Why Hiroshima Was Destroyed

The Detailed History Of An Infamous Era 

A very popular movie in Japan was Pride, The Fateful Moment, which shows Prime Minister General Hideki Tojo in a favorable light. With six others, he was hanged in 1968 as a war criminal. During his trial, his lawyers stated to the International Tribunal for the Far East, the Asian version of Nuremberg Trials that Tojo’s war crimes could not begin to approach the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The prosecutors immediately objected, and censored their statements. That was the last time there was any official recognition of the atomic bomb massacres in Japan.  Japanese officials have been effectively prevented from taking any stand on this matter because the American military occupation, which officially ended in 1952 with the Treaty with Japan, was quietly continued. Today, 49,000 American troops are still stationed in Japan, and there is no public discussion of the crimes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Cast of Characters

The House of Rothschild; international bankers who made  enormous profits during the nineteenth century, and used their money to take  over governments.

Bernard Baruch: New York agent of the Rothschild’s who at the turn of the century set up the tobacco trust, the copper trust and other trusts for the  Rothschild’s. He became the grey eminence of the United States atomic bomb program when his lackey, J. Robert Oppenheimner, became director of the Los  Alamos bomb development, and when his Washington lackey, James F. Byrnes,  advised Truman to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Albert Einstein; lifelong Zionist who initiated the United States’ atomic bomb program with a personal letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1939.

The Secret History Of The Atomic Bomb

SUBTITLE  Why Hiroshima Was Destroyed – The Untold Story

By Eustace C. Mullins

June 1998

The world was stunned to learn that India has now tested nuclear weapons.  For many years, all nations have been concerned about the proliferation of atomic explosives. Even in their distress, no one seems to be interested in the historic or the psychological record of why these weapons were  developed, and what special breed of mankind devoted themselves to this  diabolical goal.

Despite the lack of public interest, the record is clear, and easily available to anyone who is interested. My interest in this subject, dormant  for many years was suddenly rekindled during my annual lecture tour in  Japan. My hosts had taken me to the city of Nagasaki for the first time.  Without telling me their plans, they entered the Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Museum. I thought it would be an interesting experience, but, to my surprise, when I walked into the exhibition rooms, I was suddenly overcome by sadness. Realizing that I was about to burst into tears, I moved away from my companions, and stood biting my lip. Even so, it seemed impossible to control myself. I was surrounded by the most gruesome objects, the fingers of a human hand fused with glass, a photograph of the shadow of a  man on a brick wall; the man had been vaporized in the explosion .


When I returned to the United States, I knew1 had to unearth the sinister  figures behind greatest of human catastrophes. It took many weeks of  research to uncover what turned out to be the most far-reaching conspiracy  of all time, the program of a few dedicated revolutionaries to seize control  of the entire world, by inventing the powerful weapon ever unveiled.

The story begins in Germany. In the 1930s, Germany and Japan had a number of scientists icing on the development of nuclear fission. In both of these countries, their leaders sternly forbade them to continue their research.  Adolf Hitler said he would never allow anyone in Germany to work to work on such an inhumane weapon.

The Emperor of Japan let his scientists know that he would never approve  such a weapon. At that time the United States had no one working on nuclear fission. The disgruntled German scientists contacted friends in the United States, and were told that there was a possibility of government support for their work here. As Don Beyer tells these immigrants to the United States pushed their program.

“Leo Szilard, together with his long time friends and fellow Hungarian physicists, Eugene Wigner and Edward Teller, agreed that the President must be warned; fission bomb technology was not so farfetched. The Jewish emigres, now living in America, had personal experience of fascism in Europe. In 1939, the three physicists enlisted the support of Albert Einstein, letter  dated August 2 signed by Einstein was delivered by Alexander Sachs to  Franklin D. Roosevelt at the White House on October 11, 39.”


At the Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Museum, photographs of two men are prominently displayed; Albert Einstein, and J. Robert Oppenheimer, who developed the atomic bomb at Los Alamos laboratories, New Mexico. Also on display is a statement from General Eisenhower, who was then supreme Military Commander,  which is found in number of books about Eisenhower, and which can be found  on p.426, Eisenhower by Stephen E. Ambrose, Simon & Shuster, NY, 1983.

“Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson first told Eisenhower of the bomb’s existence. Eisenhower was engulfed by “a feeling of depression’. When  Stimson said the United States proposed to use the bomb against Japan,  Eisenhower voiced ‘my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that  Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely  unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid  shocking world opinion by the use (of atomic weapons).’ Stimson was upset by Eisenhower’s attitude ‘almost angrily refuting the reasons I gave for my quick conclusion’. Three days later, Eisenhower flew to Berlin, where he met with Truman and his principal advisors. Again Eisenhower recommended against using the bomb, and again was ignored.

Other books on Eisenhower state that he endangered his career by his protests against the bomb, which the conspirators in the highest level of the United States government had already sworn to use against Japan, regardless of any military developments. Eisenhower could not have known  that Stimson was a prominent member of Skull and Bones at Yale, the  Brotherhood of Death, founded by the Russell Trust in 1848 as a bunch of the  German Illuminati, or that they had played prominent roles in organizing  wars and revolutions since that time. Nor could he have known that President  Truman had only had one job in his career, as a Masonic organizer for the  State of Missouri, and that the lodges he built up later sent him to the  United States Senate and then to the presidency.


The man who set all this in motion was Albert Einstein, who left Europe and came to the United States in October 1933. His wife said that he “regarded human beings with detestation”. He had previously corresponded with Sigmund Freud about his projects of “peace” and “disarmament”, although Freud later  said he did not believe that Einstein ever accepted any of his theories.  Einstein had a personal interest in Freud’s work because his son Eduard  spent his life in mental institutions, undergoing both insulin therapy and  electroshock treatment, none of which produced any change in his condition.

When Einstein arrived in the United States, he was feted as a famous scientist, and was invited to the White House by President and Mrs.  Roosevelt. He was soon deeply involved with Eleanor Roosevelt in her many leftwing causes, in which Einstein heartily concurred. Some of Einstein’s biographers hail the modern era as “the Einstein Revolution” and “the Age of Einstein”, possibly because he set in motion the program of nuclear fission in the United States. His letter to Roosevelt requesting that the government inaugurate an atomic bomb program was obviously stirred by his lifelong commitment to “peace and disarmament”. His actual commitment was to Zionism; Ronald W. Clark mentions in Einstein; His Life And Times, Avon, 1971, p.377,”He would campaign with the Zionists for a Jewish homeland in Palestine.” On p.460, Clark quotes Einstein, “As a Jew I am from today a supporter of the Jewish Zionist efforts.” (1919) Einstein’s letter to Roosevelt, dated august 2, 1939, was delivered personally to President Roosevelt by Alexander Sachs on October 11. Why did Einstein enlist an intermediary to bring this letter to Roosevelt, with whom he was on friendly terms? The atomic bomb program could not be launched without the necessary Wall Street sponsorship. Sachs, a Russian Jew, listed his profession as “economist” but was actually a bagman for the Rothschild’s, who regularly delivered large sums of cash to Roosevelt in the White House. Sachs was an advisor to Eugene Meyer of the Lazard Freres International Banking House, and also with Lehman Brothers, another well known banker. Sachs’ delivery of the Einstein letter to the  White House let Roosevelt know that the Rothschild’s approved of the project  and wished him to go full speed ahead.


In May of 1945, the architects of postwar strategy, or, as they liked to  call themselves, the “Masters of the Universe”, gathered in San Francisco at  the plush Palace Hotel to write the Charter for the United Nations. Several  of the principals retired for a private meeting in the exclusive Garden  Room. The head of the United States delegation had called this secret  meeting with his top aide, Alger Hiss, representing the president of the  United States and the Soviet KGB; John Foster Dulles, of the Wall Street law  firm of Sullivan and Cromwell, whose mentor, William Nelson Cromwell, had  been called a “professional revolutionary” on the floor of Congress; and W.  Averill Harriman, plenipotentiary extraordinary, who had spent the last two years in Moscow directing Stalin’s war for survival. These four men represented the awesome power of the American Republic in world affairs, yet of the four, only Secretary of State Edward Stettinius Jr., had a position authorized by the Constitution. Stettinius called the meeting to order to discuss an urgent matter; the Japanese were already privately suing for peace, which presented a grave crisis. The atomic bomb would not be ready for several more months. “We have already lost Germany,” Stettinius said.  “If Japan bows out, we will not have a live population on which to test the bomb.”

“But, Mr. Secretary,” said Alger Hiss, “no one can ignore the terrible power  of this weapon.” “Nevertheless,” said Stettinius, “our entire postwar program depends on terrifying the world with the atomic bomb.” “To accomplish that goal,” said John Foster Dulles, “you will need a very good tally. I should say a million.” “Yes,” replied Stettinius, “we are hoping for a million tally in Japan. But if they surrender, we won’t have anything.” “Then you have to keep them in the war until the bomb is ready,” said John Foster Dulles. “That is no problem. Unconditional surrender.”  “They won’t agree to that,” said Stettinius. “They are sworn to protect the Emperor.” “Exactly,” said John Foster Dulles. “Keep Japan in the war another three months, and we can use the bomb on their cities; we will end this war  with the naked fear of all the peoples of the world, who will then bow to  our will.”

Edward Stettinius Jr. was the son of a J.P. Morgan partner who had been the world’s largest munitions dealer in the First World War. He had been named  by J.P. Morgan to oversee all purchases of munitions by both France and  England in the United States throughout the war. John Foster Dulles was also  an accomplished warmonger. In 1933, he and his brother Allen had rushed to  Cologne to meet with Adolf Hitler and guaranteed him the funds to maintain  the Nazi regime. The Dulles brothers were representing their clients, Kuhn Loeb Co., and the Rothschilds. Alger Hiss was the golden prince of the communist elite in the united States. When he was chosen as head of the prestigious Carnegie Endowment for International Peace after World War II, his nomination was seconded by John Foster Dulles. Hiss was later sent to prison for perjury for lying about his exploits as a Soviet espionage agent.

This secret meeting in the Garden Room was actually the first military strategy session of the United Nations, because it was dedicated to its mission of exploding the world’s first atomic weapon on a living population.  It also forecast the entire strategy of the Cold War, which lasted forty-three years, cost American taxpayers five trillion dollars, and accomplished exactly nothing, as it was intended to do. Thus we see that the New World Order has based its entire strategy on the agony of the hundreds of thousands of civilians burned alive at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, including  many thousands of children sitting in their schoolrooms. These leaders had learned from their master, Josef Stalin, that no one can rule without mass  terrorism, which in turn required mass murder. As Senator Vandenberg, leader  of the Republican loyal opposition, was to say (as quoted in American  Heritage magazine, August 1977), “We have got to scare the hell out of “em.”


The atomic bomb was developed at the Los Alamos Laboratories in New Mexico.  The top secret project was called the Manhattan Project, because its secret director, Bernard Baruch, lived in Manhattan, as did many of the other  principals. Baruch had chosen Maj. Gen. Leslie R. Groves to head the operation. He had previously built the Pentagon, and had a good reputation among the Washington politicians, who usually came when Baruch beckoned.

The scientific director at Los Alamos was J. Robert Oppenheimer, scion of a prosperous family of clothing merchants. In Oppenheimer; the Years Of Risk, by James Kunetka, Prentice Hall, NY, 1982, Kunetka writes, p. 106, “Baruch was especially interested in Oppenheimer for the position of senior scientific adviser.” The project cost an estimated two billion dollars. No other nation in the world could have afforded to develop such a bomb. The first successful test of the atomic bomb occurred at the Trinity site, two hundred miles south of Los Alamos at 5:29:45 a.m. on July 16, 1945.

Oppenheimer was beside himself at the spectacle. He shrieked, “I am become Death, the Destroyer of worlds.” Indeed, this seemed to be the ultimate goal  of the Manhattan Project, to destroy the world. There had been considerable fear among the scientists that the test explosion might indeed set off a chain reaction, which would destroy the entire world. Oppenheimer’s exultation came from his realization that now his people had attained the ultimate power, through which they could implement their five-thousand-year  desire to rule the entire world.


Although Truman liked to take full credit for the decision to drop the  atomic bomb on Japan, in fact, he was advised by a prestigious group, The  National Defense Research Committee, consisting of George L. Harrison,  president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Dr. James B. Conant,  president of Harvard, who had spent the First World War developing more  effective poison gases, and who in 1942 had been commissioned by Winston  Churchill to develop an Anthrax bomb to be used on Germany, which would have  killed every living thing in Germany. Conant was unable to perfect the bomb before Germany surrendered, otherwise he would have had another line to add to his resume.  His service on Truman’s Committee which advised him to drop the atomic bomb on Japan, added to his previous record as a chemical warfare professional, allowed me to describe him in papers filed before the United States Court of Claims in 1957, as “the most notorious war criminal of the Second World War”. As Gauleiter of Germany after the war, he had ordered the burning of my book, The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, ten thousand copies having been published in Oberammergau, the site of the world-famed Passion  Play.

Also on the committee were Dr. Karl Compton, and James F. Byrnes, acting Secretary of State. For thirty years, Byrnes had been known as Bernard Baruch’s man in Washington. With his Wall Street profits, Baruch had built the most lavish estate in South Carolina, which he named Hobcaw Barony. As the wealthiest man in South Carolina, this epitome of the carpet-bagger also controlled the political purse strings. Now Baruch was in a position to dictate to Truman, through his man Byrnes, that he should drop the atomic  bomb on Japan.


