The Great Global Warming Fraud

image

While the public has been led to believe that “all” the leading scientists share the global warming hysteria and the political agenda that goes hand in hand, in practice, official reports of the United Nations or the National Academy of Sciences are written by bureaucrats and decorated with the names of important scientists who were “consulted” but whose contrary conclusions have been ignored.

MIT scientists and leading universities in a number of countries are included. Some of these are scientists whose names were peaked in some of the literature on the origin of global warming being promoted in the media, but they clearly state that they neither wrote those publications nor gave its approval. 30,000 scientists are suing Al Gore for fraud caused global warming.

There is no doubt that the globe is warming, but it has been heated and cooled as before, and is not as warm now as it was centuries ago, before there were any automobiles and before there was so much fossil fuel as far.

What is the Purpose of this fraud?

The main objective is to centralize power (economic, population control, etc.) in a few and impose a carbon tax to get more power and also prevent third world countries (Latin America and others) are developed, by putting them more and more obstacles to not succeed.

Al Gore, the First Eco Billionaire

Al Gore has no get juice known as global warming and eco trends, green companies consolidate their millions in profits thanks to their lobbying and influence.

And in itself is suspicious that an “almost-president” of the U.S. he had established himself as the champion of the world ecology, Gore also seems suspect, having belonged to the Skull & Bones, the devourer has renounced capitalism promulgated by the sect to which also belongs to George W. Bush and a cast of potentates in the world of banking, politics, heavy industry and the media.

The Global Warming Swindle was created in the “Club of Rome”, and in a document of this group is a quote from one of its founder Aurelio Peccei says:

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, famine, and these things were perfect”
The Global Revolution – 1991

And of course another member of the Club of Rome is Al Gore, that’s why the official story that says the cause of climate change is the emission of CO2 by humans, is as absurd as the official history of 11 / S. It’s just an excuse to create more international laws, more taxes and more state control over our lives.

How benefits economically Al Gore global warming?

The leading suspect in the movement against global warming receives government loans to develop green technology and has a stake in one of the most important companies in sustainable development

Understanding that climate change is a serious issue, it is also big business, particularly alarmist movement leader, Al Gore.

The Wall Street Journal reports that a Finnish company which Al Gore is a partner will receive a loan of 529 million dollars to develop a hybrid sports car.

Similar to how the Bush family has ties with oil companies and automakers, with pharmaceutical or Rumsfeld, Gore is closely linked to the industry of green technology in different ways and with different interests.

Gore is the company director of Generation Investment Management (GIM). A London firm that invests in green companies with a sustainable vision. His partner is David Blood, former director of Goldman Sachs, the bank that dominates the financial positions of the Obama administration. The partners have dubbed his company Gore & Blood, bizarre but revealing nickname for a green company.

http://despiertaalfuturo.blogspot.com/2013/09/el-gran-fraude-del-calentamiento-global.html?m=1

El Gran Fraude del Calentamiento Global

image

Mientras que el público ha sido conducido a creer que “todos” los científicos importantes comparten la histeria del calentamiento global y la agenda política que va de la mano, en la práctica, los informes oficiales de Naciones Unidas o la Academia Nacional de Ciencias están escritos por burócratas y decorados con los nombres de importantes científicos que fueron “consultados”, pero cuyas conclusiones contrarias han sido ignoradas.

Se incluyen científicos del MIT y universidades punteras de un buen número de países. Algunos de estos son científicos cuyos nombres fueron enarbolados en algunas de las publicaciones sobre el ORÍGEN del calentamiento global que se están promocionando en los medios, pero que afirman claramente que ellos ni redactaron esas publicaciones, ni dieron su aprobación. 30.000 científicos demandaron a Al Gore por el fraude del ORÍGEN del calentamiento global.

No hay duda de que el globo se está calentando, pero se ha calentado y enfriado ya antes, y no es tan cálido ahora como lo era hace unos siglos, antes de que hubiera ningún automóvil y antes de que hubiera tanto consumo de combustibles fósiles como ahora.

¿Cuál es el Objetivo de este Fraude?

El objetivo principal es centralizar el poder (económico, control poblacional,etc) en unos pocos e imponer un impuesto al carbono para así obtener más poder y además evitar que países tercermundistas (américa latina y otros) se desarrollen, poniendoles cada vez más obstaculos para que no lo logren.

Al Gore, el Primer Eco Billonario

Al Gore ha sabido como nadie sacar jugo al calentamiento global y las eco tendencias; sus empresas verdes consolidan ganancias millonarias gracias a su cabildeo e influencias.

Ya de por si es sospechoso que un “casi-presidente” de los EE.UU. se hubiese consagrado como el abanderado de la ecología mundial, asimismo parece sospechoso que Gore, habiendo pertenecido a los Skull & Bones, hubiese renunciado al capitalismo devorador promulgado por la secta a la que también pertenece George W. Bush y un elenco de potentados en el mundo de la banca, la política, la industria pesada y los medios de comunicación.

La estafa del calentamiento global se creó en “el Club de Roma”, y en un documento de este grupo hay una cita de uno de sus fundadores Aurelio Peccei que dice:

“En busca de un nuevo enemigo para unirnos, se nos vino la idea de que la polución, la amenaza del calentamiento global, hambruna y estas cosas eran perfectas”
The Global Revolution – 1991

Y por supuesto otro miembro del Club de Roma es Al Gore, por eso es que la historia oficial que dice que la causa del cambio climático es la emisión de CO2 por los humanos, es tan absurda como la historia oficial del 11/S. Es sólo una excusa más para crear más leyes internacionales, más impuestos y más control del estado sobre nuestras vidas.

¿Cómo se beneficia económicamente Al Gore del calentamiento global?

El sospechoso líder del movimiento en contra del calentamiento global recibe préstamos del gobierno para desarrollar tecnología verde y tiene participación en una de las empresas más importantes de desarrollo sustentable

Entendiendo que el cambio climático es una cuestión seria, también es un gran negocio, particularmente para el líder del movimiento alarmista, Al Gore.

El Wall Street Journal reporta que una compañía finlandesa de la cual Al Gore es socio recibirá un préstamo de 529 millones de dólares para desarrollar un coche híbrido deportivo.

Similarmente a cómo la familia Bush tiene relaciones con las petroleras y las armadoras, o Rumsfeld con las farmacéuticas, Gore está ligado estrechamente a la industria de la tecnología verde de distintas formas y con distintas participaciones.

Gore es director de la empresa Generation Investment Management (GIM). Una firma londinense que invierte en compañías verdes con una visión sustentable. Su socio es David Blood, ex director de Goldman Sachs, el banco que domina los puestos financieros del gobierno de Obama. Los socios han apodado a su compañía Gore & Blood, extraño pero revelador apodo para una compañía verde.

http://despiertaalfuturo.blogspot.com/2013/09/el-gran-fraude-del-calentamiento-global.html?m=1

La legendaria isla de Hy-Brasil

image

Desde Avalon del rey Arturo  a la Atlántida de Platón, Laputa de Jonathan Swift para carnívoros Edén del Pi, la gente siempre ha soñado con islas mágicas donde sucede milagros y el hallazgo del santuario  perdido. Los celtas de Irlanda no eran diferentes, y en su tradición, la mítica isla era conocida como Hy-Brasil.

