You’re Being Lied To About Hiroshima (And Much More..)

download (3)

Japan marked the 71st anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima by renewing calls for a nuclear weapons free world and urging leaders to follow the example of President Barack Obama and visit the bomb sites.  –Washington Post

It is the anniversary of dropping an atom bomb on Hiroshima. But the Hiroshima narrative is a lie.

We’ve reported at considerable length about how the whatever was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn’t have the kind of immediate destructive impact that is portrayed.

Crawford Sams who ran the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission in Japan had this to say about the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Transcript HERE.) :

When the bomb went off, about 2 thousand people out of 250 thousand got killed [in Hiroshima] – by blast, by thermal radiation, or by intense x-ray, gamma radiation … You see, it wasn’t “Bing” like the publicity here [said]: a bomb went off and a city disappeared. No such thing happened. That was the propaganda for deterrent …

 

When I came back to this country, I was appalled, from a military standpoint, to find that our major planners in the War Department were using their own propaganda, 100 thousand deaths, Bing! …

 

You don’t hear much about the effects of Nagasaki because actually it was pretty ineffective. That was a narrow corridor from the hospital … down to the port, and the effects were very limited as far as the fire spread and all that stuff. So you don’t hear much about Nagasaki.

We’ve reported that a squadron of 66 bombers were launched on August 6th (666) to bomb the municipality of Imabari, even though Imabari. had been bombed already, twice.

This bombing squadron may well have fire-bombed Hiroshima instead, as Hiroshima was not far away.  HERE is a video on the squadron and also a narrative from a book by Edwin Hoyt entitled Inferno, the Firebombing of Japan.

Here is some narrative from a PERTINENT PAGE in the actual book.

“Suddenly,  one day, I was told something unexpected,” Manabe said. “When I was looking at the train timetable, I found that no trains stopped at Imabari station … I wondered why the third largest city in the province had no train service. It  sounded ridiculous…

 

The other guy said, “Wow! No Imabari Station. But … all the trains pass by Imabari Station.”

 

A third guy stepped up … “It’s not strange at all. There’s no stop because there’s no Imabari City anymore. It got burned up last April in the air raid … No buildings, no houses, no people … The whole city burned up and the people ran away …”

 

A fellow soldier explained to Manabe. “The air raids came on the 26th of April and the 8th of May. Imabari was burned up. My father was in business there. We had a wholesale draper business. All gone. All burned up.”

The attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were horrible and tragic. But whether they were results of “atom” bombs (certainly in the sense that people understand them today) is at least seriously questionable.

More from the Post:

Quoting part of Obama’s speech in Hiroshima in May, Mayor Kazumi Matsui urged countries with nuclear weapons to “have the courage to escape the logic of fear, and pursue a world without them …

 

“I once again urge the leaders of all nations to visit the A-bombed cities.”  Like Obama’s, he said that such visits “will surely etch the reality of the atomic bombings in each heart.”

Visiting Hiroshima and Nagasaki won’t etch anything into your heart but lies.

And the sickening falsehoods allow politicians a faux rhetorical nobility that they don’t deserve.

Whatever happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki is nothing like what is being recited today.

Bikini Atoll, where additional atomic bombs were tested following the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks, was repopulated by 1968, even though radiation estimates suggested the island would be uninhabitable for a thousand years.

The actual bomb blasts seem to have been faked. Two years ago, the controversial but prolific investigator Miles Mathis – an artist and mathematician – published a debunking HERE entitled, The Bikini Atoll Nuclear Tests were Faked.”

…For more proof, we can go to Google. You can get a picture of the Bikini Atoll today from Google Earth. That’s dated 2013, not 1945. We are told the locals can’t live there now because of radioactivity, but we see at least three proofs against that.

 

…We see lots of plant life both on and offshore. Radioactivity affects plants just as it .affects animals, so the island should be barren.

 

Remember, the Bikini Atoll wasn’t said to be blasted by only Able and Baker. It was blasted 23 times, including three of the biggest blasts ever from US testing: the 4.5 megaton Navajo and the 5 megaton Tewa, in 1956; and the 15 megaton Bravo in 1954.

Why would Bikini Island tests have been faked if the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were real?

Did the US suddenly run out of bombs?

And what about Russia? How did the USSR make nuclear bombs while the Pentagon was faking theirs?

Mathis writes some photographs of USSR nuclear explosions appear fake.

When did the USSR get the “bomb?” And even more importantly, when did the US finally create the weapons of mass destruction that so frighten us today?

When did the Cold War really start? Did both sides know that nuclear weapons were not as powerful as advertised? Or maybe that they didn’t exist at all as described?

Hiroshima and Nagasaki themselves are thriving small cities and there is no appreciable difference in radiation between these two municipalities and other cities in Japan.

Additional issues (See sources at the end of this article.):

  • Death rates at Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not higher than elsewhere.
  • Three days after the Hiroshima bombing, a trolley was running again.
  • The bank at “ground zero” remains standing to this day.
  • Eight Jesuits hiding in their church survived the blast at ground zero to tell the tale – spared only by the intervention of the Virgin Mary.
  • Outside of the Jesuits, and one communist reporter who hated the US, there was no significant reporting from either Hiroshima or Nagasaki for at least a month.
  • For years in both Japan and the US, it was a crime punishable by death to speak or write about the bombings.
  • The entire atom bomb narrative created by the Pentagon was delivered to the public via a single writer from the New York Times who later turned out to be on the Pentagon payroll.

The narrative of the bombings was surely shaped just as the Pentagon and its controllers wished for it to be. It was acquiesced to by the Japanese government that had its own reasons for promoting nuclear untruths.

Whatever happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki has not been accurately reported. In fact, it is probably not too strong to say that what has been reported may constitute (in aggregate) one of the most profound lies of the 20th century.

