7,500 Years Old Toy Car The Earliest Evidence Of The Wheel

Author Cliff Dunning: “Historians tell us the oldest civilized cultures who developed the wheel are around 5,000 years old, and yet, new discoveries are continually pushing this date further back – WITHOUT our history books reflecting on the new information.

Generations of people still believe that the oldest organized civilizations are those that lived in the Middle East, parts of China and groups scattered throughout the world. Before 3,000 years – we are told that man lived in caves. Here is an example of the wheel, attached to a small toy car of some type that was found to be 7,500 years old. 

It is older than anything I have found in Central or South America that has wheels, and may have once been formed from clay, (and has turned to stone).”


Possibly. the earliest representation of the wheel Culture and Tourism Director of Mardin, Davut Beliktay


According to the Culture and Tourism Director of Mardin, Davut Beliktay, stone dolls and whistles, were also found at sites in the area. 


“We believe that the whistles and dolls are 5,000 to 6,000 years old. The whistles are still in working condition,” he said. – See more at: http://humansarefree.com/2013/09/7500-years-old-toy-car-earliest.html?m=0#sthash.6seqJwL0.FQ80xSho.dpuf


The American Babylonianism Introduction

The Statue of Liberty has become the most cherished symbol of the United States of America. What we were NOT taught in school were the truly significant facts regarding the true nature of the Statue. Those pertinent facts that remain largely unknown revolve around the true history of the Statue’s inception as well as the meaning and significance behind the statue.

French sculptor, Frederic Bartholdi, designed the Statue of Liberty. Bartholdi did not originate the concept of the statue. The idea for creating a statue of liberty and freedom was first proposed by another Frenchman by the name of Edward Laboulaye. It was Laboulaye’s idea and determination during the American Civil War that carried the idea from a simple notion to an actual project.


Laboulaye, a French Freemason proposed the idea of a giant statue replicating a goddess that the Masonic movement idolized. Laboulaye proceeded to raise the financial support and commission Bartholdi to provide the sculpture of this goddess of illumination from ancient times.

What deity was this? It was the goddess known by various names. Laboulaye and his fellow Freemason, sculptor Bartholdi referred to her as “Libertas” but she was also an early adoption by Romans of the Babylonian goddess Ishtar. We’ll need to follow the research on the goddess connections to fully understand this statue’s meaning.

Roman goddess Libertas

Libertas was the name of an ancient Roman goddess adopted by the Romans perhaps as early as the 5th century BC and certainly by the 4th Century BC. She was referred to as the goddess of personal freedom and liberty. In fact Libertas meant freedom. So liberty means freedom. The 2 names describe the one concept we call freedom. Liberty = Freedom and Freedom = Liberty.

This goddess was the goddess of freedom because she promoted the ideals for the personal freedom to do anything that felt good. She was called the matron goddess of prostitution because she promoted sexual freedom. Indeed, she had invented the concept. Slaves considered her their goddess in the hopes of winning their freedom.

Many women who gained freedom later turned to prostitution to survive and thereby retained Libertas as their goddess, especially if they became priestesses in the Libertas cult. Libertas was also a goddess of war in order to fight for freedom. She was also referred at times as the goddess of victory because freedom must have victory in order to survive. This goddess was also the goddess of immigrants.

The whole idea of immigration connoted the idea of freedom. Her popularity was also unique because of her unique doctrine of hearing personal prayers. This unique doctrine was something that most of the pagan deity doctrines were not disposed towards.


Left: Roman goddess LibertasWe know that this goddess existed because of the records left behind to us. We have the ancient writings of Cicero who writes of this goddess and her Temple on the Aventine Way in Rome. She was depicted on some Roman coins as wearing a freedom cap and having a wreath along with a spear or sometimes a sword.

Such coin images were not the only depictions. Sometimes she was well robed and at other times seductively unclothed in both sculptures and paintings. We know of Libertas being referred to as the Mother of Harlots by the famous Roman historian (and senator) Cicero’s writings. Cicero indicates that she was also a very early goddess of the Greeks even before early Roman civilization developed.