El mito de Brasil

También llamado O’Breasail, Hi-Brasil, O’Brazil, Hy Breasail, Hy Breasal y Insula Fortunatae (Isla Afortunada), la “Isla de los Benditos”, se creía que era un lugar de abundancia y felicidad, que se encuentra en algún lugar al oeste. Según la tradición celta, “Country O’Breasal estaba más o menos donde el sol toca el horizonte, o inmediatamente en su otro lado”.

Diversos estudios afirman que Breasail era un cacique poderoso o un dios inmortal. El clan Ui Breasail  conocido por los historiadores, habian habitado al noreste de Irlanda. Según la leyenda, el gran jefe de la Edad de Hierro, Breasal, lamentó su hija perdida que se ahogó en el río Gaillimh cerca de la bahía de Galway (al este de donde la isla de Brasil suele recaer en los mapas antiguos).

Otros señalan que Breasal fue el nombre dado al Celta inmortal, Rey del Mundo, que según la leyenda, tenía su corte en la isla de la felicidad eterna, Hy Breasal,  cada siete años; durante el interregno, se informa de la isla haber descendido por debajo de las olas.

Brasil en el Mapa

Angellino de Dalorto fue el primero en asignar Brasil, en su famosa obra (mapa) de 1325, colocó la isla ligeramente hacia el suroeste de Irlanda, y lo etiquetó Insula de monotonis SIUE de Brazile En este y en su  mapa en 1339  (publicado bajo el nombre. Dulcert), Dalorto representado Hy Breasail que tiene “una forma sorprendentemente redonda, a menudo dividido por un canal”.

En 1375, la Insula de Brasil se colocó en dos sitios en el Atlas Catalán – uno al oeste de Irlanda y el otro al sur. Sin embargo, para el 1480, una de las dos islas, tanto en la etiqueta “Illa de brasil,” se había desplazado hasta el sur de Groenlandia, mientras que el otro permaneció cerca de Irlanda.

El famoso Piri Reis incluyó una isla redonda frente a la costa oeste de Irlanda en su mapa de Europa y el Mediterráneo en 1513 y, además, dos mapas de 1595, el mapa de Ortelius de Europa y la Europa Mercator Map, ambos continúan situando una isla redonda llamada Brasil, al oeste de Irlanda.

Incluso en la era industrial, Hy-Brasil se incluyó en mapas y gráficos, al parecer, y según algunos investigadores, apareció en 1776 como “una roca 6 grados al oeste del extremo sur de Irlanda”, y continuó en fecha tan tardía como 1865 en las cartas del Almirantazgo Británico.

En busca del Brasil

Independientemente de que nadie había visitado la isla en realidad y verdaderamente estar en mapas, en algún momento de los siglos 14 o 15, se volvió a perder.

Muchos exploradores famosos y no tan famosos buscaron Hy-Brasil. En 1480, John Cabot emprendió una expedición en busca de Brasil,  y repite el esfuerzo, al parecer, todos los años 1490-1497.
A pesar de que no hay pruebas definitivas de que las expediciones de Cabot llegó a la isla existe, Pedro de Ayala, diplomático español, informó en 1497 de que Cabot le dijo que hizo su viaje hacia y desde América del Norte, con “los hombres de Bristol que encontraron Brasil.”

Desde entonces, otros informes, llegaron sobre la isla. En el siglo 17, un hombre llamado O’Ley afirmó que había sido “secuestrado y llevado a Hy-Brasil”. En esa época, en 1674, el capitán John Nisbet, navegando a través de un banco de niebla, informó  que llegó a la isla y conoció a un anciano que les dio el oro y la plata. Una segunda expedición a la isla, al mando del capitán Alexander Johnson, también afirmó haber encontrado Brasil.

En 1872, el folclorista irlandés T.J. Westropp y sus compañeros informaron que veían la isla aparecer y desaparecer bajo las olas. De hecho, tan tarde como el siglo 20, los pescadores irlandeses reclamaban haber “navegado tan lejos como Hy-Brasil”.

¿Adónde se fue?

Isla de Baffin

Algunos creen que Brasil era en realidad la isla de Baffin. Apoyan su teoría señalando que, a través de los años, la isla sobre todo redonda, bifurcado en el Atlántico Norte se desplazó hacia el oeste mientra los mapas se hicieron más sofisticados.

Por ejemplo, en las cartas posteriores, como Johannes Ruysch mapa de 1508 , la primera isla dividida a aparecer en el oeste de Irlanda se encuentra en el golfo de Groenlandia. Como la exploración continuó, esta isla parece estar colocado más y más hacia el oeste. En última instancia, según ellos, se convierte en la masa que hoy conocemos como la isla de Baffin.

En apoyo secundario de esta teoría, estos historiadores apuntan a las primeras obras de Dalorto, que el lugar de Brasil en medio de numerosas “Islas Afortunadas”. Baffin Island es sólo una de más de 90 islas principales del archipiélago ártico.

Bajo el mar

Otra teoría es que la isla era parte de lo que hoy es una “tierra hundida”.  Los partidarios de esta  hipótesis de que durante la última edad de hielo (en su punto máximo hace 20.000 años), los niveles del mar eran tanto como 120 metros más bajo. Tanto el Banco de Porcupine al oeste de Irlanda, así como la cordillera hundida bajo las islas de Aran en la bahía de Galway puede haber estado expuestas, y cada uno está en las proximidades de la ubicación de la isla mística .

Ilusión óptica

Una tercera teoría es que Hy-Brasil nunca existió. Los meteorólogos han descubierto que en ciertas condiciones climáticas, los espejismos pueden aparecer en los territorios del norte y pueden producirse cuando “capas de refractar C frío-calor, o doblar, los rayos de luz. La luz rebota en las superficies de las nubes, el agua y el hielo para crear ilusiones ópticas.

Los que prefieren esta hipótesis creen que los celtas antiguos, la gente de mar y otras personas pueden haber experimentado sólo una ilusión óptica. Tales trucos de la luz se sabe que han ocurrido a través de Irlanda, y pertinentemente, a veces en relación con un avistamiento de Hy-Brasil:

El 7 de julio de 1878, los habitantes de la ciudad costera irlandesa de Ballycotton en el condado de Cork había sorprendidos y asombrados por la repentina aparición de una isla que no se había visto en el océano antes. Observadores reunidos en cadena pudieron ver la nueva isla con toda claridad y fueron capaces de distinguir  la costa, bosques, campos y valles profundos. Un número de pescadores de County Cork se subieron a los barcos para investigar, pero cuando se acercaron, la isla entera le guiñó un ojo fuera de la existencia, lo que les deja asombrados y preguntándose.