It calls into question further “truths” about Western society that we live with to this day.

Nuclear weapons are a perfect propaganda for the state.

-Their tests cannot be ascertained at close range because they are too powerful.

 

-Their inner workings cannot be disseminated because they are “top secret.”

 

-Their programmatic elements cannot be observed by the normal media because too much information available to the public can stimulate adversarial or even terrorist activity.

Modern Western society is a virtual tissue of lies designed to make you believe you are living in a “civil society” (no, it’s not civil) faced by life-threatening challenges that only Western governments and the shadowy powers behind them can overcome.

The world is not running out of food, nor water. It’s not going to burn to a cinder because the air is clogged with “carbon.”

The economic disasters we face are purely man-made. Absent monopoly central banking, they would not exist.

Now we are facing “radical Islam” – another false narrative put in place by the same banking elite that has tortured the West for centuries.

This follows on the heels of numerous, serial US wars and the obscene, manufactured Hell of World Wars One and Two.

Thank goodness for the Internet and what we have called the Internet Reformation.

Thanks to information that has emerged from secret recesses (and the patterns they portray), we know more about the Way the World Really Works  than any single group of individuals in recorded history.

Conclusion: It has been a great privilege to live in these unusual times. However, please take note: The reality of the world has revealed a titanic struggle between good and evil. Which side are you on? And just as importantly, what are you going to do about it?

*  *  *

Some Nuclear Anomalies and Sources Pertaining to Questionable Hiroshima and Nagasaki Events

  • The dreaded mushroom cloud presented by the Hiroshima memorial is actually a photo of Hiroshima on fire. HERE.
  • A squadron of 66 bombers was directed to Imabari. in the early morning of August 6 (666) – the morning of the A-bomb – but Imabari. had been bombed already, twice. This bombing squadron might have fire-bombed Hiroshima instead. HERE.
  • Initial reports in Japan were that Hiroshima was firebombed. AP filed the same report. HERE.
  • In the aftermath of the explosion, Hiroshima (and Nagasaki) look no different than Tokyo after it was firebombed. HERE and HERE.
  • In Hiroshima numerous buildings are standing along with erect tree stumps. HERE.
  • Limited trolley service was revived in Hiroshima after only three days. HERE.
  • The Hiroshima bank at the epicenter of the bomb is fully functional and can be seen HERE.
  • Predictions of endless radiation poisoning for thousands of years proved untrue. Today, Hiroshima and Nagasaki’s radiation levels are normal.  HERE.
  • Outdoor shadows and other dramatic evidences of the Hiroshima bombing seem to be faked. HERE.
  • The initial American reporting on Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs  came from Wilfred Burchett and William L. Laurence. One was a communist (Burchett) who hated America and reportedly ended up on the Kremlin’s payroll. HERE.
  • The other was secretly a paid employee of US armed forces. He was the man who rode with the crew to witness the nuke dropped on Nagasaki. His report on the attack is painful to read for all the wrong reasons. HERE.
  • Laurence was also the only reported to cover the development of the atomic bomc, see the initial bomb testing (from 20 miles away) and to report from Nagasaki. In other words, only one reporter, paid by the US war dept, provided the entirety of the initial civilian narrative for the testing of nuclear devices and then bombing of Nagasaki. Just one. It was roughly the same at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Reporters were not allowed to visit. HERE.
  • Military officers were asked to exaggerate the injury count.
  • Hiroshima and Nagasaki were apparently shut down for months. There was no influx of Western reporters. The nuclear narrative was developed by the Pentagon from what we can tell. HERE.
  • It was immediately made a crime punishable by death in both the US and Japan to discuss nuclear attacks and the technology  that created them. (“The restricted dataclauses of the US Atomic Energy Act specifies that all nuclear weapons-related information is to be considered classified unless explicitly declassified, and makes no distinction about whether said information was created in a laboratory by a government scientist or anywhere else in the world by private citizens.”) HERE.
  • As for Little Boy, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, photos show it seems to lack the necessary antennas to function. HERE.
  • There were apparently several Little Boys of various sizes, not just one. HERE.
  • The narrative surrounding the dropping of the Hiroshima bombing is reportedly inaccurate. “Levers” were “pulled” to drop the bomb, but the automatic system did the job. HERE.
  • The automatic targeting system itself was an inaccurate device that reportedly might drop bombs miles from where the pilot hoped to deliver them. The odds that both bombs ended up delivering effective blasts are surprisingly low.
  • The Nagasaki bombing narrative was confused for decades. The story kept changing. Even the pilot was misidentified. The crews were switched. HERE.
  • The photos of the Nagasaki mushroom cloud are suspicious. They appear to be composite images with cloud cover inserted to ensure that identification of Nagasaki is impossible. HERE.  Other Nagasaki photos appear fake.
  • One of the two famous and supposedly identical photos of the Nagasaki mushroom cloud includes part of a plane. One of the photos is thus fake, or at least retouched. HERE.
  • For events of such magnitude, there are surprisingly few eyewitness accounts of the actual blast. Many eyewitness accounts start the day after the blast or during the firestorm. Only a few Japanese survivors have stepped forward to become regular “faces” of the blast.
  • There don’t seem to be any civilian photos of either mushroom cloud taken by Japanese civilians or even military facilities. This one HERE looks evidently faked.
  • Much of the Western Hiroshima narrative regarding the blast was developed by a single Jesuit priest who, along with other Jesuits, had survive at the epicenter of the blast through the intervention of the Virgin Mary. HERE.
  • The eyewitness accounts of the blast itself have a repetitive and artificial quality to them, at least the ones we read. One doctor claims to have treated 2000-3000 injured on the first day. HERE.

There are other disturbing elements to the Nagasaki and Hiroshima bombings, and if you are interested, you can see more documents calling many elements of the attacks into question HERE.

