aceite o alquitrán hirviendo ¡”Todo el Poder a los Trabajadores” significa realmente todo el poder al Nuevo Orden Mundial!  Víctimas empapadas con gasolina y quemadas vivas  Víctimas colocadas en ataúdes llenos de ratas hambrientas  Víctimas empapadas con agua, y convertidas en cubos de hielo humanos en invierno.  Los sacerdotes, los monjes y las monjas tienen el plomo fundido derramado en sus gargantas (19) El terror desmoralizante toma una carga psicológica pesada sobre el pueblo ruso asustado. En 1922, muchos se rompen en sumisión a los monstruos rojos de la Cheka.

1 & 2 – El horror del terror rojo judío asustó a Europa. Desde los días de Genghis Khan no se han asesinado brutalmente tantos europeos. 3- Yakov Sverdlov era una bestia asesina en masa.


Para el otoño de 1918, está claro que Alemania ya no puede ganar la guerra. Su política ahora es “no perderla tampoco”. Como lo hizo en 1916, el Kaiser se ofrece a negociar la paz en términos favorables a todos. Aunque Alemania no puede ganar, los Aliados tampoco pueden ganar. El frente oriental de Alemania con Rusia está cerrado. No hay tropas aliadas en territorio alemán, la capital. Berlim está a 900 millas de distancia de la fachada, y el ejército alemán es muy capaz de defender a la patria de cualquier invasión. Pero el frente de la casa se está derrumbando. Los políticos traidores, los líderes sindicales marxistas y los magnates de los medios sionistas se combinan para desmoralizar al pueblo y desestabilizar a Alemania. El Kaiser se ve obligado a dimitir, exiliando a Holanda. El 11 de noviembre de 18, los marxistas y liberales de la recién formada “República de Weimer” (formada en la ciudad de Weimar) se acuestan y se lanzan hacia los Aliados! Increíblemente, en un momento en que los Aliados no tienen un solo soldado en suelo alemán, los traidores de Weimar ordenan a los militares que depongan las armas y se retiren del frente. Basados ​​en las vacías promesas de Wilson de “paz sin victoria”, los ‘Criminales de Noviembre’ colocan a Alemania en la misericordia total del Nuevo Orden Mundial.

1- La trampa del armisticio fue firmada en un vagón en Compiegne, Francia. 2- La historieta alemana patriótica representa a los políticos que apuñalan a tropas alemanas en la parte posterior. 3- Los judíos se apoderan de Berlín ese mismo día

11 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 1918 COMO COMUNISTAS JUDÍOS CAPTURA BERLÍN / KAISER FLEES A HOLANDA En 1915, los rojos judíos Rosa Luxemburg y Karl Liebknecht fundaron la “Liga Spartacus” (nombrada en honor al nombre en código de “Spartacus” del fundador de NWO / Illuminati, Adam Weishaupt). En 1919, el grupo se convierte en el Partido Comunista de Alemania. Ese mismo mes, los espartaquistas, ayudados por el judío-húngaro Red Bela Kun, aprovechan el caos de la posguerra, y realizan un golpe en Berlín. Kaiser Wilhelm, temiendo el mismo destino que el zar Nicolás, huye a Holanda. Ahora lamenta su liberalismo pasado y denuncia la “influencia judía” que arruinó a Alemania. La toma de poder comunista de Berlín es de corta duración como veteranos conocidos como el control de recuperación de los “Freikorps” de los rojos judíos y sus seguidores. Luxemburgo y Liebknecht son capturados y ejecutados. Los “Freikorps” han salvado a Alemania del mismo destino mortal que le ha sucedido a Rusia, pero la nueva Alemania “socialista democrática” pronto se enfrentará a otros problemas graves. Al igual que los rojos de Rusia, los rojos de Rusia dejaron de lado al socialista Kerensky, los rojos de Alemania seguirán tratando de obtener el poder absoluto de los “socialistas democráticos” de Weimar.

Los Freikorps alemanes salvaron a Alemania del baño de sangre comunista de estilo soviético que los judíos Reds Luxemburg y Liebknecht estaban planeando.


Como artista hambriento de 25 años de edad, Adolfo Hitler se había ofrecido a luchar por Austria en 1914. En ese momento, sus dos padres habían fallecido. Afligido por la tuberculosis durante la juventud, Hitler fue rechazado por el servicio militar. Hitler entonces pidió a las autoridades bávaras que le permitieran luchar por Alemania. Él sirvió con gran distinción, y fue ascendido a Lance Corporal después de haber sido galardonado con la Cruz de hierro alemana 2 ª Clase por valentía. En octubre de 16, fue herido gravemente y pasó dos meses en un hospital militar. Podría haberse quedado en casa, pero optó por volver a las líneas de frente. En agosto de 18, Hitler recibe la prestigiosa Cruz de Hierro de 1ra Clase. En octubre de 1918, es cegado por un ataque de gas venenoso británico. Mientras recupera la vista, Hitler escucha la vergonzosa capitulación de Alemania. Está confundido e indignado. El sacrificio y el sufrimiento de los soldados alemanes habían sido para nada. El valiente pintor desconocido de Viena quiere respuestas, y no descansará hasta que los ‘Criminales de Noviembre’ (su término) queden expuestos y el honor de Alemania restablecido.

Hitler, sentado a la izquierda, era un soldado heroico y altamente condecorado.