La Isla Perdida Hoy

Aunque fuera de moda durante la mayor parte del siglo 20, Hy-Brasil parece estar haciendo una reaparición, en particular con los fans de la Fortean. De acuerdo con un episodio de The History Channel Ancient Aliens, uno de los dos aviadores estadounidenses involucrados en el incidente del Bosque de  Rendlesham  1980 afirman que, entre los mensajes que recibieron telepáticamente desde una nave extraterrestre eran las coordenadas de navegación de la ubicación de Hy-Brasil …

The Legendary Island of Hy-Brasil

image
Catalan_AtlasFrom King Arthur’s Avalon to Plato’s Atlantis, Jonathan Swift’s Laputa to Pi’s carnivorous Eden, people have long dreamed of magical islands where the miraculous happens and the lost find sanctuary. The Celts of Ireland were no different, and in their tradition, the mythical island was known as Hy-Brasil.

The Myth of Brasil

Also called O’Breasail, Hi-Brasil, O’Brazil, Hy Breasail, Hy Breasal and Insula Fortunatae (Fortunate Island), the “Isle of the Blessed,”[1] was believed to be a place of plenty and happiness, located somewhere to the west. According to Celtic tradition, “Country O’Breasal lay roughly where the sun touched the horizon or immediately on its other side.”[2]

Scholars variously claim Breasail was a powerful chieftain or an immortal god. The clan Ui Breasail is known to historians to have inhabited northeastern Ireland. According to legend, the great Iron Age chief, Breasal, mourned his lost daughter who drowned in the river Gaillimh near Galway Bay (just east of where the island of Brasil is often placed on old maps).

Others note that Breasal was the name given to the Celtic immortal High King of the World who, according to legend, held court on the island of eternal happiness, Hy Breasal,[3] every seven years; during the interregnum, the island is reported to have descended beneath the waves.[4]

Brasil on the Map

Angellino de Dalorto was the first to map Brasil; in his famous1325 work, he placed the island slightly to the southwest of Ireland, and labeled it Insula de monotonis siue de brazile.[5] In this and his 1339 map (published under the name Dulcert), Dalorto represented Hy Breasail as having “a strikingly round form, often divided by a channel.“[6]

By 1375, the Insula de Brazil was placed at two sites on the Catalan Atlas – one west of Ireland and the other to the south. Yet, by 1480, one of the two islands, both labeled “Illa de brasil,” had shifted to just south of Greenland, while the other remained near Ireland.

The famous Piri Reis included a round island off the west coast of Ireland in his map of Europe and the Mediterranean in 1513; in addition, two maps from 1595, the Ortelius Map of Europe and the Europa Mercator Map, both continue to situate a round island, named Brazil, to the west of Ireland.

Even into the industrial age, Hy-Brasil was included on maps and charts, apparently, and according to some researchers, appeared in 1776 as “a rock 6 degrees west of the southern point of Ireland,”[7] and continued to be recorded as late as 1865 on British Admiralty charts.

In Search of Brasil

Regardless of whether anyone had actually visited the island and truly mapped its features, at some point in the 14th or 15th centuries, it was lost again.

Many famous and not so famous explorers looked for Hy-Brasil. In 1480, John Cabot launched an expedition to search for Brazil,[8] and repeated the effort, apparently, every year from 1490-1497.[9] Although no definitive proof that Cabot’s expeditions reached the island exists, Pedro de Ayala, a Spanish diplomat, reported in 1497 that Cabot told him he made his journey to and from North America with “the men from Bristol who found Brasil.”

Since then, others reportedly reached the island. In the 17th century, a man named O’Ley claimed to have been “kidnapped and taken to Hy-Brasil.”[10] At about that time, in 1674, Captain John Nisbet, sailing through a fog bank, reported that a landing party who traversed the island met an old man who gave them gold and silver. A second expedition to the island, led by Captain Alexander Johnson, also claimed to have found Brasil.

In 1872, Irish folklorist T.J. Westropp and his companions reported they saw the island appear and vanish beneath the waves. In fact, as late as the early 20th century, Irish fishermen were claiming to have “sailed as far as Hy-Brasil.”[11]

Where Did it Go?

Baffin Island

Some believe Brasil was actually Baffin Island. They support their theory by noting that, through the years, the notably round, bifurcated island in the North Atlantic shifted to the west as maps became more sophisticated.

For example, in later charts such as Johannes Ruysch’s 1508 map, the first split island to appear to the west of Ireland sits in the gulf of Greenland. As exploration continued, this island appears to be placed further and further west. Ultimately, they claim, it becomes the mass we know today as Baffin Island.

In secondary support for this theory, these historians point to Dalorto’s early works, which place Brasil in the middle of numerous “Fortunate Islands.” Baffin Island is just one of over 90 major islands in the Arctic Archipelago.

Under the Sea

Another theory is that the island was part of what is now a “sunken land.”[12] Adherents of this hypothesis note that during the last Ice Age (at its peak 20,000 years ago), sea levels were as much as 120 meters lower. Both the Porcupine Bank west of Ireland as well as sunken ridge under the Aran Islands in Galway Bay may have been exposed, and each is in the vicinity of the mythical location of the island.

Optical Illusion

A third theory is that Hy-Brasil never existed. Meteorologists have found that during certain climatic conditions, mirages can appear in northern territories and may occur when “layers of hot and cold air refract, or bend, light rays. Light bounces off the surfaces of clouds, water, and ice to create optical illusions.

Those who prefer this hypothesis believe that ancient Celts, seafarers and others may have just experienced an optical illusion. Such tricks of the light are known to have occurred throughout Ireland, and pertinently, sometimes in relation to a Hy-Brasil sighting:

On July 7, 1878, the inhabitants of the Irish seaside town of Ballycotton in County Cork were both surprised and astounded by the sudden appearance of an island that had not been seen in the ocean before. Sighseers gathering on the strand were able to see the new island quite plainly and were able to make out is coastline, woodlands, fields, and deep valleys. A number of County Cork fishermen set out in boats to investigate but as they approached, the entire island winked out of existence, leaving them amazed and wondering.[13]

The Lost Island Today

Although out of vogue for most of the 20th century, Hy-Brasil appears to be making a comeback, particularly with fans of the Fortean. According to an episode of the History Channel’s Ancient Aliens, one of the two American airmen involved in the 1980 Rendlesham Forest incident claims that, among the messages he received telepathically from an alien spacecraft were the navigational coordinates of the location of Hy-Brasil….

http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2013/11/legendary-island-hy-brasil/

The “Military-Industrial Complex”: Murderers of the Patriotic Progressive Agenda and Kennedy

image

By Ivan Gutiérrez del Arroyo

At the fiftieth anniversary of the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy (JFK), the real criminals have begun a campaign of lies, whose goal is to keep the confusion on this important in the modern history of the U.S. and the world event. Like Hitler’s propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, intellectuals murderers have consistently repeated the two “credible” but completely false conspiracies:
(A) In response to the Kennedy campaign against “organized crime,” the Mafia ordered his execution.
(B) To avoid assassination attempts against Fidel Castro Cubans and the Soviets planned his murder.
When the international press is scrutinized, particularly in the USA, one realizes the genius of Goebbels as these media focus on the details of the murder without taking into account the strategic causes were the masterminds to end the life of the President of the USA and the progressive legacy of the Kennedys.
During the administration of President Dwight Eisenhower (1956-1960) this retired general plan a summit with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchew, which was sabotaged by the CIA. This not only irritated the Pres., But caused that in his last message to the nation fustigara the powerful “Military-Industrial Complex” (CMI).
This analysis attempts to answer the following question: Who took advantage of the JFK assassination and death that caused changes in domestic and foreign policy of the U.S.?  Desafortudamente, investigations have focused on the details, not in the heart of the matter : Who benefited from the assassination of JFK?
JFK’s presidency was characterized by nationalist and progressive agenda, whose motto was: “what matters is not what the nation can do for you but what you can do for the country.” Then we detail the most salient aspects of true nationalist and progressive agenda of JFK, which caused such anger WCC had no choice but to order the physical removal of the President and any other politician who dared to challenge them, such was the case of his brother Robert Kennedy, and Reverend pacifist winner, Martin Luther King Nobel Peace Prize.
The Irish-American Patriot against the English Empire