Upon further investigation we find that the Greeks had acquired knowledge of this being from previous empires in the Middle East and Egypt. This goddess was called Ashtoreth in Hebrew and in the Old Testament’s Greek version (the Septuagint).

Ashtoreth becomes transliterated into the Greek as Astarte, which became the early Greek name for the goddess until it was later changed to Aphrodite. The Hebrew term Ashtoreth was itself a transliteration from the Babylonian dialect (Akkadian) term of Ishtar.

Ishtar in the most ancient of times was also referred to by the Sumerian dialect as Inanna or Ninanna meaning the Queen of Heaven or Lady of Heaven. In Canaan this deity was called Ashtaroth. The Hittites called her Shaushka. The Phoenicians on Cypress initially referred to her as Astarte.

Isis was the name the Egyptians gave to her. This is how the goddess became introduced to the earliest Greeks. We know this transformation in part due to the written texts found by archaeologists plus from studying the character traits and descriptions. For instance all these deities were actually just one goddess and she was associated with the planet Venus.

Most had phonetic language roots in the transliterating aspects of the name Ishtar and this remained so until the Greeks changed the name to Aphrodite. Later the Romans referred to her in the Latin, initially as Libertas and later as Venus when they accepted more than just the Liberty doctrines.

ISHTAR: Goddess of Liberty and Personal Freedom

Ishtar was introduced to the Greeks as Astarte through the Phoenicians. We can see that the lineage of the Greek and Roman goddess of the planet Venus goes all the way back to ancient Babylon of around 3,000 BC.

Apparently the Greeks (and later the Romans) chose to initially honor only one portion of Ishtar’s character and doctrines that appealed to them in those very early years before they established empires. Ishtar’s doctrine of personal freedom was what really impressed both the Greeks and the Romans. They therefore chose to worship just that aspect of her character.


As time passed, the succeeding generations of Greeks found the other Ishtar doctrines to be appealing and incorporated her into their pantheon of deities as Astarte or Aphrodite. Later still, the Romans did the same and referred to her as Venus.

It seems that the allure of Ishtar was her doctrine of holy sex or salvation by holy sexual relations with a temple priestess or priest as a means of purification and holiness.

Of course, this entailed paying the priestess or priest and thus it was officially sanctioned and therefore “holy” prostitution. Ishtar introduced that whole concept to the human race.

This is why she was referred to as the Mother of Harlots. Harlots had been deemed to be social outcasts so she was also referred to as the Mother of exiles.

This was later equated with the idea of immigration. Naturally then Ishtar (a.k.a.– Libertas) was known as the Mother of Harlots, the Mother of Exiles and the Mother of immigrants throughout not only Babylon and Babylonia but also later Assyria, Egypt, Greece and Rome.

What was Ishtar’s legacy in Babylon? She was the chief goddess of Babylon and all of Babylonia. There was no other goddess more honored than she. She was equated to have nearly the same power as the chief god of Babylon, the sun god Utu, also known as Shamesh. In later years, the chief male deities would flip-flop in popularity.

The most famous and prominent during the times of Israel’s nationhood was “Baal.” [Baal was also called Marduk/Mardok/Merodach/Bel] Baal was identified with the planet Mars and was called the god of War. His name meant “Lord of the air” for his superior powers and the supremacy of the air. It was claimed that he as well as Ishtar and all the  other deities “flew” among and from the “stars in heaven.”

Ishtar was a multi-faceted deity. She was first and foremost endeared to the hearts and minds of Babylonians because of her primary dedication to Freedom and Liberty. She was also considered the Mother of Prostitution or Harlotry…and it was considered “holy.”

Why? Ishtar introduced the concept of removal of sins by the practice of the sinner engaging in a “holy” rite of sexual relations with a priestess or priest.

This action would involve the payment of money to the priestess or priest as part of the cleansing process. It was an offering of thanksgiving for the purification. This is the very first instance of Prostitution in human history.

Ishtar was also known as the goddess of war because she fights for freedom and liberty. She was also known as the goddess of victory because there is no freedom without victory. She was also known as the goddess of love because of her sexuality and her promotion of all types of sexual perversion in the name of freedom. Her motto was “if it feels good, do it.”