La Conferencia de Paz de París es la reunión de los vencedores aliados para aplastar financieramente a Alemania y determinar las nuevas fronteras de las naciones derrotadas. Los Globalistas elaboran una serie de tratados (Tratados de Paz de París) que remodelan Europa y el mundo. En su centro están los líderes de las tres ‘Grandes Potencias’: Woodrow Wilson (Estados Unidos), los Primeros Ministros David Lloyd George (EE.UU.) y Georges Clemenceau (Francia). Alemania no está invitada y no tendrá voz en las decisiones finales. Los Globalistas desmantelarán las naciones existentes y crearán otras nuevas. Austria-Hungría y Turquía están talladas; Sus pueblos dispares reasignados a nuevos estados. La Conferencia también crea el marco para un futuro Gobierno Mundial, la Sociedad de Naciones. Una delegación sionista también está presente. Habían traído a Estados Unidos a la guerra, y ahora es el momento de cobrar el pago por los servicios prestados (Declaración de Balfour). Los antiguos territorios árabes del Imperio Otomano están separados del dominio turco y divididos en pequeños estados. Palestina se convertirá en un protectorado británico. Ver: Mandato británico La declaración sionista establece la demanda del judío a un pedazo de Palestina, garantizado por la Liga de las Naciones y exactamente como Herzl había predicho en 1897! Los judíos de todo el mundo pueden ahora emigrar a la Palestina británica, pero en números controlados. Los árabes de Palestina (una mayoría del 95%) no fueron consultados sobre este acuerdo, y están enojados.

Clemenceau, Wilson, y George frente a los gangsters Globalista en París.


De la Conferencia de Paz de París se produce el bárbaro e infame “Tratado de Versalles”. La crueldad del Tratado es hoy reconocida incluso por los historiadores liberales. Con Alemania desarmada por su nuevo gobierno, los Globalistas y Sionistas proceden a violar a la nación alemana; Una nación que no quería la guerra, había tratado de evitar la guerra, y había ofrecido hacer la paz en numerosas ocasiones después de que la guerra había comenzado. El Tratado contiene 440 cláusulas, 414 de las cuales se dedican a castigar a Alemania por una guerra que se le impuso. Entre las disposiciones clave que una Alemania desarmada y Austria (Tratado de St. Germaine) se ven obligados a aceptar a punta de pistola y mientras están bajo un bloqueo de hambre son:

1. Alemania debe aceptar el 100% de responsabilidad por la guerra.

2. Fuerzas armadas alemanas restringidas a 100.000 hombres.

3. La Renania alemana industrial será ocupada por las tropas francesas durante 15 años.

4. Kaiser Wilhelm II (seguro en Holanda) debe ser juzgado por “ofensas contra la moral internacional”.

5. La región alemana de Prusia Occidental se da a la nueva nación de Polonia. ¡Dos millones de prusianos occidentales son expulsados ​​de sus hogares y la prusia oriental queda aislada del resto de Alemania!

6. La región alemana de los Sudetes se somete al régimen de la nueva nación de «Checoslovaquia».

7. Se prohíbe al nuevo estado de Austria unirse con sus hermanos en Alemania.

8. Alemania está despojada de las colonias africanas. Gran Bretaña, Francia y Bélgica los toman.

9. La región de Sarre, rica en carbón, de Alemania, se encuentra bajo el control de la Sociedad de Naciones durante 15 años. Durante este tiempo, su carbón se enviará a Francia.

10. La ciudad portuaria de Dantzig, del Mar Báltico, está separada de Alemania y declarada “ciudad libre”.

11. Alemania se ve obligada a pagar grandes reparaciones de guerra en forma de dinero y recursos naturales. El aplastante pago de la deuda (equivalente a 1 billón de dólares en moneda moderna) devastará la economía alemana y pronto causará un colapso monetario hiperinflacionario. Defenseless Alemania se mantiene bajo el bloqueo del hambre hasta que ella acepta los duros términos. Alrededor de 100.000 alemanes mueren como resultado del bloqueo alimentario posterior al armisticio. El injusto e inhumano tratado de Versalles generará resentimiento y enojo durante el año venidero.

1- La Prusia Occidental se da al nuevo estado de Polonia. Prusia del Este es cortada del resto de Alemania! 2- Los Sudetes alemanes se asignan al nuevo estado de Checoslovaquia




Estas banderas falsas fueron utilizadas para comenzar una guerra


Apenas en caso de que un libro de texto de la historia tuviera algunas páginas adicionales rasgadas hacia fuera, éste puede ser un buen rato de recordar apenas cómo lejos el gobierno de uno está dispuesto a ir para comenzar una guerra bajo pretextos falsos. A continuación se muestra una lista parcial de algunos de los eventos documentados “falsa bandera” que fueron destinados y / o sirvió para iniciar una guerra en la historia reciente y no tan reciente.

download (2)

Guerra Franco-Prusiana

Otto von Bismarck agitó una “bandera roja” delante del “toro gálico” reeditando un telegrama del rey prusiano de modo que parecía como si el rey hubiera insultado a un embajador francés durante un tiempo de extrema tensión internacional franco-alemana relaciones. El telegrama se conoce como Ems Dispatch. Ayudó a alentar a los estados a ir a la guerra.

download (3)

Guerra Russo-Sueca

En 1788, un sastre de la Real Ópera Sueca recibió una orden para coser un número de uniformes militares rusos que más tarde fueron utilizados en un intercambio de disparos en Puumala, un puesto avanzado sueco en la frontera russo-sueca, el 27 de junio de 1788. El ataque en escena, que causó un escándalo en Estocolmo, fue para convencer al Riksdag de los Estados y proporcionar al rey sueco Gustav III una excusa para declarar una guerra “defensiva” contra Rusia. Esto era importante ya que el rey no tenía derecho constitucional a iniciar una guerra ofensiva sin el acuerdo de los estados que ya habían dejado claro que su aceptación no estaría disponible.