See information on an alternative theory regarding nuclear weapons HERE:

Additional DB Nuclear Articles to Share (With Links)

North Korea Nuclear Hoax Heightens Alternative Media Skepticism March 10

The Trillion Dollar Nuclear Weapons Fraud April 15

NASA and Nuclear Activities: More Scrutiny Needed May 25

NY Times Uses Hiroshima to Justify Gun Control, Even as More Evidence Questions A-Bomb Scenario June 15

NY Times: Hiroshima Mushroom Cloud Actually ‘Smoke from Raging Firestorm’ June 20

Brexit’s Modern Manipulation and Its A-Bomb Beginnings June 29

Pentagon’s Not Properly Funding Its Trillion-Dollar Nuclear Costs July 1

More Nuke Questions: Lies About Trident, Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Now Bikini, Too July 25

North Korea Nuclear Tensions Said to Increase – But How Do We Know It’s True?
 
July 28 

North Korea Has Missiles, but Does It Have Nuclear Weapons? August 3

How Dangerous, Really? Trump Now Denies Asking Why US Does Not Use Nuclear Weapons August 3

Advertisements

PR Bankruptcy Plan.

 

ptousa

After years of economic hardship, the government of Puerto Rico pulled the trigger on a bankruptcy-like filing on Wednesday, turning the page in a saga featuring public officials, creditors and the 3.4m residents who have lost control of the island.

At stake is more than $120bn of debt and pension obligations, with investors braced for billions of dollars of losses. What caused this crisis and what awaits the US territory? How did Puerto Rico get into this predicament? Many politicians and historians attribute the economic crisis to changes to the tax code in 1996, when incentives for doing business on the island were slowly phased out.

By 2006 economic growth had slowed markedly. As the credit crisis ravaged the US mainland, Puerto Rico struggled, too, and financial regulators were forced to seize several banks. Puerto Rico continued to decline. The government kept on borrowing to fund operations, running large budget deficits and now has bond debts of about $74bn.

A federal oversight board installed by the US Congress estimated the island could only afford a quarter of that amount. Anne Krueger, the former first deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund, remarked bleakly in her 2015 report: “Structural problems, economic shocks and weak public finances have yielded a decade of stagnation, outmigration and debt.” What does the bankruptcy filing mean for Puerto Ricans? Puerto Rico’s near $50bn pension system is vastly underfunded and could be fully depleted by the end of this year. That would shift as much as $1.5bn on to the government’s annual budget, weighing on its ability to fund other public services.

Pensioners are preparing for cuts to their retirement pay. A fiscal plan proposed by the government has sought to cut payrolls, reduce subsidies to the island’s university system and slash spending on healthcare. Those changes could spur additional migration from the island, one of Puerto Rico’s most pressing problems. With more than 45 per cent of Puerto Ricans living below the poverty line, Puerto Ricans are moving to the US mainland in search of work.

What is Title III? Puerto Rico, like other US territories, was in no man’s land before the passage of the Promesa rescue legislation in Congress last year. The island is not a US local government or public corporation so it does not have access to typical bankruptcy protections. The rescue law borrowed heavily from the Chapter 9 bankruptcy code, allowing territories to restructure their debts under the purview of a control board in a process known as Title III.

The island must first prove that it attempted good faith negotiations with its creditors before the board can sign off on a Title III filing. Once it has, John Roberts, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, will designate a district court judge to oversee the court proceedings. Title III includes cramdown provisions, which can bind dissenting creditors to a plan that is signed off by the oversight board and the courts.

These provisions prevent holdout creditors from blocking a wider deal and needs agreement from only a single creditor class within Puerto Rico’s complex web of debt issuing agencies. “Title III puts a lot of power in the hands of the board, including seeking to have the court cram their plan down on to any dissenting class of creditors,” says Jim Millstein, the adviser to Puerto Rico’s previous administration and the former chief restructuring officer at the US Treasury, where he led the rescue of insurer AIG. “The risk of cramdown should alter everyone’s negotiating strategy, hopefully to prompt a settlement sooner than later.”

Who are the losers? Mutual funds, including Franklin Templeton and OppenheimerFunds, which are large holders of constitutionally backed general obligation bonds and junior sales tax-backed debt, are among the biggest losers in Puerto Rico’s default. The two fought vociferously against proposals under the previous governor, who offered higher payouts than the current administration. Monoline bond insurers, which insure a portion of Puerto Rican debt, are also facing losses. Distressed investors are in a difficult spot after the oversight board projected this year that Puerto Rico could afford far less on bond payments than previously predicted. Those investors, including Aurelius Capital Management and Monarch Alternative Capital, have already filed lawsuits against the territory.

How soon will this be resolved? No one knows how long a restructuring of Puerto Rico’s debts, the largest bankruptcy in the history of the $3.8tn municipal bond market, will last. In a best-case scenario, creditors could begin to settle with the oversight board in the next few months.

However, many advisers fear the process could last 18 months to two years — or even longer — costing millions in legal fees and depressing economic activity on the island. Litigation between creditors could also make its way to the Supreme Court, with holders of the sales tax-backed bonds — known as Cofina by its Spanish acronym — and general obligation bond investors both claiming they deserve seniority in a restructuring. “With that bankruptcy now started, the governor has forfeited all power over the restructuring, and the economy of Puerto Rico will be put on hold for years,” says Andrew Rosenberg, a lawyer with Paul Weiss who is advising some of the general obligation bondholders. “Make no mistake: the board has chosen to turn Puerto Rico into the next Argentina.”

 

Why Random Thoughts are Actually Important, Backed By ScienceLIFESTYLE

Some people call them earworms, some call them mind-pops, but random thoughts that enter your brain for no apparent reason are actually important, according to scientists. Our brains can surprise us with sudden random memories. It could be a line from a play that you were in from 6th grade or a song from a commercial that you saw last week.