Despite the fact that the Manhattan Project was the most closely guarded secret of World War II, one man, and one many only, was allowed to observe  everything and to know everything about the project. He was Lipman Siew, a Lithuanian Jew who had come to the United States as a political refugee at the age of seventeen. He lived in Boston on Lawrence St., and decided to take the name of William L. Laurence. At Harvard, he became a close friend of James B. Conant and was tutored by him. When Laurence went to New York,  he was hired by Herbert Bayard Swope, editor of the New York World, who was  known as Bernard Baruch’s personal publicity agent. Baruch owned the World.  In 1930, Laurence accepted an offer from the New York Times to become its science editor. He states in Who’s Who that he “was selected by the heads of the atomic bomb project as sole writer and public relations.” How one could be a public relations writer for a top secret project was not explained.  Laurence was the only civilian present at the historic explosion of the test bomb on July 16, 1945. Less than a month later, he sat in the copilots seat  of the B-29 on the fateful Nagasaki bombing run.


There were still many anxious moments for the conspirators, who planned to launch a new reign of terror throughout the world. Japan had been suing for  peace. Each day it seemed less likely that she could stay in the war. On March 9 and 10, 1945, 325 B-29s had burned thirty-five square miles of  Tokyo, leaving more than one hundred thousand Japanese dead in the ensuing  firestorm. Of Japan’s 66 biggest cities, 59 had been mostly destroyed. 178 square miles of urban dwellings had been burned, 500,000 died in the fires,  and now twenty million Japanese were homeless. Only four cities had not been  destroyed; Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata, and Nagasaki. Their inhabitants had  no inkling that they had been saved as target cities for the experimental  atomic bomb. Maj. Gen. Leslie Groves, at Bernard Baruch’s insistence, had  demanded that Kyoto be the initial target of the bomb. Secretary of War  Stimson objected, saying that as the ancient capital of Japan, the city of  Kyoto had hundreds of historic wooden temples, and no military targets. The  Jews wanted to destroy it precisely because of its great cultural importance  to the Japanese people.


While the residents of Hiroshima continued to watch the B-29s fly overhead  without dropping bombs on them, they had no inkling of the terrible fate  which the scientists had reserved for them. William Manchester quotes  General Douglas MacArthur in American Caesar, Little Brown, 1978, p.437

[quoting:] There was another Japan, and MacArthur was one of the few Americans who suspected its existence. He kept urging the Pentagon and the State Department to be alert for conciliatory gestures. The General predicted that the break would come from Tokyo, not the Japanese army. The General was right. A dovish coalition was forming in the Japanese capital, and it was headed by Hirohito himself, who had concluded in the spring of  1945 that a negotiated peace was the only way to end his nation’s agony.  Beginning in early May, a six-man council of Japanese diplomats explored ways to accommodate the Allies. The delegates informed top military  officials that “our resistance is finished”. [End quoting]

On p.359, Gar Alperowitz quotes Brig. Gen. Carter W. Clarke, in charge of preparing the MAGIC summary in 1945, who stated in a 1959 historical  interview, “We brought them down to an abject surrender through the  accelerated sinking of their merchant marine and hunger alone, and when we  didn’t need to do it, and knew we didn’t need to do it, we used them as an  experiment for two atomic bombs.”

Although President Truman referred to himself as the sole authority in the  decision to drop the bomb, in fact he was totally influenced by Bernard  Baruch’s man in Washington, James F. Byrnes. Gar Alperowitz states, p. 196,”Byrnes spoke with the authority of-personally represented-the president of  the United States on all bomb-related matters in the Interim Committee’s  deliberations.” David McCullough, in his laudatory biography of Truman, which was described as “a valentine”, admitted that “Truman didn’t know his  own Secretary of State, Stettinius. He had no background in foreign policy,  no expert advisors of his own.”

The tragedy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was that a weak, inexperienced president, completely under the influence of Byrnes and Baruch, allowed  himself to be manipulated into perpetrating a terrible massacre. In the introduction to Hiroshima’s Shadows, we find that “Truman was moving in quite the opposite direction, largely under the influence of Byrnes. The atom bomb for Byrnes was an instrument of diplomacy-atomic diplomacy.”  (p.ix)


On August 6, 1945, a uranium bomb 3-235, 20 kilotons yield, was exploded 1850 feet in the air above Hiroshima, for maximum explosive effect. It devastated four square miles, and killed 140,000 of the 255,000 inhabitants.  In Hiroshima’s Shadows, we find a statement by a doctor who treated some of the victims; p.415, Dr. Shuntaro Hida: “It was strange to us that Hiroshima  had never been bombed, despite the fact that B-29 bombers flew over the city  every day. Only after the war did I come to know that Hiroshima, according to American archives, had been kept untouched in order to preserve it as a  target for the use of nuclear weapons. Perhaps, if the American administration and its military authorities had paid sufficient regard to  the terrible nature of the fiery demon which mankind had discovered and yet  knew so little about its consequences, the American authorities might never  have used such a weapon against the 750,000 Japanese who ultimately became  its victims.”

Dr. Hida says that while treating the terribly mangled and burned victims,  “My eyes were ready to overflow with tears. I spoke to myself and bit my lip  so that I would not cry. If I had cried, I would have lost my courage to  keep standing and working, treating dying victims of Hiroshima.”

On p.433, Hiroshima’s Shadows, Kensaburo Oe declares, “From the instant the  atomic bomb exploded, it became the symbol of all human evil; it was a  savagely primitive demon and most modern curse…. My nightmare stems from a  suspicion that a ‘certain trust in human strength’ or ‘humanism’ flashed  across the minds of American intellectuals who decided upon the project that  concluded with the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima.”

In the introduction to Hiroshima’s Shadows, we find that “One of the myths  of Hiroshima is that the inhabitants were warned by leaflets that an atomic  bomb would be dropped. The leaflets Leonard Nadler and William P. Jones  recall seeing in the Hiroshima Museum in 1960 and 1970 were dropped after  the bombing. This happened because the President’s Interim Committee on the Atomic Bomb decided on May 31 ‘that we could not give the Japanese any warning’. Furthermore, the decision to drop ‘atomic’ leaflets on Japanese cities was not made until August 7, the day after the Hiroshima bombing.  They were not dropped until August 10, after Nagasaki had been bombed. We can say that the residents of Hiroshima received no advance warning about the use of the atomic bomb. On June 1, 1945, a formal and official decision was taken during a meeting of the so-called Interim Committee not to warn the populations of the specific target cities. James Byrnes and Oppenheimer insisted that the bombs must be used without prior warning.”

“Closely linked to the question of whether a warning of an atomic bomb attack was given to the civilian populations of the target cities is the third ‘article of fifth’ that underpins the American legend of Hiroshima; the belief that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were military targets. The Headquarters of the Japanese Second army were located in Hiroshima and approximately 20,000 men-of which about half, or 10,000 died in the attack.  In Nagasaki, there were about 150 deaths among military personnel in the city. Thus, between the two cities, 4.4% of the total death toll was made up of military personnel. In short, more than 95% of the casualties were civilians.”

On p.39 of Hiroshima’s Shadows we find that (at Hiroshima) “strictly military damage was insignificant.” How are we to reconcile this statement with Harry Truman’s vainglorious boast in Off The Record; the Private Papers of Harry S. Truman Harper, 1980, p.304, “In 1945 I had ordered the Atomic Bomb dropped on Japan at two places devoted almost exclusively to war production.” In fact, many thousands of the Hiroshima casualties were children sitting in their classrooms.

The bomb was dropped because (p.35) “The Manhattan Project’s managers were lobbying to use the atomic bomb. Byrnes sat in on these meetings. Maj. Gen.  Groves seems to have been the author of the claim that the use of the bomb would save a million American lives–a figure in the realm of fantasy.”

Truman himself variously stated that the use of the use of the atomic bomb  saved “a quarter of a million American lives”, a “half-million American  lives”, and finally settled on the Gen. Groves figure of “a million American  lives saved.”

Meanwhile (p.64) William L. Laurence, who was writing for the New York Times  at full salary while also receiving a full salary from the War Department as  the “public relations agent for the atomic bomb” published several stories  in the New York Times denying that there had been any radiation effects on  the victims of the Hiroshima bombing (Sept. 5, 1945 et seq.) in which he  quotes General Groves’ indignant comment, “The Japanese are still continuing  their propaganda aimed at creating the impression we won the war unfairly  and thus attempting to create sympathy for themselves.”

(p.66) “The Legation of Switzerland on August 11, 1945 forwarded from Tokyo the following memorandum to the State Department (which sat on it for  twenty-five years before finally releasing it): ‘The Legation of Switzerland  has received a communication from the Japanese Government.’ On August 6,  1945, American airplanes released on the residential district of the town of  Hiroshima, bombs of a new type, killing and injuring in one second a large  number of civilians and destroying a great part of the town. Not only is the  city of Hiroshima a provincial town without any protection or special  military installations of any kind, but also none of the neighboring regions  or towns constitutes a military objective.”

The introduction to Hiroshima’s Shadows concludes that (p.lxvii) “The claim that an invasion of the Japanese home islands was necessary without the use of the atomic bombs is untrue. The claim that an ‘atomic warning’ was given to the populace of Hiroshima is untrue. And the claim that both cities were key military targets is untrue.”


Corroboration of these statements is found in the remarkable record of  Ellsworth Torrey Carrington, “Reflections of a Hiroshima Pilot”, (p.9) “As  part of the Hiroshima atomic battle plan my B-29 (named Jabbitt III, Captain  John Abbott Wilson’s third war plane) flew the weather observation mission  over the secondary target of Kokura on August 6, 1945.” (p. 10) “After the  first bomb was dropped, the atom bomb command was very fearful that Japan  might surrender before we could drop the second bomb, so our people worked  around the clock, 24-hours-a-day to avoid such a misfortune.” This is, of course, satire on Carrington’s part. (p. 13) “in city after city all over the face of Japan (except for our cities spared because reserved for atomic holocaust) they ignited the most terrible firestorms in history with very light losses (of B-29s). Sometimes the heat from these firestorms was so intense that later waves of B-29s were caught by updrafts strong enough to loft them upwards from 4 or 5,000 feet all the way up to 8 or 10,000 feet.  The major told us that the fire-bombing of Japan had proven successful far beyond anything they had imagined possible and that the 20th Air Force was running out of cities to burn. Already there were no longer (as of the first  week in June 1945) any target cities left that were worth the attention of  more than 50 B-29s, and on a big day, we could send up as many as 450  planes!” “The totality of the devastation in Japan was extraordinary, and this was matched by the near-totality of Japan’s defenselessness.” (As of June 1, 1945, before the atomic bombs were dropped.) (p. 14) “The Truman  government censored and controlled all the war information that was allowed  to reach the public, and of course, Truman had a vested interest in  obscuring the truth so as to surreptitiously prolong the war and be  politically able to use the atom bomb. Regarding the second element of the Roosevelt-Truman atomic Cold War strategy of deceiving the public into believing that Japan was still militarily viable in the spring and summer of  1945, the centerpiece was the terribly expensive and criminally unnecessary  campaign against Okinawa.

Carrington quotes Admiral William D. Leahy, p. 245, I Was There, McGraw Hill: “A large part of the Japanese Navy was already on the bottom of the sea. The combined Navy surface and air force action even by this time had forced Japan into a position that made her early surrender inevitable. None of us then knew the potentialities of the atomic bomb, but it was my opinion, and I urged it strongly on the Joint Chiefs, that no major land invasion of the Japanese mainland was necessary to win the war. The JCS did order the preparation of plans for an invasion, but the invasion itself was never authorized.”

Thus Truman, urged on by General Groves, claims that “a million American lives were saved” by the use of the atomic bomb, when no invasion had ever  been authorized, and was not in the cards. Carrington continues, p. 16, “The monstrous truth is that the timing of the Okinawa campaign was exclusively  related to the early August timetable of the atomic bomb. J’accuse!  I accuse Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman of deliberately  committing war crimes against the American people for the sole purpose of  helping set the stage for the criminally unnecessary use of atomic weapons  on Japan.”

Carrington further quotes Admiral Leahy, from I Was There, “It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagaski was of no  material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and  the successful bombing with conventional weapons.”

Carrington concludes, p.22, “Truman’s wanton use of atomic weapons left the  American people feeling dramatically less secure after winning World War II  than they had ever felt before, and these feelings of insecurity have been  exploited by unscrupulous Cold War Machine Politicians ever since.” As Senator Vandenberg said, “We have to scare the hell out of ’em” in order to browbeat the American people into paying heavy taxes to support the Cold War.


Admiral William Leahy also stated in I Was There, “My own feeling is that  being the first to use it (the atomic bomb) we had adopted an ethical  standard common to the Barbarism of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make  war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and  children.”

Gar Alperowitz notes, p. 16, “On May 5, May 12 and June 7, the Office of Strategic Services (our intelligence operation), reported Japan was considering capitulation. Further messages came on May 18, July 7, July 13 and July 16.”

Alperowitz points out, p.36, “The standing United States demand for ’unconditional surrender’ directly threatened not only the person of the Emperor but such central tenets of Japanese culture as well.”

Alperowitz also quotes General Curtis LeMay, chief of the Air Forces, p.334,”The war would have been over in two weeks without the Russians entering and  without the atomic bomb. PRESS INQUIRY: You mean that, sir? Without the  Russians and without the atomic bomb? LeMay: The atomic bomb had nothing to  do with the end of the war at all.” September 29, 1945, statement.


When the Air Force dropped the atomic bomb on Nagasaki, with William  Laurence riding in the co-pilot’s seat of the B-29, pretending to be Dr.  Strangelove, here again the principal target was a Catholic church. P.93,  The Fall Of Japan, by William Craig, Dial, NY, 1967, “the roof and masonry  of the Catholic cathedral fell on the kneeling worshippers. All of them died.” This church has now been rebuilt, and is a prominent feature of the Nagasaki tour.