Didn’t we hear that same idea as a theme song during the 1960s? She was also the goddess of the planet Venus. She was a goddess who “flew among the stars” and so therefore was called the Queen of Heaven or Lady of Heaven.

Zecharia Sitchin, in his book “Divine Encounters” describes another significant role for Ishtar in Babylonia/Sumer. [Note: the earliest Babylonians did not call themselves Babylonians nor their land Babylon. They called their land Sumer and they are referred to as Sumerians.]

Now, Sitchin is one of only a handful of scholars who has been able to learn and translate the cuneiform tablet writings of the Sumerians/Babylonians. He has written numerous books detailing various aspects of the culture and writings of Sumer.

In his book “Divine Encounters” he describes a significant role that Ishtar held for the Sumerians. On pages 174 through 176 he describes the annual ritual in which the King of Sumer must come to the special chamber temple of Ishtar to engage in sexual relations with her for one night of passion.

If during the night she is displeased with the King in anyway she kills him and a new candidate is selected to undergo another ritual initiation of one night passion. He must perform satisfactorily. This process was to continue until Ishtar accepted a candidate who met with her satisfaction.

If the king or candidate found acceptance he would appear the following morning to the expectant crowds outside the temple palace to show that he had gained the favor of the goddess to rule for one more year. Such acceptance also meant that the nation would have a good year of agricultural harvests.

Sitchin also notes that the Biblical references to “daughter of Babylon” always refers to Ishtar of Babylon. She was a Mother of Harlots and also a daughter of Babylon.

This seems like a dichotomy of sorts but Ishtar was a daughter of the original founding god of Babylon known as “Anu” who was the ruler of the planet called “Nibiru.” Nibiru was an additional planet in our solar system that circled the earth every 3,600 years, according to the royal records of Babylon.

Sitchin has been roundly ridiculed by scientists for proposing that this notion of Nibiru could actually exist. However on June 30, 1999 a scientist, David Stevenson from California Institute of Technology published a paper stating that “interstellar planets” (which is what a “Nibiru” would be called) is certainly a theoretical possibility and should not be dismissed.

In the CNN/Reuters News story the text mentions that Stevenson is not alone and that others have theorized that there may be others planets roaming interstellar space that came from our solar system.

Sitchin is also a noted Dead Sea Scrolls scholar. He served in the original investigative group attempting to repair the damaged scrolls. He is an extraordinarily gifted scholar. [See Divine Encounters, Published by Avon Books, NY. NY., 1995; ISBN: 0-380-78076-3]

Now this ritual between Ishtar and the king or king candidate is what the Biblical prophecies are referring to when it talks about the Harlot having relations with the “kings of the earth.”

In other words, in the prophecies, it is referring to Ishtar approving the rule of the kings because they have pleased her and did as she commanded. See Revelation 17:1-2, 4-5 and also 18: 3, 9 and 19:2. See also: Isaiah 47:1-15; Jeremiah 51:7.

It also means that the relationship is a two-way street. Ishtar gives to the kings the necessities to maintain authority and control. In return, the kings of course swear allegiance to Ishtar and provide sacrifices for her. Revelation provides a symbolic similarity between the ancient historical aspect and a future relationship between a future Babylon and the rest of the nations.

Super-power Babylon acts just like an Ishtar and engages in prostitution with the rest of the nations. The context is all with regards to money and materialism. See Revelation 18:1-24 and note how the overall theme revolves around money and material things.

Connecting Ishtar to the Statue of Liberty

The Statue of Liberty was a Masonic concept conceived from within Freemasonry. The chief promoter and fundraiser for the project was Edward Laboulaye and he collaborated with the sculptor Frederic Bartholdi to develop a statue of Masonic enlightenment.

The statue was developed from within the highest doctrines of Freemasonry. This “enlightenment” took its form in various symbols found in the sculpture itself.

#1. The Crown of 7 Spikes:

This symbol was to represent the enlightenment of the Babylonian sun god Shamesh/Utu. The idea was that this sun god’s occultic illumination could be focused by each of the 7 spikes of the crown. Each spike would flash this occultic enlightenment to each of the 7 “horas” or large landmasses of the world.