The complete unpredictability of these thoughts is a fun part of being human; we get to still be amazed by our brains. Even when science has explored almost all of our grey matter, they are still able to learn new things that we are capable of.

Stray or random thoughts are what scientists call involuntary semantic memories. These thoughts are involuntary, meaning they were not something you were trying to think of. Semantic refers to facts or events, but the word itself means meaning. These random thoughts are memories that come back to you when you aren’t expecting them and they have no apparent meaning.

The most interesting part of these random thoughts is that they might not be random after all. Scientists think that these memories are trying to help you solve a problem.

THIS IS WHY RANDOM THOUGHTS ARE ACTUALLY IMPORTANT, BACKED BY SCIENCE

A song can get stuck in your head or pop into your mind at random. Often, it’s just a portion of a song that we hear repeatedly in our minds, like the chorus. The distinguishing feature of mind-pops is that we have no conscious control over them.

Music that pops into your head at random is called involuntary musical imagery. The more scientific definition of this musical phenomenon is ‘introspective persistence of a musical experience in the absence of direct sensory instigation of that experience.’ In other words, you are hearing things that aren’t really there, but that you have heard before.

musical earworm is usually a song with lyrics that you enjoy or a melody that brings up a particular emotion for you. These persistent songs that get stuck in your mind can be annoying, but what if they were trying to solve a problem for you, rather than annoy you?

Here’s an example:

* You are postponing doing your taxes because you have an unusual situation and might need help. Time goes by while you worry about this problem.

* Days later, the name song pops in your head and you start singing ‘Banana fana fo fana, Hannah.’

This makes you think of your friend Hannah that you knew in college who is now an accountant and who can probably help you with your taxes.

The random earworm song that popped into your mind helped you to remember that you have a friend who can help you solve your problem. Problem solving is one way that scientists believe our random mind pops are benefitting us.

A seemingly random thought can usually be traced back to a trigger. In this example, the trigger was the problem of needing help with filing taxes.

WHY DO WE HAVE RANDOM THOUGHTS?

Scientists believe that random thoughts are likely the result of memory processing and also creative thinking. You may start to notice that you have mind-pops more often when you have a problem that you want to solve.

It’s as if you have told your brain to search for things that can help you solve the problem and your brain responds with random things that are connected.

‘Researchers speculate that mind pops are the result of long-term semantic priming, with an initial exposure to a source of information ‘activating a web of representations in the mind that stay activated until a relevant stimulus in our environment’ triggers the semantic memory. The tenuous relationship between some of these initial activation experiences and the semantic memories that result from them minutes, hours, and even days later hints at a correlation between mind-popping and creative thinking,’ an ability to perceive connections between seemingly unrelated concepts.

People who experience frequent random thoughts tend to rate higher on tests of creative thinking. In a study of the brains of research subjects and their random thoughts, ‘High-frequency mind pops were significantly associated with “larger grey and white matter volume in the prefrontal cortex. This increase in mind pops is also linked to higher creativity and the personality trait of ‘openness.”

HOW YOU CAN MAXIMIZE RANDOM THOUGHTS FOR YOUR BENEFIT

Being mindful is the best way to make use of random thoughts to enhance your creativity. Here are a few ideas to help you allow your random thoughts solve problems for you:

Dwell on the random thought for 90 seconds – Sing along with the song or immerse yourself in the memory that was brought up.

* Read 7 Things That Keep You From Living in the Now – Our guide to avoiding things that keep you from being mindful will help you make use of random thoughts when they happen.

* Think briefly about your current problem – What is it that you are currently struggling with?

Think about how the random thought connects to the problem – Is there a connection between the random thought and the problem?

https://www.powerofpositivity.com/this-is-why-random-thoughts-are-actually-important-backed-by-science/

 ¿Por qué los pensamientos aleatorios son realmente importantes, respaldados por la ciencia?

Algunas personas les llaman earworms, algunos llaman mind-pops, pero los pensamientos aleatorios que entran en su cerebro sin razón aparente son realmente importantes, según los científicos. Nuestros cerebros pueden sorprendernos con recuerdos al azar repentinos. Podría ser una línea de una obra en la que estuvieras en el sexto grado o una canción de un comercial que viste la semana pasada.

La imprevisibilidad completa de estos pensamientos es una parte divertida de ser humano; Llegamos a estar aún sorprendidos por nuestros cerebros. Incluso cuando la ciencia ha explorado casi toda nuestra materia gris, todavía son capaces de aprender nuevas cosas de las que somos capaces.
Los pensamientos dispersos o aleatorios son lo que los científicos llaman recuerdos semánticos involuntarios. Estos pensamientos son involuntarios, lo que significa que no eran algo que estaban tratando de pensar. Semántica se refiere a hechos o eventos, pero la palabra misma significa significado. Estos pensamientos al azar son recuerdos que vuelven a ti cuando no los esperas y no tienen un significado aparente.
La parte más interesante de estos pensamientos aleatorios es que pueden no ser aleatorios después de todo. Los científicos piensan que estos recuerdos están tratando de ayudar a resolver un problema.