After the terror bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the victorious Allies moved promptly to try Japanese officials for their “war crimes”. From 1945-51 several thousand Japanese military men were found guilty of war crimes by an International Military Tribunal which met in Tokyo from 1946 to 1948. Twenty-eight Japanese military and civilian leaders were accused of having engaged in conspiracy to commit atrocities. The dissenting member of the Tokyo tribunal, Judge Radhabinod of India, dismissed the charge that Japanese leaders had conspired to commit atrocities, stating that a stronger  case might be made against the victors, because the decision to use the  atomic bomb resulted in indiscriminate murder.

A very popular movie in Japan today is Pride, The Fateful Moment, which  shows Prime Minister General Hideki Tojo in a favorable light. With six  others, he was hanged in 1968 as a war criminal. During his trial, his  lawyers stated to the International Tribunal for the Far East, the Asian  version of Nuremberg Trials, that Tojo’s war crimes could not begin to  approach the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The  prosecutors immediately objected, and censored their statements. That was  the last time there was any official recognition of the atomic bomb  massacres in Japan. Japanese officials have been effectively prevented from  taking any stand on this matter because the American military occupation,  which officially ended in 1952 with the Treaty with Japan, was quietly  continued. Today, 49,000 American troops are still stationed in Japan, and  there is no public discussion of the crimes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.


The most authoritative Air Force unit during World War II was the U.S.  Strategic Bombing Survey, which selected targets on the basis of need, and  which analyzed the results for future missions. In Hiroshima’s Shadow, the  U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey report of July 1, 1946 states, “The Hiroshima  and Nagasaki atomic bombs did not defeat Japan, nor by the testimony of the  enemy leaders who ended the war did they persuade Japan to accept  unconditional surrender. The Emperor, the lord privy seal, the prime  minister, the foreign minister, and the navy minister had decided as early  as May 1945 that the war should be ended even if it meant acceptance of  defeat on allied terms…. It is the Survey’s opinion that certainly prior  to December 1, 1945 and in all probability prior to November 1, 1945, Japan  would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped and  even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated.”

Both military, political and religious leaders spoke out against the atomic  bombing of Japanese civilians. The Federal Council of the Churches of Christ  in America issued a formal statement in March 1946 (cited by Gar  Alperowitz):

“The surprise bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are morally indefensible.  Both bombings must be judged to have been unnecessary for winning the war.  As the power that first used the atomic bomb under these circumstances, we  have sinned grievously against the laws of God and against the people of  Japan.”-Commission on the Relation of the Church to the War in the Light of  the Christian Faith.

On p.438, Gar Alperowitz quotes James M. Gillis, editor of Catholic World,  “I would call it a crime were it not that the word ‘crime’ implies sin, and  sin requires a consciousness of guilt. The action taken by the Untied States  government was in defiance of every sentiment and every conviction upon  which our civilization is based.”

One of the most vociferous critics of the atomic bombings was David  Lawrence, founder and editor of U.S. News and World Report. He signed a  number of stinging editorials, the first on August 17, 1945.

“Military necessity will be our constant cry in answer to criticism, but it  will never erase from our minds the simple truth, that we, of all civilized  nations, though hesitating to use poison gas, did not hesitate to employ the  most destructive weapon of all times indiscriminately against men, women and  children.” On October 5, Lawrence continued his attack, “The United States  should be the first to condemn the atomic bomb and apologize for its use  against Japan. Spokesmen for the Army Air Forces said it wasn’t necessary  and that the war had been won already. Competent testimony exists to prove  that Japan was seeking to surrender many weeks before the atomic bomb came.”  On November 23, Lawrence wrote, “The truth is we are guilty. Our conscience  as a nation must trouble us. We must confess our sin. We have used a  horrible weapon to asphyxiate and cremate more than 100,000 men, women and  children in a sort of super-lethal gas chamber- and all this in a war  already won or which spokesman for our Air Forces tell us we could have  readily won without the atomic bomb. We ought, therefore, to apologize in  unequivocal terms at once to the whole world for our misuse of the atomic  bomb.”

David Lawrence was an avowed conservative, a successful businessman, who  knew eleven presidents of the United States intimately, and was awarded the  Medal of Freedom by President Richard M. Nixon, April 22, 1970.


Although Eisenhower never changed his opinion of the use of the atomic bomb,  during his presidency he repeatedly voiced his opinion, as quoted by Steve  Neal, The Eisenhowers Doubleday, 1978. P.225, “Ike would never lose his  scepticism of the weapon and later referred to it as a ‘hellish  contrivance’.”

His brother, Milton Eisenhower, a prominent educator, was even more vocal on  this subject. As quoted by Gar Alperwitz, p.358, Milton Eisenhower said,  “Our employment of this new force at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a supreme  provocation to other nations, especially the Soviet Union. Moreover, its use  violated the normal standards of warfare by wiping out entire populations,  mostly civilians, in the target cities. Certainly what happened at Hiroshima  and Nagasaki will forever be on the conscience of the American people.”

During his Presidency, Dwight Eisenhower tried to find peaceful uses for  atomic energy. In The Eisenhower Diaries, p.261, we find that “The phrase  ‘atoms for peace’ entered the lexicon of international affairs with a speech  by Eisenhower before the United Nations December 8, 1953.” Control of atomic  energy had now given the New World Order clique enormous power, and  Eisenhower, in his farewell speech to the American people on leaving the  Presidency In Review (Doubleday, 1969), on January 17, 1961, warned, “In the  councils of government we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted  influence, whether sought or unsought, by the miliary-industrial complex.  The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will  persist.”

By failing to name the power behind the military-industrial complex, the  international bankers, Eisenhower left the American people in the dark as to  he was actually warning them against. To this day they do not understand  what he was trying to say, that the international bankers, the Zionists and  the Freemasons had formed an unholy alliance whose money and power could not  be overcome by righteous citizens of the United States.


General Douglas MacArthur also tried to warn the American people of this  threat, as quoted in American Ceaser, by William Manchester, Little Brown,  1978, p.692, “In 1957, he lashed out at large Pentagon budgets. ‘Our  government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear-kept us in a continuous  stampede of patriotic fervor-with the cry of grave national emergency.  Always there has been some terrible evil to gobble us up if we did not  blindly rally behind it by furnishing the exorbitant funds demanded. Yet, in  retrospect, these disasters seem never to have happened, seem never to have  been quite real.”

This was the restatement of Senator Vandenberg’s famous comment, “We have to  scare the hell out of ’em.”


The scientists who had built the atomic bomb were gleeful when they received  the news of its success at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In the book, Robert  Oppenheimer, Dark Prince, by Jack Rummel, 1992, we find, p.96, “Back in the  United States the news of the bombing of Hiroshima was greeted with a  mixture of relief, pride, joy, shock and sadness. Otto Frisch remembers the  shouts of joy, ‘Hiroshima has been destroyed!’ ‘Many of my friends were  rushing to the telephone to book tables at the La Fonda Hotel in Santa Fe in  order to celebrate. Oppenheimer walked around “like a prizefighter, clasping  his hands together above his head as he came to the podium”.'”

Oppenheimer had been a lifelong Communist. “He was heavily influenced by  Soviet Communism “: A New Civilization, by Sidney and Beatrice Webb, the  founders of Fabian Socialism in England. He became director of research at  the newly formed U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, with his mentor, Bernard  Baruch, serving as chairman. Oppenheimer continued his many Communist Party  Associations; his wife was Kitty Peuning, widow of Joe Dallet, an American  Communist who had been killed defending Communism with the notorious Lincoln  Brigade in Spain. Because Oppenheimer was under Party discipline, the Party  then ordered him to marry Kitty Peuning and make a home for her.

Baruch resigned from the Atomic Energy Commission to attend to his business  interests. He was replaced by Lewis Lichtenstein Strauss, of Kuhn, Loeb Co.  Strauss was apprised of Oppenheimer’s many Communist associations, but he  decided to overlook them until he found that Oppenheimer was sabotaging  progress on developing the new and much more destructive hydrogen bomb. It  seemed apparent that Oppenheimer was delaying the hydrogen bomb until the  Soviet Union could get its own version on line. Furious at the betrayal, he  asked Oppenheimer to resign as director of the Commission. Oppenheimer  refused. Strauss then ordered that he be tried. A hearing was held from  April 5 to May 6, 1954. After reviewing the results, the Atomic Energy  Commission voted to strip Oppenheimer of his security clearance, ruling that  he “possessed substantial defects of character and imprudent dangerous  associations with known subversives”.

Oppenheimer retired to Princeton, where his mentor, Albert Einstein,  presided over the Institute for Advanced Study, a think tank for refugee  “geniuses”, financed by the Rothschilds through one of their many secret  foundations. Oppenheimer was already a trustee of the Institute, were he  remained until his death in 1966.


Einstein considered the atomic age merely as a stage for the rebirth of  Israel. On p.760 of Einstein; His Life And Times we find that Abba Eban, the  Israeli Ambassador, came to his home with the Israeli consul, Reuben Dafni.  He later wrote, “Professor Einstein told me that he saw the rebirth of  Israel as one of the few political acts in his lifetime which had an  essential moral quality. He believed that the conscience of the world  should, therefore, be involved in Israel’s preservation.” by Ronald W.  Clarke, Avon Books 1971.

On March 1, 1946, Army Air Force Contract No. MX-791 was signed, creating  the RAND Corporation as an official think tank, defining Project RAND as “a  continuing program of scientific study and research on the broad subject of  air warfare with the object of recommending to the Air Force preferred  methods of techniques and instrumentalities for this purpose.” On May 14,  1948, RAND Corporation funding was taken over by H. Rowan Gaither, head of  the Ford Foundation. This was done because the Air Force had sole control of  the atomic bomb, RAND Corp. developed the Air Force and atomic bomb program  for the Cold War, with the Strategic Air Command, the missile program, and  many other elements of the “terror strategy”. It became a billion dollar  game for these scientists, with John von Neumann, their leading scientist,  becoming world famous as the inventor of “game theory”, in which the United  States and the Soviet Union engaged in a worldwide “game” to see which would  be the first to attack the other with nuclear missiles. In the United  States, the schools held daily bomb drills, with the children hiding under  their desks. No one told them that thousands of schools children in  Hiroshima had been incinerated in their classrooms; the desks offered no  protection against nuclear weapons. The moral effect on the children was  devastating. If they were to be vaporized in the next ten seconds, there  seemed little reason to study, marry and have children, or prepare for a  steady job. This demoralization through the nuclear weapons program is the  undisclosed reason for the decline in public morality.

In 1987, Phyllis LaFarge published The Strangelove Legacy, The Impact Of The  Nuclear Threat On Children, chronicling through extended research the moral  devastation wreaked on the children by the daily threat of annihilation. She  quotes Freeman Dyson, who stated the world has been divided into two worlds,  the world of the warriors, and the world of the victims, the children. It  was William L. Laurence, sitting in the co-pilot’s seat of a B-29 over  Nagasaki, and the children waiting to be vaporized below. This situation has  not changed.


Because Japan was occupied by the U.S. Military in 1945, the Japanese  Government was never allowed any opportunity to file any legal charges about  the use of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although Japanese  leaders were tried and executed for “war crimes” no one was ever charged for  the atomic bombings. It was not until 1996 that the World Court delivered an  opinion on the use of nuclear weapons, (p.565, Hiroshima’s Shadows) “In July  1996, the World court took a stand in its first formal opinion on the  legality of nuclear weapons. Two years earlier, the United Nations had asked  the Court for an advisory opinion. The General Assembly of the United  Nations posed a single, yet profoundly basic, question for consideration. It  the threat of use of nuclear weapons on any circumstances permitted under  international law? For the first time, the world’s pre-eminent judicial  authority has considered the question of criminality vis-a-vis the use of a  nuclear weapon, and, in doing so, it has come to the conclusion that the use  of a nuclear weapon is ‘unlawful’. It is also the Court’s view that even the  threat of the use of a nuclear weapon is illegal. Although there were  differences concerning the implications of the right of self-defense  provided by Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, ten of the fourteen judges  hearing the case found the use of threat to use a nuclear weapon to be  illegal on the basis of the existing canon of humanitarian law which governs  the conduct of armed conflict. The judges based their opinion on more than a  century of treatise and conventions that are collectively known as the  ‘Hague’ and ‘Geneva’ laws.”

Thus the Court ruled that nuclear weapons are illegal under the Hague and  Geneva conventions , agreements which were in existence at the time of the  Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. They were illegal then, and they are  illegal now.


Among world leaders who spoke out about the United States’ use of atomic  weapons in Japan, Mahatma Gandhi echoed the general climate of opinion.  P.258, Hiroshima’s Shadow: “The atomic bomb has deadened the finest feelings  which have sustained mankind for ages. There used to be so-called laws of  war which made it tolerable. Now we understand the naked truth. War knows no  law except that of might. The atomic bomb brought an empty victory to the  Allied armies. It has resulted for the time being in the soul of Japan being  destroyed. What has happened to the soul of the destroying nation is yet too  early to see. Truth needs to be repeated as long as there are men who do not  believe it.”


The Private Lives Of Albert Einstein, by Roger Highfield, St. Martins Press,  NY, 1993.

The Wizards Of Armageddon, by Fred Kaplan, Simon & Shuster, NY, 1993.

Albert Einstein, by Milton Dank, Franklin Watts, 1983.

Off The Record; The Private Papers Of Harry S. Truman, Harper & Row, 1980.

The Eisenhowers, by Steve Neal, Doubleday, 1978.

The Eisenhower Diaries, W.W. Norton, 1981.

In Review, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Doubleday, 1969.

Eisenhower, Stephen E. Ambrose, Simon & Schuster, 1983.

The Strangelove Legacy, Phyllis LaFarge, Harper & Row, 1987.