In other words, the each spike would flash occultic enlightenment to a continent on planet earth. Each of the 7 spikes would then be representative of one of the 7 large landmasses or continents of the world.

#2. The Tablets:

A common misconception is that the tablets represent the 10 Commandments that God gave to Moses. This is not true. The tablets are engraved only with the Roman numerals standing for July 4th, 1776.

According to the preeminent Statue Historian, Marvin Trachtenberg in his book “The Statue of Liberty” the tablets represented a generic notion of the concept of law. This should not be confused with the Laws of Moses.

Freemasonry gives lip service to Judaism, Christianity and Islam as law-giving religions but Freemasonry tries to synthesize all religions into one central focus…the idea of “law” in general. Hence the tablets being held by the Statue of Liberty carry that general meaning.

#3. The Robe:

In the original planning, the Statue of Liberty was designed in the initial stages to be in color. She was to be wearing the royal robes of scarlet and purple.

It became obvious that for reasons of monetary purposes the statue must be made from copper. The use of copper precluded the use of any color schemes. Thus the original plans for scarlet and purple robes were abandoned.

#4. The Torch:

This item was originally designed to be a golden cup filled with the wine of freedom. This golden cup remained in the planning and was actually made.

However, before completion and shipping of the entire statue, the New York Port authorities asked if there could be some sort of modification to allow for an eternal flame or light to be designed into the statue so that ships could use her as a night time navigational aid. Bartholdi consented to make modifications to the basic cup design to allow for a natural gas flame to be utilized.

The torch we see today is actually the same type of cup design used in ancient times for drinking wine. It featured a handle for the cup at the bottom and the handle looked much like a stick. The golden aspect itself was altered again to conform to the needs of the natural gas flame.

The actual, original golden cup was later sold by the project to the Czar of Russia, Czar Nicholas. In 1917 during the Russian revolution the Communist government took possession of it. The cup has remained in Russian hands but in 1997 was reportedly offered for sale by the Russian government to help pay off Russia’s foreign debts. This author has not been able to determine whether or not the cup was actually sold or not. It is only known that the cup is still in existence.

#5. “Mother of Exiles” 

“Mother of Exiles” is a key term in the poem by Emma Lazarus. In her famous poem about the statue, (now etched into the base of the statue) Lazarus refers to the woman as “The Mother of Exiles”. The poem has forever indelibly linked the statue to immigrants from around the world.

The statue is the patron “saint” of immigrants everywhere. Oddly enough, the Babylonian goddess Ishtar was also the patron goddess of immigrants in Babylon because as a goddess of personal freedom, she brought hope to immigrants seeking to make a better life for themselves in Babylon.

So too for this “Mother of Exiles”. In fact, if we try to transliterate the English term “Mother of Exiles” into the Greek… Mother as a word has similar phonetic sounds. Doing the same with “exiles” from English into Koine-Greek, the Koine-Greek listener would link it to a similar Greek word that connoted deep inhalation of air or “heavy breathing.”

This is tied into the Greek word “epithumia” which in English is normally translated as “lust” but the literal meaning in Koine-Greek meant literally “heavy breathing” and was connoted with desire. Now this terminology is then linked to the word “Porneoh” from which we get the word Pornography. Porneoh=lust fulfillment by sexual relations in exchange for money… which again was the main claim to fame for Ishtar… holy sexual prostitution.

Ishtar worship is the very first instance of prostitution in human history and it was deemed “holy!” Now, this may indeed just be an interesting coincidence but remember Revelation 17:5 where the woman called Mystery Babylon is referred to as the “Mother of Harlots.”


The are just too many coincidences when we compare the characteristics in the scriptures relating to the woman called “Mystery Babylon — “Mother of Harlots” with that of Ishtar of Babylon and the Statue of Liberty. What we conclude:

The Statue of Liberty is the woman being described in Revelation 17/18 and especially 17:4-5, 9 and 18:7 along with Isaiah 47:1-15. We say this because we know that the Statue of Liberty is actually the artist/sculpture’s vision of Ishtar, the goddess of Babylon. This makes the Statue of Liberty the largest Idol ever made by human hands.