ES POR ESO QUE LOS PENSAMIENTOS ALEATORIOS SON REALMENTE IMPORTANTES, APOYADOS POR LA CIENCIA
Una canción puede quedar atrapada en tu cabeza o entrar en tu mente al azar. A menudo, es sólo una porción de una canción que escuchamos repetidamente en nuestras mentes, como el coro. La característica distintiva de la mente-estallidos es que no tenemos ningún control consciente sobre ellos.
La música que se mete en la cabeza al azar se denomina imágenes musicales involuntarias. La definición más científica de este fenómeno musical es “la persistencia introspectiva de una experiencia musical en ausencia de la instigación sensorial directa de esa experiencia”. En otras palabras, usted está escuchando cosas que no están realmente allí, pero que usted ha oído antes.
Un earworm musical es generalmente una canción con las líricas que usted goza o una melodía que traiga para arriba una emoción particular para usted. Estas canciones persistentes que se atascan en su mente puede ser molesto, pero ¿qué pasa si estaban tratando de resolver un problema para usted, en lugar de molestarle?
He aquí un ejemplo:

SHARENEXT
Por qué los pensamientos aleatorios son realmente importantes, respaldados por la ciencia
ESTILO DE VIDA
Unesdoc.unesco.org unesdoc.unesco.org
Algunas personas les llaman earworms, algunos llaman mind-pops, pero los pensamientos aleatorios que entran en su cerebro sin razón aparente son realmente importantes, según los científicos. Nuestros cerebros pueden sorprendernos con recuerdos al azar repentinos. Podría ser una línea de una obra en la que estuvieras en el sexto grado o una canción de un comercial que viste la semana pasada.
La imprevisibilidad completa de estos pensamientos es una parte divertida de ser humano; Llegamos a estar aún sorprendidos por nuestros cerebros. Incluso cuando la ciencia ha explorado casi toda nuestra materia gris, todavía son capaces de aprender nuevas cosas de las que somos capaces.
Los pensamientos dispersos o aleatorios son lo que los científicos llaman recuerdos semánticos involuntarios. Estos pensamientos son involuntarios, lo que significa que no eran algo que estaban tratando de pensar. Semántica se refiere a hechos o eventos, pero la palabra misma significa significado. Estos pensamientos al azar son recuerdos que vuelven a ti cuando no los esperas y no tienen un significado aparente.
La parte más interesante de estos pensamientos aleatorios es que pueden no ser aleatorios después de todo. Los científicos piensan que estos recuerdos están tratando de ayudarle a resolver un problema.
ES POR ESO QUE LOS PENSAMIENTOS ALEATORIOS SON REALMENTE IMPORTANTES, APOYADOS POR LA CIENCIA
Una canción puede quedar atrapada en tu cabeza o entrar en tu mente al azar. A menudo, es sólo una porción de una canción que escuchamos repetidamente en nuestras mentes, como el coro. La característica distintiva de la mente-estallidos es que no tenemos ningún control consciente sobre ellos.
La música que se mete en la cabeza al azar se denomina imágenes musicales involuntarias. La definición más científica de este fenómeno musical es “la persistencia introspectiva de una experiencia musical en ausencia de la instigación sensorial directa de esa experiencia”. En otras palabras, usted está escuchando cosas que no están realmente allí, pero que usted ha oído antes.
Un earworm musical es generalmente una canción con las líricas que usted goza o una melodía que traiga para arriba una emoción particular para usted. Estas canciones persistentes que se atascan en su mente puede ser molesto, pero ¿qué pasa si estaban tratando de resolver un problema para usted, en lugar de molestarle?
He aquí un ejemplo:
* Usted está posponiendo haciendo sus impuestos porque tiene una situación inusual y podría necesitar ayuda. El tiempo pasa mientras se preocupa por este problema.
* Días después, el nombre de la canción aparece en tu cabeza y comienzas a cantar ‘Banana fana fo fana, Hannah’.

SHARENEXT
Por qué los pensamientos aleatorios son realmente importantes, respaldados por la ciencia
ESTILO DE VIDA
Unesdoc.unesco.org unesdoc.unesco.org
Algunas personas les llaman earworms, algunos llaman mind-pops, pero los pensamientos aleatorios que entran en su cerebro sin razón aparente son realmente importantes, según los científicos. Nuestros cerebros pueden sorprendernos con recuerdos al azar repentinos. Podría ser una línea de una obra en la que estuvieras en el sexto grado o una canción de un comercial que viste la semana pasada.
La imprevisibilidad completa de estos pensamientos es una parte divertida de ser humano; Llegamos a estar aún sorprendidos por nuestros cerebros. Incluso cuando la ciencia ha explorado casi toda nuestra materia gris, todavía son capaces de aprender nuevas cosas de las que somos capaces.
Los pensamientos dispersos o aleatorios son lo que los científicos llaman recuerdos semánticos involuntarios. Estos pensamientos son involuntarios, lo que significa que no eran algo que estaban tratando de pensar. Semántica se refiere a hechos o eventos, pero la palabra misma significa significado. Estos pensamientos al azar son recuerdos que vuelven a ti cuando no los esperas y no tienen un significado aparente.
La parte más interesante de estos pensamientos aleatorios es que pueden no ser aleatorios después de todo. Los científicos piensan que estos recuerdos están tratando de ayudarle a resolver un problema.
ES POR ESO QUE LOS PENSAMIENTOS ALEATORIOS SON REALMENTE IMPORTANTES, APOYADOS POR LA CIENCIA
Una canción puede quedar atrapada en tu cabeza o entrar en tu mente al azar. A menudo, es sólo una porción de una canción que escuchamos repetidamente en nuestras mentes, como el coro. La característica distintiva de la mente-estallidos es que no tenemos ningún control consciente sobre ellos.
La música que se mete en la cabeza al azar se denomina imágenes musicales involuntarias. La definición más científica de este fenómeno musical es “la persistencia introspectiva de una experiencia musical en ausencia de la instigación sensorial directa de esa experiencia”. En otras palabras, usted está escuchando cosas que no están realmente allí, pero que usted ha oído antes.
Un earworm musical es generalmente una canción con las líricas que usted goza o una melodía que traiga para arriba una emoción particular para usted. Estas canciones persistentes que se atascan en su mente puede ser molesto, pero ¿qué pasa si estaban tratando de resolver un problema para usted, en lugar de molestarle?
He aquí un ejemplo:
* Usted está posponiendo haciendo sus impuestos porque tiene una situación inusual y podría necesitar ayuda. El tiempo pasa mientras se preocupa por este problema.
* Días después, el nombre de la canción aparece en tu cabeza y comienzas a cantar ‘Banana fana fo fana, Hannah’.
* Esto te hace pensar en tu amiga Hannah que sabías en la universidad que ahora es un contador y que probablemente pueda ayudarte con tus impuestos.
La canción al azar del earworm que apareció en su mente le ayudó a recordar que usted tiene un amigo que puede ayudarle a solucionar su problema. La solución de problemas es una de las maneras en que los científicos creen que nuestra mente al azar nos está beneficiando.

