Mandela Effect Examples That Will Mess With Your Brain

Have you ever shared a vivid memory of something with many people, only to realize that event never happened? You may be experiencing the Mandela Effect. The Mandela Effect is one of the internets recently popular conspiracy theories that has been messing with all of our brains. This phenomenon is when thousands of people with no relation to each other have the exact same collective misremembering of the same event. The name, coined by Fiona Bloome, came about in 2013 when human rights activist Nelson Mandela died. Many people from all over the world were confused because they all had the same vivid memory of him dying in prison during the 1980s. People have even found old textbooks and biographies that state that Nelson Mandela did die in the 80’s. Since then, many other collective false memories have sprung up and shaken up our reality.

There are a lot of different theories for why the Mandela Effect exists. Many believe that it is a result of time travel. Possibly some person who will live thousands of years from now traveled back to our time and changed little things in the middle of our lifetime. Others think it may be due to the shifting of parallel universes. Perhaps we all once lived in a universe where things were slightly different and we still remember it that original way but are now in a reality where things are different. Some people have even gone as far to say that the ending of the world in 2012 didn’t seem to happen because it was simply the end of our current universe and we all shifted into a new one. Psychologists credit the Mandela Effect to confabulation, the clinical term for memory defects. However, the fact that large numbers of people who have never met all have identical false memories continues to stump even the most educated psychologists. No matter what the reasoning is, the Mandela Effect will make you question reality and send shivers down your spine. Here are just a handful of examples that you are sure to identify with.

 The Berenstein Bears

This popular childrens book and television show series was loved by many for years. Anyone you ask will tell you that the way I spelled Berenstein above is the correct spelling. What if I told you thats wrong? Thats right, its actually called the Berenstain Bears. If you go back and look at your old VHS tapes or books, it will say Berenstain. There is no record of it ever being called Berenstein. Personally, I have never met a person who remembers it being spelled that way. This Mandela Effect example is one of the most popular because so many people vividly remember it being Berenstein. Have we all just been remembering it wrong? Perhaps, but there is some evidence that it was once spelled Berenstein. The photo above is of a VHS tape that one Reddit user found in their attic. On the actual tape, Berenstain is printed, but on a sticker on the side (something likely added by the VHS manufacturer or distributing company) it says Berenstein. Many people have used this as proof of the Mandela Effect because it shows that, at one point in time, it was Berenstein. Perhaps because that sticker was not owned directly by the company, it did not change when time travel or the shifting of the universe occured. People have also found old TV Guides and news articles that refer to the program as Berenstein Bears, further enhancing the proof for this example.

The Flintstones

This one has tended to shift in and out of reality, which has freaked me out throughout my research. Just under one week ago, the “Flintstones” was spelled without a “T” as the “Flinstones.” Today I went to google it, and saw that it changed from “Flinstones” to “Flintstones” and was back to its original spelling. I might sound crazy saying that, but I’m not the only wannabe Mandela Effect expert that has kept up with it and noticed the constant shift. I am glad that the “t” is back because in my childhood I vividly remember it being spelled “Flintstones.” Most remember their last name being Flintstones, which makes sense because flint is a type of rock and the family lives in the fictional town Bedrock, where everything is made of rock. However, if you went back and watched it last week, their last name was actually Flinstone. Today, it is once again “Flintstone.” This example firmly backs up the theory of shifting parallel universes because it changes constantly. If you google “Flintstones Mandela Effect,” you will see that many other people have also noticed it switching.

Oscar Meyer

My bologna has a first name. Its O-S-C-A-R. My bologna has a second name its M-E-Y-E-R. Everyone remembers this cutesy song from the Oscar Meyer commercials of our childhood. The commercial even spelled out the last name in the song. If you look back now, it isnt Oscar Meyer, it is Oscar Mayer. The way that people pronounce the companys name is Meyer, so it being Mayer makes no sense. It isnt pronounced Oscar Mayer like John Mayer, its pronounced Oscar Meyer. The pronunciation of the company name and the song just show that it once was Meyer.

“Mirror Mirror On the Wall”

This line from Snow White is probably one of the most famous of any Disney movie. Its on t-shirts and has been referenced in other shows and movies. There is even a Snow White spin off movie released in 2012 that was called Mirror Mirror after the famous line. What if I told you we were all remembering it wrong? Thats right, it isnt mirror mirror on the wall. In the movie, they say magic mirror on the wall. I have never met a person who remembers it this way. I even remember watching Snow White as recently as four or five years ago and it said mirror mirror. Why would there be so much merchandise that says mirror mirror and a spin off movie with that name if it never was Mirror Mirror on the Wall?