download (4)

Guerra hispanoamericana, es decir, el hundimiento del USS Maine

El hundimiento del USS Maine el 15 de febrero de 1898 en el puerto de La Habana fue pensado inicialmente para ser causado por una mina externa explotó debajo de la nave. Esta creencia despertó el sentimiento anti-español en los Estados Unidos y ayudó a catalizar la guerra hispanoamericana más tarde ese mismo año. En 1911 se realizó un extenso estudio sobre el naufragio, y nuevamente se creyó que una mina externa era la causa. En 1976, un equipo de expertos en explosivos navales examinó las pruebas anteriores y concluyó que la causa más probable del hundimiento era una explosión interna causada por combustión espontánea de carbón almacenado en un búnker junto a una revista que contenía más de 5 toneladas cortas T) de cargas de polvo para las pistolas. A pesar de este análisis, algunos observadores creen que la explosión fue causada por un agente estadounidense con el propósito de enojar a la población estadounidense e iniciar la guerra que siguió. Eliades Acosta, político cubano y ex director de la biblioteca nacional, afirma que “los poderosos intereses económicos” en los Estados Unidos probablemente fueron responsables no sólo del hundimiento del Maine, sino del asesinato de tres presidentes norteamericanos del siglo XIX, comenzando por Abraham Lincoln. El incidente de Mukden en septiembre de 1931 implicó a oficiales japoneses que fabricaban un pretexto para anexionar Manchuria explotando una sección de ferrocarril. De hecho, la explosión fue tan débil que la línea no se vio afectada. Seis años más tarde, en 1937, reclamaron falsamente el secuestro de uno de sus soldados en el incidente del puente Marco Polo como excusa para invadir China propiamente dicha.

download (5)

Fuego del Reichstag

El fuego del Reichstag fue un incendio provocado en el edificio del Reichstag, en Berlín, el 27 de febrero de 1933. El incendio comenzó en la Sala de Sesiones y, cuando llegaron policías y bomberos, la principal Cámara de Diputados fue envuelta en llamas. La policía registró el edificio y encontró a Marinus van der Lubbe, un joven concejal holandés, albañil comunista y desempleado que había llegado recientemente a Alemania, aparentemente para llevar a cabo actividades políticas. El fuego fue utilizado como evidencia por los nazis que los comunistas estaban comenzando una trama contra el gobierno alemán. Van der Lubbe y cuatro dirigentes comunistas fueron posteriormente detenidos. El 30 de enero, Adolf Hitler, juramentado como canciller de Alemania cuatro semanas antes, instó al presidente Paul von Hindenburg a aprobar un decreto de emergencia para contrarrestar la “despiadada confrontación del Partido Comunista de Alemania”. Con las libertades civiles suspendidas, el gobierno instituyó detenciones masivas de comunistas, incluyendo a todos los delegados parlamentarios comunistas. Con su amargo rival comunistas desaparecidos y sus asientos vacíos, el Partido Nacional Socialista de los Trabajadores Alemanes pasó de ser un partido de pluralidad a la mayoría; Las elecciones posteriores confirmaron esta posición y así permitieron a Hitler consolidar su poder. Los historiadores discrepan sobre si Van der Lubbe actuó solo, como él dijo, para protestar contra la condición de la clase obrera alemana, o si el incendio fue planeado y ordenado por los nazis, entonces dominante en el propio gobierno, como una operación de bandera falsa. La responsabilidad por el fuego del Reichstag sigue siendo un tema de debate e investigación.

download (6)

El incidente de Gleiwitz

El incidente de Gleiwitz en 1939 implicó a Reinhard Heydrich que fabricaba evidencia de un ataque polaco contra Alemania para movilizar a la opinión pública alemana para la guerra, para establecer el casus belli, y para justificar la guerra con Polonia. Alfred Naujocks fue un organizador clave de la operación bajo órdenes de Heydrich. Esto condujo a la muerte de inocentes víctimas del campo de concentración nazi que fueron vestidos como soldados alemanes y luego fusilados por la Gestapo para hacer parecer que habían sido disparados por soldados polacos. Esto, junto con otras operaciones de bandera falsa en la Operación Himmler, se utilizaría para movilizar el apoyo de la población alemana para el inicio de la Segunda Guerra Mundial en Europa.

download (7)

Guerra de invierno

En 1939 el ejército rojo bombardeó Mainila, una ciudad rusa cerca de la frontera finlandesa. Las autoridades soviéticas culparon a Finlandia del ataque y utilizaron el incidente como pretexto para iniciar la Guerra de Invierno cuatro días después.

download (8)

Ataque de Kassa

El ataque de Kassa en 1941 involucró a la ciudad de Kassa, hoy Košice (Eslovaquia), que entonces era parte de Hungría, siendo bombardeada por tres planos no identificados de origen aparentemente soviético. Este ataque se convirtió en el pretexto para que el gobierno de Hungría declarara la guerra a la Unión Soviética.

download (9)

Operación Ajax

La sustitución de la Compañía de Petróleo Anglo-Persa de Irán por cinco compañías petroleras estadounidenses y el golpe de Estado iraní de 1953 fue consecuencia de la Operación Ajax, operada por los Estados Unidos y la orquesta británica. La operación Ajax usó intriga política, propaganda y acuerdos con líderes tribales Qashqai para deponer al líder democráticamente electo de Irán, Mohammed Mosaddeq. La información sobre el golpe de estado patrocinado por la CIA ha sido desclasificada en gran medida y está disponible en los archivos de la CIA.