When JFK returns to Boston and decides to enter politics “his goal was to return to the policies of Franklin Roosevelt (FDR) and crush imperialism,” the American historian Anton Chaitkin in his latest essay, “John F. Kennedy against Empire “(EIR, 06/09/2013) – This essay and literature are the basis of this research -. In his first public speech to veterans of the American Legion (18/11/1945) compare JFK FDR the political record of the British Conservative leader Winston Churchill, “while Roosevelt won his political reputation by the way Lydian (successfully) with Depression, the Conservative Party (English) the lost. ” Also the young politician underlined the impact they had American soldiers when they were stationed in Britain, “the Conservative leader Disraeli once said that England is divided into two nations – rich and poor – but with the arrival of American troops a new desire … for the good things of life has greatly captivated England. ”
Roosevelt Whip England

In January 1938, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR), the political idol JFK, beginning a secret correspondence with British officials to warn that its policy of supporting totalitarian regimes of Hitler and Mussolini could cause “a feeling of disgust political cowardice “in the U.S.. (1) FDR tells his assistant James Foley in 1939, “… the problem is that the British for centuries are controlled by the upper classes. These upper classes control all trade and exchange, and therefore, the British government policy is aimed at protecting the interests of that class. ” (2) However, his ambassador in Britain, Joe Kennedy – JFK’s father – had allied with the British, and even lived in the house of the banker JP Morgan. After FDR’s death allies Churchill in the White House, the “democrats” Dean Anderson and Averell Harriman and brothers “Republicans” Allen and John Foster Dulles lined the political machinery of Pres. Truman with English imperialist policies, and thus tried to destroy the nationalist and anti-imperialist policies of FDR. In his book, “As I saw” (As I Saw It), the President’s son, Elliot Roosevelt detailing the strategic differences of FDR and Winston Churchill (WC), particularly on methods to release and develop the British colonies in the postwar. FDR insisted on using “American methods” (ie protectionist measures, the use of new and high technology in manufacturing and agriculture and the promotion of large infrastructure projects revolutionaries) as opposed to the “English method” (ie the so-called “free trade “and the” invisible hand “that govern the economy using the laws of supply and demand). The most distinguished economists of the “American system of political economy” are Alexander Hamilton, Mathew and Henry Carey and Friedrich List (3).
Kennedy: The “Imperialism is the Enemy of Freedom in Africa and the Middle East”

During his term as Democratic Congressman JFK and his brother Robert travel through Asia and the Middle East in 1951. In a radio message to the entire nation, FDR describes what he learned in his extensive tour:
“… It’s full of poverty, disease … injustice and inequality area date back many years and is now part of daily life … the fire of nationalism,
is burning … They have been victims of the empires of Western Europe – England, France and the Netherlands – for over 100 years … The same desert sands rise up to oppose the imposition of foreign control of the destinies of these very proud people …
“The real enemy of the Arab world is poverty and needs ….
“Our intervention on behalf of the British oil investments in Iran are not directed to the development of Iran … (and has caused) the terrible human tragedy of over 700,000 Arab refugees (Palestinians), this is opposed to Arab wishes and canceled the promises the (U.S. broadcaster) Voice of America …
“In Indochina (Vietnam) we have allied with the French regime desperate, who are bent on catching the rest of his empire … through force of arms … {4} efforts
In his most important speech before formalizing his candidacy for the presidency, states in the Senate on July 2 de1957, that “Imperialism is the Enemy of Freedom” and demands that the U.S. support the Arab rebels in Algeria against French Imperialism. Compare the situation in North Africa with the collapse of France in Vietnam, and so lashes policy conservative Eisenhower administration and the CIA director, Allen Dulles to support the French imperialists efforts in Algeria and Vietnam. This discourse was developed jointly with the Algerian anti-colonialist leadership and was a great support in the Arab world, according to the American historian Anton Chaitkin.
The Electoral Campaign: JFK lays the basis for the  support of the U.S. Independence and African Development

During the 1959-60 campaign JFK met several times with the nationalist president of Guinea, Sekou Toure and very good friends and collaborators did. It also established official contacts with the president of Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah, the founder of African nationalism, and the first African leader who successfully led his people in the anti-colonial revolt against the English Empire in 1957. Before arriving at the JFK Presidency met with Economy Minister and Ambassador to the United Nations in Ghana. He also criticized the foreign policy of past administrations of the American Union to characterize Nkrumah and Toure as enemies of the U.S. for not choosing sides in the Cold War. According to Kennedy, these erroneous policies had forced these Africans to strengthen relations with the Soviet Union.
Why devote so much time to JFK African Affairs during his 1960 election campaign? Because during that period 13 African countries gained their independence from the French and British empires. Simultaneously, Belgian Congo Independence accept, but European-owned copper mines and uranium in this country, and multinational intelligence of the British Empire orchestrated a sham civil war which eventually kill the Congolese President Patrice Lumumba, disciple Nkrumah politician. The Ghanaian president I communicate to JFK two major concerns: the imperial intrigues against the Congolese president and his plan to build a giant dam, and thus able to industrialize their country and provide electricity throughout West Africa. Nkrumah, who had lived in the U.S. when Roosevelt was President, I as a model for large water project dam built by FDR in the Tennessee Valley.
Mobilize Against The CIA Kennedy Before Election

Long before the inauguration of JFK’s CIA director, Allen Dulles orchestrated an invasion against the revolutionary government of Fidel Castro by a force of 1,400 Cuban exiles. When JFK opposes the use of U.S. military forces in such madness Dulles blackmailed him by telling him that if he did not approve of his military adventure politically deploy these 1,400 Cuban exiles against him throughout the U.S..
Three days before making JFK CIA and British intelligence services, whose base of operations was the Daphne Park in Congo, coordinated the assassination of Lumumba Congolese president on January 20, 1961. Dulles and his lieutenants knew Anglophiles JFK had never approved the murder of Lumumba.
Dulles ordered the CIA to collaborate with the French fascists – Secret Weapons Organization (OAS) – who opposed Algerian independence and attempted to assassinate French President Charles de Gaulle, who had already agreed to release the Algerian independence rebels . The OAS also the anti-imperialist murderer Italian industrialist Enrico Mattei, friend of JFK and strategist and one of the key figures, who was coordinating the acute financial independence revolt in Algeria. (5)
After all these operations were conducted and the world blame the administration of JFK all these destabilizadores actions sponsored by the WCC, President Kennedy banned from administration to CIA chief Allen Dulles and his deputies, Richard Bissell and Charles Cabell for being unfair and constitute a “reactionary state within a state. (6)
JFK Administration: Progressive Alliance  with Africa-India-Indonesia-Lift