Sex in the City

The beloved show about a woman named Carrie Bradshaw and her friends living in New York City is known by most who were original fans of the show as Sex In The City. Now, if you go back and watch the show it is called Sex and the City. The producers never changed the name and there is no record left of it ever being called Sex in the City. This instance also has some proof that it once was called Sex in the City. Above is a montage of clips from award shows where all of the presenters called the show Sex in the City. It is highly unlikely that every single presenter got the shows name wrong.

“Life is like a box of chocolates.”

This one is another famous line. In the movie Forrest Gump, Forrest says, My momma always said, life is like a box of chocolates. That is a famous line that everyone who has ever seen the movie would know. Well, if you go back and watch the movie, it says life was like a box of chocolates. That doesnt even sound right with the quote or in the context of the movie. Ive never met somebody who remembers it saying was. If you go on google and type in the beginning of the quote and stop at life, the next suggested word is is, not was.

“Its a beautiful day in the neighborhood.”

In the childrens show, Mister Rogers Neighborhood, he always sings a song with the line Its a beautiful day in the neighborhood. Everyone who watched this show as a child remembers it this way. Well, now the song says Its a beautiful day in this neighborhood. That doesnt even sound right in the song and nobody remembers it this way that I know.

Interview with a Vampire

This 90s movie with Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise is pretty famous, and most people remember it being called Interview with a Vampire. If you type in on google interview with the suggested ending is a vampire. Surprisingly, the movie is actually called Interview with the Vampire. Again, this doesnt sound right.

Looney Toons

Another childrens cartoon, the Looney Toons was loved by many. Its name, Looney Toons makes sense because toons is the ending of cartoons. The show is actually called Looney Tunes. Tunes doesnt make any sense in the context of the show. I personally loved this show as a child and have vivid memories of the title screen saying toons.

Fruit Loops

This one is what started my interest in the Mandela Effect. Ive always been a big fan of Fruit Loops and used to eat them often as a child. One day, I was walking through the grocery store only to see a box that said Froot Loops on it. While froot makes more sense with the shape of the cereal and the word loops, I had never remembered seeing it this way.

Febreeze

A popular household air freshener, Febreeze is seen by a lot of people every single day. Since when was it spelled febreze with only one e?

“Luke, I am your father.”

One of the most famous movie lines of all time is this one from Star Wars. The phrase Luke, I am your father can be found on t-shirts, hats, phone cases, and anything else in between. With the recent re-popularization of Star Wars, this phrase has been everywhere. However, if you go back and watch Star Wars now, youll see that Darth Vader doesnt even say this, he says no, I am your father. This one is insanely obvious that it once, whether in another universe or in our same reality before it was changed, was Luke, I am your father. People who havent even seen Star Wars all know this famous line. It has been quoted more times than I could ever count and referenced so many times.

Sketchers

This well known sneaker brand has been word by many people for years. I specifically remember the brand name being spelled Sketchers but now it is actually Skechers.

Chic-Fil-A

This one is an example that I vividly remember. As a child, I used to go to Chic-Fil-A with my dad sometimes before he had work. After we stopped doing that, I had not been for while until high school, when I realized it was now spelled “Chick-Fil-A.” I noticed this because I constantly spelled it wrong on texts when I would ask my friends to meet me there. I’m not the only one who remembers it this way. The spelling “Chic-Fil-A” is a common google search and is often used by people on twitter. There are many people on Reddit who also recall “Chic-Fil-A” and remember joking around and saying that the chicken must be “chic” and fashionable.

If you are a regular human being, you were probably caught off guard by at least one of these changes. The Mandela Effect is crazy because so many people strongly remember these things the wrong way. You may identify with some examples and not with others. This could be another explanation to back up the “shifting realities” theory because all of us could be in different realities at this very moment. There are many other Mandela Effect examples, like the placement of the country New Zealand and the absence of a famous portrait of King Henry VII of England holding a turkey leg, that you can find on the internet that many people also remember incorrectly. The ones listed here are examples that have personally effected me, but there are many more that other people have noticed in their realities. Considering all of these different instances, it would be too much of a coincidence if the Mandela Effect was a simple case of confabulation. The next time you do a double take after seeing something you remember differently, just know that our perception of reality may not be as straight forward as it seems.