download (10)

Operación Northwoods

La planeada, pero nunca ejecutada, operación de 1962 por Northwoods del Departamento de Defensa de Estados Unidos para una guerra con Cuba involucró escenarios tales como fabricar el secuestro o derribar aviones de pasajeros y militares, hundir un barco estadounidense en las cercanías de Cuba, , El hundimiento de un barco lleno de refugiados cubanos, los ataques de presuntos infiltrados cubanos dentro de los Estados Unidos y el hostigamiento de los aviones y el transporte de Estados Unidos y la destrucción de los aviones aéreos por aviones disfrazados de MiG cubanos. Estas acciones serían imputadas a Cuba y serían un pretexto para la invasión de Cuba y el derrocamiento del gobierno comunista de Fidel Castro. Fue escrito por el Estado Mayor Conjunto, pero luego rechazado por el presidente John F. Kennedy. El sorprendente descubrimiento de los documentos relacionados con la Operación Northwoods fue el resultado de la búsqueda exhaustiva de registros relacionados con el asesinato del presidente John F. Kennedy por la Junta de Revisión de los Documentos de Asesinato a mediados de los años noventa. La información sobre la operación Northwoods fue publicada más adelante por James Bamford.

download (11)

Golfo de Tonkin incidente

El incidente del golfo de Tonkin (o el incidente de USS Maddox) es el nombre dado a dos confrontaciones separadas que implican Vietnam del norte y los Estados Unidos en las aguas del golfo de Tonkin. El primer acontecimiento ocurrió el 2 de agosto de 1964, entre el destructor USS Maddox y tres barcos torpederos de la marina del norte vietnamita del 135o escuadrón del torpedo. El segundo fue reivindicado originalmente por la Agencia de Seguridad Nacional de los Estados Unidos como ocurrido el 4 de agosto de 1964, como otra batalla naval, pero en su lugar podría haber involucrado “Tonkin Ghosts” (falsos radares) y no los ataques de los torpederos reales de NVN. El resultado de estos dos incidentes fue el pasaje por el Congreso de la Resolución del Golfo de Tonkín, que otorgó al Presidente Lyndon B. Johnson la autoridad para ayudar a cualquier país del sudeste asiático cuyo gobierno se considerara comprometido por la “agresión comunista”. La justificación legal de Johnson para el despliegue de las fuerzas convencionales estadounidenses y el comienzo de una guerra abierta contra Vietnam del Norte. En 2005, se desclasificó un estudio histórico interno de la Agencia de Seguridad Nacional; Concluyó que el Maddox había contratado a la marina vietnamita del norte el 2 de agosto, pero que no había buques navales del norte vietnamita presentes durante el incidente del 4 de agosto. El incidente del Golfo de Tonkin se ha acusado de ser una operación falsa de la bandera, El juicio sigue en disputa.


These False Flags Were Used To Start A War



Just in case one’s history textbook had a few extra pages ripped out, this may be a good time to recall just how far one’s government is willing to go to start a war under false pretenses.

Below is a partial list of some of the documented “false flag” events that were intended and/or served to start a war in recent and not so recent history.

download (2)

Franco-Prussian War

Otto von Bismarck waved a “red flag” in front of the “gallic bull” by re-editing a telegram from the Prussian King so that it appeared as though the King had insulted a French ambassador during a time of extremely tense French-German international relations. The telegram is known as the Ems Dispatch. It helped encourage the states to go to war.

download (3)

Russo-Swedish War

In 1788, a head tailor of the Royal Swedish Opera received an order to sew a number of Russian military uniforms that later were used in an exchange of gunfire at Puumala, a Swedish outpost on the Russo-Swedish border, on June 27, 1788. The staged attack, which caused an outrage in Stockholm, was to convince the Riksdag of the Estates and to provide the Swedish king Gustav III with an excuse to declare a “defensive” war on Russia. This was important since the king did not have constitutional right to start offensive war without agreement of the estates who had already made clear that their acceptance would not be forthcoming.

download (4)

Spanish–American War, i.e, the Sinking of the USS Maine

The sinking of the USS Maine on 15 February 1898 in Havana harbor was initially thought to be caused by an external mine exploded under the ship. This belief roused anti-Spanish sentiment in the United States and helped catalyze the Spanish–American War later that same year. In 1911 an extensive study was made of the wreck, and again an external mine was believed to be the cause. In 1976 a team of naval explosive experts re?examined the earlier evidence and concluded that the likeliest cause of the sinking was an internal explosion caused by spontaneous combustion of fuel coal stored in a bunker next to a magazine holding more than 5 short tons (4.5 t) of powder charges for the guns. Despite this analysis, some observers believe that the explosion was caused by a U.S. agent for the purpose of angering the U.S. populace and initiating the war which followed. Cuban politician and former director of the national library Eliades Acosta claims that “powerful economic interests” in the United States were probably responsible not only for the sinking of the Maine but for the assassination of three 19th-century U.S. presidents, beginning with Abraham Lincoln.

The Mukden incident in September 1931 involved Japanese officers fabricating a pretext for annexing Manchuria by blowing up a section of railway. In fact the explosion was so weak that the line was unaffected. Six years later in 1937 they falsely claimed the kidnapping of one of their soldiers in the Marco Polo Bridge Incident as an excuse to invade China proper.

download (5)

Reichstag fire

The Reichstag fire was an arson attack on the Reichstag building in Berlin on 27 February 1933. The fire started in the Session Chamber, and, by the time the police and firemen arrived, the main Chamber of Deputies was engulfed in flames. Police searched the building and found Marinus van der Lubbe, a young, Dutch council communist and unemployed bricklayer who had recently arrived in Germany, ostensibly to carry out political activities.