After the assassination of Lumumba JFK issuing the Action Memorandum National Security (MASN) 16 on February 13, 1961, which ordered the support of the U.S. to the “newly independent areas” without taking into consideration the “support of Western Europe … when such action in the best interests of the United States. ” MASN also issued 60 in 14 and July 16, 1961, ordering the economic strangulation of the Portuguese Salazar totalitarian government, and thus force him to stop short his bloody war against separatist rebels in Angola and Mozambique. Since then JFK orders the help of the U.S. to those fighters.
As expected, the first foreign leader that was received on March 8, 1961 with bells and whistles by JFK was his friend and president of Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah. Kennedy not only took over the financing of the project, but organize the structural support for the draft industrial friend Edgar Kaiser of Kaiser Industries and his Italian friend Enrico Mattei I coordinate the work of hydraulic engineering for such a feat. The Akosombo Dam on the Volta River created the world’s largest artificial lake and provided you with the electricity needed to transform Ghana into a modern country. This project was dedicated in 1966 to the late President JFK with a commemorative plaque at the site, but desafortudamente a week later, Nkrumah was overthrown in a coup planned in London. (7)
In the Middle East the Truman and Eisenhower administrations had marginalized Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, who was sponsoring the Algerian independence rebels. Although Eisenhower had pledged to help Nasser in his project to build a large dam on the Nile, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles cancel it, which forced the President of Egypt seek financial aid from the Soviets. All this culminated in 1956 when Israel, Britain and France invade Egypt during the Suez Canal crisis. Kennedy and Nasser began a correspondence, which culminated when the U.S. supported the Pres. Egyptian in its confrontation against the alliance of the British and the Saudis.
JFK also growing very close relations with the Indian premier Nehru Jamaharlal and Indonesian President Sukarno, who led the national liberation of his major countries against the British and Dutch empires respectively. Despite the neutrality of these countries in the Cold War, JFK decided to finance the construction of large steel in Bokhara, India until his murder when the U.S. withdrew their support of the project and the Soviets replace Americans. Before his tragic death JFK begins to organize support for the industrialization of Indonesia (MASN 179, 08.16.1962). Unfortunately, the help never came and Lyndon B. Johnson started a joint operation with British intelligence services, whose aim was the overthrow of Sukarno.
This is only part of the progressive and nationalist legacy of JFK, but it is enough to explain why the “Military-Industrial Complex” had reason enough to orchestrate the murder of one of the most optimistic and visionary president of the American Union.
Ivan Gutierrez del Arroyo

Ivarroyo48@aol.com

Ivan Gutierrez del Arroyo on Facebook and Twitter

(1) British National Archives
(2) James A. Farley, Jim Farley’s Story: The Roosevelt
Years (New York: McGraw Hill, 1948) p. 199.
(3) Alexander Hamilton, Report on Manufactures (01/05/1791) Report on a National Bank (13/12/1790) Reports to the U.S. Congress.
Henry Carey, The Harmony of Interest (Periodico Plough, Loom and Advil, 1851)
Mathew Carey, Addresses of the Philadelphia Society
for the Promotion of National Industry (27/03/1819).
Friedrich List, Outlines of American Political Economy
(Newspaper Philadelphia National Gazette, 1827
Pamphlet published by the Society for the Promotion of
Manufacturing and Mechanical Arts in Pennsylvania,
1827).
(4) JFK Library
(5) Theodore Sorensen, Kennedy (New York: Harper and Row, 1965) pp. 406-407.
(6) Thomas F. Brady, “Paris Rumors on CIA,” New York Times, May 2, 1961.
(7) “Exiles in London Led Revolt Ghana, Nkrumah Foe Tells of Plot Mapped by Secret Group,” New York Times, Feb. 25, 1966.

El “Complejo Militar-Industrial”: Asesinos de la Agenda Patriótica y Progresista de Kennedy

image

By Ivan Gutiérrez del Arroyo

En el quincuagésimo  aniversario del asesinato del presidente estadounidense John F. Kennedy (JFK), los verdaderos criminales han iniciado una campaña de mentiras, cuyo objetivo es mantener la confusión existente sobre este acontecimiento tan importante en la historia moderna de los EUA y el mundo. Al igual que el ministro de Propaganda de Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, los asesinos intelectuales han repetido constantemente las dos conspiraciones “más creíbles”, pero completamente falsas:
(a) Como respuesta a la campana de los Kennedy contra el “crimen organizado”, la Mafia ordeno su ejecución.
(b) Para evitar los intentos de asesinatos contra Fidel Castro los cubanos y los soviéticos planificaron su asesinato.
Cuando se escudriña la prensa internacional, particularmente la de los EUA, uno se da cuenta de la genialidad de Goebbels ya que estos medios de comunicación se enfocan en los pormenores del asesinato sin tomar en consideración las causas estratégicas que tuvieron los autores intelectuales para ponerle fin a la vida del Presidente de los EUA y el legado progresista de los Kennedy.
Durante la administración del presidente Dwight Eisenhower (1956-1960) este general retirado planifico una cumbre con el premier soviético Nikita Khrushchew, que fue saboteada por la CIA. Esto no solo irrito al Pdte., sino que provoco que en su último Mensaje a la Nación fustigara al poderoso “Complejo Militar-Industrial” (CMI).
Este análisis intenta contestar la siguiente pregunta: Quiénes sacaron provecho del asesinato de JFK y que cambios provoco dicha muerte en la política doméstica y exterior de los EUA?  Desafortudamente, las investigaciones se han centrado en los detalles, y no, en el meollo del asunto: Quien se benefició del asesinato de JFK?
La presidencia de JFK se caracterizó por su agenda nacionalista y progresista, cuyo lema era: “lo importante no es lo que la Nación pueda hacer por ti, sino lo que tú puedas hacer por el País”. A continuación detallaremos los aspectos más sobresalientes de la verdadera agenda nacionalista y progresista de JFK, que provoco tal enfado del CMI que no tuvieron más remedio que ordenar la eliminación física del Presidente y de cualquier otro político que se atreviera a desafiarlos, tal fue el caso de su hermano Robert Kennedy, y el reverendo pacifista y ganador del Premio Nobel de la Paz,  Martin Luther King.
El Patriota Irlandés-Americano contra el Imperio Ingles