Un pensamiento aparentemente aleatorio suele rastrearse hasta un desencadenante. En este ejemplo, el desencadenante fue el problema de necesitar ayuda para presentar impuestos.
¿POR QUÉ TENEMOS PENSAMIENTOS ALEATORIOS?
Los científicos creen que los pensamientos aleatorios son probablemente el resultado del procesamiento de la memoria y también el pensamiento creativo. Usted puede comenzar a notar que usted tiene mind-pops más a menudo cuando usted tiene un problema que usted desea resolver.
Es como si usted le haya dicho a su cerebro que busque cosas que pueden ayudarle a resolver el problema y su cerebro responde con cosas aleatorias que están conectadas.
Los investigadores especulan que los estallidos mentales son el resultado de un cebado semántico a largo plazo, con una exposición inicial a una fuente de información que activa una red de representaciones en la mente que permanecen activadas hasta que un estímulo pertinente en nuestro entorno desencadene la memoria semántica. La tenue relación entre algunas de estas experiencias iniciales de activación y los recuerdos semánticos que resultan de ellas minutos, horas e incluso días después sugiere una correlación entre el pensar mental y el pensamiento creativo, una capacidad de percibir conexiones entre conceptos aparentemente no relacionados.

Las personas que experimentan pensamientos aleatorios frecuentes tienden a calificar más alto en las pruebas del pensamiento creativo. En un estudio de los cerebros de los sujetos de la investigación y sus pensamientos aleatorios, “los estallidos mentales de alta frecuencia se asociaron significativamente con” mayor volumen de materia gris y blanca en la corteza prefrontal. Este aumento en la mente pops también está vinculado a una mayor creatividad y el rasgo de personalidad de la “apertura”.
CÓMO USTED PUEDE MAXIMIZAR LOS PENSAMIENTOS ALEATORIOS PARA SU BENEFICIO
Ser consciente es la mejor manera de hacer uso de pensamientos aleatorios para mejorar su creatividad. Aquí hay algunas ideas para ayudarle a permitir que sus pensamientos aleatorios resolver problemas para usted

Dwell en el pensamiento al azar durante 90 segundos – Canta junto con la canción o sumergirse en la memoria que fue educado.
* Lea 7 cosas que le impiden vivir en el ahora – Nuestra guía para evitar las cosas que le impiden ser consciente le ayudará a hacer uso de pensamientos al azar cuando suceden.

Piensa al azar durante 90 segundos – Canta junto con la canción o sumergirse en la memoria que vio.
Lea 7 cosas que le impiden vivir en el ahora – Nuestra guía para evitar las cosas que le impiden ser consciente le ayudará a hacer uso de pensamientos al azar cuando suceden.
Piense brevemente acerca de su problema actual – ¿Qué es lo que está luchando actualmente?
Piense en cómo el pensamiento aleatorio se conecta al problema – ¿Existe una conexión entre el pensamiento aleatorio y el problema?
https://www.powerofpositivity.com/this-is-why-random-thoughts-are-actually-important-backed-by-science/

No accepted medical use? There are scores of studies that say differently.

Cannabis is a Schedule I drug in the United States. That means the government has designated the plant as having no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.

No accepted medical use? There are scores of studies that say differently.

Rick Simpson is a medical Cannabis activist, and he has been on a crusade of healing. He considers Cannabis to be the most medicinally active plant that humans can use on this planet.

Cannabis has been shown in some cases to effectively treat numerous types of cancer, improve immunity, and fight anxiety and pain.

Here’s the list of 100 studies for you to peruse at your leisure:

Cannabis kills tumor cells

Uterine, testicular, and pancreatic cancers

Brain cancer

Mouth and throat cancer

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20516734

Breast cancer

Lung cancer

Prostate cancer

Blood cancer

Skin cancer

Liver cancer

Cannabis cancer cures (general)

Cancers of the head and neck

Cholangiocarcinoma cancer

Leukemia

Cannabis partially/fully induced cancer cell death

Translocation-positive rhabdomyosarcoma

Lymphoma

Cannabis kills cancer cells

Melanoma

Thyroid carcinoma

Colon cancer

Intestinal inflammation and cancer

Cannabinoids in health and disease


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19914218

6 Reasons Why Most Scientific Research Is Fake, False Or Fraudulent

 

Test Tubes Fake ScienceChristina Sarich, Staff
Waking Times

How often do scientists smugly quote the latest research on a topic only later to be made the fool by insider revelations that published research in peer-reviewed journals is abjectly false? This happens so frequently now, that it has become clear: Science is broken, and most scientific research is fraudulent.

It isn’t broken like a bike needing a new tire, or even an outdated paradigm that has reached its tipping point, as in the time of the renaissance. Modern science is broken for reasons that might shock you.

First, there’s a replication crisis. More and more studies simply cannot be replicated, so any false theories are not thrown out, but left floating as acceptable ‘fact’ in the hallowed scientific ethers, when they are nothing more than studies paid for and promoted by the companies who have a marked interest in proving their personal hypothesis.

Take for example a recent review of 67 blockbuster drug discovery research findings published in prestigious journals. A review of the studies found that three-fourths of them weren’t right. Bayer simply couldn’t replicate findings that were published in more than 75 percent of their drug trials. Another study of cancer research found that only 11 percent of preclinical cancer research could be reproduced – but the problem isn’t just in the pharmaceutical industry.