The fire was used as evidence by the Nazis that the Communists were beginning a plot against the German government. Van der Lubbe and four Communist leaders were subsequently arrested. Adolf Hitler, who was sworn in as Chancellor of Germany four weeks before, on 30 January, urged President Paul von Hindenburg to pass an emergency decree to counter the “ruthless confrontation of the Communist Party of Germany”. With civil liberties suspended, the government instituted mass arrests of Communists, including all of the Communist parliamentary delegates. With their bitter rival Communists gone and their seats empty, the National Socialist German Workers Party went from being a plurality party to the majority; subsequent elections confirmed this position and thus allowed Hitler to consolidate his power.

Historians disagree as to whether Van der Lubbe acted alone, as he said, to protest the condition of the German working class, or whether the arson was planned and ordered by the Nazis, then dominant in the government themselves, as a false flag operation. The responsibility for the Reichstag fire remains an ongoing topic of debate and research.

download (6)

The Gleiwitz Incident

The Gleiwitz incident in 1939 involved Reinhard Heydrich fabricating evidence of a Polish attack against Germany to mobilize German public opinion for war, to establish casus belli, and to justify the war with Poland. Alfred Naujocks was a key organiser of the operation under orders from Heydrich. It led to the deaths of innocent Nazi concentration camp victims who were dressed as German soldiers and then shot by the Gestapo to make it seem that they had been shot by Polish soldiers. This, along with other false flag operations in Operation Himmler, would be used to mobilize support from the German population for the start of World War II in Europe.

download (7)

Winter War

In 1939 the Red Army shelled Mainila, a Russian town near the Finnish border. Soviet authorities blamed Finland for the attack and used the incident as a pretext to start the Winter War four days later.

download (8)


Kassa attack

The Kassa attack in 1941 involved the city of Kassa, today Košice (Slovakia), which was then part of Hungary, being bombed by three unidentified planes of apparently Soviet origin. This attack became the pretext for the government of Hungary to declare war on the Soviet Union.

download (9)

Operation Ajax

The replacement of Iran’s Anglo-Persian Oil Company with five American oil companies and the 1953 Iranian coup d’état was the consequence of the U.S. and British-orchestrated false flag operation, Operation Ajax. Operation Ajax used political intrigue, propaganda, and agreements with Qashqai tribal leaders to depose the democratically elected leader of Iran, Mohammed Mosaddeq. Information regarding the CIA-sponsored coup d’etat has been largely declassified and is available in the CIA archives.

download (10)

Operation Northwoods

The planned, but never executed, 1962 Operation Northwoods plot by the U.S. Department of Defense for a war with Cuba involved scenarios such as fabricating the hijacking or shooting down of passenger and military planes, sinking a U.S. ship in the vicinity of Cuba, burning crops, sinking a boat filled with Cuban refugees, attacks by alleged Cuban infiltrators inside the United States, and harassment of U.S. aircraft and shipping and the destruction of aerial drones by aircraft disguised as Cuban MiGs. These actions would be blamed on Cuba, and would be a pretext for an invasion of Cuba and the overthrow of Fidel Castro’s communist government. It was authored by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy. The surprise discovery of the documents relating to Operation Northwoods was a result of the comprehensive search for records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy by the Assassination Records Review Board in the mid-1990s. Information about Operation Northwoods was later publicized by James Bamford.

download (11)

Gulf of Tonkin incident

The Gulf of Tonkin incident (or the USS Maddox incident) is the name given to two separate confrontations involving North Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. The first event occurred on August 2, 1964, between the destroyer USS Maddox and three North Vietnamese Navy torpedo boats of the 135th Torpedo Squadron. The second was originally claimed by the U.S. National Security Agency to have occurred on August 4, 1964, as another sea battle, but instead may have involved “Tonkin Ghosts” (false radar images) and not actual NVN torpedo boat attacks.

The outcome of these two incidents was the passage by Congress of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by “communist aggression.” The resolution served as Johnson’s legal justification for deploying U.S. conventional forces and the commencement of open warfare against North Vietnam.

In 2005, an internal National Security Agency historical study was declassified; it concluded that the Maddox had engaged the North Vietnamese Navy on August 2, but that there were no North Vietnamese Naval vessels present during the incident of August 4. The Gulf of Tonkin incident has long been accused of being a false flag operation, but this judgment remains in dispute.




Heliocentric theory is wrong

There are four pieces of solid evidence that heliocentric theory is wrong (that I know of). The first one requires a bit of visualization but is very difficult to explain otherwise. Three others are 99.99% certain bordering on the ridiculous. You would literally have to make stuff up to try and counter them (and they have!). So without further ado, let’s begin.
Exhibit A – Where is the constant wind?
Exhibit B – Hovering, flying and falling
Exhibit C – Hardly any stellar parallax
Exhibit D – Scientific experiments

Exhibit A – Where is the constant wind?

The density of the Earth has been calculated at 5,515 kg/m3 (whether accurate or not is unknown). The density of air is 1.204 kg/m3 at room temperature, 4580 times less dense than the Earth.

A denser solid object does not carry a less dense gas along with it when it moves. This is self-evident as it is the basis of aerodynamics as shown in the video below.

dog out window
A moving solid object (100km/h car) leaves a gas (air) behind, creating a 100km/h wind in the perceived opposite direction of the moving car.