Cuando JFK regresa a Boston y decide ingresar a la política “su objetivo era retomar las políticas de Franklin Roosevelt (FDR) y aplastar al Imperialismo”, según el historiador norteamericano Anton Chaitkin en su más reciente ensayo, “John F. Kennedy contra el Imperio” (EIR, 6/9/2013) – este ensayo y su bibliografía son la base de esta investigación –. En su primer discurso público a veteranos de la Legión Americana (18/11/1945) JFK compara el record político de FDR con el líder conservador británico Winston Churchill, “mientras Roosevelt se ganó su reputación política por la forma que lidio (exitosamente) con la Depresión, el Partido Conservador (ingles) la perdió”. También el joven político destaco el impacto que tuvieron los soldados estadounidenses cuando estuvieron estacionados en Gran Bretaña, “el líder conservador Disraeli dijo una vez que Inglaterra está dividido en dos naciones – los ricos y los pobres –, pero con la llegada de las tropas americanas…un nuevo deseo por las cosas buenas de la vida ha cautivado fuertemente a Inglaterra”.
Roosevelt Fustiga a Inglaterra

En enero de 1938, el presidente Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR), el ídolo político de JFK, inicio unas correspondencias secretas con funcionarios británicos para advertirles que su política de apoyar a los regímenes totalitarios de Hitler y Mussolini podía provocar “un sentimiento de disgusto por su cobardía política “en los EUA. (1)  FDR le dice a su ayudante James Foley en el 1939, “…que el problema de los británicos es que por varios siglos son controlados por las clases altas. Estas clases altas controlan todo el comercio e intercambio, y por lo tanto, la política del gobierno británico está dirigida a proteger los intereses de esa clase”. (2) Empero, su embajador en Gran Bretaña, Joe Kennedy – el papa de JFK – se había aliado con los británicos, y hasta, vivía en la casa del banquero J.P. Morgan. Después de la muerte de FDR los aliados de Churchill en la Casa Blanca, los “demócratas” Dean Anderson y Averell Harriman y los hermanos “republicanos” Allen y John Foster Dulles alinearon la maquinaria política del Pdte. Truman con las políticas imperialistas inglesas, y así, intentaron destruir las políticas nacionalistas y anti-imperialistas de FDR. En su libro, “Como Yo lo Vi” (As I Saw It), el hijo del Presidente, Elliot Roosevelt detalla las diferencias estratégicas de FDR y Winston Churchill (WC), particularmente sobre los métodos para liberar y desarrollar las colonias británicas en la postguerra. FDR insistía en emplear “métodos americanos” (i.e. medidas proteccionista, el uso de nuevas y altas tecnología en la manufactura y agricultura y el impulso de grandes proyectos revolucionarios de infraestructura) en contraposición a los “métodos ingleses” (i.e. el llamado “libre comercio” y la “mano invisible” que regulan la economía utilizando las leyes de la oferta y la demanda). Los economistas más representativos del “sistema americano de economía política” son Alexander Hamilton, Mathew y Henry Carey y Friedrich List (3).
Kennedy: el “Imperialismo es el Enemigo de la Libertad en África y el Medio Oriente”

Durante su periodo como congresista demócrata JFK y su hermano Robert viajan por Asia y el Medio Oriente en el 1951. En un mensaje por radio a toda la Nación, FDR describe lo que aprendió en su extenso recorrido:
“…Es un área repleta de pobreza, enfermedades…las injusticias y la desigualdad datan de muchos años y ya forma parte del diario vivir …el fuego del nacionalismo ,,,
está ardiendo…Han sido víctimas de los Imperios de Europa Occidental – Inglaterra, Francia y Holanda – por más de 100 anos…Las mismas arenas del desierto se levantaran para oponerse a la imposición del control extranjero de los destinos de estos pueblos tan orgullosos…
“El verdadero enemigo del mundo árabe es la pobreza y las necesidades….
“Nuestra intervención a nombre de las inversiones petroleras inglesas en Irán no están dirigidas al desarrollo de Irán… (y ha causado) la terrible tragedia humana de más de 700,000 refugiados árabes (palestinos), esto se opone a los deseos árabes y anula las promesas de la (emisora estadounidense) La Voz de América…
“En Indochina (Vietnam) nos hemos aliado a los esfuerzos desesperados de un régimen francés, que se empeñan en controlar los restos de su Imperio…a través de las fuerzas de las armas…{4}
En su discurso más importantes antes de oficializar su candidatura a la Presidencia, declara en el pleno del Senado el 2 de julio de1957, que el “Imperialismo es el Enemigo de la Libertad” y demanda que los EUA apoye a los rebeldes árabes en Argelia contra el Imperialismo francés. Compara la situación en África del Norte con la debacle de Francia en Vietnam, y así, fustiga la política de la administración conservadora de Eisenhower y el director de la CIA, Allen Dulles de apoyar los esfuerzos imperialistas franceses en Argelia y Vietnam. Este discurso fue elaborado conjuntamente con el liderato anti-colonialista argelino y obtuvo un gran respaldo en el mundo árabe, según el historiador estadounidense Anton Chaitkin.
La Campana Electoral: JFK Sienta las Bases para el Apoyo de los EUA a la Independencia y Desarrollo Africano

Durante la campaña electoral de 1959-60 JFK se reunió varias veces con el presidente nacionalista de Guinea, Sekou Toure y se hicieron muy buenos amigos y colaboradores. También estableció contactos oficiales con el presidente de Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah, el fundador del nacionalismo africano, y el primer dirigente de África que encabezo exitosamente a su pueblo en la revuelta anti-colonial contra el Imperio ingles en el 1957. Antes de llegar a la Presidencia JFK se reunió con el ministro de Economía y el embajador en la Naciones Unidas de Ghana. También critico la política exterior de las pasadas administraciones de la Unión Americana por caracterizar a Nkrumah y Toure como enemigos de los EUA por no escoger bandos en la Guerra Fría. Según Kennedy, estas políticas erróneas habían obligados a estos países africanos a estrechar sus relaciones con la Unión Soviética.
Por qué JFK dedico tanto tiempo a los asuntos africanos durante su campaña electoral del 1960? Porque durante ese periodo 13 países africanos obtuvieron su Independencia de los Imperios franceses y británicos. Simultáneamente, Bélgica acepto la Independencia del Congo, pero las multinacionales europeas –dueñas de las minas de cobre y uranio en este país– y los servicios de inteligencia del Imperio británico orquestaron una farsa guerra civil; donde eventualmente asesinan al presidente congolés Patricio Lumumba, discípulo político de Nkrumah. El mandatario ghanés le comunico a JFK sus dos grandes preocupaciones: las intrigas imperiales contra el presidente congolés y su plan para construir una presa gigantesca, y así, poder industrializar a su País y proveerle electricidad a toda el África occidental. Nkrumah, quien había vivido en los EUA cuando Roosevelt era Presidente, tomo como modelo para su gran proyecto hidráulico la presa construida por FDR en el Valle de Tenesi.
La CIA se Moviliza Contra Kennedy Antes de las Elecciones