Even in physics, supposedly the most complex and most reliable of all sciences, two of the most flaunted physics results of the past few years — the announced discovery of both cosmic inflation and gravitational waves at the BICEP2 experiment in Antarctica, as well as the supposed discovery of superluminal neutrinos at the Swiss-Italian border — have now been retracted.

Why the gross negligence in a field that has been heralded as sacrosanct? The errors in science have been due to simple arithmetic miscalculations or excel spreadsheet mistakes, but they are also due to industry greed and outright fraud.

Science has even discredited itself – in one study meant to hoodwink the very prestigious British Medical Journal, a paper with eight major errors was submitted. Not a single one of the 221 scientists who reviewed the paper caught all the errors in it, and only 30 percent of reviewers recommended that the paper be rejected.

Second, scientists can manipulate data almost any way they deem fit. Data can be excluded, included and re-arranged to support the presupposition of any scientist.

Third, the scientific community doesn’t listen to women, young people, or those whose ideas go against the current scientific dogma. The greatest scientific pioneers were once weirdoes with wiry glasses and grandiose ideas that they set out to prove with the scientific method. Now, we have an aged scientific population, that is mostly white and male, worried about getting tenure at their institutions or that have been lobbied directly by pharmaceutical and biotech industries to promote a certain plan that affects our entire sociological structure.

Next, its all about the fame and money. These two things alone kill objectivity. Industry-funded studies completely ignore conflict of interest and skew any possible hope for real scientific results. This is why institutions like the FDA, supposedly founded on scientific study, are a complete fraud.

Finally, its about the social pandering to guys in white lab coats. We’ve made scientists Gods while ignoring that they are people with greed, lust for power, and other very human traits.

There aren’t just cracks in the current scientific community, there are gapping gulches that need to be addressed. William A Wilson writes:

Even if self-correction does occur and theories move strictly along a lifecycle from less to more accurate, what if the unremitting flood of new, mostly false, results pours in faster? Too fast for the sclerotic, compromised truth-discerning mechanisms of science to operate? The result could be a growing body of true theories completely overwhelmed by an ever-larger thicket of baseless theories, such that the proportion of true scientific beliefs shrinks even while the absolute number of them continues to rise. Borges’ Library of Babel contained every true book that could ever be written, but it was useless because it also contained every false book, and both true and false were lost within an ocean of nonsense. [First Things]

Skeptic of science, Michael Shermer, says that science is “a set of methods designed to describe and interpret observed or inferred phenomena, past or present, aimed at building a testable body of knowledge open to rejection or confirmation.”

Science is modifiable and falsifiable, just like religion. So why have we made it the modern day, untouchable dogma? We can’t treat beliefs as facts, but when science is broken we do. How do we trust science again when it is so shattered? Perhaps its time to trust our guts again, and not every testimony given in the latest scientific journal.

 

Pugnacious Parasites and the Provocation

by Zen Gardner

Everyone knows the unscrupulously manipulative always accuse others of what they themselves are guilty of. It’s an age old trick to obfuscate the obvious and buy time to accomplish their purposes.

Lying is their pathological language.

Such behavior, especially in high profile public figures, is unthinkable, yet for some inexplicable reason it is not just tolerated, but ironically readily expected.

People still buy into it. And the reaction always remains the same. Complacency on the most part, and a rising sense of anger in others. No doubt a byproduct of cognitive dissonance and range of other deliberately triggered mechanisms, but surreal just the same.

net fist

A Bald Faced Lie is a Punch in the Face

This is essentially what transpires when someone knowingly lies to your face. It jars your mind and pushes you back on the defensive and you’re left to try and understand why your heart and head are not matching up with what you just heard.

Everyone, except these willingly possessed psychopaths, has a conscience. And it’s faithful to speak to us. This is why humanity has been conditioned to not respond to it, and also why fear is so essential to their game. When our signals are scrambled, our gut reaction belittled and intuition denied we’re left in a daze.

This is exactly what they want to happen. It gives them time to keep executing their programs, especially when a complicit media candies and bandies it about as if it’s true and nothing to question.

This is the whirled we’re in and up against. Again, another reason to stay fully conscious and circumspect and thoroughly educated as to their techniques and true nature. Not pretty stuff to look at, but understand it we must.

Abject bullies like Israel are relatively easy to spot – if we grasp their obvious odious nature and where they’re coming from. The bully in the playground works by pure intimidation and force and will resort to any form of expression they can – loud mouthed intimidation, brandishing weapons, and all bathed in swaggering bravado right up to and including physical force to get their point across.

Send a signal is their MO. And those who don’t cower, teach them a lesson. Again, just look at the abject genocidal insanity of the Israeli occupiers. Now that they’ve gained control of most of the world’s media, especially in the west, what they say goes. And if the media or governments don’t toe their line well enough they’ll hear from these vociferous, self serving elitist beasts.

warburg

The Provocation

Another aspect of bullying is provoking your supposed enemy. The US is at this big time, deliberately firing up the conservative right and constitutionalists. It’s full on deliberate. The opulent extravagance of the Obamas, the clearly deliberate crashing of the economy, the flagrant trashing of patriotism and removal of individual rights are all carefully planned. Threatening to disarm fiercely independent Americans is an essential part of this agenda.

The mass migration agenda is the same. While the US gets inundated with needy Central Americans with clear governmental manipulation, Europe is similarly being swept with an influx that threatens their economies and cultural identities.

What’s most amazing about this is anyone can read this agenda for themselves from UN statements and documents and the Agenda 21 or 2030 programs. That so many can’t be bothered to look into much of this is outright frightening.