When the solid planes are more perpendicular, it will push gas (such as air) away from the solid object, such as a fan. The Earth, although a spinning squashed globe, would push a little air out into space due to its slight undulations but by and large it would be very aerodynamic, as this man spinning a basketball shows.

spinning ball
A very aerodynamic globe.

Heliocentric theory states that the Earth rotates at 1675km/h at the equator, 1049km/h in London, and 231km/h in Alert, northern Canada. This rotation would cause winds of almost equal speeds on the Earth’s surface… constantly.

The fastest wind speed known to man is a F5 Incredible tornado with wind speeds of 420-511 km/h. The tornado in Oklamohma in 1999 which killed 38 people and destroyed 8000 homes traveled at 486km/h; the devastation of which we can see below.

Tornado- Oklahoma
If 486km/h winds did this, what would 1675km/h do?

There is nowhere on Earth that has a constant wind speed of between 1675km/h and 231km/h. If there were, nobody living below Greenland could venture outside. We would be all living underground in caves.

Sometimes there are days of no wind, sometimes a mild breeze. The wind travels in all kinds of directions, sometimes changing by the second. Clouds move with the wind and can travel in any direction, but mostly go from West to East. This contradicts heliocentric theory as the Earth is supposed to rotate West to East, which would create winds going in the opposite direction East to West. Oops!

Another piece of self-evident incredulity. There’s more.

Exhibit B – Hovering, flying and falling

Even more obvious is the fact that the Earth does not rotate under hovering objects. A helicopter which hovers above the ground at ANY height from 1 meter all the way to its upper limit of around 8000 meters NEVER experiences the ground traveling 231km/h to 1675km/h West to East, or in any direction in fact.

Nope, the Earth is not moving.
Still not moving. Who’d a thunk it.

The same applies to those machines which traverse the sky, such as airplanes. The only differential between a one-way and return flight is changes in wind speed and direction.


the rotation of the Earth has no effect on the travel time of an aircraft… it is the headwinds and tailwinds that cause the change in travel times… a mere 65 mph wind is more than enough to cause a difference in travel time of five hours when you are traveling long distances!


Let’s check a flight along the equator just to be sure. Maldives to Singapore and back fits the bill. Singapore Airlines has two flights come up. Maldives to Singapore (West to East) takes 4 hours 45 minutes for both flights and Singapore to Maldives (East to West) takes 4 hours 30 minutes and 4 hours 25 minutes respectively.

The Earth is supposed to rotate at 1675km/h West to East at these locations which are 3388km apart. A Boeing 777 travels at 885km/h at 10,675m. Do I really need to do the math?

Flying from Singapore to the Maldives would take about an hour (including take off and landing) if the Earth were rotating under the plane. Going the other way, it is worse as the plane can only fly half as fast as a rotating 1675km/h Earth and so you would have to continue flying all the way around the globe East to West just to get back to Singapore. This is an obvious fallacy.

Singapore to Maldives is a one-way trip with a rotating Earth.

So, we have gone from 8000m to 10,675m altitude and still the Earth does not move under our feet. If we go any higher there won’t be many air molecules left to be magically Velcroed to the solid Earth’s surface by a mystical and yet unknown force which there must be for heliocentric theory to exist. But let’s go higher anyway.

As mentioned in my first post on the mysterious disappearing stars at high altitude, amateurs can now send weather balloons up into the stratosphere as high as 36,000m. At these heights only about 1% of the air is left, but these few air molecules must also magically stick to the solid surface of the Earth. All these different densities and all somehow staying with the Earth.

Look at the time these balloons are in the air and the difference in distance between landing and take-off. Here’s the first one: Launched at 13:07:38, hit the ground at 16:04:40, highest altitude 29.78Km, distance from launch 108.4 Km! Launched in Maine, USA would give a rotating Earth speed of 1181km/h (45° latitude). That means the Earth should have moved 3500km under the balloon making it land in the middle of USA, but it did not. (The second example on that website page is even worse!)

Let’s go higher. Felix Baumgartner on his world record free-fall jump reached 38,969m altitude and spent 2 and a half hours ascending, 4:19 minutes falling to the ground, and 7 minutes parachuting the rest of the way down. His distance from launch:


So, the 1% of surface air density and all the other air densities on the way to the ground and Felix himself being obviously heavier than air all moved with the rotating Earth in tandem, by some magical mystical force unknown to man. At what height would Felix have experienced the Earth rotating below him? 50km? 70km? 100km? The heliocentric advocates will have to make up a magic number. Why not, it is all fantasy after all.

Let’s continue.

Exhibit C – Hardly any stellar parallax

The stars revolve 360° in 24 hours in an anti-clockwise fashion around the north polar star in the northern hemisphere, and clockwise around the southern star in the southern hemisphere. Photographers take photos with very long shutter speeds to show this effect.

Rotating stars in the sky at night.

This, you may think, is a good case for a rotating Earth; but on it’s own it is also a good case for a geocentric one, as it demonstrates that either the Earth is moving or the heavens.

However, after 6 months, those EXACT same stars are at the EXACT same location, as can be seen with the naked eye, at which they had been 6 months previously. The annual change in the position of stars in the sky is called stellar parallax. You can demonstrate this lack of parallax by following this experiment devised by Samuel Rowbotham of Zetetic Astronomy.