Is it any wonder that our Congressional lawmakers seem to be so perpetually “screwed up?”

The reference to “Mystery Babylon — Mother of Harlots” is referencing Ishtar, the Mother of Harlots of Babylon…and her “mystery doctrines” such as salvation by sex for money. There are numerous other statue of other pagan deities in the US Capitol building and around the nation’s capitol city. America is indeed the Mystery Babylon of Revelation 17 and 18.

By AO Report; | References:

1. Crane, Gregory R. (ed.) The Perseus Project May, 1999. See also specific page:

2. Also see this link and scroll down to the letter “L” section and then click on the term Libertas:

3. Here are links to more information on Ishtar:

– See more at: http://humansarefree.com/2014/04/the-secret-worship-of-illuminati-statue.html?m=0#sthash.pfb9GMRa.ZHYTd88Y.dpuf

Transhumanist Singularity – The Ultimate Escapist Agenda


Bear with me, for this may not be an easy read – but we need to crack the code of this much discussed vainglorious chimera.

Which is not to say it doesn’t exist – it does. Yet it exists as a byproduct of minds that operate in a sub human vacuum; that have severed their connection with with the normal diversity of emotions – and more particularly – with spirit and soul. Once this type of divorce is sanctioned there can only be deleterious consequences.

The current Transhumanist ethos is deeply atheistic and, as such, has no need to replace God, since it doesn’t believe there is such an entity in the first place. But, ironically, it seemingly does have the need to create an all-powerful god of its own design.

Such a concept, pursued through to its conclusion, can, according to its proponents, provide some sort of final solution to the human dilemma. So we get the Transhumanist notion that the realisation of a computer that can outmaneuver the human brain will somehow produce a liberated society.

Nothing, in reality could be further from the truth. By handing over responsibility for the management of our lives to machines, we usurp our own ability to shape, alter, direct and ultimately rejoice in the art of living. Instead, we individually elect to become slaves to our own inventions.

Recognising this is most important, as it puts the Transhumanist agenda in its true light – which is actually not light at all – but essentially dark. When given free rein, harbouring delusional visions of power leads on to openly fascistic expressions. The Nazi eugenics programme of World War Two is testimony to this horror. And the attempt to bring into existence an all-powerful ‘conscious’ computer capable of outstripping human intelligence makes Transhumanism into a new form of concentration camp.

The eugenics school of ‘population cleansing’ has never been far from the surface in this corporate-dominated era, and is particular to New World Order ambitions. But to achieve a major depopulation ambition in the post World War Two era would require a highly subversive slight of hand – and I believe that the Transhumanist prophecy of a coming ‘Singularity’ – is such a deeply subversive slight of hand.

Transhumanists use the term ‘The Singularity’ to describe the time when they believe that artificial intelligence, in continuing on its exponential rate of growth, will take over – or overtake – natural intelligence. They name that time ‘The Omega Point’.

This is, I suggest, a direct plagiarism of the spiritual context in which this same term (although not in common parlance) would describe the time of humanity’s broad awakening to Divine Consciousness – or Godliness.

The Singularity of Transhumanist origins thus represents the demonic opposite of Divine Awakening, or Enlightenment. It reverses the natural flow of life and imprisons its prey in a Matrix-like world of brainwashed, sterile conformity; the overseer of which is a man-made brain. Orwell, Huxley and others warned of just such a possibility more than sixty years ago.

So when we hear that Google, whose chairman is a regular Bilderberg attendee, is pursuing interests in this field, it becomes all too clear that the agenda is directly linked to the ongoing establishment of just such a big brother global control system. One which, according to the Singularity ethos, ultimately leads on to a technically refined form of ‘thinking’ super-computer permanently replacing the higher callings of the human mind.

Under this heinous regime, it is touted that this piece of man-made technology will, sooner or later, take the responsibility for managing planetary affairs out of human hands completely, and leave newly ‘liberated people’ to scuttle around like so many rudderless chickens under the watchful eye of the ‘master cyborg cock’.