Israel again is a master example of aggressive agendas designed to push back common sense and reason as well as true empathy for the plight of others. A clearly apartheid state while claiming they were the victims of such treatment is completely nonsensical. It flies in the face of simple reason and logic. Yet they get away with it. How? They’ve taken over the media and political structures through the same tactics of intimidation and potential consequence by their massive Mossad/CIA/MI6 black hand of control.

TENSION2

Strategy of Tension and Not Just Provoking, but Demonizing Your Subjects

What’s amazing is the thoroughness of psychopathic social engineers. This is where we need to wake up and get smart.

They operate according to something called the Strategy of Tension, keeping peoples and nations nervous and afraid and more inclined to rely on government and enforcement to protect them. It also homogenizes cultures in a form of group think and a state of malleability due to this state of fear.

The extension of their influence is far and wide. Mass shootings, weird mass “accidents” at certain interims, and most of all false flags, never mind assassinations and the like. This has been the weapon of choice for every totalitarian regime for eons and a real favorite of this latest push for world dominion by these psychopaths.

The end result, ironically, is not entirely to direct everyone’s attention to a foreign enemy. That’s just a ruse and excuse for genocide and expansion. The enemy to them is within – us. We must be contained like animals and malleable to their every whim.

OKbomb.J

So-called domestic terrorism has been a meme on the rise. The deliberate migration of “potential muslim extremists” is a key part of this, as any and every incident they stage can more and more be justified and conveniently blamed on outside influences. The end result is the same: clampdown on the populace.

Just look at this propaganda piece brought to you by the Rothschild/Rockefeller owned and CIA/Mossad/MI6 et all run Reuters news agency:

U.S. eyes ways to toughen fight against domestic extremists

The U.S. Justice Department is considering legal changes to combat what it sees as a rising threat from domestic anti-government extremists, senior officials told Reuters, even as it steps up efforts to stop Islamic State-inspired attacks at home.

Extremist groups motivated by a range of U.S.-born philosophies present a “clear and present danger,” John Carlin, the Justice Department’s chief of national security, told Reuters in an interview. “Based on recent reports and the cases we are seeing, it seems like we’re in a heightened environment.” (source)

The agenda is obvious. If we’re looking. The language as well is a giveaway, the smooth talking and use of buzz phrases like “clear and present danger”, “national security” and the like are rife.

BRAIN_GEARS

The Subtler Techniques of Deceit

This may seem a bit tangential to the main point I’m making here but is nonetheless essential information if we’re to more fully understand how these tactics are carried out on subtler levels.

You’ll see the following logical fallacy tactics in use continually, but unfortunately most people fall for them for lack of discernment as well as awareness of just what deceitful people are capable of doing.

This is a big subject well worth researching on your own but here are a few to get you started:

1. The Strawman Argument – Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack.

Example: After Will said that we should put more money into health and education, Warren responded by saying that he was surprised that Will hates our country so much that he wants to leave it defenseless by cutting military spending.

You’ll see this in use continually especially in the political and government arenas. It’s very clever really, side-stepping the real issue and misdirecting the argument to a false issue having nothing to do with the original question or discussion.

2. The False Choice Dilemma Giving an extremely narrow range of choice to an issue or situation that is much wider than is being portrayed with virtually unlimited possibilites.

Baby Bush’s carefully framed post 9/11 statement is the classic geopolitical example: “You’re either with us, or you’re with the terrorists.”

You have to admit that’s pretty damn galvanizing. But in what way? Now you can’t question what the “good guys” are doing or you might be with “axis of evil”? That’s what it’s since come down to. Again, cleverly staged propaganda by these very intelligent psychopaths. Keeping the public drugged and dumbed down would sure work in their favor, wouldn’t it?

3. Correlation versus Causation. You can apply this across the board. It’s so easy to assume what we’re told is true in this context. Beware.

The easiest example is when two events occur at the same time, or in close apparent relation with each other. One is then seen as the cause of the other. An increase in robberies occurs at the same time that jobs cuts are announced, for example. There is no evidence to support the claim that the expected job losses caused the increase in robberies.

This is best seen in false flag events when the enemy or culprit is named before any investigation whatsoever. If someone “claims” responsibility it’s case closed, as they go after their pre-selected patsy to confirm this or already executed this planted persona on the spot. Done deal.

4. Overgeneralization or Oversimplification.

This is another framework for logical fallacies. Generalizing from too small of a population, or reducing complex social issues to only one choice or the other, and leaving out the complex issues that do not support the claim are examples of fallacies that stem from overgeneralization and oversimplification. (source of last two citations)

These are just a few examples. It’s a field well worth exploring and getting a handle on. When you dissect and analyze these mechanisms it is extremely empowering.

angry-awareness

All That To Say…

Be on the look out. Stay alert and awake and aware. What we see around us is not what we get, unless we fall for it and thereby make it our reality. Personal empowerment in such an environment as we’re living in is essential.

But you have to do the work.

Psychopaths are running the external world. It’s more evident by the day to more and more people. Those not fully on board even at higher and middle levels are being bullied into it within the power structure. They can see who the apparent heirs are to the coming positions of power so they’re buckling under the pressure in an effort to save their hides.

Others at many levels of society are waking up and looking for ways to expose this nefarious agenda and help humanity push back in whatever way it can. We need to keep our voices loud and clear and distinctly truthful and helpful.

There may be many vectors by which they’re coming at us, be they geonengineering, manipulated food, societal crackdowns, media programming and the like, but we’re clearly up to the challenge.

After all, we’re here! We’re thriving just fine in spite of all they do, and we’re growing stronger by the day.

Never forget that, let down your guard, nor grow weary in well doing.

This is our day – not theirs. Let’s fulfill our mission, and use the massive spiritual weapons at our disposal – love, truth, our connection to Source and essential eternal nature which can never be taken away.

Stay true.

Love always, Zen

ZenGardner.com