Take two carefully-bored metallic tubes, not less than six feet in length, and place them one yard asunder, on the opposite sides of a wooden frame, or a solid block of wood or stone: so adjust them that their centres or axes of vision shall be perfectly parallel to each other. Now, direct them to the plane of some notable fixed star, a few seconds previous to its meridian time. Let an observer be stationed at each tube and the moment the star appears in the first tube let a loud knock or other signal be given, to be repeated by the observer at the second tube when he first sees the same star. A distinct period of time will elapse between the signals given. The signals will follow each other in very rapid succession, but still, the time between is sufficient to show that the same star is not visible at the same moment by two parallel lines of sight when only one yard asunder. A slight inclination of the second tube towards the first tube would be required for the star to be seen through both tubes at the same instant. Let the tubes remain in their position for six months; at the end of which time the same observation or experiment will produce the same results–the star will be visible at the same meridian time, without the slightest alteration being required in the direction of the tubes: from which it is concluded that if the Earth had moved one single yard in an orbit through space, there would at least be observed the slight inclination of the tube which the difference in position of one yard had previously required. But as no such difference in the direction of the tube is required, the conclusion is unavoidable, that in six months a given meridian upon the Earth’s surface does not move a single yard, and therefore, that the Earth has not the slightest degree of orbital motion.


Traditionally, stellar parallax has been notoriously difficult to measure with even the best of modern equipment.

The angles involved in these calculations are very small and thus difficult to measure. The nearest star to the Sun (and thus the star with the largest parallax), Proxima Centauri, has a parallax of 0.7687 ± 0.0003 arcsec.


There are 3,600 arcseconds in 1 degree, 180 of which cover the sky at night. No wonder we can’t see any movement with the naked eye. Even so, movement for only a tiny fraction of the stars can be measured at all even by modern equipment!

In 1989, the satellite Hipparcos was launched primarily for obtaining parallaxes and proper motions of nearby stars, increasing the reach of the method tenfold. Even so, Hipparcos is only able to measure parallax angles for stars up to about 1,600 light-years away, a little more than one percent of the diameter of the Milky Way Galaxy. The European Space Agency’s Gaia mission, due to launch in 2013, will be able to measure parallax angles to an accuracy of 10 microarcseconds, thus mapping nearby stars (and potentially planets) up to a distance of tens of thousands of light-years from Earth.

There are an estimated 100 to 200 billion galaxies in the universe (which is bunk, as there are no galaxies) each with up to 100 trillion stars! So being able to detect movement in 1% of the stars of our own galaxy is a miniscule amount. We also know about our space agencies’ weird and wonderful orbiting machines, so even this 1% is unlikely to be true.

This is a big problem for heliocentric theory which states that every 24 hours the Earth rotates on its axis at 1675km/h, revolving around the Sun at 107,000km/h, which in turn moves around the center of the galaxy at 900,000km/h, which moves in the universe at 2,160,000km/h!

Apart from the atmosphere disappearing at these speeds, how is there no stellar parallax, especially considering that all the other stars and galaxies are revolving around each other and the Earth as well. The sky must be a right mess! Each new day must bring a brand new unique constellation in the sky at night with some new stars getting nearer so they can be seen with the naked eye and some traveling further away and disappearing never to return for thousands or millions of years.

Before we move on, this lack of stellar parallax is the reason why advocates of heliocentric theory give the unbelievably enormous distances the heavenly bodies must be from Earth. They can’t measure it! The stars must be thousands and millions of light years away (with the Milky Way 100,000 light years across, 1 light year being 9.46 trillion kilometers!) because there is no (or little) detectable stellar parallax; otherwise heliocentric theory would be definitely wrong.


It is clear from Euclid’s geometry that the effect would be undetectable if the stars were far enough away, but for various reasons such gigantic distances involved seemed entirely implausible: it was one of Tycho Brahe’s principal objections to Copernican heliocentrism that in order for it to be compatible with the lack of observable stellar parallax, there would have to be an enormous and unlikely void between the orbit of Saturn and the eighth sphere (the fixed stars).


Not only is there no evidence for such astronomical distances, but we have now proven that the stars are approximately 4000 miles away!

Does making stuff up to support a theory lacking any observational or experimental evidence sound like science to you?

Speaking of which…

Exhibit D – Scientific experiments

How do we know it is not the heavens or “space” which moves above us, instead of the Earth, which causes both the rotation of the stars and any of their hard-to-detect parallax. We now know it is the former, thanks to an experiment in 1871 by Astronomer Royal, George Airy; which is this:

If stellar parallax is too small to see with the naked eye, then why not artificially increase it. If the Earth rotates at the same speed constantly, then by slowing the light down (by filling the telescope with water), the angle of star movement would increase. If stellar parallax increased then the telescope would have to be tilted more to see the same star and prove a rotating Earth once and for all.

And guess what? As confirmed by others, the most careful measurements gave the same angle for a telescope with water as for one filled with air. This is called “Airy’s failure”. It proved the rotation of the heavens, not Earth, which moves stars.

The angle stayed the same, proving that the Earth does not rotate.

The heliocentric advocates were now desperate. What was needed was another observable experiment to still offer the possibility of a rotating Earth. Enter Foucault’s pendulum in 1885. This pendulum swings back and forth, each swing moving slightly to the right in the northern hemisphere and to the left in the southern hemisphere until, at the poles, one full circle is achieved in 24 hours. It doesn’t move left or right at all at the equator.

Foucault Pendulum in California
Not to scale, but illustrating the movement.

As you have noticed, this is the same phenomenon as the stars rotating every 24 hours around the polar star, which was proved not to be caused by a rotating Earth thanks to George Airy. Unfortunately for the heliocentric supporters, Foucault’s pendulum also had a problem. In 1954 and 1959, Maurice Allais noticed that during a solar eclipse, which lasted 2 and a half hours, the angle of the pendulum changed dramatically by 13.5°. This has been repeatedly observed with positive results on most of the subsequent eclipses, which obviously means that the pendulum isn’t registering the Earth’s rotation, but the motion of something else instead.