Mucho antes de la toma de posesión de JFK el director de la CIA, Allen Dulles orquesto una invasión contra el gobierno revolucionario de Fidel Castro por una fuerza de 1,400 exilados cubanos. Cuando JFK se opone al uso de las fuerzas militares estadounidenses en semejante locura Dulles lo chantajeo al decirle que si él no aprobaba su aventura militar el desplegaría políticamente a estos 1,400 exilados cubanos en contra suya por todo los EUA.
Tres días antes de la toma de JFK la CIA y los servicios de inteligencia británicos, cuya base de operaciones era el Parque Daphne en el Congo, coordinaron el asesinato del presidente congolés Lumumba el 20 de enero del 1961. Dulles y sus lugartenientes anglófilos sabían que JFK nunca hubiese aprobado el asesinato contra Lumumba.
Dulles ordeno que la CIA colaborara con los fascistas franceses – la Organización de Armas Secretas (OAS) —- que se oponían a la Independencia de Argelia e intentaron asesinar al presidente francés Charles de Gaulle, quien ya había acordado la liberación argelina con los rebeldes independentistas. La OAS también asesino al industrial italiano Enrico Mattei, amigo de JFK y estratega anti-imperialista y una de las figuras claves, que estaba coordinando la aguda financiera a la revuelta independentista en Argelia. (5)
Después que todas estas operaciones fueron realizadas y el mundo culpo a la administración de JFK de todas estas acciones destabilizadores auspiciadas por el CMI, el presidente Kennedy expulso de su administración al jefe de la CIA, Allen Dulles, y su lugartenientes, Richard Bissell y Charles Cabell por ser desleales y constituirse en un “estado reaccionario dentro del mismo estado. (6)
La Administración de JFK: Alianza Progresista con África-Levante-India-Indonesia

Después del asesinato de Lumumba JFK emite el Memorándum de Acción de Seguridad Nacional (MASN) 16 el 13 de febrero del 1961, que ordeno la ayuda de los EUA a las “áreas recientemente independientes” sin tomar en consideración el “apoyo de Europa Occidental…cuando tal acción favorezca el interés de los Estados Unidos”. También emitió el MASN 60 en los días 14 y 16 de julio del 1961, que ordena el estrangulamiento económico del gobierno totalitario portugués de Salazar, y así, obligarlo a parar en seco su guerra sangrienta contra los rebeldes independentistas de Angola y Mozambique. Desde ese momento JFK ordena la ayuda de los EUA a dichos  combatientes.
Como era de esperarse el primer mandatario extranjero que fue recibido el 8 de marzo del 1961 con bombas y platillos por JFK fue su amigo y presidente de Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah. Kennedy no solo se encargó del financiamiento del proyecto, sino que organizo el apoyo estructural al proyecto de su amigo industrial Edgar Kaiser de la Industrias Kaiser y su amigo italiano Enrico Mattei coordino el trabajo de ingeniería para semejante proeza hidráulica. La Represa Akosombo en el rio Volta creo el lago artificial más grande del mundo y le proveyó la electricidad que Ghana necesitaba para poder transformarse en un país moderno. Este proyecto fue dedicado en el 1966 al fenecido presidente JFK con una placa conmemorativa en el lugar, pero desafortudamente una semana después, Nkrumah fue derrocado en un golpe planificado en Londres. (7)
En el Medio Oriente las administraciones de Eisenhower y Truman habían marginado al presidente egipcio Gamal Abdel Nasser, quien auspiciaba a los rebeldes independentistas de Argelia.  Aunque Eisenhower se había comprometido ayudar a Nasser en su proyecto de construir una gran presa en el Nilo, el secretario de Estado John Foster Dulles lo cancelo, lo que obligo a que el Presidente de Egipto recabara ayuda económica de los soviéticos. Todo esto culmino en el 1956 cuando Israel, Inglaterra y Francia invaden a Egipto durante la crisis del Canal de Suez. Kennedy y Nasser empezaron una correspondencia, que culmino cuando los EUA apoyaron al Pdte. egipcio en su confrontación contra la alianza de los británicos y los sauditas.
También JFK cultivo unas relaciones muy estrechas con el premier hindú Jamaharlal Nehru y el presidente indonesio Sukarno, quienes encabezaron la liberación nacional de sus importantes países contra los Imperios británicos y holandés, respectivamente. A pesar de la neutralidad de estos países en la Guerra Fría, JFK decidió financiar la construcción de la gran siderúrgica en Bokara, India hasta su asesinato cuando los EUA retiran su apoyo del proyecto y los soviéticos reemplazan a los estadounidenses. Antes de su trágica muerte JFK empieza a organizar ayuda para la industrialización de Indonesia (MASN 179, 16/8/1962). Desafortunadamente, la ayuda nunca llego y Lyndon B. Johnson inicia una operación conjunta con los servicios de inteligencia británicos, cuyo objetivo era el derrocamiento de Sukarno.
Esto es solo parte del legado progresista y nacionalista de JFK, pero es suficiente para explicar porque el “Complejo Militar-Industrial” tenía suficientes razones para orquestar el asesinato de uno del presidente más optimista y visionario de la Unión Americana.
Ivan Gutiérrez del Arroyo

Ivarroyo48@aol.com

Ivan Gutierrez del Arroyo en Facebook y Twitter

(1)      Archivos Nacionales Británicos
(2)      James A. Farley, Jim Farley’s Story: The Roosevelt
Years (New York: McGraw Hill, 1948) p. 199.
(3)      Alexander Hamilton, Report on Manufactures (5/1/1791), Report on a National Bank (13/12/1790), Informes al Congreso de los EUA.
Henry Carey, The Harmony of Interest (Periodico Plough, Loom and Advil, 1851)
Mathew Carey, Addresses of the Philadelphia Society
for the Promotion of National Industry (27/3/1819).
Friedrich List, Outlines of American Political Economy
(Periódico de Filadelfia National Gazette, 1827 y
Panfleto publicado por la Society for the Promotion of
Manufacturing and Mechanical Arts in Pennsylvania,
1827).
(4)      Biblioteca de JFK
(5)      Theodore Sorensen, Kennedy (New York: Harper and Row, 1965) pp 406-407.
(6)      Thomas F. Brady, “Paris Rumors on C.I.A.,” New York Times, May 2, 1961.
(7)      “Exiles in London Led Ghana Revolt, Nkrumah Foe Tells of Plot Mapped by Secret Group,” New York Times, Feb. 25, 1966.

How THEY Got Control

image

Catherine J. Frompovich
Activist Post

CONSEQUENTLY, in the interest of future world order, peace, and tranquility, it was decided to privately wage a quiet war against the American public with an ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands of the self-disciplined, responsible, and worthy few.

The above paragraph, along with hundreds of similar philosophical ideas, comes from a document that had its ‘conception’ after the end of World War II, and which was to become the playbook for what United States of America citizens apparently are experiencing today.

This is what it was – and is – all about:
In conclusion, the objective of economic research, as conducted by the magnates of capital (banking) and the industries of commodities (goods) and services, is the establishment of an economy which is totally predictable and manipulatable.

The last word “manipulatable” apparently is referring to the economy being capable of being manipulated. If nothing more, that paragraph sets the guidelines for the economic downturn the USA has experienced and from which it seems not to be recovering, nor will it ever recover, if the controllers and other “worthy few” have their say and way. Now, doesn’t it all make sense? Oh, how we have been played like a fiddle that’s never had the tune up it so badly needs!