Welcome to the era of transhumanism

In a compelling webseries from 2012 entitled H+, we were introduced to a future world where much of the population has a hi-tech implant, allowing individuals a direct neural interface with the internet. As often is the case in science fiction, things don’t turn out well for those technological pioneers. A virus infects the implant and chaos quickly descends on a human race that has become biologically fused with technology.

The series was an overt examination of a transhumanist future, with the title H+ being an appropriation of the common transhuman abbreviation. Five years after the series’ birth, we live in a present even more entrenched on a path towards the realization of transhumanist ideals.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZedLgAF9aEg

Early in February 2017, innovative billionaire Elon Musk reiterated an idea he had floated several times over the past year: Humans need to merge with machines. Musk sees a direct brain/computer interface as an absolute necessity, not only in order for us to evolve as a species, but as a way of keeping up with the machines we are creating. According to Musk, if we don’t merge with the machines, we will become useless and irrelevant.

While Elon Musk does not self-identify as a “transhumanist,” the idea of fusing man with machine is fundamental to this movement that arose over the course of the 20th century. And as we move into a tumultuous 21st century, transhumanism is quickly shifting from its sci-fi influenced philosophical and cultural niche into a more mainstream, and increasingly popular, movement.

Zoltan Istvan, a prominent futurist and transhumanist, is currently making a bold political run for the position of Governor of California. “We need leadership that is willing to use radical science, technology, and innovation – what California is famous for –to benefit us all,” Istvan declared in a recent editorial published by Newsweek. “We need someone with the nerve to risk the tremendous possibilities to save the environment through bioengineering, to end cancer by seeking a vaccine or a gene-editing solution for it.”

What is transhumanism?

Simply put, transhumanism is a broad intellectual movement that advocates for the transformation of humanity through embracing technology. Thinkers in the field opine that our intellectual, physical and psychological capabilities can, and should, be enhanced by any and all available emerging technologies. From genetic modification to make us smarter and live longer, to enhancing our physical capabilities through bioengineering and mechanical implants, transhumanists see our future as one where we transcend our physical bodies with the aid of technology.

The term “transhuman” can be traced back several hundred years, but in terms of our current use we can look to 20th century biologist and eugenicist, Julian Huxley. Across a series of lectures and articles in the 1950s, Huxley advocated for a type of utopian futurism where humanity would evolve and transcend its present limitations.

“We need a name for this new belief,” Huxley wrote in 1957. “Perhaps transhumanism will serve; man remaining man, but transcending himself, by realizing the new possibilities of and for his human nature.”

Huxley’s ideas were arguably inspired by influential speculative fiction of the mid-20th century from the likes of Arthur C. Clarke and Robert Heinlein, and consequently his more specific transhumanist philosophies went on to influence a generation of cyberpunk authors in the 1980s. It was in this era that the first self-described transhumanists began appearing, having formal meetings around the University of California.

With the pace of technological advancement dramatically accelerating into the 21st century, transhumanist thinking began to manifest in more specific futurist visions. Cryonics and life extension technology was one focus of transhumanists, while others looked to body modification, gender transitioning and general biohacking as a way of transcending the limits of our physical bodies.

What could go wrong?

Plenty of criticisms have been lobbed at transhumanists over the years, with their extreme views of the technological future of humanity causing many to question whether this is a direct pathway to losing touch with what makes us essentially human. The fear that we will merge into some kind of inhuman, god-like, robot civilization quite fairly frightens and disturbs those with more traditional perspectives on humanity.

Science fiction classically reflects many fears of transhumanist futures, from Skynet taking over the world to a Gattaca-like future where genetic modification creates dystopian class separation. But prominent transhumanist critic Francis Fukuyama has soberly outlined the dangers of this modern movement in his book, Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution.

Fukuyama comprehensively argues that the complexity of human beings cannot be so easily reduced into good and bad traits. If we were to try to eliminate traits we considered to be negative, be it through genetic modification or otherwise, we would be dangerously misunderstanding how we fundamentally function. “If we weren’t violent and aggressive we wouldn’t be able to defend ourselves; if we didn’t have feelings of exclusivity, we wouldn’t be loyal to those close to us; if we never felt jealousy, we would also never feel love,” he writes.