With Airy’s failure proving that the Earth does not rotate, the heliocentric theorists needed to quickly show with no further doubt that the Earth rotated. Enter two staunch supporters of heliocentricity, Albert Michelson and Edward Morley, who in 1887 set up a device which split up light: one beam in the direction of the Earth’s rotation, and one at right angles. The two light beams then recombined and hit a photographic plate. The difference is speed of the two beams would create an interference pattern. They expected to measure a speed of 30 km/s as that was the speed of the Earth’s supposed rotation, but instead registered a variable difference of between 1 and 10 km/s each time the experiment was repeated. They called this a “null” result. This proves that the Earth is not rotating and at the same time proved the existence of the ether.

M-M experiment
Gosh, the traveling light wasn’t rotating with the Earth. Who’d a thunk it?

It didn’t stop there, Georges Sagnac, and Henry Gale conducted similar experiments, but on a rotating platform, which again demonstrated the existence of the ether, already proved by default in 1871 and 1885 by combining the results from George Airy and Foucault’s pendulum, and also in 1887 by the Michelson-Morley experiment.

How do you think the advocates of heliocentric theory responded? Why, they made something up of course! What else could they do but invent another wild theory to play down these experimental results and lead us further into the cesspit of fallacy. Enter showbiz academic of the 20th century, Einstein and the special theory of relativity.

Enter the clowns.

Special relativity was invented to make sure all these experiments still gave heliocentric theory a chance of being correct. It needed objects to shrink to a specific size in direct proportion to its speed. These objects weren’t measured! The concept had never been observed at all. It was metaphysical only. But it had to be correct, otherwise the unthinkable would be true.

The rescue operation was performed by means of a purely metaphysical concept lifted directly from Professors Fitzgerald and Lorentz, who had also been trying to explain the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment, and renamed by him the Special Theory of Relativity. What was suggested was that if the dimensions of an object in motion were assumed to shrink exactly in proportion to the speed at which it was traveling by exactly the necessary amount, mathematical calculations could be made to show that the Earth was in motion after all. No one has ever seen an object shrink as a result of being in motion, and indeed one of the world’s leading authorities on relativity, Dr. Herbert Dingle, was later to dismiss the theory of relativity as metaphysical nonsense with no basis on what could be observed.


Making up a new branch of mathematics to explain the results of experiments that disagrees with your worldview does not a proof make! As a J.J. Thomson once said:


We have Einstein’s space, de Sitter’s space, expanding universes, contracting universes, vibrating universes, mysterious universes. In fact the pure mathematician may create universes just by writing down an equation, and indeed if he is an individualist he can have a universe of his own.


However, when you make stuff up not based on anything in the real world, it is bound to run into trouble.


Ironically, when Special Relativity failed due to its internal contradictions, Einstein had to invent General Relativity to shore up the façade, and in the process he had to take back the very two foundations he had discarded in Special Relativity, namely, (a) that nothing can exceed the speed of light and (b) the existence of ether. In the end, Einstein’s theories were a mass of contradictions which are covered over by obtuse mathematical equations.


Despite this nonsense, the heliocentric “authorities” pushed it through with all their media power and academic might so that once this new mathematics was firmly established, they had carte blanche to sneak in other bad “science” when experimental observations went against them, like black holes, dark matter, wormholes and other such unobservable and unverifiable nonsense. The worst offence though was trying to tie in the Coriolis effect of a rotating Earth with observable atmospheric phenomena. The Coriolis effect is an optical illusion whereby an object traveling in a straight line is seen to be moving in a curved one instead because the observer is on a rotating platform.

The Coriolis optical illusion. You are the red dot. Below is what you observe. Above is what actually happens.
This is the complete pattern and scale of ANY Coriolis effect on the Earth. If something in the real world doesn’t match this, it can NOT be the Coriolis effect!

They say it is this effect which causes moving objects to be deflected in a clockwise direction in the northern hemisphere and anti-clockwise in the southern hemisphere; an example of which are large cyclones. This is obviously false. The Coriolis effect is NOT a force, it is an optical illusion. It cannot cause objects to be deflected; their trajectories remain the same, which is straight. Cyclones do not “travel in straight lines, but just appear to be curved because we are on the surface of a rotating sphere”. Their size ranges from under 222km to over 888km making their curves far too tight and localized. Plus there are very high altitude images looking down on cyclones from above. Is the camera rotating with the Earth to get this curved perspective?

cyclone from above
Is the camera rotating with the Earth? How can a cyclone twisting on itself be a straight line? Is this image even real?
cyclone - Australia
A tropical cyclone in Australia twisting down to Earth is not a straight line.

And what about smaller vortex phenomena like Tornadoes which average only 150m across. Where is the Coriolis effect now?

A 150m wide tornado is really a straight line!

If you wish to study further the fallacy of linking the Coriolis effect with atmospheric phenomena then Miles Mathis‘ work is a must. Otherwise, those inclined to understand cyclones and tornadoes would do well to study the relationship between gravity and electromagnetism, and vortex dynamics instead, as even physicists admit that the Coriolis “effect” and electromagnetism is eerily similar. (What a surprise!)


So far we have proved that:

  • The Earth does not tilt.
  • The Earth does not rotate.
  • The Sun moves, not the Earth.
  • The heavens move, not the Earth, which means that:
  • “Space” or the ether moves and not the Earth.
  • “Space” moves in a circular motion (and is probably a vortex).