The software instructions would no doubt gear this all-pervasive big brother to instill a further degree of fear upon an already jittery society. And so in awe of its powers would people be – that the ‘logic’ of its pronouncements/actions would be deemed irrefutable. So much so, that all its instructions could never be proved invalid, or be capable of being struck down by a court of law.

No surprise that we have recently witnessed a slew of cinematic previews of this futuristic type of scenario becoming reality.

If you have ever tried to question your account balance with banking staff, you will likely have experienced an abdication of responsibility for any error that may have been made – followed by a reference to any error being “with the computer” and therefore somehow beyond the control of bank staff. This is an initial phase of human abdication to the ‘thinking’ machine. Only a managerial employee might finally be persuaded to actually check the computing end of the system for a potential error.

The desire to never be held accountable and to escape all personal responsibility for the realisation of one’s own God-given creative potential – or for the condition of the physical world – represents the ultimate escapist agenda; and makes perfect canon fodder for the vampiric greed of the dark side.

We know that various forms of high-tech (mind) control systems were already under scrutiny within the sinister and secretiveMK-Ultra programme and CIA sponsored Cybernetics teams of four or five decades ago. And that before this, certain pseudo-Christian sects held that the gathering of all human intelligence into one vast central holding pool would somehow provide the basis for an evolutionary shift into a higher evolved state for human kind; which would in turn flood the universe with the power of its combined intelligence.

Within this delusional vision of a man-made sped-up evolution, the ‘superior mind’ of the computer would be relied upon to coral collective global human information energy. Once achieved, it would no doubt be left in charge of deciding who would – and who would not – be acceptable to the resulting cybernetic society. A supercomputer would, in this way, inherit the role of eugenics commander-in-chief, and in something like a Scientology debriefing session – would be given responsibility for selecting who was eligible or ineligible within a kind of sub-human survival of the fittest. The ineligible being dispensed with in whatever way was deemed ‘most efficient’.

Most efficient – and most in keeping with the needs of those party to designing and programming the commander-in-chief’s software – who would make sure to write themselves out of the programme and claim they had no part in the outcome. This supercomputer will therefore supply the perfect alibi as, according to its programmers, it will have have exceeded their ability to retain control over its actions – and thereby absolve them of responsibility for its excesses. The ultimate pre conceived opt-out.

Nevertheless, the commander-in-chief computer’s primary role is supposed to be a triggering of the great ‘Singularity Event’. An event that might manifest as some kind of Luciferain/Illuminati glorification rapture. A ritualistic dark-side fest with strong similarities to the annual Californian Bohemian Grove gathering. A satanic coming together to celebrate the time in which the spiritual soul would finally be laid to rest and the rampant materialist ambitions of a soulless elite get their full and unopposed due. In this scenario ‘The Omega Point’ sees the Illuminati dream fulfilled.

After this, the machine would no doubt be switched off – by someone who had retained sufficient will power to carry out this action. Most of the new inheritors of the Earth would insist on having human slaves to look after their various and vicarious needs. In their compassion-less version of Shangri-La, the suffering of others would likely add some ‘frissant’ to daily life – and robotic objects could not so amply fulfil this role.

It seems likely that today’s Transhumanists are extending a script that emanates from the Nazi era. The wish to preserve/build a super race – and rid the world of all that fails to measure up to its definitions of mental perfection. Illuminati initiates already consider themselves to be bloodline descendants of extraterrestrial god-kings. These extraterrestrial ambitions tie-in closely with the Transhuman agenda – in which human heart-based spiritual power, being the chief obstruction to the fulfilment of their goal, is finally fully subverted.

We know something about this. For the same sinister theme runs throughout the barely hidden ambitions of corporate exploits in the fields of GMO, pharmaceuticals, agrichemicals, nuclear energy, much of the food industry, corporate-controlled media, key banking institutions, advanced technology and telecommunications

, the military, NATO, the super-rich, the top dogs of just about all government institutions including the Vatican and other church hierarchies. Not forgetting the European Union and United States executive and taking-in the World Trade Organisation and all the main global trading blocks of this materialistically segmented planet.