Einstein, His Life & Times, Ronald W. Clark, Avon books, 1971.

Robert Oppenheimer, Dark Prince, by Jack Rummel, 1992.

The Manhattan Project, by Don E. Beyer, Franklin Wat, 1991.

The Great Decision, The Secret History Of The Atomic Bomb, Michael Amrine,  Putnams, NY, 1959.

Eisenhower At War, by David Eisenhower, Random House, NY, 1986.

The Fall Of Japan, by William Craig, Dial, NY, 1967.

Oppenheimer, The Years Of Risk, Jas W. Kunetka, Prentice Hall, 1982.

Target Tokyo, Gordon W. Prange, McGraw Hill, 1984.

Hiroshima’s Shadow, edited by Kai Bird, Pamphleteer Press, 1998.

The Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb, by Gar Alperowitz, Knopf, NY, 1995.

Was Einstein Right? by Clifford M. Will, Basic Books, 1986.


Eustace C. Mullins, Ezra Pound World Peace Foundation Japanese-American  Friendship Society and the People of Japan,


The United States Government, Defendant.

The plaintiffs bring this action before the World Court of International  Justice to resolve the following charges:

1.  Defendant conspired to commit war crimes against the people of Japan  during World War II.

2.  Defendant conspired to commit atrocities against the people of Japan  during World War II.

3.  Defendant conspired to subsequently evade and cover up these crimes by  militarily occupying the nation of Japan, effectively preventing the people  of Japan from seeking legal recourse for the actions of defendant.  Defendant continues to militarily occupy Japan today, with 49,999 troops  stationed there, on the pretext that the Soviet Union might attack.  This  pretext ignores the geopolitical fact that the Soviet Union collapsed in  1989 and does not pose a threat to anyone.

4.  Defendant conspired to commit crimes of genocide against the people of  Japan, motivated by racial hatred and religious bigotry.

5.  Defendant violated the Hague agreements and the Geneva Convention, as  determined by the World Court in June  1996, by making war against civilians  and inflicting millions of casualties by firebombing Japanese cities and the  atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II.

6.  After committing these crimes, defendant conspired to cover up these  crimes by issuing a number of false statements, denying war crimes, and  distortions of fact to evade any punishment for these war crimes.

7.  Defendant also conspired to conceal from the American people the  circumstances behind the commission of these war crimes, that a small group  of conspirators, refugees from Europe, came to the United States and  infiltrated the government of the United States, and in total secrecy  launched the project to manufacture an atomic bomb for use against Germany  and Japan. At no time during this conspiracy were the people of the United  States aware of what was taking place, nor consulted for their approval, in  violation of republican’principles and the Constitution of the United  States.

8. Since World War II,  defendant has conducted a worldwide program of  atomic terrorism, called atomic diplomacy, to ensure that its program  continues unabated, and without punishment.

9. Although Japan had been reduced to ashes by June 1945, defendant insisted  that an invasion was necessary, while ignoring peace tenders from Japan  since May 1945, and defendant further claimed that the American military  would suffer one million war dead while invading Japan, and that it was  necessary to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima, August 6,  1945, and  Nagasaki, August 9, 1945. In fact, as Admiral William D. Leahy pointed out  in his book, I Was There, “the invasion itself was never authorized.”  General Dwight D. Eisenhower, Supreme Military Commander, Admiral William D.  Leahy, Air force General Curtis LeMay, and many other American military  leaders, made public statements that it was not necessary to drop the atomic  bombs. Political considerations dictated that it be dropped on Japan, in  order to test it on a living population, and, if possible, to “tally” a  million or more victims with the bombs, for the purpose of postwar  intimidation of all other nations.

10.  The atomic bomb was the creation of a small group of European refugees,  whose efforts to develop such a bomb in Europe had been indignantly  rejected.  Albert Einstein,  the physicist, wrote a personal letter to  President Franklin D. Roosevelt, August 2, 1939, recommending that  this bomb be built by the United States. His letter was hand-delivered to  Roosevelt by Alexander Sachs, a Wall Street speculator.  The atomic bomb  program was directed from behind the scenes by another Wall Street  speculator, Bernard Baruch, an agent of the Rothschilds.  Baruch selected  Major General Leslie Groves as the director of the project, and J. Robert  Oppenheimer as science director of the program. Baruch continued to issue  directives throughout the program, insisting to Major General Groves that  the city of Kyoto be the primary target of the atomic bombs.  Military  leaders opposed this selection, pointing out that Kyoto was the ancient  capital of Japan, and a religious center with more than two hundred ancient  temples. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were finally chosen, although neither of  these cities offered a primary military target.  Baruch continued to  dictate decisions on the atomic bomb, through the President’s National  Defense Research Committee, chaired by Baruch’s Washington representative,  James F. Byrnes.

11.  After the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, defendant perpetrated  a number of outright falsehoods to avoid blame for these massacres of  civilians. The first was that the inhabitants were warned by leaflets  dropped over the city that an atomic bomb would be used. In fact, the  leaflets were not dropped until August 10,  after  the  bombs  had  exploded. The President’s Committee had resolved on May 31, 1945 that  “we could not give the Japanese any warning.” The second falsehood was  that an invasion of Japan would be necessary if the atomic bomb was not  used; this would cost a million American lives.  Many leading American  military authorities state this is absolutely false. The third falsehood was  that both cities were “key military targets”.  President Truman boasted in  his private papers that “in 1945 I had ordered the atomic bomb dropped on  Japan at two places devoted almost exclusively to war production.”

In fact, more than 95% of the dead at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were civilians.  Only 4.4% of the death toll was made up of military personnel. A fourth  falsehood, printed in the New York Times September 5, 1945, was that the  victims had suffered no radiation damage. This story was written by William  L. Laurence, the paid propagandist for the War Department with exclusive  rights to material on the atomic bomb. Laurence quoted Major General Groves  that the Japanese “are attempting to create sympathy for themselves”.

12.  The Legation of Switzerland in Tokyo forwarded to the defendant a  statement from the Japanese government, the complaint that “the city of  Hiroshima is a provincial town without any protection or military  installations of any kind, but also none of the neighboring regions or towns  constitutes a military objective.” Observers on the scene recorded that  “strictly military damage was insignificant.”

13.  The most authoritative official United States unit during World War II  was the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey, which selected targets and analyzed  the results of the bombings for the benefit of future missions. Their  report of July 1,  1946 states, “the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs did not  defeat Japan, nor by the testimony of the enemy leaders who ended the war  did they persuade Japan to accept unconditional surrender. The Emperor, the  lord privy seal, the prime minister, the foreign minister, and the navy  minister had decided as early as May 1945 that the war should be ended even  if it meant acceptance of defeat on allied terms… It is the Survey’s  opinion that certainly prior to December 1, 1945, and in all probability  prior to November 1, 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic  bombs had not been dropped and even if no  invasion  had  been  planned  or contemplated.”

14. This proves that the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were war  crimes deliberately committed, with foreknowledge that it was not necessary  to drop the atomic bombs on these two cities.  As David Lawrence, founder  and editor of U.S. News And World Report, wrote in his editorial November  23, 1945, “the truth is we are guilty.  Our conscience as a nation must  trouble us. We must confess our sin. We have used a horrible weapon to  asphyxiate and cremate more than 100,000 men, women and children in a sort  of super-lethal gas chamber–and all this in a war already won or which  spokesman for our Air Forces tell us we could have readily won without the  atomic bomb.”

15. The world leader and pacifist Mahatma Gandhi  spoke sadly about the  tragedy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  “The atomic bomb has deadened the finest  feelings which have sustained mankind for ages. There used to be so-called  laws of war which made it tolerable. Now we understand the naked truth.  War knows no law except that of might. The atomic bomb brought an empty  victory to the Allied armies.  It has resulted for the time being in the  soul of Japan being destroyed.  What has happened to the soul of the  destroying nation is yet too early to see.”

16.  Defendant is in violation of the Geneva Convention.  Protocol 2,  Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law, states:  1. “International  humanitarian law is applicable to international armed conflicts.  The international law of peace existing between the states concerned will thus  be large superseded by the rules of international humanitarian law…. A state can not, therefore, be allowed to invoke military necessity as a justification for upsetting that balance by departing from those rules.”

17. IV.  Humanitarian Requirements and Military Necessity. “In war, a belligerent many apply only that amount and kind of force necessary to defeat the enemy. Acts of war are only permissible if they are directed against military objectives, if they are not likely to cause unnecessary suffering,  and if they are not perfidious.” The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki clearly falls outside the scope of this ruling, being civilian targets, the bombing caused unnecessary suffering, and defendant’s attempted justification was openly perfidious.

18. 129. If an act of war is not expressly prohibited by international agreements or customary law, this does not necessarily mean that it is actually permissible. The so-called Martens Clause, developed by the  Livonian professor Friedrich von Martens (1845-1909) delegate of Tsar  Nicholas II at the Hague Peace Conferences, which has been included in the  Preamble to the 1907 Hague Convention IV and reaffirmed in the 1977  Additional Protocal I as stated below, will always be applicable.  In cases not covered  by the  Protocol  or by  other international agreement,  civilians and combatants remain under the protection and authority of the  principles of international law derived from established custom, from the  principles of humanity, and from the dictates of public conscience.  (Artl.,  pars. 2 AP  1;  see also Preamble pars. 4 AP II)

19.  Protocol I-Part IV. Section i.  “….the obligation of the Parties to the conflict to ‘at all times distinguish between the civilian population  and combatants’.”  Article 48-Basic rule, “the prohibition of ’indiscriminate attacks’.” Article 51-Protection of the civilian population,  paragraph  4, in  particular  “an attack  by bombardment by any method  or means which treats as a single military objective a number of clearly  separated and distinct military objectives, located in a city, town, village  or other area containing a similar concentration of civilians or civilian  objects” (Article 51-Protection of the civilian population paragraph 5 (a)  and “an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian  life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination  thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct  military advantage anticipated (article 51-Protection of the civilian  population, paragraph 5 [b]).

20.  Protocol I-Part IV, Section 1. “Protection of civilians from arbitrary and oppressive enemy action, outlined in 1899, and later in 1907, was expressed in its most complete form in the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, which is now supplemented by this Protocol.

WHEREFORE, the plaintiffs respectfully move this Court to hear these charges  of conspiracy to commit war crimes and atrocities, conspiracy to cover up  their crimes, motivated by racial hatred and religious bigotry, and having  intimidated the government of Japan and prevented them from seeking any  redress for these crimes, and by defendant’s ongoing program of atomic  terrorism, perfidious falsehoods, and their continuing conspiracy to cover  up crimes of genocide, mass murder and undue suffering among their victims,  and that the Court shall hear these charges, decide upon appropriate  damages, and punishment for the offenders.

Respectfully submitted,

Eustace C. Mullins

La carta de Albert Pike a Giuseppe Mazzini y 1er GM, 2da GM y 3era GM

15 de agosto 1871

La  siguiente es una carta que la especulación afirmó que Albert Pike le escribió a Giuseppe Mazzini en 1871 en relación a una conspiración que involucra a tres guerras mundiales que estaban previstas en un intento de conquistar el mundo .

La carta de Pike a Giuseppe Mazzini se estuvo en exhibición en el Museo de la Biblioteca Británica de Londres hasta 1977.

Esta carta ha sido reclamada por muchos sitios de Internet a residir en la Biblioteca Británica en Londres , que niega la carta exista.

Giuseppe Mazzini fue un líder revolucionario italiano de mediados de 1800 , así como el Director de los Illuminati
Albert Pike ( figura masónica histórica ) es un grado 33 , masón ocultista, gran maestro y creador de la Jurisdicción Sur de la Orden Masónica del Rito Escocés

Los siguientes son aparentemente, extractos de la carta, que muestra cómo se han planificado tres guerras mundiales para muchas generaciones.

La Primera Guerra Mundial debe ser provocada con el fin de permitir a los Illuminati derrocar el poder de los zares en Rusia y de hacer ese país una fortaleza del comunismo ateo. Las divergencias causadas por la” Agentur ” (agentes) de los Illuminati entre los imperios británico y germánico se utilizarán para fomentar esta guerra . al final de la guerra , el comunismo será construido y utilizado para destruir los demás gobiernos  con el fin de debilitar las religiones ” .

La Segunda Guerra Mundial debe ser fomentada tomando ventaja de las diferencias entre los fascistas y los sionistas políticos. Esta guerra debe ser provocada por lo que el nazismo sea destruido y que el sionismo político sea suficientemente fuerte para instituir un Estado soberano de Israel en Palestina . durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial , el comunismo internacional debe ser lo suficientemente fuerte para balancear la cristiandad , que sería entonces restringuida y controlada hasta  el momento en el que sería necesario para el cataclismo social del final ” .

” La Tercera Guerra Mundial debe ser fomentada tomando ventaja de las diferencias causadas por la” Agentur ” de los” Illuminati “entre los sionistas políticos y los líderes del mundo islámico . La guerra debe llevarse a cabo de tal manera que el Islam ( los musulmanes árabe Mundiales) y el sionismo político ( el Estado de Israel) se destruyan mutuamente.

Mientras tanto, las otras naciones, una vez más divididas sobre esta cuestión que se sentirán impelidos a luchar hasta el punto de agotamiento físico, moral , espiritual y económico … Vamos a dar rienda suelta a los nihilistas  ( es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilismo) y los ateos, y vamos a provocar un cataclismo social, formidable que con todo su horror, mostrará claramente a las naciones el efecto del ateísmo absoluto , origen del salvajismo y de la crisis más sangrienta .