Some of the more valid concerns about the dawning transhumanist future are the socioeconomic repercussions of such a speedy technological evolution. As the chasm between rich and poor grows in our current culture, one can’t help but be concerned that future advancements could become disproportionately limited to those with the financial resources to afford them. If life extension technologies start to become feasible, and they are only available to the billionaire class, then we enter a scenario where the rich get richer and live longer, while the poor get poorer and die sooner.

Without exceptionally strong political reform maintaining democratic access to human enhancement technologies, it’s easy to foresee the rise of a disturbing genetic class divide. As environmentalist and activist Bill McKibben writes: “If we can’t afford the fifty cents a person it would take to buy bed nets to protect most of Africa from malaria, it is unlikely we will extend to anyone but the top tax bracket these latest forms of genetic technology.”

Remember eugenics …

The looming specter of eugenics hovers over a great deal of transhumanist thought. In the first half of the 20th century the term became disturbingly, but not unreasonably, associated with Nazi Germany. Sterilizing or euthanizing those who displayed characteristics that were deemed to be imperfect was ultimately outlawed as a form of genocide. But as the genome revolution struck later in the century a resurgence in the philosophical ideals of eugenics began to arise.

Transhumanist thought often parallels the ideals of eugenics, although most self-identifying transhumanists separate themselves from that stigmatized field, preferring terms like reprogenetics and germinal choice. The difference between the negative outcomes of eugenics and the more positive, transhumanist notion of reprogenetics seems to be one of consent. In a 21st century world of selective genetic modification, all is good as long as all parents equally have the choice to genetically modify their child, and are not forced by governments who are trying to forcefully manage the genetic pool.

Prominent transhumanist advocate Nick Bostrom, labeled by The New Yorker as the leading transhumanist philosopher of today, argues that critics of the movement always focus on the potential risks or negative outcomes without balancing the possible positive futures. He advocates that the mere potential of a negative future outcome is not enough to stifle technological momentum.

Bostrom lucidly makes his point in an essayexamining the transhumanist perspectives on human genetic modifications. “Good consequences no less than bad ones are possible,” he writes. “In the absence of sound arguments for the view that the negative consequences would predominate, such speculations provide no reason against moving forward with the technology.”

But what about God?

At first glance it would seem like the transhumanism movement would be synonymous with atheism. In 2002 the Vatican released an expansive statement exploring the intersection of technology and religion. The statement warned that changing a human’s genetic identity was a “radically immoral” action. The old adage of the scientist playing God certainly raises its head frequently in criticisms of transhumanism. Zoltan Istvan even penned an op-ed entitled “I’m an Atheist, Therefore I’m a Transhumanist” in which he, rather weakly, attempted to blend the two movements.

But there are some compelling intersections between religion and transhumanism that point to the possibility that the two sides are not as mutually exclusive as one would think. A poll by the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, founded by Nick Bostrom, discovered that only half of the transhumanists it surveyed identified as either atheist or agnostic.

Lincoln Cannon, founder of both the Mormon Transhumanist Association and the Christian Transhumanist Association (the very existence of these entities says something), has been advocating for a modern form of post secular religion based on both scientific belief and religious faith. Cannon sees transhumanism as a movement that allows for humanity to evolve into what he labels “superhumans.”

In his treatise titled, “The New God Argument,” Cannon envisions a creator God akin to our superhuman future potential. He posits an evolutionary cycle where we were created by a superhuman God, before then evolving into becoming our own superhuman Gods, from which we will create new life that will worship us as Gods and continue the cycle anew.

The New God Argument presents a fascinating case for aan evolution of religious thought, but it also pushes transhumanism into the realms of spirituality in ways that are bound to make many of the movement’s advocates uncomfortable. Another more extreme religious offshoot of transhumanism is Terasem, a self-described “transreligion.”

Terasem recalls a 1990s-styled new-age sentiment with its four core beliefs: life is purposeful, death is optional, God is technological, and love is essential. Founded by millionaire entrepreneur Martine Rothblatt, Terasem functions as both a spiritual transhumanist movement and a charitable organization that invests into technological research. The movement is especially focused on cryonic technology and researching ways to preserve human consciousness through downloading one’s thoughts and memories into either a mainframe or an independent social robot.