Additionally, they set out deliberately to dumb down the population illustrated in phrases like:
The quality of education given to the lower class must be of the poorest sort, so that the moat of ignorance isolating the the  inferior class from the superior class is and remains incomprehensible to the inferior class. With such an initial handicap, even bright lower class individuals have little if any hope of extricating themselves from their assigned lot in life. This form of slavery is essential to maintaining some measure of social order, peace, and tranquility for the ruling upper class.
How many U.S. citizens realize that they have been programmed from pre-school or kindergarten to be living in slavery so that the “ruling upper class” can have “some measure of social order, peace, and tranquility”? Who ever heard of such elitist class action warfare? Maybe in Germany in the late 1930s.

Under the subtitle of “Descriptive Introduction of the Silent Weapon,” we find how they planned to implement their “Quiet War” with this:
It [the war] shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled by data processing, instead of chemical reaction (explosion); originating from bits of data, instead of grains of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun; operated by a computer programmer, instead of marksman; under the orders of a banking magnate, instead of a military general.
Unabashedly, they acknowledge the game plan using data processing, the computer, and the banksters (banking magnate). So much for all the technology everyone bought into that has us so enthralled, we don’t know which end is up, i.e., to answer a cell phone or voice mail; send a tweet or finger a text message using phonics instead of words. See how dumb we’ve become.

In talking about all the technology, they say this about their silent, secret weapon(s):
The public cannot comprehend this weapon, and therefore cannot believe that they are being attached [sic] and subdued by a weapon.
That, dear readers, is the critical issue everyone must recognize, realize, understand, and decide how to react to, and what action you will take.

If the above doesn’t gore your bull, then this ought to smack your donkey:
When a silent weapon is applied gradually to the public, the public adjusts/adapts to its presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their lives until the pressure (psychological via economic) becomes too great and they crack up.
Silent weapon – applied gradually – learn to tolerate its encroachment – pressure becomes too great – they [we] crack up! Now, isn’t that what’s going on in virtually every segment of society in which we have been living for the last two to three decades, especially terroristic fears?

Then we have the periodic traumatic events that galvanize us into an untenable state of fear so that we will gladly respond to what has been termed the Hegelian Dialectic – problem-reaction-solution – the very method the controllers have instituted to enforce the “Quiet War” and empower themselves to take away our human and civil rights.

Consider the flack that’s going on about the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights as outdated documents. How those very tenets of governance and jurisprudence that have guided the USA and its society since its inception have now been cast aside and even trampled upon by none other than those who should know better.

Recall the events of 9-11, especially Building 7 self-imploding with no airplane hitting it. [2]

Recall how Watertown, Massachusetts, was turned into a closed ‘police state’ looking for a lone gunman. Wasn’t that the perfect drill that may have been undertaken to comply with?
The solution of today’s problems requires an approach which is ruthlessly candid, with no agonizing over religious, moral, or cultural values. [1] Security Section
How about the NSA surveillance tech and equipment attached to buildings, utility poles, or whatever in order to create a gulag [1a] of sorts in Seattle, Washington and Las Vegas, Nevada. Here is why you should care:

What the controllers are counting on was the discovery by Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of the Rothschild banking family.
What Mr. Rothschild had discovered was the basic principle of power, influence, and control over people as applied to economics. That principle is “when you assume the appearance of power, people soon give it to you”. [1] Mr. Rothschild’s Energy Discovery
Are U.S. citizens unwittingly guilty of acquiescing to the above Rothschild ‘principle’? When will we wake up and get out from under that spell of black magic?

What Rothschild’s real discovery was about was that he could
induce people (inductance, with people corresponding to a magnetic field) into surrendering their real wealth in exchange for a promise of greater wealth (instead of real compensation).
Rothschild, in essence, invented a “philosopher’s stone” [3] regarding monetary matters that banksters, money lenders, and Federal Banks use to create wealth and manipulate disparity for the rest of us.
Mr. Rothschild had discovered that currency gave him the power to rearrange the economic structure to his own advantage,,[sic] to shift economic inductance to those economic positions which would encourage the greatest economic instability and oscillation.
Readers, please read the above statement again. That’s what’s been going on for longer than we have been led to believe, by banksters and, particularly, by the Federal Reserve Bank System,[4] I’m inclined to think.

As if that’s not enough to get your juices running, under the “Quiet War” section termed “The Economic Model,” we find this confirmation:
The Harvard Economic Research Project (1948-) was an extension of World War II Operations Research. Its purpose was to discover the science of controlling an economy; at first the American economy, and then the world economy. It was felt that with sufficient mathematical foundation and data, it would be nearly as easy to predict and control the trend of an economy as to predict and control the trajectory of a projectile. Such as [sic] proven to be the case. Moreover, the economy has been transformed into a guided missile on target. [Emphasis added]
So, there’s the apparent answer to what’s going on with the U.S. economy, the European Union economic problems, and probably what’s on the financial radar screen for Japan and China, two of the world’s most prolific economies. China is the world’s second largest economy after the USA. Japan is the third largest economy in the world. Fukushima just may ruin Japan’s economy if there are more radioactive problems that TEPCO can’t deal with and the government of Japan has to step in and take over. Maybe that’s why the Japanese government is letting TEPCO handle the ‘cleanup’?

Now that we’ve learned that the economy is part of the “silent weapon technology” in the “Quiet War,” do you think there will ever be a peace armistice? With the real estate bubble burst in 2007-09 that helped lead to the never-ending recession; the stock market crash of 1929 and subsequent hits in 1987, 2000, and 2008; it would appear that we are due for another financial ‘hit’ or “projectile” of some sort, if the “Quiet War” is to remain on target.

Could the next “silent weapon” come from the insurance world, e.g., sticker shock that healthcare insurance consumers are experiencing? With five million healthcare insurance policy cancellations rendered and replacement policies that will cost anywhere from double to quadruple premiums, doesn’t that sound like healthcare insurance is a targeted projectile in the “Quiet War”?

What projectiles can we, the citizens, send back? Complaints, more and louder complaints to members of Congress, Letters to the Editors of newspapers and, of course, to the White House. Comments can be telephoned to the White House switchboard at 202-456-1111.

As this writer sees it, voters have been asleep at their voting booth levers. We need to wake up and not be ingrained in party politics. We need to see the overall picture of what’s going on rather than salute a party’s candidate. They did that in Germany in the 1930s and look what that got them. We did that in 2008 and 2012 and look what it’s gotten us! We can no longer take the party line as truth. Look what the Democrats were able to pull off with regard to the Affordable Care Act. It’s anything but affordable. Voters have to become educated—and real fast—otherwise, the controllers will win the “Quiet War.” Human dignity and human compassion cannot allow that to happen in the USA, in the European Union, nor anywhere. What will you do?

Notes:

The following document, dated May 1979, was found on July 7, 1986, in an IBM copier that had been purchased at a surplus sale.

[1] “Silent Weapons for a Quiet War” An Introductory Programming Manual, Operations Research Technical Manual adopted by the Policy Group of the Bilderberg Group at its 1954 meeting. May 1979 #74-1120

[1a] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag

[2] http://www.ae911truth.org/news/41-articles/344-building-7-implosion-the-smoking-gun-of-911.html

[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosopher’s_stone

[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Bank

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/11/how-they-got-control.html?m=1