Entonces en todas partes, los ciudadanos , obligados a defenderse contra la minoría mundial de revolucionarios , exterminará a esos destructores de la civilización , y la multitud , desilusionada con el cristianismo, cuyos espíritus deístas estarán a partir de ese momento  sin brújula ni dirección, ansiosos por un ideal, pero sin saber dónde hacer su adoración, recibirán la verdadera luz a través de la manifestación universal de la doctrina pura de Lucifer, llevado finalmente a cabo en la vista pública.

Esta manifestación resultará del movimiento reaccionario general que seguirá a la destrucción del cristianismo y el ateísmo , ambos conquistados y exterminados al mismo tiempo ” .

The Albert Pike letter to Giuseppe Mazzini and WW1,WW2 and WW3

August 15, 1871

The following is a letter that speculation claimed that Albert Pike wrote to Giuseppe Mazzini in 1871 regarding a conspiracy involving three world wars that were planned in an attempt to take over the world.

The Pike letter to Giuseppe Mazzini was on display in the British Museum Library in London until 1977.

This letter has been claimed by many internet sites to reside in the British Library in London, which denies the letter exists.

Following are apparently extracts from the letter, showing how Three World Wars have been planned for many generations.

The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the “agentur” (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.”

The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.”

The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.

Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion… We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.

Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.

This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”

 from GeraldCelenteChannel Website

Churchill, Hitler…And History

Churchill, Hitler…And History

Winston Churchill was knighted after World War 2 and buried from Westminster Abbey, perhaps the highest tribute that could be paid to him, while Adolf Hitler has been accorded the status of perhaps the most evil politician in human history.


“When I look around to see how we can win the war I see that there is only one sure path. We have no Continental army which can defeat the German military power.. Should [Hitler].. not try invasion [of Britain].. there is one thing that will bring him back and bring him down, and that is an absolutely devastating, exterminating attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland. We must be able to overwhelm them by this means, without which I do not see a way through. We cannot accept any aim lower than air mastery. When can it be obtained?” [Extract from Winston S Churchill The Second World War (Volume 2 Their Finest Hour Appendix A), Memo from Prime Minister to Minister of Aircraft Production, 8.July 1940].

ADOLF HITLER in May 1940

Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler actually wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order of 24 May 1940 at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:

“He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilization that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church ­ saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..” (p 200).

According to Liddell Hart, “At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia” (p140).

David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to “the discovery.. That at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.”

Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organizations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia’s population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries. According to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter 8):

‘It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.

‘To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.’ Other authors agree with this:

“There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists.. led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation.” (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).

“The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in ‘nice society’, and ‘nice society’ included the universities.” (Martin Bernal, Black Athena vol. 1 pp. 367, 387).

“The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler’s) anti-Semitic beliefs.” (J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).

Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says, “The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all” (p.267), and “Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership” (p104-5). What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and Hitler was an opportunist ‘who took advantages whenever they offered themselves’ (Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain.


A major awkwardness concerning Churchill’s conduct of the war lies in the secret British policy of so-called ‘area bombing’, adopted early in 1942 and outlined by (Lord) CP Snow in the 1960 Godkin Lectures at Harvard University (published in his book Science and Government, Oxford University Press 1961). Snow had an insider’s view of the development of this policy. He outlines how the sinister Professor FA Lindemann (later to become Lord Cherwell, Churchill’s chief scientific adviser), persuaded the British Cabinet to adopt the policy of directing bombing campaigns primarily against German working-class housing. ‘Middle-class houses have too much space around them, and so are bound to waste bombs; factories and “military objectives” had long since been forgotten, except in official bulletins, since they were much too difficult to find and hit’ (p 48). Snow asks, ‘What will people of the future think of us? Will they say.. we were wolves with the minds of men? Will they think that we had resigned our humanity? They will have the right.’ (p 49). Fortunately, Snow needn’t have worried. There have been and remain such powerful vested interests committed to preserving the myths of World War II that even the history departments of universities have in most cases assisted with the cover-up.

The respected British military historian Martin Middlebrook says, ‘In some ways, Area Bombing was a three-year period of deceit practiced upon the British public and on world opinion. It was felt to be necessary that the exact nature of R.A.F. bombing should not be revealed. It could not be concealed that German cities were being hit hard, and that residential areas in those cities were receiving many of the bombs, but the impression was usually given that industry was the main target and that any bombing of workers’ housing areas was an unavoidable necessity. Charges of ‘indiscriminate bombing’ were consistently denied.. The deceit lay in the concealment of the fact that the areas being most heavily bombed were nearly always either city centres or densely populated residential areas, which rarely contained any industry.. The vital links in the dissemination of this view were the press and the radio upon which the public depended for all wartime news..

Neutral reports [of the campaign against the residential areas of the German city of Hamburg, for example] that 20,000 or 30,000 people had been killed were dismissed as ‘Nazi-inspired stories’.. The military historian Sir Basil Liddell Hart [after the Thousand Bomber Raid on Cologne with its claim of so many acres of city destroyed] wrote: “It will be ironical if the defenders of civilization depend for victory upon the most barbaric and unskilled way of winning a war that the modern world has seen.” ‘ (Middlebrook, The Battle of Hamburg (1980) pp 343-4]. In his foreword, Middlebrook notes ‘I am likely to be criticized.. for choosing a series of raids which produced such extremes of horror on the ground. But I must point out that a large proportion of the raids carried out by R.A.F. Bomber Command in the Second World War were devoted to this type of bombing. What happened at Hamburg was when Bomber Command ‘got everything right’ (p 12). In reality many of these raids consisted of initial attacks using high explosive bombs to break up the buildings, followed with attacks using thousands of incendiary bombs to set alight all the fabrics, furnishing and upholstery exposed by the explosives. In this way firestorms were created under the right conditions which burned tens of thousands of people alive, especially the women and children at home while the men were at the front.

Churchill himself ordered the firebomb raid on the city of Dresden (David Irving The Destruction of Dresden (1966) pp. 96-100), Alexander McKee Dresden 1945 (1982) p 300, 306, 310) in the last months of the war, producing the most spectacular deliberate firestorm in the history of Europe. This action was probably the major war crime committed in Europe ­ Dresden was not in any way a military target, and was packed with refugees fleeing the advancing Russians, mainly women and children and the elderly who were unfit to fight. It is therefore understandable that it has been necessary to distract attention away from this viciously and appallingly barbaric act by fabricating war crimes afterwards and attributing them to the other side, a procedure that is finally starting to come unstuck. The Bush-Blair attack on Iraq at the behest of Zionists in the US administration such as Paul Wolfowitz has demonstrated before a world audience the lies that can be used to start wars, and in fact usually do. The transparency and scale of Bush Administration lies, together with the support given to the lies by a diverse array of other governments, is producing a revulsion for professional politicians and their handlers and spin doctors and sponsors.

While Churchill has been given titles such as “the greatest Englishman who ever lived’, this does not stand up to any scrutiny. While he had unquestioned gifts of oratory – he may have been one of the most bombastic Englishmen who ever lived. His ego was awesome. At a time when he and his wife were short of finance:

“Clemmie (Mrs Churchill).. told me that Winston was most extravagant about his underclothes. They were made of very finely woven silk (pale pink) and came from the Army & Navy Stores and cost the eyes out of the head. This year according to her calculations he spent something like eighty pounds on them. When I taxed him with this curious form of self-indulgence he replied: ‘It is essential to my well-being. I have a very delicate and sensitive cuticle which demands the finest covering. Look at the texture of my cuticle – feel it (uncovering his forearm by rolling up his sleeve). I have a cuticle without blemish – except on one small portion of my anatomy where I sacrificed a piece of skin to accommodate a wounded brother-officer on my way back from the Sudan campaign’.” – [quoted from Paul Johnson, The Oxford Book of Political Anecdotes (1989) p215.]

Churchill was also quoted as having the belief that ‘in wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.’ Just what truth was he referring to – the British guarantee to Poland, which turned out not to apply to FD Roosevelt’s Yalta-agreed Communist control of Poland, for instance?

By Jack Nicholas

1913: Cómo El Fed fue empujado a la Nacion Américana


Schiff gastó millones de dólares para ayudar a los comunistas conquistar a  Rusia.


En un discurso ante la Cámara de Comercio, el magnate de la banca zionista y aliado de  Jacob Rothschild… Schiff ‘profética’ advertertencia:

“A menos que tengamos un Banco Central con el control de los recursos de crédito, este país va a sufrir el pánico de dinero más graves y de largo alcance en su historia.”



Pánico  bancario en Nueva York

Los banqueros de Nueva York han inflado el mercado de valores con los préstamos fáciles. Y cuando los prestamos despues  se hacen mas dificiles de otorgar, la burbuja explota. Acciones se estrellan un 50%. Las personas corren para sacar su dinero. Los banqueros de Wall Street y el  New York Times, usaron  El Pánico de 1907 para hacer el caso para un estilo del Banco Central tipo  Europa (como imaginó Karl Marx)


Senador Owen presintio que algo iba a pasar

1911: SENADOR OWEN: 07 fue una conspiración!
Cuatro años después del panico de 1907, el senador Robert Owen de Oklahoma  exige una investigación sobre la repentina caída.


“(El Pánico) fue provocado por una conspiración deliberada para el enriquecimiento de los que la diseñaron …. Lo considero  una traición contra los Estados Unidos …. algunos hombres controlan el poder de expandir o contraer crédito. Este poder ilimitado significa que el poder de crear pánico y obligar a este país políticamente a lo que sea “.


TR era una herramienta, bocon y  fanfarrón de los Banqueros.

1908: Teddy Roosevelt NOMBRA LA COMISIÓN
El títere de los zionistas-  presidente Theodore Roosevelt, designa a una “comision bipartidista”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Monetary_Commission  para estudiar las causas del pánico y hacer sugerencias. El Presidente de la Comisión es el Senador Nelson Aldrich (del que su hija será un día la madre de  los 5 hijos de Rockefeller , David, John III, Nelson, Winthrop, y Lawrence)


Senador Aldrich era un pariente de los Rockefeller. Su Nieto David,corrió  La Comisión Trilateral y el CFR.

La principal recomendación de la Comisión Monetaria Nacional de Aldrich es el establecimiento de un Banco Central con el monopolio del crédito y la emisión de moneda. El Banco de propiedad privada sería crear dinero de la nada y prestarlo bancos locales y el gobierno con interés.


Paul Warburg, padre de la Fed, el Banco Central de los Estados Unidos (títere de la Dinastia Rothschild).

1910: reunión secreta en Jekyll Island
Aldrich, Paul Warburg, y otros agentes de las dinastías Rockefeller y Rothschild se reúnen en secreto en el club privado de JP Morgan en Jekyll Island, Georgia. Uno de los conspiradores, Frank Vanderlip, será, años más tarde, revela al Saturday Evening Post:
“Hubo una ocasión, cerca del final de 1910, cuando era tan secreto, de hecho, tan furtiva como cualquier conspiracion … Estábamos tratando de planificar un mecanismo que corrija las debilidades de nuestro sistema bancario como se vio en las tensiones y presiones del Pánico de 1907. No me siento que sea  ninguna exageración hablar de nuestra expedición secreta en Jekyll Island como la ocasión de la concepción actual de lo que se convirtió, finalmente, en el Sistema de la Reserva Federal. …. Si llegara a ser expuestos públicamente que nuestro grupo se había reunido y ha escrito un proyecto de ley de banca, ese proyecto de ley no tendría posibilidad alguna de paso por el Congreso “.


2010: Greenspan y Bernanke visitan la Isla Jekyll en el 100 aniversario de la reunión!

Los banqueros ABIERTAMENTE celebrar el 100 º aniversario de la reunión conspirativa en Jekyll Island. Presidente de la Fed Ben Bernanke y el ex presidente Alan Greenspan asistieron a la conferencia titulada “De regreso a la Isla Jekyll: Historia de su Origen y Futuro del Fed” http://www.frbatlanta.org/news/conferences/10jekyll_index.cfm – celebrada exactamente 100 años después de la reunión de 1910, y exactamente en el mismo edificio.


Charles Lindbergh Sr. y su famoso hijo.


Senador Aldrich presenta un proyecto de ley para establecer un Banco Central (The Aldrich Bill ). El esquema (nacido en la isla de Jekyll) es transparente, y el nombre de Aldrich está muy estrechamente vinculada a los Money Masters de Nueva York. El congresista Charles A Lindbergh Sr. (padre del famoso aviador) declara:
“El Plan Aldrich es el Plan de Wall Street. Significa otro pánico, si es necesario, para intimidar a la gente. Aldrich, pagados por el gobierno para representar al pueblo, propone un plan para los fideicomisos en su lugar. ”
La oposición al régimen de Aldrich es tan fuerte, que el proyecto de ley para crear un Banco Central ni siquiera bajo para su votación.

Una historieta contra  El Banco Central de 1912!



1913: EL ‘ALDRICH BILL’ se vuelve a empaquetar – El FED ha nacido!

Algunos cambios cosméticos se realizan en el viejo Aldrich Bill y el proyecto de ley se cambia el nombre ‘La Ley de la Reserva Federal “. Congresman Lindbergh no se deja engañar:
“Este es el proyecto de ley Aldrich disfrazada …. Esta Ley establece la confianza más gigantesca en la tierra. Cuando el Presidente firme este proyecto de ley, se legalizó el gobierno invisible del Poder Monetario. La gente puede no saber de inmediato, pero el día del juicio final está a sólo a unos años. El peor crimen legislativo de todos los tiempos es perpetrado por este proyecto de ley bancaria “.
El proyecto de ley pasa de todos modos, el 23 de diciembre, después de que muchos senadores y congresistas habían salido de la ciudad para las vacaciones de Navidad! EL Títere, Presidente Woodrow Wilson firma rápidamente el proyecto de ley de creación del Sistema de la Reserva Federal de propiedad privada. Semanas antes, Wilson ya había promulgado los primero Impuesto sobre el Ingresos a la nación  (necesario para pagar intereses a los banqueros después de que establecieron su Banco Central!) La falsificación, abuso de información privilegiada, la usura, los globalistas Money Masters ahora al control de Estados Unidos!