The rise of the biohackers

At the turn of the century, a transhumanist community began to form that fused the ethos of computer hacking with a body modification movement determined to create do-it-yourself cybernetic devices. These “Grinders” embraced cyborg technologies that could be directly integrated into their organic bodies.

Biohacking can take the form of pharmaceutical enhancements that hack one’s body chemistry, to implanting electronics into the body such as magnets or RFID and NFC tags. These transhumanist grinders sit at the furthermost borders of the movement, experimenting on their own bodies with occasionally quite extreme DIY surgical procedures.

Lepht Anonym is a Berlin-based biohacker who advocates cybernetics for the masses. Lepht (who identifies as genderless) has performed numerous body modifications over the past decade, including implanting neodymium metal discs under fingertips to enable the physical sensing of electromagnetic fields, and several internal compass implants designed to give a physical awareness of north and south magnetic poles.

But the biohacking movement is moving in from the fringe, with several tech start-ups arising over the past few years with an interest in developing a commercial body modification economy. Grindhouse Wetware, based on Pittsburgh, has been prominent in creating technology that augments the human body.

The company’s most prominent device is called the Northstar, which is an implant that it is hoped will have Bluetooth capabilities allowing the user to control their devices with simple hand movements. The first iteration of the device simply had an aesthetic function with LED lights under the user’s skin that mimic a form of bioluminescence. Future uses for the Northstar could see it interfacing with your smartphone, tracking biometric data, such as blood sugar, or acting as a controller for a variety of devices connected to the internet of things.

Hitting the big time

Transhumanism is moving inexorably into the mainstream as technological advances accelerate. Proponents advocate we dive head first into this brave new cybernetic world, while traditionalists grow increasingly nervous.

Regardless of one’s personal view there is undoubtedly an enormous number of people lining up to have that first brain/computer interface implanted into their head, or to genetically cue a set of specific characteristics for their baby. We live in exciting times that’s for sure … now excuse me while I re-watch Gattaca and hope it doesn’t turn into a documentary-like premonition of our future.

http://newatlas.com/transhumanism-mainstream-era-popular/47941/

History Has Been Hacked

 

images (12)

We know now that the elite are into big lies for mind control, and for sure history has been hacked too.


I am personally not sure if all of this information below is all totally accurate, but it’s 100% for sure worth knowing about, and delving into if you resonate with it. We need more people looking into this field of research.

Here are a few short trailers to watch that summarise how our history has been hacked.

They present that:

  • Homer’s Iliad – The Trojan War and 1st Crusade were the same event
  • Goths – were the biblical Gog/ Magog people and were actually Slavs
  • Tartars – the name of these people has been erased from history, although many ancient maps exist. After defeating them, the Romanov’s re-wrote Russian history
  • John’s Book of Revelation/ Apocalypse – according to the astronomical description in the biblical texts, this book had to be written in Sept/Oct 1486 AD
  • Dark Ages – this vacuum of time never existed. It was added to push back some historical events to make them more credible
  • Jesus was born in 1053 and died in 1086. It’s the same 33 years, just 1000+ years later in time
  • Egyptian/ Greek/ Roman ages – existed simultaneously
  • Mongolian Empire never existed. It was a Russian army called the Horde (Tartarians) These are the descendants of the Hyperboreans.

 

 

La Version De Cristo En La India…

Krishna de la India
Esto es basado en la historia, sea incorrecto o no …
El 28 de agosto, millones de indios celebraron el cumpleaños del Señor Krishna, que nació hace unos 3.000 años. La celebración principal comenzó a medianoche, y las actividades incluyen cantar, orar y ayunar. (La siguiente imagen muestra a los hindúes reuniéndose para el cumpleaños de Krishna en un templo en Katmandú, Nepal).

Las semejanzas entre el carácter cristiano y el Mesías Krishna de la India son centenares, particularmente cuando se consideran apócrifos los primeros textos cristianos que ahora se consideran apócrifos. Hay que señalar que una ortografía inglesa común anterior de Krishna era “Christna”, que revela su relación Con “Cristo”. También en bengalí, Krishna es reputado “Christos”, que es lo mismo que los griegos para “Cristo” y que los soldados de Alejandro Magno lo llaman Krishna. Cabe señalar además que, al igual que con Jesús, Buda y Osiris, muchas personas han creído y siguen creyendo en un Krishna histórico. Lo que sigue es una lista parcial de las correspondencias entre Jesús y Krishna:

* Krishna nació de la virgen Devaki (“Divina”) el 25 de diciembre.
* Su padre terrenal era un carpintero que estaba en la ciudad pagando impuestos mientras que Krishna nació.
* Su nacimiento fue señalado por una estrella en el este y asistido por ángeles y pastores, en cuyo momento se le presentaron con especias.
* Los anfitriones celestiales bailaron y cantaron en su nacimiento.
* Fue perseguido por un tirano que ordenó la matanza de miles de niños.
* Krishna fue ungido en la cabeza con aceite por una mujer que sanó.
* Se le representa como teniendo su pie en la cabeza de una serpiente.
* Él hizo milagros y maravillas, resucitando a los muertos y curando a los leprosos, a los sordos ya los ciegos.
* Krishna usó parábolas para enseñar a la gente acerca de la caridad y el amor, y “vivió pobre y amó a los pobres”
* Castigó al clero, acusándolos de “ambición e hipocresía … la tradición dice que cayó víctima de su venganza”.
* El “discípulo amado” de Krishna era Arjuna o Ar-jouan (Juan)
* Se transfiguró delante de sus discípulos.
* Él dio a sus discípulos la capacidad de hacer milagros.
Su camino estaba “sembrado de ramas”.
* En algunas tradiciones murió en un árbol o fue crucificado entre dos ladrones.
* Krishna fue asesinado alrededor de la edad de 30, y el sol oscureció a su muerte.
* Se levantó de la muerte y ascendió al cielo “a la vista de todos los hombres”.
* Fue representado en una cruz con agujeros de uñas en sus pies, así como tener un emblema de corazón en su ropa.
Krishna no es el “león de la tribu de Saki”.
* Fue llamado el “Dios Pastor” y considerado el “Redentor”, “Primogénito”, “Portador del Pecado”, “Libertador”, “Palabra Universal”.
“Fue considerado el” Hijo de Dios “y” Nuestro Señor y Salvador “, que vino a la Tierra para morir por la salvación del hombre.
* Era la segunda persona de la Trinidad.
* Sus discípulos supuestamente le otorgaron el título de “Jezeo”, o “Jezeo”, que significa “Esencia pura”.
* Krishna debe volver a juzgar a los muertos, cabalgando sobre un caballo blanco, y luchar con “El Príncipe del Mal”, que desolará la Tierra.
* La historia de Krishna como se registró en las antiguas leyendas y textos indúes 

Contenido: // media / external / file / 47711

India’s Christ Version..

Krishna of India

This is base on history, wether its wrong or not…

On August 28, millions of Indians celebrated the birthday of Lord Krishna, who was born about 3,000 years ago.  The main celebration began at midnight, and activities include singing, praying, and fasting. (The next image  shows Hindus gathering for Krishna’s birthday at a temple in Kathmandu, Nepal.)

The similarities between the Christian character and the Indian Messiah Krishna number in the hundreds, particulary when the early Christian texts now considered apocryphal are factored in. It should be noted that a common earlier English spelling of Krishna was ” Christna,” which reveals its relation with “Christ.” Also in Bengali, Krishna is reputedy “Christos,” whish is the same as the Greeks for “Christ” and which the soldiers of Alexander The Great call it Krishna. It should be further noted that, as with Jesus, Buddha and Osiris, many people have believed and continue to believe in a historical Krishna. The following is a partial list of the correspondences between Jesus and Krishna:

*Krishna was born of the virgen Devaki (“Divine One”) on December 25th.

*His earthly father was a carpenter who was off in the city paying tax while Krishna was born.

*His birth was signaled by a star in the east and attended by angels and shepherds, at which time he was presented with spices.

*The heavenly hosts danced and sang at his birth.

*He was persecuted by a tyrant who ordered the slaughter of thousands of infants.

*Krishna was anointed on the head with oil by a woman whom he healed.

*He is depicted as having his foot on the head of a serpent.

*He worked miracles and wonders, rising the dead and healing the lepers, the deaf and the blind.

*Krishna used parables to teach the people about charity and love, and he “lived poor and he loved the poor,”

*He castigated the clergy, charging them with “ambition and hypocrisy… tradition says he fell victim to their vengeance.”

*Krishna’s​ “beloved disciple” was Arjuna or Ar-jouan (John)

*He was transfigured in front of his disciples.