In all these – and more – one can detect the mostly secretive but sometimes quite open despotic desire to exercise an inhuman form of domination, surpassing even the profit motive. The desire to exercise a coldly controlling influence over others and to use this planet as if it were nothing more than free fuel for the further aggrandisement of already overinflated egos. Never mind if ecocide is the end result. Never mind if wisdom, knowledge and a caring heart have to be dispensed with so as to get this devil onto its vainglorious throne.

All these sinister ambitions are fully dependent for their realisation on the Singularity ‘Omega Point’ delivering its technological takeover of human society – and mesmerising the majority into submission and surrender with its seemingly endless and adaptable calculating capacities.

Psychologically, the despotic ‘thinking supercomputer’ is nothing more than the projection of an ever-restless alter ego. A compensation for an unbearable sense of spiritual inner emptiness and the attempt to try to make up for this by surrendering one’s soul to an all powerful and dominating self-created idol.

So if you harbour a secret fascination in corporate mass-produced gadgetry – watch out! You are already entering the foothills of the Transhumanist domain and opening yourself to a mind-controlling medium which is shaping the lives of a whole generation even as I write.

It is, in fact, part of the same domain in which avid genetic scientists like Craig Venter are putting the final touches to their (ostensibly illegal) laboratory conceived designer babies.

We, in whom circulates the precious red blood of love, sympathy, sadness, joy and passion, are never going to fall foul of this soulless ghost – neither now or in the future. But we need to know of it; if only to remind ourselves of what lies in store for this world if we fail to realise our God-given potential to be warm hearted, creative beings.

Creative, sentient beings whose destiny is to break through the insanity which surrounds us, drawing upon a deeper courage and a greater conviction concerning our own Divine powers. Powers to bring forth that which will banish forever those who count on fear winning out over the glorious celebration of love; which is, has been – and will always be – the true foundation of Universal and Earthly life.


7 Unexplained Ancient Egyptian Artifacts

Egyptologists have of course done a wonderful job of figuring out the lives of the Dynastic Egyptians from as far back as about 3100 BC. However, there are certain artifacts, some shown here, that do not fit into their scheme very well.Explain these:


1. The Colossi of Memnon

The one on the left is one solid piece of quartzite, and its estimated weight is 720 tons. The quarry from which the stone was cut is near Cairo, 400 hundred miles away.


2. The unfinished obelisk at Aswan, made of rose granite 

It would have weighed 1200 tons had it been finished. So how were they planning on lifting it out of its trench? Slaves?

3. The Serapeum Megaliths

One of the more than 20 stone boxes, underground in the Serapeum at Saqqara. The lid and box are made from one piece of stone, and weigh about 100 tons. Also, the stone was brought from Aswan in many cases, about 500 miles away.

4. The Osirion at Abydos

Built on purpose underground, as were many pre-dynastic structures. The large vertical blocks are Aswan granite; the quarry being more than 100 miles away.


5. Large core drill hole at Karnak

Clearly an ancient work, and the groove created indicates that the drill was boring into the Aswan pink granite at a rate of at least 2 mm per revolution.

6. The Ramesseum broken statue

PART of a broken statue at the Ramesseum near Karnak, again made of Aswan pink granite. When intact, it would have weighed about 1000 tons. The distance from the quarry is about 140 miles.


Here’s a foot on top of the that of the giant statue:


7. The Hall of Records,

beneath the Sphinx And perhaps the most enigmatic of all ancient sculptures, the Sphinx. Where is the Hall of Records? If this stone near the back of the Sphinx is removed, it reveals a ladder that descends into the bedrock of the Giza Plateau:

And at the front, authorities have made a wooden walkway, hiding the entrance to a ramp and possibly chambers under the Sphinx’s paws:

All of the above mysteries are best seen with the experts at http://www.khemitology.com; it is a family tradition. These amazing structures alone are enough to challenge the official version of history. But Egypt is home to the biggest of all mysteries: the Great Pyramids. The same old questions stand to this day: Who built them? How? And more importantly, Why? If you think you already know all the secrets of these marvelous constructions, think again.