“Yo soy un hombre muy infeliz. he arruinado sin querer a mi país. Una gran nación industrial está controlada por su sistema de crédito. Nuestro sistema de crédito está concentrado. El crecimiento de la nación, por lo tanto, y todas nuestras actividades están en manos de unos pocos hombres. Hemos llegado a ser uno de los peor gobernados, uno de los gobiernos más completamente controlados y dominados en el mundo civilizado, no más un gobierno de libre opinión, no más un gobierno por convicción y el voto de la mayoría, pero un gobierno por la opinión y la coacción de un pequeño grupo de hombres dominantes “. -Woodrow Wilson, después de la firma de la Reserva Federal

Senadores y Diputados

“La mayoría de los estadounidenses no tienen una comprensión real de la operación de los prestamistas internacionales. Las cuentas del Sistema de la Reserva Federal, nunca ha sido auditada se opera fuera del control del Congreso y manipula el crédito de los Estados Unidos.”. – El senador Barry Goldwater (Rep. AR)




The Mysterious Connection Between Sirius and Human History

The Mysterious Connection Between Sirius and Human History

Since ancient times and across multiple civilizations, Sirius, the dog star, has been surrounded with a mysterious lore. Esoteric teachings of all ages have invariably attributed to Sirius a special status and the star’s importance in occult symbolism is an attestation of that fact. What makes Sirius so special? Is it simply due to the fact that it is the brightest star in the sky? Or is it also because humanity has an ancient, mysterious connection with it? This article looks at the importance of Sirius throughout History and secret societies and will describe the symbolism surrounding it.

Sirius is located in the constellation Canis Major – also known as the Big Dog – and is therefore known as the “dog star”. It is over twenty times brighter than our sun and is twice as massive. At night time, Sirius is the brightest star in the sky and its blue-white glare never failed to amaze star gazers since the dawn of time. No wonder Sirius has been revered by practically all civilizations. But is there more to Sirius than meets the eye?

Artifacts of ancient civilizations have revealed that Sirius was of a great importance in astronomy, mythology and occultism. Mystery schools consider it to be “sun behind the sun” and, therefore, the true source of our sun’s potency. If our sun’s warmth keeps the physical world alive, Sirius is considered to keep the spiritual world alive. It is the “real light” shining in the East, the spiritual light, where as the sun illuminates the physical world, which is considered to be a grand illusion.
Associating Sirius with the divine and even considering it as the home of humanity’s “great teachers” is not only embedded in the mythology of a few primitive civilizations: It is a widespread belief that has survived (and even intensified) to this day. We will look at the importance of Sirius in ancient times, analyze its prominence in secret societies and we will examine these esoteric concepts as they are translated in popular culture.


In Ancient Civilizations

In Ancient Egypt, Sirius was regarded as the most important star in the sky. In fact, it was astronomically the foundation of the Egyptians’ entire religious system. It was revered as Sothisand was associated with Isis, the mother goddess of Egyptian mythology. Isis is the female aspect of the trinity formed by herself, Osiris and their son Horus. Ancient Egyptians held Sirius in such a high regard that most of their deities were associated, in some way or another, with the star. Anubis, the dog-headed god of death, had an obvious connection with the dog star and Toth-Hermes, the great teacher of humanity, was also esoterically connected with the star.

The Egyptian calendar system was based on the heliacal rising of Sirius that occurred just before the annual flooding of the Nile during summer. The star’s celestial movement was also observed and revered by ancient Greeks, Sumerians, Babylonians and countless other civilizations. The star was therefore considered sacred and its apparition in the sky was accompanied with feasts and celebrations. The dog star heralded the coming of the hot and dry days of July and August, hence the popular term “the dog days of summer”.

Several occult researchers have claimed that the Great Pyramid of Giza was built in perfect alignment with the stars, especially Sirius. The light from these stars were said to be used in ceremonies of Egyptian Mysteries.

“This ancient people (Egyptians) knew that once every year the Parent Sun is in line with the Dog Star. Therefore, the Great Pyramid was so constructed that, at this sacred moment, the light of the Dog Star fell upon the square “Stone of God” at the upper end of the Great Gallery, descending upon the head of the high priest, who received the Super Solar Force and sought through his own perfected Solar Body to transmit to other Initiates this added stimulation for the evolution of their Godhood. This then was the purpose of the “`Stone of God,’ whereon in the Ritual, Osiris sits to bestow upon him (the illuminate) the Atf crown or celestial light.” “North and South of that crown is love,” proclaims an Egyptian hymn. “And thus throughout the teaching of Egypt the visible light was but the shadow of the invisible Light; and in the wisdom of the ancient country the measures of Truth were the years of the Most High.” 1

Recent scientific discoveries relating to the Great Pyramid and its mysterious “air shafts” have lead researchers to further confirm the importance of Sirius within the pyramid.

Star alignment with the Great Pyramid of Giza. Orion (associated with the god Osiris) is aligned with the King’s Chamber while Sirius (associated with the goddess Isis) is aligned with the Queen’s Chamber.

Star alignment with the Great Pyramid of Giza. Orion (associated with the god Osiris) is aligned with the King’s Chamber while Sirius (associated with the goddess Isis) is aligned with the Queen’s Chamber.

A fascinating aspect of Sirius is the consistency of the symbolism and meanings attached to it. Several great civilizations have indeed associated Sirius with a dog-like figure and viewed the star as either the source or the destination of a mysterious force. In Chinese and Japanese astronomy, Sirius is known as the “star of the celestial wolf”. Several aboriginal tribes of North America referred to the star in canine terms: the Seri and Tohono O’odham tribes of the southwest describe the Sirius as a “dog that follows mountain sheep”, while the Blackfoot call it “Dog-face”. The Cherokee paired Sirius with Antares as a dog-star guardian of the “Path of Souls”. The Wolf (Skidi) tribe of Nebraska knew it as the “Wolf Star”, while other branches of knew it as the “Coyote Star”. Further north, the Alaskan Inuit of the Bering Strait called it “Moon Dog”. 2

The Dogon Tribe and Atlantis

In 1971, the American author Robert Temple published a controversial book entitled The Sirius Mystery where he claimed that the Dogons (an ancient African tribe from Mali) knew details about Sirius that would be impossible to be know without the use of telescopes. According to him, the Dogon understood the binary nature of Sirius, which is, in fact, composed of two stars named Sirius A and Sirius B. This lead Robert Temple to believe that the Dogons had “direct” connections with beings from Sirius. While some might say “you can’t be Sirius” (sorry), a great number of secret societies (who have historically held within their ranks some of the world’s most influential people) and belief systems teach about a mystic connection between Sirius and humanity.

In Dogon mythology, humanity is said to be born from the Nommo, a race of amphibians who were inhabitants of a planet circling Sirius. They are said to have “descended from the sky in a vessel accompanied by fire and thunder” and imparted to humans profound knowledge. This lead Robert Temple to theorize that the Nommos were extraterrestrial inhabitants of Sirius who travelled to earth at some point in the distant past to teach ancient civilizations (such as the Egyptians and Dogons) about the Sirius star system as well as our own solar system. These civilizations would then record the Nommos’ teachings in their religions and make them a central focus of their Mysteries.

The Dogon’s mythology system is strikingly similar to the ones of other civilizations such as the Sumerians, Egyptians, Israelites and Babylonians as it includes the archetypal myth of a “great teacher from above”. Depending on the civilization, this great teacher is known as eith Enoch, Thoth or Hermes Trismegistus and is said to have taught humanity theurgic sciences. In occult traditions, it is believed that Thoth-Hermes had taught the people of Atlantis, which, according to legend, became the world’s most advanced civilization before the entire continent  was submerged by the Great Deluge (accounts of a flood can be found in the mythologies of countless civilizations). Survivors from Atlantis travelled by boat to several countries, including Egypt, where they imparted their advanced knowledge. Occultists believe that the inexplicable resemblances between distant civilizations (such as the Mayas and the Egyptians) can be explained by their common contact with Atlanteans.

“Was the religious, philosophic, and scientific knowledge possessed by the priestcrafts of antiquity secured from Atlantis, whose submergence obliterated every vestige of its part in the drama of world progress? Atlantean sun worship has been perpetuated in the ritualism and ceremonialism of both Christianity and pagandom. Both the cross and the serpent were Atlantean emblems of divine wisdom. The divine (Atlantean) progenitors of the Mayas and Quichés of Central America coexisted within the green and azure radiance of Gucumatz, the “plumed” serpent. The six sky-born sages came into manifestation as centers of light bound together or synthesized by the seventh – and chief – of their order, the “feathered” snake. The title of “winged” or “plumed” snake was applied to Quetzalcoatl, or Kukulcan, the Central American initiate. The center of the Atlantean Wisdom-Religion was presumably a great pyramidal temple standing on the brow of a plateau rising in the midst of the City of the Golden Gates. From here the Initiate-Priests of the Sacred Feather went forth, carrying the keys of Universal Wisdom to the uttermost parts of the earth.


From the Atlanteans the world has received not only the heritage of arts and crafts, philosophies and sciences, ethics and religions, but also the heritage of hate, strife, and perversion. The Atlanteans instigated the first war; and it has been said that all subsequent wars were fought in a fruitless effort to justify the first one and right the wrong which it caused. Before Atlantis sank, its spiritually illumined Initiates, who realized that their land was doomed because it had departed from the Path of Light, withdrew from the ill-fated continent. Carrying with them the sacred and secret doctrine, these Atlanteans established themselves in Egypt, where they became its first “divine” rulers. Nearly all the great cosmologic myths forming the foundation of the various sacred books of the world are based upon the Atlantean Mystery rituals.” 3

Is Thoth-Hermes-Trismegistus the equivalent of the Dogon’s Nommos, who are believed to originate from Sirius? Ancient texts concerning Hermes describe him as a teacher of mysteries who “came from the stars”. Furthermore, Thoth-Hermes was directly connected with Sirius in Egyptian mythology.

“The dog-star: the star worshipped in Egypt and reverenced by the Occultists; by the former because its heliacal rising with the Sun was a sign of the beneficient inundation of the Nile, and by the latter because it is mysteriously associated with Toth-Hermes, god of wisdom, and Mercury, in another form. Thus Sothis-Sirius had, and still has, a mystic and direct influence over the whole living heaven, and is connected with almost every god and goddess. It was “Isis in the heaven” and called Isis-Sothis, for Isis was “in the constellation of the dog”, as is declared on her monuments. Being connected with the Pyramid, Sirius was, therefore, connected with the initiations which took place in it.” 4

“The Trismegistic treatise ‘The Virgin of the World’ from Egypt refers to ‘the Black Rite’, connected with the ‘black’ Osiris, as the highest degree of secret initiation possible in the ancient Egyptian religion – it is the ultimate secret of the mysteries of Isis. This treatise says Hermes came to earth to teach men civilization and then again ‘mounted to the stars’, going back to his home and leaving behind the mystery religion of Egypt with its celestial secrets which were some day to be decoded.” 5

Interpreting the mythology of ancient cultures is not an exact science and connections are inherently difficult to prove. However, the symbolic link between Sirius and occult knowledge has constantly appeared throughout History and has seamlessly traveled through the ages. In fact, it is as revered today as it was millenniums ago. Modern secret societies such as the Freemasons, the Rosicrucians and the Golden Dawn (which are considered to be Hermetic Orders due to the fact their teachings are based on those of Hermes Trismegistus) all attribute to Sirius the utmost importance. An educated look at their symbolism provides a glimpse at the profound connection between Sirius and occult philosophy.

Sirius in Occult Symbolism and Secret Societies

To claim that Sirius is “important” to Hermetic Orders would be a gross understatement. The dog star is nothing less than the central focus of the teachings and symbolism of secret societies. The ultimate proof of this fact: many secret societies are actually named after the star.

In the Tarot

The seventeenth numbered major trump is called Les Étoiles, (French for The Star), and portrays a young girl kneeling with one foot in water and the other on and, her body somewhat suggesting the swastika. She has two urns, the contents of which she pours upon the land and sea. Above the girl’s head are eight stars, one of which is exceptionally large and bright. Count de Gébelin considers the great star to be Sothis or Sirius; the other seven are the sacred planets of the ancients. He believes the female figure to be Isis in the act of causing the inundations of the Nile which accompanied the rising of the Dog Star. The unclothed figure of Isis may well signify that Nature does not receive her garment of verdure until the rising of the Nile waters releases the germinal life of plants and flowers.

“The seventeenth numbered major trump is called Les Étoiles, (French for The Star), and portrays a young girl kneeling with one foot in water and the other on and, her body somewhat suggesting the swastika. She has two urns, the contents of which she pours upon the land and sea. Above the girl’s head are eight stars, one of which is exceptionally large and bright. Count de Gébelin considers the great star to be Sothis or Sirius; the other seven are the sacred planets of the ancients. He believes the female figure to be Isis in the act of causing the inundations of the Nile which accompanied the rising of the Dog Star. The unclothed figure of Isis may well signify that Nature does not receive her garment of verdure until the rising of the Nile waters releases the germinal life of plants and flowers.” 6

In Freemasonry

In Masonic lodges, Sirius is known as the “Blazing Star” and a simple look at its prominence in Masonic symbolism reveals its utmost importance. The Masonic author William Hutchinson wrote about Sirius: “It is the first and most exalted object that demands our attention in the Lodge.” The same way the light of Sirius made its way into the Great Pyramid during initiations, it is symbolically present in Masonic lodges.