*He gave his disciples the ability to work miracles.

His path was “strewn with branches.”

*In some traditions he died on a tree or was crucified between 2 thieves.

*Krishna was killed around the age of 30, and the sun darkened at his death.

*He rose from the death and ascended to heaven “in the sight of all men.”

*He was depicted on a cross with nail holes in his feet, as well as having a heart emblem on his clothing.

*Krishna isnthe “lion of the tribe of Saki.”

*He was called the “Shepherd God” and considered the “Redeemer,” “Firstborn,” “Sin-Bearer,” “Liberator,” “Universal Word.”

“He was deemed the “Son of God” and “Our Lord and Savior,” who came to Earth to die for man’s salvation.

*He was the second person of the Trinity.

*His disciples purportedly bestowed upon him the title “Jezeus,” or “Jezeus,” meaning “Pure Essence.”

*Krishna is to return to.judge the dead, riding on a white horse, and to do battle with “The Prince of Evil,” who will desolate the Earth.

*The story of Krishna as recorded in the ancient Indian legends and text.

content://media/external/file/47711

Osiris, El Cristo Antes De Cristo…

Esto es basado en la historia, este mal o no…

Horus / Osiris De Egipto
Las leyendas de Osiris / Horus se remontan a miles de años, y muchas personas a lo largo de los milenios han pensado que Osiris es una persona real, algunos afirman que vivió hace 22.000 años. El culto de Osiris, Isis y Horus estaba extendido en el mundo antiguo, incluso en Roma. En el mito egipcio, Horus y su padre una vez y futuro, Osiris, son frecuentemente intercambiables, como en “Yo y mi Padre somos Uno”. En cuanto a Osiris, Walker dice:
De todos los dioses salvadores adorados al principio de la era cristiana, Osiris pudo haber contribuido más detalles a la figura evolutiva de Cristo que cualquier otro. Ya muy viejo en Egipto, Osiris se identificó con casi todos los dioses egipcios y estaba en el camino de absorber a todos. Tenía más de 200 nombres divinos. Fue llamado El Señor de los Señores, rey de reyes, Dios de los Dioses. Era la resurrección y la vida, el buen pastor, eternidad y eternidad, el dios que “hizo que los hombres y las mujeres volviesen a nacer”. Osiris fue para los egipcios el dios hombre que sufrió , Y murió, y resucitó, y reinó eternamente en el cielo. Creyeron que ellos heredarían la vida eterna, tal como lo había hecho … ”
La llegada de Osiris fue anunciada por tres hombres sabios: las tres estrellas Minkata, Anilam y Alnitak en el cinturón de Orion, que apuntan directamente a la estrella de Osiris en el este, Sirius (Sothis)

Significación de su nacimiento …
Ciertamente Osiris era un mesías prototipo, así como Host devorado.
Su carne se comía en forma de comunión tortas de trigo, la “planta de la Verdad” … el culto de Osiris aportó una serie de ideas y frases a la Biblia. Los Salmos 23 copiaron un texto egipcio apelando a Osiris el bien guiado para llevar al difunto a los “pastos verdes” y “aguas tranquilas” de la tierra nefernefer, para restaurar el alma al cuerpo y dar protección en el valle del Sombra de la muerte (el Tuat).


La oración de los señores fue prefigurada por el himno egipcio a Osiris-amén, principio: “Amén, oh Amén, que estás en el cielo”. Amén también fue invocado al final de cada oración.

La Conspiración de Cristo:

La historia más grande jamás vendida

Todos Los Planetas Caben Entre La Tierra Y La Luna, Deacuerdo a La NASA..

Algunos diámetros citados suman alrededor de 390.000 km, que es más grande que los 384.000 km o tan habitualmente citados como la distancia Tierra-Luna. Pero si descuidan los 6.000 kilómetros impares, entonces sí, todos los planetas pueden encajar más o menos entre la Tierra y la Luna. Júpiter tiene un volumen de 1,43 x 10 ^ 15 kilómetros cúbicos.
Si esto es correcto,  como es esto posible?

Foto tomada desde el satélite Epic a 1,000,000 de millas de distancia

Foto tomada desde el Rover en El Planeta Marte…

Foto tomada desde el satélite Cassini orbitando El Planeta Saturno..

For de la Luna desde La Tierra obviamente

Obviamente algo aquí no hace sentido..

Piensa por ti mismo..