“The Ancient Astronomers saw all the great Symbols of Masonry in the Stars. Sirius glitters in our lodges as the Blazing Star.” 7Sirius, the Blazing Star, at the center of the Masonic mosaic pavement.

Sirius, the Blazing Star, at the center of the Masonic mosaic pavement.

The Blazing Star shining upon members of a Masonic lodge

The Blazing Star shining upon members of a Masonic lodge

“(The Blazing Star) originally represented SIRIUS, or the Dog-star, the forerunner of the inundation of the Nile; the God ANUBIS, companion of ISIS in her search for the body of OSIRIS, her brother and husband. Then it became the image of HORUS, the son of OSIRIS, himself symbolized also by the Sun, the author of the Seasons, and the God of Time; Son of ISIS, who was the universal nature, himself the primitive matter, inexhaustible source of Life, spark of uncreated fire, universal seed of all beings. It was HERMES, also, the Master of Learning, whose name in Greek is that of the God Mercury.” 8

In Freemasonry, it is taught that the Blazing Star is a symbol of deity, of omnipresence (the Creator is present everywhere) and of omniscience (the Creator sees and knows all). Sirius is therefore the “sacred place” all Masons must ascend to: It is the source of divine power and the destination of divine individuals. This concept is often represented in Masonic art.

Masonic art portraying Sirius, the Blazing Star, as the destination of the Mason’s journey.

Masonic art portraying Sirius, the Blazing Star, as the destination of the Mason’s journey.

To achieve perfection, the initiate must successfully understand and internalize the dual nature of the world (good and evil; masculine and feminine; black and white, etc.) through alchemical metamorphosis. This concept is symbolically represented by the union of Osiris and Isis (the male and female principles) to give birth to Horus, the star-child, the Christ-like figure, the perfected man of Freemasonry – who is equated with the Blazing Star.

“The sun and moon … represent the two grand principles … the male and the female … both shed their light upon their offspring, the blazing star, or Horus.” 9

The Egyptian hieroglyph representing Sirius has been esoterically interpreted to be a representation of this cosmic trinity.

The hieroglyph representing Sirius contains three elements: a “phallic” obelisk (representing Osiris), a “womb-like” dome (representing Isis) and a star (representing Horus).

The hieroglyph representing Sirius contains three elements: a “phallic” obelisk (representing Osiris), a “womb-like” dome (representing Isis) and a star (representing Horus).

This concept is so crucial for Freemasons, that it was embedded in some of the most important structures in the world.

The Washington Monument, an Egyptian obelisk representing the male principle, is directly connected with the dome of the Capitol, representing the female principle. Together they produce Horus an unseen energy represented by Sirius. (For more information, read the article Mystical Sites – The U.S. Capitol on The Vigilant Citizen).

The Washington Monument, an Egyptian obelisk representing the male principle, is directly connected with the dome of the Capitol, representing the female principle. Together they produce Horus an unseen energy represented by Sirius. (For more information, read the article Mystical Sites – The U.S. Capitol).

As stated by Albert Pike above, the Egyptian god Horus and the star Sirius are often associated. In Masonic symbolism, the eye of Horus (or the All-Seeing Eye) is often depicted surrounded by the glittering of light of Sirius.

A Masonic tracing board depicting the sun above the left pillar (representing the masculine), the moon above the right pillar (representing feminine) and Sirius above the middle pillar, representing the “perfected man” or Horus, the son of Isis and Osiris. Notice the “Eye of Horus” on Sirius.

A Masonic tracing board depicting the sun above the left pillar (representing the masculine), the moon above the right pillar (representing feminine) and Sirius above the middle pillar, representing the “perfected man” or Horus, the son of Isis and Osiris. Notice the “Eye of Horus” on Sirius.

The Eye of Horus inside a triangle (symbolizing deity) surrounded by the glow of Sirius, the Blazing Star

The Eye of Horus inside a triangle (symbolizing deity) surrounded by the glow of Sirius, the Blazing Star

The All-Seeing Eye inside the Blazing Star in Masonic art.

The All-Seeing Eye inside the Blazing Star in Masonic art.

Given the symbolic correlation between the All-Seeing Eye and Sirius, the next image becomes self-explanatory.

The light behind the All-Seeing Eye on the American dollar bill is not from the sun, but from Sirius. The Great Pyramid of Giza was built in alignment with Sirius and is therefore shown shining right above the Pyramid. A radiant tribute to Sirius is therefore in the pockets of millions of citizens.

The light behind the All-Seeing Eye on the American dollar bill is not from the sun, but from Sirius. The Great Pyramid of Giza was built in alignment with Sirius and is therefore shown shining right above the Pyramid. A radiant tribute to Sirius is therefore in the pockets of millions of citizens.

Order of the Eastern Star

The symbol of the OES is an inverted star, similar to the Blazing Star of Freemasonry.

The symbol of the OES is an inverted star, similar to the Blazing Star of Freemasonry.

Considered to be the “female version” of Freemasonry (although men can join), the Order of the Eastern Star (OES) is directly named after Sirius, the “Star rising from the East”. A “general public” explanation of the origins of the Order’s name claims it originated from the “Star of the East” that lead the Three Magis to Jesus Christ. A look into the occult meaning of the Order’s symbolism however makes it clear that the OES is a reference to Sirius, the most important star of Freemasonry, its parent organization.

OES art depicting Sirius above the Great Pyramid.

OES art depicting Sirius above the Great Pyramid.

Madame Blavatsky, Alice Bailey  and Theosophy

Helena Blavatsky and Alice Bailey, the two main figures associated with Theosophy, have both considered Sirius to be a source esoteric power. Blavatsky stated that the star Sirius exerts a mystic and direct influence over the entire living heaven and is linked with every great religion of antiquity.

Alice Bailey sees the Dog Star as the true “Great White Lodge” and believes it to be the home of the “Spiritual Hierarchy”. For this reason she considers Sirius as the “star of initiation”.

“This is the great star of initiation because our Hierarchy (an expression of the second aspect of divinity) is under the supervision or spiritual magnetic control of the Hierarchy of Sirius. These are the major controlling influences whereby the cosmic Christ works upon the Christ principle in the solar system, in the planet, in man and in the lower forms of life expression. It is esoterically called the “brilliant star of sensitivity.” 10

Not unlike most many esoteric writers, Bailey considers Sirius to have a great impact on human life.

“All that can be done here in dealing with this profound subject is to enumerate briefly some of the cosmic influences which definitely affect our earth, and produce results in the consciousness of men everywhere, and which, during the process of initiation, bring about certain specific phenomena.

First and foremost is the energy or force emanating from the sun Sirius. If it might be so expressed, the energy of thought, or mind force, in its totality, reaches the solar system from a distant cosmic centre via Sirius. Sirius acts as the transmitter, or the focalising centre, whence emanate those influences which produce self-consciousness in man.” 11

Aleister Crowley, the A.A. and Kenneth Grant

In 1907, Crowley started his own occult order called the A.A. – short for Argentium Astrum, which can be translated to ‘The Order of the Silver Star’. The ‘Silver Star’ was, of course, a reference to Sirius. Even if Crowley almost always referred to the dog star in veiled terms, the whole of his magickal philosophy, from his development as a young Freemason through to his final years as the Head of the O.T.O, is wholly in accordance with the Sirian influence, which was identified and expressed by other writers of his era. His alleged contact with his Holy Guardian Angel that later led to the channeling of ‘Liber AL: The Book of the Law’ is believed to have originated from Sirius.

If Crowley used code words to describe Sirius, his protégé Kenneth Grant has explicitly and extensively written about the dog star. Throughout his numerous books, he often described Sirius as being a powerful center of magickal magnetic power. His belief that the star holds the central key to unlocking the mysteries of the Egyptian and Typhonian traditions has strengthened over time and became a central focus of his research. One of Grant’s most important and controversial thesis was his discovery of the “Sirius/Set current”, which is an extra-terrestrial dimension connecting Sirius, the Earth and Set, the Eyptian god of Chaos – who was later associated with Satan.

“Set is the initiator, the Opener of mans’ consciousness to the rays of the Undying God typified by Sirius – the Sun in the South.” 12

“Sirius, or Set, was the original “headless one” – the light of the lower region (the south) who was known (in Egypt) as An (the dog), hence Set-An (Satan), Lord of the infernal regions, the place of heat, later interpreted in a moral sense as “hell”. 13

Although each occult philosophy describes Sirius in a slightly different matter, it is still consistently regarded as the “sun behind the sun”, the true source of occult power. It is perceived as the cradle of human knowledge and the belief of the existence of a strong connection between the star and planet Earth never seems to become outdated. Is there a true link between Sirius and Earth? Is the dog star an esoteric symbol representing something happening in the spiritual realm? It is both? One thing is for sure, the cult of Sirius is not a “thing of the past” and is very alive today. An in-depth look at our popular culture, which is heavily influenced by occult symbolism, reveals numerous references to Sirius.

Sirius in Popular Culture

Direct references to Sirius in popular culture are too many to enumerate (e.g. see the name and the logo of the most important satellite radio in the world). A more interesting aspect of popular culture to analyze are the coded references to Sirius. Important movies have indeed made veiled yet profound references to the dog star (apparently intended to those “in the know”), where the star plays the role it was always given by the Mysteries: as an initiator and a divine teacher. Here are some examples.

In Disney’s Pinocchio, based on a story written by Freemason Carlo Collodi, Gepetto prays to the brightest star in the sky to have a “real boy”. The Blue Fairy (her color is a reference to Sirius’ light-blue glow) then descends from the heavens to give life to Pinocchio. Throughout the marionette’s quest to become a boy (an allegory for esoteric initiation), the Blue Fairy guides Pinocchio towards the “right path”. Sirius is therefore represented as a source of life, a guide and a teacher. (For more information see the article entitled The Esoteric Interpretation of Pinocchio on The Vigilant Citizen).

In Disney’s Pinocchio, based on a story written by Freemason Carlo Collodi, Gepetto prays to the brightest star in the sky to have a “real boy”. The Blue Fairy (her color is a reference to Sirius’ light-blue glow) then descends from the heavens to give life to Pinocchio. Throughout the marionette’s quest to become a boy (an allegory for esoteric initiation), the Blue Fairy guides Pinocchio towards the “right path”. Sirius is therefore represented as a source of life, a guide and a teacher. (For more information see the article entitled The Esoteric Interpretation of Pinocchio).

The theme song of the movie Pinocchio is also an ode to Sirius.

When you wish upon a star, makes no difference who you are
Anything your heart desires will come to you

If your heart is in your dreams, no request is too extreme
When you wish upon a star as dreamers do

(Fate is kind, she brings to those who love
The sweet fulfillment of their secret longing)

Like a bolt out of the blue, fate steps in and sees you thru
When you wish upon a star, your dreams come true

In Harry Potter, the character named Sirius Black is most likely a reference to Sirius B. (the “darker” star of Sirius’ binary system). He is Harry Potter’s godfather, which makes Sirius, once again, a teacher and a guide. The wizard can turn into a big black dog, another link with the “dog star”.

In Harry Potter, the character named Sirius Black is most likely a reference to Sirius B. (the “darker” star of Sirius’ binary system). He is Harry Potter’s godfather, which makes Sirius, once again, a teacher and a guide. The wizard can turn into a big black dog, another link with the “dog star”.

In the Truman Show, a spotlight – used to imitate the light of a star in Truman’s fake world – falls from the sky and nearly hits him. The label on the spotlight identifies it as Sirius. Truman’s encounter with Sirius gives him a glimpse of “true knowledge” and prompts his quest for truth. Sirius is therefore the “star of initiation”. It caused Truman to realize the limitations of the his studio world (our material world) and lead him to freedom (spiritual emancipation).

In the Truman Show, a spotlight – used to imitate the light of a star in Truman’s fake world – falls from the sky and nearly hits him. The label on the spotlight identifies it as Sirius. Truman’s encounter with Sirius gives him a glimpse of “true knowledge” and prompts his quest for truth. Sirius is therefore the “star of initiation”. It caused Truman to realize the limitations of the his studio world (our material world) and lead him to freedom (spiritual emancipation).

In Conclusion

From the dawn of civilization to modern times, from remote tribes of Africa to the great capitals of the modern world, Sirius was – and still is – seen as a life-giver. Despite the disparity between cultures and epochs, the same mysterious attributes are given to the dog star, which can lead us to ask: how can all theses definitions synchronize so perfectly? Is there a common source to these myths about Sirius? The dog star is invariably associated with divinity and is regarded as a source of knowledge and power. These connections are particularly evident when one examines the teachings and the symbolism of secret societies, who have always taught about a mystical link with this particular celestial body. Is there a secret link between human evolution and Sirius? Unlocking this secret would mean unlocking one of humanity’s greatest mysteries.


El Gobierno Oculto

“Aquellos que no aprenden de la historia, están condenados a repetirla.”

– George Santayana

“Denme el control del dinero de una nación
y no me importa quién haga las leyes “.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild

Ex presidentes de los Estados Unidos y otros líderes políticos de alto perfil han emitido en repetidas advertencias en los últimos 214 años que el gobierno de EE.UU. se encuentra bajo el control de un “gobierno invisible sin ninguna lealtad y ninguna responsabilidad para con el pueblo”.

De acuerdo con seis de nuestros ex presidentes, un vicepresidente, y un sinfín de otros líderes políticos de alto perfil, un gobierno invisible que es “muy maligno en su intención”, ha tenido el control del gobierno de EE.UU. “desde los días de Andrew Jackson “(por lo menos desde 1836). Ellos “prácticamente corren el gobierno de los Estados Unidos para sus propios fines egoístas. Prácticamente controlan ambos partidos politicos … Opera bajo la cubierta de una pantalla de creación propia “[y] se apodera de nuestros ejecutivos, órganos legislativos, las escuelas, los tribunales, los periódicos y todos los organismos creados para la protección pública.

Como resultado de ello, “hemos llegado a ser uno de los peor gobernados, uno de los gobiernos más completamente controlados y dominados, en el mundo civilizado ya-no un gobierno de libre opinión, no es más un gobierno por convicción y el voto de la la mayoría, sino un gobierno por la opinión y la coacción de pequeños grupos de hombres dominantes. ”

Advertencias Sobre el Gobierno Invisible que Correr los EE.UU.

Las advertencias que aparecen a continuación, aparecen en orden cronológico, comenzó con nuestro primer presidente – George Washington. El último presidente que hablo al respecto fue John F. Kennedy, quien fue asesinado. Lea lo que ellos y otros líderes políticos han dicho sobre el gobierno invisible.

George Washington escribió que los Illuminados quieren separar a las personas de su Gobierno

“No fue mi intención poner en duda que, las doctrinas de los Illuminados, y los principios del jacobinismo no se habían extendido en los Estados Unidos. Por el contrario, nadie esta más verdaderamente satisfecho de este hecho que yo. La idea que yo queria transmitir, era que yo no creía que las logias de masones que había en este país como Sociedades, trató de propagar las doctrinas diabólicas de los primeros, o perniciosos principios de la última (si son susceptibles de separación). Que los individuos de las mismas pueden … en realidad tener una separación de las personas de su Gobierno que esten a  la vista, es demasiado evidente para ser interrogado “-. George Washington, 1 º Presidente de los Estados Unidos (1789-1797), a partir de una carta que Washington escribió el 24 de octubre de 1798, que se puede encontrar en la Biblioteca del Congreso. Para un análisis de la advertencia de Washington, consulte Library of Congress: George Washington Warns of Illuminati

“Creo, sinceramente, como usted, que los establecimientos bancarios son más peligrosos que los ejércitos permanentes.”-Thomas Jefferson, 3er Presidente de los Estados Unidos (1801-1809) y autor principal de la Declaración de Independencia de Estados Unidos (1776), en un carta dirigida a John Taylor en 28 de mayo 1816.

“Un poder se ha levantado en el gobierno más que las propias personas, compuesto de muchos y diversos intereses de los poderosos, combinados en una sola masa, y se mantienen unidos por la fuerza de cohesión de la gran superávit en los bancos.” – John C. Calhoun, Vice Presidente (1825-1832) y de EE.UU. el senador, de un discurso pronunciado el 27 de mayo 1836.

Tenga en cuenta que parece que Washington y Jefferson tenian preocupaciones con respecto a los banqueros y la separación de pueblo hacia el gobierno, ellos  se dieron cuenta alla para el 1836. Este hecho fue confirmado en una carta escrita por FDR en 1933 (ver más abajo) en la que escribió que “un elemento financiero en los grandes centros ha poseído el gobierno desde los días de Andrew Jackson.” Jackson fue el séptimo presidente de los Estados Unidos (1829-1937). Calhoun Jackson sirvió como vicepresidente de 1829 a 1832.

“Detrás del gobierno ostensible se sienta entronado un gobierno invisible sin ninguna lealtad y ninguna responsabilidad para con el pueblo. Para destruir este gobierno invisible, para manchar la alianza impía entre los negocios corruptos y la corrupción política es la primera tarea del estadista del día “-. Theodore Roosevelt, 26to Presidente de los Estados Unidos, Theodore Roosevelt, An Autobiography, 1913

“Una gran nación industrial está controlada por su sistema de crédito. Nuestro sistema de crédito está concentrado en manos privadas. El crecimiento de la nación, por lo tanto, y todas nuestras actividades están en manos de unos pocos hombres …hemos llegado a ser uno de los peor gobernados, uno de los gobiernos más completamente controlados y dominados, en el mundo civilizado-no es más un gobierno de libre opinión, ya no es un gobierno por convicción y el voto de la mayoría, sino un gobierno por la opinión y la coacción de pequeños grupos de hombres dominantes “-. Woodrow Wilson, presidente 28 de los Estados Unidos, The New Freedom, 1913

” Desde que entré la política, he tenido principalmente de los hombres mas prominentes confidencias en privado. Algunos de los hombres más grandes en los Estados Unidos, en el campo del comercio y la producción, tienen miedo de algo. Ellos saben que hay un poder en algún lugar tan organizado, tan sutil, tan vigilante, tan entrelazado, tan completo, tan penetrante, que mejor no hubieran hablar por encima de su aliento cuando hablan para condenarlo “-. Woodrow Wilson, 28 Presidente de los Estados Unidos, The New Freedom, 1913

“La amenaza real de nuestra República es el gobierno invisible que como un pulpo gigante extiende sus patas pegajosas sobre nuestras ciudades, estados y naciones … El pequeño circulo de poderosos banqueros internacionales virtualmente, ejecuta al gobierno de Estados Unidos para sus propios fines egoístas. Prácticamente controlan ambos partidos, … y controlan la mayoría de los periódicos y revistas en este país. Ellos usan las columnas de estos documentos para golpear hasta su sumisión o expulsar a los funcionarios públicos que se niegan a cumplir las órdenes de las poderosos circulos corruptos que componen el gobierno invisible. Operan bajo la cubierta de una pantalla de creación propia y se apodera de nuestros ejecutivos, órganos legislativos, las escuelas, los tribunales, los periódicos y todos los organismos creados para la protección pública “-. Alcalde de Nueva York John F. Hylan, New York Times, 26 de marzo 1922

“Mr. Presidente, tenemos en este país una de las instituciones más corruptas que el mundo ha conocido jamás. Me refiero a la Junta de la Reserva Federal y los Bancos de la Reserva Federal. La Junta de la Reserva Federal, una Junta de Gobierno, que ha engañado al Gobierno de los Estados Unidos y el pueblo de los Estados Unidos hemos sido estafados de bastante dinero como para pagar la deuda nacional … Sr. Presidente, cuando se aprobó la Ley de la Reserva Federal, el pueblo de los Estados Unidos no percibió que un sistema mundial se estába estableciendo aquí … y que este país serviria para suministrar el poder financiero a un superestado internacional – un superestado controlado por los banqueros internacionales  e industrias internacionales, actuando conjuntamente para esclavizar al mundo para su propio placer “-. congresista Louis T. McFadden, de un discurso pronunciado ante la Cámara de Representantes el 10 de junio 1932

“La verdad del asunto es que, como tú y yo sabemos, hay un elemento financiero en los grandes centros que ha poseído al gobierno desde los días de Andrew Jackson.” – Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 32 º Presidente de los Estados Unidos (1933 – 1945), en una carta al coronel Edward M House el 21 de noviembre de 1933, citado en FDR: sus cartas personales, 1928-1945.

“Hoy en día, el camino a la dictadura total de los EE.UU. puede ser establecido mediante medios legales … Tenemos un grupo de acción política bien organizada en este país, decidido a destruir nuestra Constitución y establecer un Estado uni partidista … Operanen secreto, en silencio , de forma continua para transformar nuestro Gobierno … Este despiadado poder de búsqueda de los elite, es una enfermedad de nuestro siglo … Este grupo … no responsable ni al presidente, ni a el Congreso, ni a los tribunales. Es prácticamente inremobible “-. Senador William Jenner, 1954 discurso

“El individuo está en desventaja por encontrarse cara a cara con una conspiración tan monstruosa que no puede creer que exista. La mente americana simplemente no ha llegado a darse cuenta del mal que se ha introducido en nuestro medio. Rechaza incluso la hipótesis de que los seres humanos podían abrazar una filosofía que en última instancia debe destruir todo lo que es bueno y decente. “-J. Edgar Hoover, The Magazine Elks, 1956

“La misma palabra” secreto “es repugnante, en una sociedad libre y abierta, y nosotros somos como pueblo inherente e históricamente opuestos a las sociedades secretas, a juramentos secretos y procedimientos secretos … Nuestra forma de vida está siendo atacada. Aquellos que son nuestros enemigos están avanzando por todo el mundo … ninguna guerra a representado una mayor amenaza para nuestra seguridad. Si usted está esperando una constatación de “peligro claro y presente”, entonces sólo puedo decir que el peligro nunca ha sido más claro y su presencia nunca ha sido más inminente … Porque nosotros estamos en contra al rededor del mundo a una conspiración monolítica y despiadada que se basa principalmente en medios encubiertos para expandir su esfera de influencia, sobre la infiltración en lugar de invasión, en subversión en lugar de elecciones, en la intimidación en lugar de libre elección, en guerrillas nocturnas en lugar de ejércitos de dia . es un sistema que ha acumulado vastos recursos humanos y  materiales en la construcción de una máquina muy unida y altamente eficiente que combina la inteligencia de las operaciones económicas, científicas y políticas militares, diplomáticas,,. Sus preparaciones son ocultan, no publicadas. Sus errores son enterrados, no en los titulares. Sus disidentes son silenciados, no elogiados. Ningún gasto se cuestiona, ningún rumor se imprime, ningún secreto es revelado. “- John F. Kennedy, 35 º presidente de los Estados Unidos, a partir de un discurso pronunciado ante la American Newspaper Publishers Association el 27 de abril de 1961, y conocida como la” Sociedad Secreta “El discurso.

“Los Rockefeller y sus aliados por lo menos cincuenta años, ha ido (cuidadosamente) siguiendo un plan para utilizar su poder económico para alzarse con el control político de 1ero América, y luego el resto del mundo. No me refiero a una conspiración? Sí, lo creo. Estoy convencido de que hay un complot, de alcance internacional, las generaciones  viejas en su planificación, y con muy malas  intenciónes. “El congresista Larry P. McDonald, noviembre de 1975, de la introducción de un libro titulado El Archivo Rockefeller.

“Existe un gobierno oculto en la  Fuerza Aérea, su propia Armada, su propio mecanismo de recaudación de fondos, y la capacidad de llevar a cabo sus propias ideas de interés nacional, libre de todos los pesos y contrapesos, y libre de la ley misma.” – Daniel K. Inouye, EE.UU. El senador de Hawai, testimonio en las audiencias Contra Irán, 1986

La Reserva Federal

“Un poder se ha levantado en el gobierno mayor que el propio pueblo …” – John C. Calhoun

En una entrevista con Jim Lehrer que fue transmitido por PBS News Hour el 18 de septiembre de 2007, que se puede ver en YouTube, dijo el oficial de la Reserva Federal Alan Greenspan, en esencia, que la Reserva Federal estaba por encima de la ley y que ninguna agencia del gobierno puede hacer caso omiso de sus acciones:

Jim Lehrer: “¿Cuál es la relación correcta, lo que debería ser la relación apropiada entre un presidente de la Reserva Federal y el presidente de los Estados Unidos?”

Alan Greenspan: “Bueno, en primer lugar, la Reserva Federal es una agencia independiente, y eso significa, básicamente, que no hay ninguna otra agencia del gobierno que puede anular las acciones que tomamos. Mientras que está en su lugar y no hay pruebas de que la administración o el Congreso o cualquier otra persona está pidiendo que hagamos cosas que no sea lo que pensamos que es lo apropiado, entonces, ¿qué las relaciones  no importan, francamente “.

El hecho de que la Fed está por encima de la ley se demostró por el corriente  presidente de la Fed, Ben Bernanke, durante su comparecencia ante el Congreso el 4 de marzo de 2009 (como se muestra en este video). El senador Bernie Sanders pregunto a Bernanke sobre $ 2.2 billón de dólares de impuestos estadounidenses que fue prestado por la Reserva Federal. Bernanke se negó a dar una respuesta:

El senador Sanders: “¿Va a decirle al pueblo estadounidense a quien le prestó $ 2.2 trillones de  dólares? … ¿Puede decirnos quiénes son? ”

Bernanke: “No”

David Rockefeller y el Consejo de Relaciones Exteriores ( CFR )

En 1921, los accionistas de la Reserva Federal financiron una organización llamada ” Council on Foreign Relations ” ( CFR ) . Una discusión completa sobre el CFR está más allá del alcance de este artículo . Baste decir que el CFR probablemente juega un papel prominente en el gobierno invisible que se nos ha advertido. El CFR está acusado de ser el brazo de la elite que gobierna los Estados Unidos. Políticos más influyentes , académicos y personalidades de los medios son miembros . El CFR utiliza su influencia para impulsar su agenda del Nuevo Orden Mundial sobre el pueblo americano .

David Rockefeller , es el actual patriarca de la familia Rockefeller. Él es el nieto único superviviente del magnate petrolero John D. Rockefeller , fundador de la Standard Oil . Rockefeller comenzó una asociación de por vida con el CFR cuando se incorporó como director en 1949 . En la autobiografía de Rockefeller 2002  “Memorias” , escribió :

” Durante más de un siglo, extremistas ideológicos en ambos extremos del espectro político han aprovechado incidentes bien publicitados , como mi encuentro con Castro para atacar a la familia Rockefeller para la excesiva influencia que dicen que ejercemos sobre las instituciones políticas y económicas estadounidenses. Algunos incluso creen que somos parte de un cábala secreto de trabajo en  contra de los mejores intereses de los Estados Unidos , caracterizando a mi familia ya mí como internacionalistas y de conspirar con otros alrededor del mundo (Rothschilds) para construir una estructura política y económica global más integrada – un mundo, si se puede decir asi. Si ese es el cargo , me declaro culpable , y estoy orgulloso de ello ” .

James Warburg , hijo del CFR [ Consejo de Relaciones Exteriores ] fundador Paul Warburg, contundente testimonio rendido ante el Comité de Relaciones Exteriores del Senado el 17 de febrero de 1950:

” Tendremos un gobierno mundial , aunque no nos guste . La cuestión es sólo si el gobierno mundial se logrará mediante consentimiento o por conquista ” .